DWS: You know, it’s pretty “unfair” to ask for ObamaCare enrollment numbers right now. And, Republicans!

posted at 5:21 pm on October 9, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

Is it, Debbie? Is it?

She’s almost uncharacteristically bumbling-and-stumbling on this one, via RCP:

So clearly we’re eight days in and to be insisting on data being produced day by day for a six-month enrollment program is a little bit unfair. And, you know, the good news that came out of this problem and HHS has acknowledged that there’s obviously been some technological problems with the server, but the good news out of that is that the servers were apparently designed to anticipate about 50,000 people a day going on the website and moving around and they — it turns out it’s been 250,000 a day. So it’s very clear that there is demand. It’s also clear that they need to fix those technological bugs. I don’t know any software program or app, for that matter, by any high-tech company that doesn’t have bugs and fixes that need to be made in the first few days of the rollout. And so that’s why, in part, there’s a six-month enrollment plan. So what the analogy that I’ve used repeatedly is that the Republicans, because they don’t like their kitchen redesign, are trying to burn their house down. And that’s what they’re doing by trying to take the government down with them and our economy.

And on and on and on, before she finally manages to turn a question about why we cannot know how many people have succeeded in signing up for ObamaCare into a condemnation of extremist Republicans who have yet to “accept that President Obama was reelected last November,” with a sweet bonus somewhere in the middle: “Even Al Gore, who didn’t — who vehemently disagreed with the Supreme Court decision that made George W. Bush president in 2000, accepted that the Supreme Court’s ruling was the final say and moved on.” Ahhh, yes. Now that you mention it, I totally see the relevance there.

As Allahpundit already wondered rhetorically the other day, does anybody really believe that The Most Humble President of All Time wouldn’t release those numbers in a heartbeat if the administration was seeing the kind of numbers it wanted to be seeing? I suppose there’s always the possibility that their online system has turned into such a grossly inept glitch-fest that they literally cannot figure out the enrollment numbers, but that admission would hardly be a preferable talking point over the glitchiness effectively barring signups. It’s probably just best to keep turning the attention to Republican obstructionism whenever possible, no?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

2:12. That’s all I could take.

BKeyser on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

Is it possible that the pastor was performing an exorcism and Debbie Wasserman Schultz came out of someone else?

PolarCoug on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

…does anybody really believe that The Most Humble President of All Time wouldn’t release those numbers in a heartbeat if the administration was seeing the kind of numbers it wanted to be seeing?

Or if Obamacare had killed Bin Laden.

de rigueur on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

When is it okay to begin impeachment proceedings?

John the Libertarian on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

Over under-1,000 for the fed and maybe 30-40000 for the states.

rob verdi on October 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM

It is pretty unfair to ask a Democrat any question that might require an answer.

DAT60A3 on October 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM

“Can’t I just get a STRAIGHT answer?” – Barney Frank

PolarCoug on October 9, 2013 at 5:27 PM

You know what I love most about Lil’ Deb, beside the fact that she’s not just another pretty face, it’s how genuine she is.

antipc on October 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM

Math is racist.

SoRight on October 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM

I have seen articles and postings by individuals that seem to know what they are talking about attributing the vast majority of the traffic to computer generated hacker hits trying to access the system before some of the system problems are fixed…and frankly to me that makes a lot more sense than this supposed huge pent up desire to pat too much for insurance co pays and deductibles the democrats insist exists

Caseoftheblues on October 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM

What did she attempt to say? It’s so bad the nappy headed broad need can’t answer softball questions on MSNBC.

Tater Salad on October 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM

What’s to stop them from just making up favorable numbers at some point? They seem to have made up everything else…?

ParisParamus on October 9, 2013 at 5:32 PM

The Most Humble President of All Time wouldn’t release those numbers in a heartbeat if the administration was seeing the kind of numbers it wanted to be seeing?

Really wondering why they don’t just handle this the way they handle everything else…

Lie your a$$ off and let the lickspittles in the media take over.

BigWyo on October 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM

even if the number of sign ups were mediocre at this point they would release them to counter the bad press. it must be horrid if they refuse to release them.

chasdal on October 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM

2:12. That’s all I could take.

BKeyser on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

Likewise.
But, then the host showed signs of life.
His face had skepticism and incredulity written all over it.

egmont on October 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Deb’s got her shoes on, it’s hard for her to count.

Another Drew on October 9, 2013 at 5:35 PM

DWS: “site only designed for 50,000 people per day.”

WTF? Are you kidding?

takeamericabackin10 on October 9, 2013 at 5:35 PM

I doubt the total is 1,000. As that implies there would be at least a few in every state. If there were that many someone would come forward in each state to get their 15 minutes of fame. I think it’s fairly obvious the total number is so low there are any number of states with zero sign-ups. They don’t want to publish a list with zeros on it.

Fred 2 on October 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM

They spent $700,000,000 for a website that can only handle 50,000 hits per day?

takeamericabackin10 on October 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM

250,000 a day? What happened to 8 million?

The Schaef on October 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM

So clearly we’re eight days in and to be insisting on data being produced day by day for a six-month enrollment program is a little bit unfair.

Why is that you ugly whore? How many people got by 404 errors and created an account? How many actually went over to the dark side and bought Obama healthcare plans?

Were this a private enterprise you would be able to get this information real time.

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 5:37 PM

Questions: How many of the hits were those interested as opposed to those logging on to check it out?

Since when did we become a democracy?

Will DWS remember her “move on” demands when a GOP administration is jamming something down her throat?

BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Math is racist.

SoRight on October 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM

lol :)

Axe on October 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Will Obamacare cover the transplanting of that colon on top of her head?

hillsoftx on October 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM

Now that’s one Little Debbie I can’t stomach.

Marcola on October 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM

It’s not the slightest bit unfair. I work as a web analyst, installing measurement software on websites. If I can’t tell you in the first hour after launching a site how many visitors you have, I deserve to be fired. It’s an out-of-the-box metric from any web analytics software. Drop a JavaScript file in the page template, and you’re up and running. It’s that simple.

The fact that they can’t is a lie — plain & simple. I checked the code on healthcare.gov, and they use a piece of software called Optimizely to test various images, etc. on the site. Optimizely would very readily report the number of visitors for any period, in near realtime.

Point being that they have the number, they just won’t release it.

RationalIcthus on October 9, 2013 at 5:40 PM

Poodle Top at a loss to ‘splain why things aren’t working as planned.
She’s lying ’cause her lips are moving.

chewmeister on October 9, 2013 at 5:40 PM

Drudge Report traffic:

034,648,027 PAST 24 HOURS
919,740,959 PAST 31 DAYS
11,582,010,124 PAST YEAR

I’ll bet it didn’t cost Drudge $700,000,000 to build his site. Yet, DWS’s healthcare site can’t handle 50,000 per day.

takeamericabackin10 on October 9, 2013 at 5:40 PM

and the real number that has any relevancy is how many enrollees signed up that do NOT have pre-existing conditions as they are the whores that have to funnel this….

hillsoftx on October 9, 2013 at 5:41 PM

BTW: To confirm my identity online with the IRS a few months ago, I was asked what car I owned when I lived at a residence from 20 years ago.

These guys can’t compile a number of enrollees? Yeah, right!

Do they have a bunch of civil servants in green eyeshades compiling numbers on a chalkboard?

BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM

If this were the Bush Administration, the Democrats would be asking for hearings already. I can’t even say I’m happy this is happening because the people going on there to sign up right now are the real belivers, the Obamaites who voted for him twice and believe every word that comes from his mouth.
It’s always hard when the bubble starts to burst.

I really love how the Republicans are called extremists for wanting to delay this because by not delaying it the Democrat extremists are screwing up a lot more lives. How long before Blitzer saying “maybe Republicans are right” to the media asking, “Why didn’t you listen to the Republicans?”

bflat879 on October 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM

I hate the analogy about software company glitches compared to this. If software companies have glitches, the American people can choose not to buy their products. Apple vs. Microsoft, Verizon razors vs. Apple IPods, etc. However with ObamaCare, they don’t have the luxury of another option. They are forced to use it or pay a tax.

djaymick on October 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM

I’m the General Manger of an E-Commerce website. There isn’t a chance in he## they don’t know exactly what the metrics are for their ACA website.

I can’t imagine she’d lie to us…

FlyNavy on October 9, 2013 at 5:44 PM

Plus, they had three and a half year to roll this out and a development budget that any software company would die for.

djaymick on October 9, 2013 at 5:44 PM

HEY DEBBIE ! . . . . . . . . . . . . I’ll tell you what’s unfair:

That the government can’t be SUED for ‘false advertisement’.

listens2glenn on October 9, 2013 at 5:45 PM

Jester Stewart loves to call us the party of crazy and hides behind people like Sideshow Wasserman Shultz, Plastic Face Pelosi, and Gaffe-a-minute Biden.

Bensonofben on October 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM

Hey, DWS!

Remember when everyone just accepted the Dred Scott decision?

Remember when people accepted Plessy v Ferguson?

Radical arsonists.

CycloneCDB on October 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM

DWS: You know, it’s pretty “unfair” to ask for ObamaCare enrollment numbers right now. And, Republicans!

AND WAR ON WOMYN!!!

Marcola on October 9, 2013 at 5:48 PM

Well I guess we can see that the dems have been given their talking points and metaphors. Us common folk don’t understand these complicated things so we have to have a metaphorical picture drawn for us.

Republicans don’t like the kitchen so they burn down the house. They don’t like the mortgage so they burn down the house as Obama said yesterday.

DWS doesn’t like her hair, so she sticks her finger in an electrical socket.

Vince on October 9, 2013 at 5:48 PM

Projected cost of establishing the Error404Care website: $93.7 million.

ACTUAL COST: $634,320,919.00

But, they are ‘responsible’ and Error404Care is gonna be GREAT!!!

You.

Just.

Wait.

Resist We Much on October 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM

MAYONNAISE! Bring me more MAYONNAISE!

Pork-Chop on October 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM

the good news out of that is that the servers were apparently designed to anticipate about 50,000 people a day going on the website and moving around and they — it turns out it’s been 250,000 a day. So it’s very clear that there is demand.

No, it is very clear that the idiots did not adequately plan the rollout.

weaselyone on October 9, 2013 at 5:51 PM

Were this a private enterprise you would be able to get this information real time.

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 5:37 PM

If a private enterprise was given control over the roll out of the ACA and had these results, Debbie the Ugly and her comrades in the media would be screaming from the mountaintops that you can’t rely private enterprise and only big government can do it.

Where in reality it private enterprise could have had it running at 90% efficiency at half the cost, and in half the time.

veni vidi vici on October 9, 2013 at 5:52 PM

MAYONNAISE! Bring me more MAYONNAISE!

Pork-Chop on October 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM

I think she’s a Miracle Whip kind of girl. :-)

Resist We Much on October 9, 2013 at 5:53 PM

Just think, by the end of the month, even the liberal media will be clamoring for a body count—real sign-ups. When these numbers get revealed, this whole program’s going to collapse in on Obama, and every pitiful democrat that attempted this take-over. My greatest pleasure will be seeing Peeeeelosi in tears running the botox off her face.

Rovin on October 9, 2013 at 5:53 PM

PS. Today’s water cooler debates ncluded libs who believe….

The oCare site crashed because of thrilled enroller traffic.

The numbers for enrollment aren’t available.

The exchanges boast rates lower across the board.

High deductibles are a falsehood

the dumbing down is complete. People now believe what they read instead of what they feel

Bensonofben on October 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM

This thing is an abortion.If they take back the house the tax increases are going to be huge to offset this blunder.

docflash on October 9, 2013 at 5:55 PM

It is pretty unfair to ask a Democrat any question that might require an answer.

DAT60A3 on October 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM

.
I should of thought of that one … : )

listens2glenn on October 9, 2013 at 5:55 PM

Seriously, is there NOTHING she can do with that hair?

ctmom on October 9, 2013 at 5:56 PM

yeesh, body by Pilsbury, make up by Dutch Boy, hair by Reddi Kilowatt, and education by Marx.

deimos on October 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM

So we can count votes and announce the winner of a Presidential Election within 24 hours (typically), but they cannot count the number of individuals who have actually signed up for insurance.

Something seems off here…

weaselyone on October 9, 2013 at 5:59 PM

So what the analogy that I’ve used repeatedly is that the Republicans, because they don’t like their kitchen redesign, are trying to burn their house down.

We didn’t want “the house” to begin with, kumkwat!

SailorMark on October 9, 2013 at 6:01 PM

Seriously, is there NOTHING she can do with that hair?

ctmom on October 9, 2013 at 5:56 PM

She could, but the cat that hacked it up would be terribly insulted.

trubble on October 9, 2013 at 6:01 PM

I doubt the total is 1,000. As that implies there would be at least a few in every state. If there were that many someone would come forward in each state to get their 15 minutes of fame. I think it’s fairly obvious the total number is so low there are any number of states with zero sign-ups. They don’t want to publish a list with zeros on it.

Fred 2 on October 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM

Yes; if there were any democratics that signed up successfully they would have been lined up on the stage behind the REB during one of his last few recitals.

I suspect there are NONE.

slickwillie2001 on October 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM

DWS is several card short of a full deck. Doesn’t say much for the constituents that voted her in.

sadatoni on October 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM

If a private enterprise was given control over the roll out of the ACA and had these results, Debbie the Ugly and her comrades in the media would be screaming from the mountaintops that you can’t rely private enterprise and only big government can do it.

Where in reality it private enterprise could have had it running at 90% efficiency at half the cost, and in half the time.

veni vidi vici on October 9, 2013 at 5:52 PM

Yep. Yep. and Yep.

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 6:03 PM

Doesn’t say much for the constituents that voted her in.

sadatoni on October 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM

Well, they’re from Florida. The 2000 elections proved they are incapable of pushing a stick through a piece of paper. Florida may be God’s waiting room but it is also our nation’s short bus.

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 6:05 PM

It doesn’t matter what the numbers are, they will “arrange” it so the numbers are what they want and we will never know the truth. Look at Ben Ghazi, Fast and Furious, etc.

birdwatcher on October 9, 2013 at 6:07 PM

Yes; if there were any democratics that signed up successfully they would have been lined up on the stage behind the REB during one of his last few recitals.

I suspect there are NONE.

slickwillie2001 on October 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM

You’re forgetting gay Chad Henderson from Chattanooga, TN. He signed up for an account in the very first hours. He will be paying through the nose for sub-standard healthcare and proud to do it. Not that he’s actually signed up for a plan as of yet.

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM

You know what I love most about Lil’ Deb, beside the fact that she’s not just another pretty face, it’s how genuine she is.

antipc on October 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM


PERFECT !!! Don’t let anybody change a word of it!

ExpressoBold on October 9, 2013 at 6:09 PM

This thing is an abortion.

docflash on October 9, 2013 at 5:55 PM

COVERED BY OBAMACARE!!!!!!

Happy Nomad on October 9, 2013 at 6:10 PM

Oh, so now Sgt. Schultz wants everybody, Republicans and Democrats, to work together after all Republicans were closed out of heathcare negotiations, after the Senate bill was declared “deemed passed” rather than actually passed and the House bill was passed by one vote by only Democrats. People who have short memories and no clue about the machinations of these Democrats may actually believe her whining and begging but I only laugh at the mayo-haired wench.

ExpressoBold on October 9, 2013 at 6:15 PM

The longer you listen to her, the dumber you get.

I work on a website that averages just a little north of 50,000 visits per day, though we could handle much more. One of the chief considerations in any web design is SCALABILITY. If we needed to we could roll in servers to handle 50,000 visits per hour. Our budget is less than one half of one percent of what it cost to put up the government monstrosity.

Further, as has been noted elsewhere, this not a bug or a coding issue. These are architectural and design flaws. I’ve seen the network topology diagrams, they look like a Rube Goldberg machine. They’re going to need another year – EVERY government IT project needs “another year”. Book it.

EA_MAN on October 9, 2013 at 6:18 PM

This babbling little twit pretty well exemplifies the essence of “Democrats”.

rplat on October 9, 2013 at 6:23 PM

Fish. Face.

onomo on October 9, 2013 at 6:24 PM

Well, do all large websites start out as impossible to use? And stay that way this long?

Alana on October 9, 2013 at 6:25 PM

Isn’t she great? Seen better faces on iodine bottles.

onomo on October 9, 2013 at 6:25 PM

If a private company released glitchy software which resulted in thousands of peoples private information being hacked, they would be liable for damages.
The government, not so much.

redshirt on October 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM

A couple of hundred people nation wide signed up. Max. Zero will conflate it to ten thousand saved or created applications.

dogsoldier on October 9, 2013 at 6:30 PM

Al Gore accepted that Bush became President? Is she kidding? I know people who still want to argue that he wasn’t a legitimate President. She illustrates the fact-resistant mind of the left.

allstonian on October 9, 2013 at 6:30 PM

Maybe they can’t differentiate all of the ghost enrollees from the real ones.

Oh, who am I kidding? They’d totally use the ghosts to inflate their stats.

obladioblada on October 9, 2013 at 6:35 PM

this from a woman with a negative net worth…

who has run the DNC finances into the ground…

yeah, she’s a really credible source…

dpduq on October 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM

Projected: $93.7 million.

ACTUAL COST: $634,320,919.00

Resist We Much on October 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM


Oh. Well! That’s only a 676.97% increase from the initial estimate, which is on par with most government estimates. As a comparison, consider Boston’s Big Dig and it’s longevity and “cost overruns” plus the incomparable “craftsmanship” associated with the finished death trap product.

ExpressoBold on October 9, 2013 at 6:38 PM

Actually… Issa interviewed the IRS agent in charge of oCare. And she said that 200k people have applied for waivers online. So as expected- the O minions aren’t looking for healthcare unless its free. The numbers for actual enrollment are even lower than we thought days ago.

Bensonofben on October 9, 2013 at 6:39 PM

The FARCE is strong in that one!

GarandFan on October 9, 2013 at 6:41 PM

I do database work for a state govt, and they know damn well how many people are signed up, and its not a number thats helpful for their propaganda machine.

these sites are a wet dream for hackers, the level of identity theft is going to be unprecendented. once the truth comes out only the low info person will submit personal data to them.

burserker on October 9, 2013 at 6:45 PM

If a private enterprise was given control over the roll out of the ACA and had these results, Debbie the Ugly and her comrades in the media would be screaming from the mountaintops that you can’t rely private enterprise and only big government can do it.

Where in reality it private enterprise could have had it running at 90% efficiency at half the cost, and in half the time.

veni vidi vici on October 9, 2013 at 5:52 PM

The liberals will never, ever understand that the few percent of profit most corporations make is nothing compared to the massive waste in the federal government from fraud, corruption, and incompetence.

slickwillie2001 on October 9, 2013 at 6:50 PM

So clearly we’re eight days in and to be insisting on data being produced day by day for a six-month enrollment program is a little bit unfair.

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ACA.ENROLLEES
WHERE STATUS = ‘SUCCESS’

It’s really not that difficult, DWS.

Kafir on October 9, 2013 at 6:53 PM

I just read that those who created an identity… got lost and they have to do it again.

How dumb are they? Will they actually give information to the website a second time?

Shhhhhhh. National IQ test in progress.

petunia on October 9, 2013 at 7:00 PM

I think she’s a Miracle Whip kind of girl. :-)

Resist We Much on October 9, 2013 at 5:53 PM

Nah, Vaseline.

Oldnuke on October 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Seriously, is there NOTHING she can do with that hair?

ctmom on October 9, 2013 at 5:56 PM

Well yeah, there is. I’m not sure she could join this club though.

Oldnuke on October 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM

The Frazzled One never fails to amaze.

CWchangedhisNicagain on October 9, 2013 at 7:36 PM

Assuming that the site worked perfectly, are the insurance companies capable of writing policies for, say, 50,000 people a day, every day for the next 12 months?

srdem65 on October 9, 2013 at 7:43 PM

I’d rather be water-boarded than listen to her for more than 60 seconds.

CWchangedhisNicagain on October 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM

Fish. Face.

onomo on October 9, 2013 at 6:24 PM

I know. right?
What’s up with that lower lip action? Is she sucking in dentures?

egmont on October 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM

01:47 “Like we’ve done for 200 years…”

This Obamanation hasn’t been around that long. What the hell is she on?

Oxymoron on October 9, 2013 at 7:51 PM

…shut-up beyotch!

KOOLAID2 on October 9, 2013 at 7:58 PM

DWS doesn’t like her hair, so she sticks her finger in an electrical socket.

Vince on October 9, 2013 at 5:48 PM

One can but wish…unfortunately.

Solaratov on October 9, 2013 at 8:05 PM

2:12. That’s all I could take.

BKeyser on October 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM

A new DWS Hot Air record!! Congrats!!

Deano1952 on October 9, 2013 at 8:39 PM

Did she say “two hundred years??”

Anyway I found myself trying to pinch and sweep the video away a la the YouTube app.

Didn’t work so a moment of panic.

Sherman1864 on October 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM

The site was designed for 50,000 people a day, and there is a 6 month enrollment period? 6 months is about 180 days. 180 * 50,000 = 9 million. They only planned for 9 million people to enroll?

Even at 250,000 a day that’s only 45 million people, and you’d assume the numbers wouldn’t be spread evenly over that period, with heavier traffic the first few days.

Cornmeal on October 9, 2013 at 11:49 PM

Visiting the site is one thing; getting through the application logic is something else. Even an incompetent web site can have millions of visitors. I guess it’s the other part they are having a problem with. Given the incompetent leadership they have, they will not ever be able to sort out software their integration issues.

In all of this, did they really assume that their undocumented, unwashed and uninsured votes would be all on the internet? Is it not possible to go to a Social Security office and sign up manually? Are they that dumb, that they left that out?

virgo on October 10, 2013 at 1:14 AM

Chatty Kathy has nuttin’ on ME –DWS

jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
jabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBERjabberJABBER
continues next page— :(

BigSven on October 10, 2013 at 5:32 AM

I’m a white racist Tea Party Member and I’m very proud of it. I hope the speaker holds out and brings this scum of the earth lowlife Obama to his knees. And what about mayonaise head Schultz, she is so ugly she could snag lightning.

tmgrant on October 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM

the servers were apparently designed to anticipate about 50,000 people a day going on the website and moving around and they — it turns out it’s been 250,000 a day

“Hits” does not equal people.

Bad web sites rack up a lot of “hits” because people try to load the page, it fails they reload, it fails… repeat until they either succeed or give up.

So 25,000 people trying to load the page an average of 10 times is not 250,000 people. Its a web site disaster.

taznar on October 10, 2013 at 9:12 AM

I am still waiting for them to tell me where obama was on sept 11 2012 during the Benghazi attack

and who ordered a stand down of the rescue team

and why obama LIED ABOUT IT BEING A SPONTANOUS UPRISING OVER A YOUTUBE VIDEO to america for 12 days.

sniffles1999 on October 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Say DEBBIE as a congresswoman, have you signed up for it?

no?
why?

oh because you are Exempt being of a privlidged class

sniffles1999 on October 10, 2013 at 10:51 AM

….. should be able to inform every curious American about the data, and CERTAINLY Journalist’s about the data …..

DEFINITION: Journalist
An elite aristocracy that supercedes subordinate ‘curious American’s’ when the terms usage pertains to access to Obamcare data.

Carnac on October 10, 2013 at 1:07 PM