Video: Assad promises “everything” in response to attack

posted at 8:01 am on September 9, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

CBS News teased an exclusive interview with Bashar al-Assad conducted by Charlie Rose yesterday, in which the Syrian dictator promises to respond to any attack from the United States. Assad told Rose that an attack on his armed forces would tip the civil war in favor of al-Qaeda and its affiliates, and scoffed at John Kerry’s assertion that the US has evidence that the regime conducted the chemical-weapons attack:

Syria’s President Bashar Assad denied his regime’s use of chemical weapons in a wide-ranging interview with CBS News’ Charlie Rose. Assad issued a chilling warning for the U.S. to “expect everything” in response to a potential strike on Syria and repeatedly told Rose the Obama administration lacks irrefutable evidence to back up charges of chemical weapons use.

Assad says his own forces have been attacked by chemical weapons:

“Our soldiers in another area were attacked chemically, our soldiers. They went to the hospital, as casualties because of chemical weapons. But in the area where they said the government used chemical weapons, we only had video and we only have pictures and allegations. We’re not there. Our forces — our police, our institutions don’t exist. How can you talk about what happened if you don’t have evidences? We’re not like the American administration. We’re not social media administration or government. We are the government that deals with reality.”

The dictator also compared Kerry to Colin Powell:

“He presented his confidence and he presented his convictions,” Assad said of Kerry. “It’s not about confidence, it’s about evidence. The United– sorry, the Russians have completely opposite evidence that the missiles were thrown from area where the rebels controlled. That reminds me — about what Kerry said — about the big lie that Colin Powell said in front of the world on satellites about the W.M.D. in Iraq before going to war when he said, ‘This is our evidence.’ Actually, he gave false evidence. In this case, Kerry didn’t even present any evidence. He talks, ‘we have evidence,’ and he didn’t present anything, not yet. Nothing so far… not a single shred of evidence.”

The administration has been presenting its evidence on Capitol Hill, which means they have significantly more than a shred.  However, it’s not exactly a convincing case from all accounts, even though the likeliest explanation for any use of chemical weapons is that it came from the regime, which is known to have stockpiles of it.  Reuters reported last night that the White House presentations appear to be backfiring as a result:

White House efforts to convince the U.S. Congress to back military action against Syria are not only failing, they seem to be stiffening the opposition.

That was the assessment on Sunday, not of an opponent but of an early and ardent Republican supporter of Obama’s plan for attacking Syria, the influential Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee, Mike Rogers.

Rogers told CBS’s “Face the Nation” the White House had made a “confusing mess” of the Syria issue. Now, he said, “I’m skeptical myself.”

No matter what, Assad will do nothing but deny, paint his enemies in the worst possible light, and hope to use American media to bolster anti-war sentiment. It’s important to keep that context in mind, but that doesn’t mean we have an interest in going to war either.  Moammar Qaddafi was as bad if not worse than Assad, and he could have made the same claims — and in the end, he would have been proven correct, too. The collapse of the Syrian regime now would only create a failed state that would benefit al-Qaeda and its affiliates and allies most.

John Miller noted this with Rose:

That goes both ways.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Team SCOAMT wants a vigorous response.

Steve Eggleston on September 9, 2013 at 8:08 AM

What’s he supposed to do, promise that they’ll just moan and lay there if we attack?

myiq2xu on September 9, 2013 at 8:10 AM

That reminds me — about what Kerry said — about the big lie that Colin Powell said in front of the world on satellites about the W.M.D. in Iraq before going to war when he said, ‘This is our evidence.’

Ohhh, ouch!

If John Kerry is Colin Powell in this play, then that makes Assad Saddam Hussein and Barack Obama……guess who….? ….. GDUB!

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:12 AM

Has the Russians and Chinese given better weapons in the last few weeks? What is anti-ship capabilities?

Again, all is this is for what? How I’m a safer?

Anything to get the subject off domestic issues.

Oil Can on September 9, 2013 at 8:12 AM

No matter what, Assad will do nothing but deny, paint his enemies in the worst possible light, and hope to use American media to bolster anti-war sentiment.

welcome to the party, Democrats……

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:14 AM

“We’re in the propaganda phase,” @JohnMillerCBS says of Assad’s comments to @CharlieRose about retaliation in the case of a Syria strike

Indeed we are. The thin-skinned rat goes out and does six “exclusive” interviews today where (almost on the eve of the Benghazi massacre) he asks us to trust him with no substantive reason for doing so. No thanks you filthy coward. At this point Assad has more credibilty.

The only thing that pisses me off is that more Americans are going to die because of Obama.

Happy Nomad on September 9, 2013 at 8:14 AM

LOL…how sad is it when I believe the Russians over the current administration at home?

watertown on September 9, 2013 at 8:14 AM

If John Kerry is Colin Powell in this play, then that makes Assad Saddam Hussein and Barack Obama……guess who….? ….. GDUB!

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:12 AM

.
“What a shocking, demented analogy! Make it stop, Daddy!” – /lib prior to rapid cranial separation

ExpressoBold on September 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM

“What a shocking, demented analogy! Make it stop, Daddy!” – /lib prior to rapid cranial separation

ExpressoBold on September 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM

I guess we can now euphemistically “Blame George Bush (TM)” in this whole charade since what goes around has officially now come around.

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM

Obama is……the DOTUS.

PappyD61 on September 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM

Whether Bush was right or wrong, he did at least work to convince others to his side, and did so strongly. Congress agreed. The UN agreed. The other nations who joined with us agreed.

The community organizer is failing pretty hard at organizing any community here.

But hey – doesn’t Assad have a sealed divorce settlement or some sketchy investments somewhere? That seems to be Obama’s fallback for failing to organize…

beatcanvas on September 9, 2013 at 8:20 AM

Ed,

There’s every reason to believe that it was an attack by the terrorists (rebels) staged for the benefit of western propaganda. They NEED Western intervention in order to tpple Assad. They are losing both land, resources, and troops to the government.

The terrorists seized. last year, a Chlorine factory that had some 400 tons of Chlorine Gas ready for use. AQ & the Taliban (and others) have tried using Chlorine canisters fitted to IED’s to make chemical weapons and have used them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

All things considered, Occam’s Razor would say it’s the terrorists and NOT the Assad regime responsible for this attack. They are the ones who benefit the most by Western intervention.

Speaking of which, with the Russians and Chinese now in the Med, and in good numbers, there is a real chance of this thing flaring out of control. 8 Nuclear Armed nations are within striking distance of the Med, and Obama is playing with fire. It only takes one spark to ignite a holocaust.

With every passing day, it looks more & more like August of 1914. Obama may well be the first Nobel Prize recipient to start a world war.

TKindred on September 9, 2013 at 8:20 AM

Not sure how credible this site is, but it does give one pause about the evidence being presented by our U.S. Government.

We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as “plausible denial.”

The list of “experts” at the bottom of the post appears to be legitimate. Or, maybe I’m being duped.

Rovin on September 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM

there are some times, when America has been arrogant….derisive….even dismissive…..

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:22 AM

The Administration’s steely resolve, forged in the crucible of Faculty Luncheons, tempered by constant pressure from an adversarial media (cough) and finally honed to a razor’s edge by the Wisdom of the One Who Knows Not Yea or Nay, but “Present” is The Way, will ultimately leave the Assad regime laid low by the devastating consequences of the Strongly Worded Letter. Obama will later be heard paraphrasing the Bhagavad Gita, saying “Now, I am become Mild Nuisance, Annoyer of Worlds.”

trubble on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM

Hey look, I’m certainly not an Obama supporter, and think
I almost hope Assad and his minions start hanging Obama
in effigy for Christ’s sake….that being said,
does anybody, anymore, in this country hava a problem with
one of our “news outlets” doing an interview with the
Syrian regime???

And Crowing about it????

ToddPA on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM

John Kerry, who once served in Vietnam, has given Assad “one week”……

Why on earth the guy did that, I cannot fathom. Do we have a Marine Expeditionary Force on Cyprus or something?

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:27 AM

White House efforts to convince the U.S. Congress to back military action against Syria are not only failing, they seem to be stiffening the opposition.

That’s the result of playing games with the truth, You lose creditably and support for your programs. It always comes back to bite you.

aknews on September 9, 2013 at 8:27 AM

Syria’s President Bashar Assad denied his regime’s use of chemical weapons in a wide-ranging interview with CBS News’ Charlie Rose. Assad issued a chilling warning for the U.S. to “expect everything” in response to a potential strike on Syria and repeatedly told Rose the Obama administration lacks irrefutable evidence to back up charges of chemical weapons use.

In any fight with the U.S., Assad’s major deployable asset is the Syrian Air Force.

Which, frankly, isn’t in very good shape, mainly due to attrition during the civil war.

Also, if SAF runs true to form for such forces in the region, when the alert comes down, a substantial number of its aircrews will man their planes, take off- and promptly head for a safe haven outside of Syria. Due to (U.S. and Kurdish-controlled) Northern Iraq being between them and Iran, I expect most to head for (Erdogan-run and increasingly Islamist) Turkey.

I wonder if The One is counting on this to make his “short victorious war” a walkover. I have no objection to an enemy panicking and folding, but I question war plans predicated on the enemy doing so.

clear ether

eon

eon on September 9, 2013 at 8:29 AM

Didn’t Drudge have a link from German Intelligence saying he didn’t order the WMD’s to be used?

gophergirl on September 9, 2013 at 8:35 AM

one of our “news outlets” doing an interview with the
Syrian regime???

And Crowing about it????

ToddPA on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM

doesn’t bother me but the timing of it must bothering the administration at this point…so who really wants to hear from obama today 6 times over when they are hearing from assad for the first time

gracie on September 9, 2013 at 8:36 AM

Al-Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001. Al-Qaeda killed the 4 Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. On September 11, 2013, President Barack Hussein Obama is asking Congress to vote in favor of involving us in the Syrian Civil War, on the side of Al Qaeda, who are laughing themselves silly over our dhimmi president.

Get the picture?

kingsjester on September 9, 2013 at 8:38 AM

If they believe Assad is a wild-eyed crazy, then why wouldn’t they believe he will retaliate using whatever means and methods he has?

rplat on September 9, 2013 at 8:39 AM

John Kerry, who once served in Vietnam, has given Assad “one week”……

Why on earth the guy did that, I cannot fathom. Do we have a Marine Expeditionary Force on Cyprus or something?

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:27 AM

kerry’s just vomiting up fecal stuff now

gracie on September 9, 2013 at 8:39 AM

I can’t side with the Trio of Obama, Kerry & al-Qaeda against anybody. Obama has used and continues to use the IRS, DoJ & NSA against American citizens (in many cases for political reasons only), and that’s just for starters. Kerry has made me sick since his lying traitorous testimony against Vietnam vets (etc), and al-Qaeda has been at war (attacking our Homeland, citizens, interests, etc) with America for over a decade.

Karmi on September 9, 2013 at 8:40 AM

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the United States is considering only an “unbelievably, small, limited” strike on Syria as punishment for allegedly using chemical weapons and he insisted military action will not end that country’s civil war.

“We’re not going to war,” Mr. Kerry told reporters Monday after meeting with British Foreign Secretary William Hague in London. “We will be able to hold [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad accountable without engaging troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort, in a very limited, very targeted, very short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria’s civil war. That is exactly what we are talking about doing; an unbelievably small, limited kind of effort.”

A strike, in name only.

Obama’s Do-Little Raiders

ted c on September 9, 2013 at 8:42 AM

Get the picture?

kingsjester on September 9, 2013 at 8:38 AM

i like how this dufus administration is gonna trot out susan rice and hillary clinton to support the military strike of syria…….and using videos as proof to boot..benghazi anyone???

unstinkin believable

gracie on September 9, 2013 at 8:43 AM

Assad the benevolent has never used chemical weapons against his enemies, not once… It was only the rebels who have used chemical weapons… This was proven without any shadow of doubt by very smart people on the internet… Among the 100,000 plus people killed in the Syrian civil war, the rebels killed every single one of them, they killed those who are with them and those who are against them…

mnjg on September 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM

What kind of bizarro America do we live in when actual thought has to be given to whether Assad, or are own government, are more truthful.

BettyRuth on September 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM

I can’t side with the Trio of Obama, Kerry & al-Qaeda against anybody. Obama has used and continues to use the IRS, DoJ & NSA against American citizens (in many cases for political reasons only), and that’s just for starters.

obama and holder have been waging war against the american people for years now

gracie on September 9, 2013 at 8:45 AM

significantly more than a shred.

Reports I read enumerate second and third party accounts, phone intercepts (that make the rebels look guilty) AND Youtube videos.

That’s the lot.

Youtube video… hmmmmm where have I heard that before…??

dogsoldier on September 9, 2013 at 8:47 AM

The list of “experts” at the bottom of the post appears to be legitimate. Or, maybe I’m being duped.

Rovin on September 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM

You are not being duped… This is the most reliable source ever…

mnjg on September 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM

What kind of bizarro America do we live in when actual thought has to be given to whether Assad, or are own government, are more truthful.

BettyRuth on September 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM

They ALL lie. The question is, do we start another war or not. Looking at Skippy’s track record, I’m going with NOT.

Assad will cut loose with everything he’s got and everything the Russians give him. He knows mr mommypants ROE, so where will that leave our guys? Screwed over.

Zero is insane. Stop the madness.

dogsoldier on September 9, 2013 at 8:51 AM

Didn’t Drudge have a link from German Intelligence saying he didn’t order the WMD’s to be used?

gophergirl on September 9, 2013 at 8:35 AM

Yes that is correct… The German intelligence are saying that Assad did not order the attack but one of his commanders did… I am certain that it was one of the rebels who dressed like an Assad commander, entered the headquarters of the Assad chemical unit, and gave the order to launch the chemical attacks…

mnjg on September 9, 2013 at 8:54 AM

Youtube video… hmmmmm where have I heard that before…??

dogsoldier on September 9, 2013 at 8:47 AM

What I wouldn’t give to have a reporter ask Carney if he’d seen the youtube video that caused the rebels to use chemical weapons. Obama needs to be ridiculed daily for that one.

BettyRuth on September 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM

I’ll tell you what this is about. I’m sure someone must have mentioned this already… but things haven’t gone as planned in
Egypt so now Syria is suddenly important.

Just follow the timeline.

JellyToast on September 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM

AP opines: That [propaganda] goes both ways.

It does. Who among us takes reality as it comes. We all have our prejudices, preferences, narratives, hobby horses. With Obama, it’s a belief in some inviolate, independent moral stricture against the use of chemical weapons, even compared to the killing of 100,000 with conventional weapons. Then he gets Biden and Kerry to go out and condemn with a high degree of righteous indignation and other emotionally-charged speech this supposed use of chemical weapons. Obama’s “red line”, which he thinks is so morally right that it’s not his red line, it’s the world’s red line. As far as Obama’s concerned, he has absolute moral authority to respond.

As I posted before, in 1943 FDR said the extermination of the Jews was the greatest act of evil the world had ever seen, and yet he didn’t act to stop it; winning the war was more important. So even in the face of the greatest evil, thought, and moral weighing is required. Maybe required more than at any other time. And yet Obama has this unquestioned attitude that a retaliation would be 100% justified. He’s 100% sure of himself, to the point everyone should agree with him, and if they don’t, then it hurts their credibility. No thought of his OWN credibility.

Paul-Cincy on September 9, 2013 at 8:58 AM

“We’re not like the American administration. We’re not social media administration or government…” – Assad

Obama justifies everything he does based on Youtube Videos and what occurs on Twitter.

Sen. McCain plays poker on his IPhone during the Foreign Relations Committee hearing discussing War.

Obama conducts policy based on WH petitions,twitter,facebook and polls.

Obama’s Administration photoshops his PR and then is absent during critical moments…usually playing Golf or Spades.

And we are in this mess because Obama spoke off script without his teleprompter.

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM

mnjg on September 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM

Your continued sarcasm is annoying. I’ll just ignore you in the future.

Paul-Cincy on September 9, 2013 at 9:01 AM

Face it guys. What difference at this point does it make? Assad has had ample time to hide or secure anything of value. Probably in hospitals, orphanages, and mosques. If the United States intervenes the targeting will be worthless.

But more importantly, at the end of it all, Assad emerges from his bunker, thumps his chest, and crows about beating the United States. If the US intervenes, it does not restore the rat-eared bastard’s street cred. It makes him look even more petty than he already does.

Happy Nomad on September 9, 2013 at 9:02 AM

Gah! Sad day when I have to measure the words of puke killers such as Assface and Pootie against those of the preznit.

Thanks for sinking the office down to their level, Dog Eater, you’ve got your own citizens raising an eyebrow now every time you speak.

Bishop on September 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM

Obama…Assad…Putin…Xi Jinping

Clash of the Tyrants

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:07 AM

We can launch cruise missiles into Syria. And it can and will affect how Assad deploys his military force. Without the further threat of more strikes and greater force though the killing by Assad will soon return to normal.

Anything we do or do not do will have consequences. As I don’t see any good outcomes in this conflict, my position is to allow Saudi, Turkey and others to fund the rebels and allow Russia and Iran to fund Assad. And Hopey-Changey Allah willing all sides lose.

jpmn on September 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM

The regime does have a thing about YouTube videos.

Ben Hur on September 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM

The Benghazi 4 remain unavailable for comment.

kingsjester on September 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM

And we are in this mess because Obama spoke off script without his teleprompter.

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM

It’s a beautiful thing, isn’t it?

I think it started a little before the “red line” remark. It started with the first RINO reaching across the aisle to appease and compromise and it has brought us all the way to the possible brink of WWIII. But hey.. whatever happens.. we have got to make sure the first black President does not fail. Even if it means the end of the world as we know it.

JellyToast on September 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM

….that being said,
does anybody, anymore, in this country hava a problem with
one of our “news outlets” doing an interview with the
Syrian regime???

And Crowing about it????

ToddPA on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM

I see nothing wrong with it. We need to remember that it is our “president” who is making terrorist threats against the sovereign nation of Syria. It is our “president” who is threatening to launch an unprovoked attack on Syria and kill an untold number of Syrians. Assad did not start this, and it is vital that Americans understand what is going on, and hear Assad’s side of the story. AND, in comparing this interview with anything that has been said by obama, Kerry, et al – it is Assad who comes off as credible.

Pork-Chop on September 9, 2013 at 9:16 AM

Assad looks like a character in one of those Politizoid vids…. quite a cartoonish looking fellow.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO6pvDQTzno

dpduq on September 9, 2013 at 9:16 AM

Pork-Chop on September 9, 2013 at 9:16 AM

It is the weirdest thing that I have come to the place where I actually find myself believing a Russian leader and a Syrian dictator more than I believe the President of the US.

This is where we are at today. Thank you low info voters, moderates and RINO’s one and all. A special thank you to John McCain and Mr. Grahmnesty and John Boehner for all the hard work you have done to support the community organizer and the Democrat party in general.

JellyToast on September 9, 2013 at 9:25 AM

so who really wants to hear from obama today 6 times over when they are hearing from assad for the first time

gracie on September 9, 2013 at 8:36 AM

.
**** snicker ****
.
al-Assad sucks the air out of Øbama’s 6-time begging interviews on U.S. media… looks like Ø is living up to his President Cypher image.

ExpressoBold on September 9, 2013 at 9:48 AM

Obama will later be heard paraphrasing the Bhagavad Gita, saying “Now, I am become Mild Nuisance, Annoyer of Worlds.

trubble on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM

.
That whole thing was hilarious! LOL

ExpressoBold on September 9, 2013 at 9:51 AM

And we are in this mess because Obama spoke off script without his teleprompter.

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM

It’s a beautiful thing, isn’t it?

I think it started a little before the “red line” remark. It started with the first RINO reaching across the aisle to appease and compromise and it has brought us all the way to the possible brink of WWIII. But hey.. whatever happens.. we have got to make sure the first black President does not fail. Even if it means the end of the world as we know it.

JellyToast on September 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM

Obama cannot govern his mouth…much less the country and the entrenched corrupt buffoonz surrounding him in both his administration,the media and in congress make it worse.

Putin is doubling down…and has painted us as the global aggressor with a nut-job as commander in chief.

By comparison Putin seems the reasonable statesman.

OY!

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:53 AM

While Obama preps for his personal WWIII…He’s alerted Congress he’ll be cutting the pay of his military.

Winning!

workingclass artist on September 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM

Obama will later be heard paraphrasing the Bhagavad Gita, saying “Now, I am become Mild Nuisance, Annoyer of Worlds.”

trubble on September 9, 2013 at 8:25 AM.

That whole thing was hilarious! LOL

ExpressoBold on September 9, 2013 at 9:51 AM

Ditto! Crucible of faculty luncheons….priceless.

questionmark on September 9, 2013 at 10:09 AM

Assad the benevolent has never used chemical weapons against his enemies, not once… It was only the rebels who have used chemical weapons… This was proven without any shadow of doubt by very smart people on the internet… Among the 100,000 plus people killed in the Syrian civil war, the rebels killed every single one of them, they killed those who are with them and those who are against them…

mnjg on September 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM

Since the opposite of this snark is also demonstrably untrue, either nuke ‘em all and let God sort them out, or stay out and let God sort them out.

I vote we stay out.

questionmark on September 9, 2013 at 10:12 AM

Our government don’t need no stink’n evidence…….Our government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; Our government rules by brute force. Get with the program Assad.

roflmmfao

donabernathy on September 9, 2013 at 10:13 AM

What I wouldn’t give to have a reporter ask Carney if he’d seen the youtube video that caused the rebels to use chemical weapons. Obama needs to be ridiculed daily for that one.

BettyRuth on September 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM

Yes!

The regime does have a thing about YouTube videos.

Ben Hur on September 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM

They do. I’m expecting Facebook and twitter evidence next, or maybe Obama’s personal blog, “UnicornsNRainbows.”

dogsoldier on September 9, 2013 at 10:22 AM

mnjg

Mental patient alert.

xblade on September 9, 2013 at 10:43 AM

Can anyone say for certain that Syria does not have chemical weapons stored in their embassy located at 2215 Wyoming Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008.

meci on September 9, 2013 at 10:46 AM

[Rovin on September 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM]

I’d ignore it, Rovin. They’re nut jobs floating theory disguised as evidence. They’ve even suggested there might be a false-flag operation afoot by our allies to sink an American ship in the Med.

If you look at some of their other stories, you’ll realize they are nut jobs.

Dusty on September 9, 2013 at 11:01 AM

Inigo Montoya: I want my father back, you filthy son-of-a-bitch!

unclesmrgol on September 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM