Obama: Hey, I didn’t set the red line!

posted at 10:01 am on September 4, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Barack Obama finds himself in Sweden today, a late change to his G-20 itinerary after deciding to snub Vladimir Putin over Edward Snowden’s asylum. Fittingly, Obama used a joint press conference in Stockholm with the Swedish Prime Minister to massage his own role in the diplomatic debacle over Syria in which Obama now finds himself.  Obama insisted that he didn’t set a “red line” for action over the use of chemical weapons, but that Congress did … and so did everyone else, except Obama, of course:

“My credibility is not on the line — the international community’s credibility is on the line,” President Barack Obama said Wednesday in Sweden regarding his desire for a military strike in response to a suspected August chemical attack in Syria. He said the question is, after going through all the evidence: “Are we going to try to find a reason not to act? And if that’s the case, then I think the (world) community should admit it.”

President Barack Obama said Wednesday the “red line” he previously spoke of regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria wasn’t his own, but the world’s. “I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line. The world set a red line when governments representing 98%” of the world’s population “passed a treaty forbidding (chemical weapons) use, even when countries are engaged in war,” Obama said in Sweden.

That’s certainly true, but it is equally true that the international “red line” on this issue was set through the UN, which is now claiming that only the multilateral organization has the authority to enforce it.  UN Secretary-General Ban-ki Moon warned yesterday that military action outside of the UN’s auspices would also violate international law — and would at the very least undermine Obama’s argument here.  If Obama strikes Syria without even bothering to ask the UN for support, then how can he rely on the UN’s “red line” as justification?

“I respect the U.N. process,” he said at an event in Stockholm with Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, who opposes military intervention without U.N. approval.

Obviously that’s not the case, since Obama isn’t even bothering to propose action at the UN Security Council.  George Bush did at least that much, but the US also had justification to open new hostilities in Iraq thanks to the repeated violations of the Saddam Hussein regime of the 1991 cease-fire agreement over a twelve-year period.  No such justification exists separately here.

By the way, here’s Obama from a year ago setting the red line:

That looks a lot like Obama setting that red line, doesn’t it?  “That would change my calculus — that would change my equation.”  There wasn’t any hint of we or they in that statement.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5

Over

Bmore on September 5, 2013 at 8:53 AM

“Who takes all the glory and none of the shame…”

steebo77 on September 5, 2013 at 8:56 AM

Who dat say dat last “Who Dat?”

Herb on September 5, 2013 at 10:02 AM

If a Republican President uttered such a fatuous lie, it would be on the front page of every paper in huge red letters. But a Democrat says it and the loving cone of media silence descends to do its work against the interests of all Americans.

drunyan8315 on September 5, 2013 at 10:12 AM

Obama’s denials are shallow, childish and obvious lies. At times it appears that he is totally oblivious of reality.

rplat on September 5, 2013 at 10:50 AM

The root of our problem in this and every other one of our problems is the media. It is completely controlled by the Democrat Party.

If we do not fight the media and the companies that support them then we will be utterly destroyed.

It is time to stop just observing the corrupt media. It is time to stop just pointing out the hypocrisy. It is time to stop just pointing out the double-standards. It is time to start boycotts. It is time to start buying out the media. It is time to start boycotting companies that carry garbage like Time and Rolling Stone. It is time to start attacking any company that advertises on MSNBC.

Start fighting now while there is still a chance or be destroyed.

GardenGnome on September 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM

In light of Pres. Obama’s denial that he set any “red lines” in Syria, may I suggest this as OFA’s new theme song? (via Shaggy)

Blaise on September 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM

He is simply saying, “Even if I didn’t say it, I was speaking for the international community (and what they said to me).”

rlwo2008 on September 5, 2013 at 11:43 AM

And thank you 51% of the voting populace for re-electing this Flaming Incompetent Rodeo Evolver.

profitsbeard on September 6, 2013 at 2:58 AM

Obama: Hey, I didn’t name Bo after me.

Sherman1864 on September 6, 2013 at 4:28 AM

Welcome back to Whose [RED] Line is it Anyway, where everything’s made up and the points[facts] don’t matter.

gekkobear on September 6, 2013 at 4:08 PM

So MR I GOT BIN LADEN
is doing a shuck n jive on a red line.

sniffles1999 on September 8, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5