Obama pushes gun control at Navy Yard memorial

posted at 10:41 am on September 23, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Notable not just for the politicization of the memorial service, but also for one of the comparisons Barack Obama makes in this speech.   Usually, memorials are about the victims, not about political agendas, but this time the media seems less inclined to carry Obama’s water (or more to the point, wave the bloody shirt on his behalf).  Instead, Obama tried to do it himself — and might have a bigger problem on his hands:

As President, I have now grieved with five American communities ripped apart by mass violence. Fort Hood. Tucson. Aurora. Sandy Hook. And now, the Washington Navy Yard. And these mass shootings occur against a backdrop of daily tragedies, as an epidemic of gun violence tears apart communities across America — from the streets of Chicago to neighborhoods not far from here.

Fort Hood?  The Obama administration has tried mightily to keep that labeled a case of workplace violence, but everyone knows that this was a case of radical jihad. Army Major Nidal Hasan had communicated with al-Qaeda recruiter and leader Anwar al-Awlaki, which a series of investigators managed to slough off over several months until Hasan launched his attack.  That wasn’t a case where a lack of gun control allowed the massacre to occur; Hasan used a legally-purchased semi-automatic pistol, which as an Army officer shouldn’t have proved too difficult to do.  Some could argue that the Pentagon’s bar on carrying weapons forced victims to remain disarmed, just as it did at the Washington Navy Yard.  Either way, the government failed in dealing with Hasan properly which lead to the terrorist attack, not lax gun laws leading to “workplace violence.”

Besides, in this case the shooter bought the weapon that Vice President Joe Biden endorsed as an alternative to the guns Obama wants most to control and/or ban — a shotgun instead of an AR-15.  The shooter also purchased it legally, complete with a background check.

Katie Pavlich points out the confusion:

Got that? If you don’t support new “common sense” gun control measures, you just don’t care about preventing mass shootings. And with all due respect, mass shootings are not the new normal and are not on the rise as President Obama would like the country to believe. Violence in the streets of Chicago between rival gangs is normal. Mass shootings, are not.

Let’s refresh what happened last week: Mad man Aaron Alexis, who was hearing aliens talk to him, purchased a shotgun legally at a Virginia gun store after passing two background checks. He carved cryptic sayings into the shotgun like “better off this way,” and “my elf gun.” He then illegally took that gun into Washington D.C., illegally brought it into the Navy Yard and committed mass murder. When it comes to more gun control, I’m not exactly sure what Obama is trying to get out here. Is he implying we should institute more restrictions on basic shotguns?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

…over… Obama!

KOOLAID2 on September 23, 2013 at 10:19 PM

Democrats are already tap dancing on the graves of the children. That’s what they do. It’s all they have.
 
Tom Servo on May 21, 2013 at 8:28 AM

 
It’s only guys like you who find a tune to dance to on a day like this.
 
verbaluce on May 21, 2013 at 9:07 AM

 

rogerb on September 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM

The shooter had a shotgun just like Biden recommended and no gun laws could have stopped him. Obama persists in preaching to the mindless left.

rplat on September 24, 2013 at 9:33 AM

Wow!!! I just sat down to think about the question of “What does gun control mean to today.

1, Not having more weapons than necessary to hold off of a SWAT team, even if you did nothing wrong – except legally live at an address they pulled out of the phone book.

2. Aiming at your target and hitting on your first firing.

3. Keeping all of your weapons clean and ready fire anytime and having enough ammo for the mission.

4. Insuring all members of your family are able to fire more than just one type and are considered expert marksmen

5 Insuring all members of the family know where the weapons and all ammo are stored and only open the locker when told to by competent authority.

Than someone tried to tell me that President Obama has more firepower that I did. I reminded him to read the Second Amendment of the Constitution and multiply by the total population of voting age that usually have more than one weapon.

MSGTAS on September 25, 2013 at 2:58 PM

Comment pages: 1 2