DVR alert: Sunday shows ready to go face-first into the tank for Wendy Davis

posted at 6:41 pm on June 28, 2013 by Allahpundit

Normally I wait until Sunday morning to give you the chat-show preview but this deserves special attention. That humidity you’ve been feeling the last few days isn’t related to the weather, it’s simply the accumulation of media slobber over Davis since her stand-with-late-term-abortion filibuster in Texas a few nights ago. Mollie Hemingway’s been wading through a river of it for the last few days on her site, but you don’t need to look far to find examples on your own. Case in point: This probing analysis from the Washington Post of the sneakers Davis wore to keep her feet comfortable while she stood up to the people and the powerless for the right to have healthy 20-week-old fetuses vacuumed into oblivion. More from Hemingway:

I found it interesting that a search of the Los Angeles Times shows that the newspaper has already published 11 staff-written stories about her. By comparison, the Times only got around to three staff-written stories about Kermit Gosnell. One of those Davis stories was literally on the front page yesterday. Kermit Gosnell never made the front page of the Los Angeles Times and it took years after his indictment in the murders of seven children and one woman for the paper to even mention him at all, buried deep within the paper.

When North Dakota pro-life senator Margaret Sitte wrote, sponsored and passed various pro-life bills, did the Los Angeles Times cover her? Not even once. Some women who work on bills related to abortion are vastly more important than other women who work on bills related to abortion. As I joked on Twitter, “It’s almost like there’s a pattern with how the media cover abortion. It’s subtle, but if you look hard, you can almost detect something.”

Word’s out this afternoon that Davis will be on “Meet the Press” and “This Week” at least, with appearances on other shows maybe to follow. Judging from how she was treated on cable news the past few days, we’re in for a must-see master class in pro-abortion media bias. Expect questions about how tired she was by the end of the filibuster, whether she feels victimized by Rick Perry the same way former designated left-wing rallying point Sandra Fluke was by Rush Limbaugh, and of course how many inquiries she’s getting about her sneakers. Expect not so many questions about the fact that, according to polls on late-term abortion, “the people’s filibuster” actually contradicts the will of the people. Or what exactly the difference is between what Kermit Gosnell did and what “respectable” abortionists do at 20 weeks.

But … maybe I’m jumping to conclusions. You trust, er, David Gregory to conduct a tough interview, don’t you? He and ABC know pro-lifers will pound them relentlessly online if these segments end up being the pattycake sessions everyone expects them to be. They’re bound to be tough even if they don’t want to be, right?

Here you go. Behold the promo image ABC’s circulating for Sunday:

abc

This is appointment viewing, people. Set your DVRs now.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The face of evil.

And the media swoon…

WTF America????

coldwarrior on June 28, 2013 at 6:44 PM

Awesome.

Liberal media goes all in for late-term abortions.

Ghouls.

BuckeyeSam on June 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM

I’m sick of this woman. It’s sick she’s being celebrated. SICK

gophergirl on June 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM

Sigh.

Awesome.

Liberal media goes go all in for late-term abortions.

Ghouls.

BuckeyeSam on June 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM

BuckeyeSam on June 28, 2013 at 6:47 PM

Sunday shows ready to go face-first into the tank for Wendy Davis

That’s a good reason to tune them out.

jaime on June 28, 2013 at 6:48 PM

Sunday? Maybe by then she can find a wig that fits.

Labamigo on June 28, 2013 at 6:48 PM

I can’t watch the celebration of evil. I’ll check back here and see how it goes.

Rose on June 28, 2013 at 6:51 PM

I’m still trying to know what words of praise someone can give the murder of babies for ten solid hours.

The liberal media need to manufacture their heroes. Real heroes, like Reagan, are such because it’s within their character and nature.

Liam on June 28, 2013 at 6:52 PM

She’s the closest thing the Dems have to a pretty young blonde, which the ‘news’ stations love to run soap opera-ish stories about.

Fenris on June 28, 2013 at 6:52 PM

I’ll give you 5-1 that at least one of the talking head jackasses who interview this dolt will lift a foot up to show off their own pink sneakers, guffawing like a hyena.

Bishop on June 28, 2013 at 6:54 PM

The party of the KKK, Bull Conner, Orvil Faubus, George Wallace. Lester Maddox – now promotes a procedure that kills 50% of Blacks in utero. Hey – at lest they are consistent.

mouell on June 28, 2013 at 6:55 PM

The Texas Senate should schedule the vote for the 3rd and let her filibuster thru the weekend.

RickB on June 28, 2013 at 6:56 PM

Maybe David Gregory will hold up and wave around her Smithsonian bound catheter as a set prop.

aquaviva on June 28, 2013 at 6:56 PM

Children aren’t vacuumed out at 20 weeks. The doctor forcibly dilates the mother’s cervix and then yanks the child apart limb by limb.

Vera on June 28, 2013 at 6:57 PM

We’ve all seen in the tank coverage but I don’t recall something this bad.

Amazing.

‘Course the other meaning of “in the tank” is doing poorly or failing.

So maybe in the tank is more accurate than we think.

SteveMG on June 28, 2013 at 6:58 PM

Why don’t we see what dirt we can find on her and then publish it in twitter-sized bites? I’m sure the media will pick up those bites and stop their incessant glorification of “The Blonde in Pink.”
.
Right?

ExpressoBold on June 28, 2013 at 7:03 PM

We live in an idiocracy.

blatantblue on June 28, 2013 at 7:04 PM

Long live partial-birth abortion; save the dolphins.

Hot Gas on June 28, 2013 at 7:05 PM

now promotes a procedure that kills 50% of Blacks in utero. Hey – at lest they are consistent.

mouell on June 28, 2013 at 6:55 PM

“What do you mean “now”?” -Margaret Sanger

In 1926, Sanger gave a lecture on birth control to the women’s auxiliary of the Ku Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey.[38] She described it as “one of the weirdest experiences I had in lecturing,” and added that she had to use only “the most elementary terms, as though I were trying to make children understand.”[38] Sanger’s talk was well received by the group, and as a result, “a dozen invitations to similar groups were proffered.”

In 1946, Sanger helped found the International Committee on Planned Parenthood, which evolved into the International Planned Parenthood Federation in 1952, and soon became the world’s largest non-governmental international family planning organization. Sanger was the organization’s first president and served in that role until she was 80 years old

Flange on June 28, 2013 at 7:05 PM

Why don’t we see what dirt we can find on her and then publish it in twitter-sized bites? I’m sure the media will pick up those bites and stop their incessant glorification of “The Blonde in Pink.”
.
Right?

ExpressoBold on June 28, 2013 at 7:03 PM

Quit bogartin’ whatever it is you’re smokin’. Pass it over! :=)

Liam on June 28, 2013 at 7:05 PM

What kind of person wakes up every morning with the passion to see that as many babies as possible are put to death? What kind of person is consumed by something that evil?

12th Legion on June 28, 2013 at 7:06 PM

I already have her poster on my wall! Right next to my poster of Hernandez! She’s my newest bestest hero!

John the Libertarian on June 28, 2013 at 7:07 PM

DVR alert: Sunday shows ready to go face-first into the tank for Wendy Davis

Certain members of the Texas GOP really dropped the ball on this one.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM

Let’s be fair: David Gregory gave a fair interview to Rand Paul after his filibuster.

Oh wait.

Notorious GOP on June 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM

The party of the KKK, Bull Conner, Orvil Faubus, George Wallace. Lester Maddox – now promotes a procedure that kills 50% of Blacks in utero. Hey – at lest they are consistent.

mouell on June 28, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Yeah, b-b-but libfreeordie!

John the Libertarian on June 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM

Babies A, B and C unavailable for comment

rbj on June 28, 2013 at 7:12 PM

Let them put her up as their hero. Let them be blatant about it.

thebrokenrattle on June 28, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Looking at the Farley/McCartney clip, for a moment I thought I was watching Tingles interviewing Obama, without the spit.

TXUS on June 28, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Sorry, but she’s a MONSTER. Aborting healthy babies as over 20 weeks gestation? Standing against clean, safe medical facilities? She’s a monster.

The whole point of that bill is to stop the horrors of Kermit Gosnell from happening in Texas. Who, in their right mind or possession of a human soul, could be against that?

Murf76 on June 28, 2013 at 7:16 PM

Move over Sandra Fluke.
Move over Cindy Sheehan.
There’s a new ____________________ in town.

Fill in the blank.

TXUS on June 28, 2013 at 7:17 PM

For those of you who might have an ounce of give-a-crap, the Amazon review for these shoes went from about 8 to over 225 today and most of them are….something.

I tried leaving my own comment and curiously enough it got removed with no explanation, and the snark was deep enough that only intrepid study by a leftist would uncover its true meaning.

Bishop on June 28, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Fill in the blank.

TXUS on June 28, 2013 at 7:17 PM

Please don’t give her an excuse to have another abortion.

Flange on June 28, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Can someone in Congress create a bill where if we don’t get an abortion, we have to pay a $2,000 tax penalty?

Notorious GOP on June 28, 2013 at 7:22 PM

Bishop on June 28, 2013 at 7:20 PM

The funny thing is – they are butt ugly shoes.

gophergirl on June 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM

But … maybe I’m jumping to conclusions. You trust, er, David Gregory to conduct a tough interview, don’t you? He and ABC know pro-lifers will pound them relentlessly online if these segments end up being the pattycake sessions everyone expects them to be. They’re bound to be tough even if they don’t want to be, right?

The pro-lifers who care would be in church at the same time those shows air. And even then, they wouldn’t give a damn.

If you watch the Sunday shows on a regular basis to begin with, it’s your own fault, and I can’t help you.

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Pass it over! :=)

Liam on June 28, 2013 at 7:05 PM

.
Here. Have it all. I’m gonna search for dirty laundry on this… elected… representative until I find something nasty!

ExpressoBold on June 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM

It’s funny how liberals are POed at Daryl Metcalfe for not letting Brian Sims have unanimous consent to speak on the PA Senate floor about gay marriage, but consider an unelected mob to be the voice of democracy when they blocked the TX vote by making too much noise.

blammm on June 28, 2013 at 7:30 PM

Couple O questions the talking heads could ask Wendy

Why is it that the very people who say the government should stay out of abortion are the same ones who want the government to pay for them?

If we use the absence of brain waves to determine that a person’s life has ended, why shouldn’t we use the presence of brain waves to determine that someone’s life has begun?

What rights do you feel a father should have in an abortion decision?

Human rights are presumably rights that belong to us in virtue of our being human–that is why they are called “human” rights. They are prior to decision or convention, precisely because they depend upon our nature. We have them simply because we are human beings, not because of an acquired characteristic or accomplishment. But if the fetus has no rights, then there are no human rights, because the fetus is clearly a human being, and if there were rights that followed from simply being human, the fetus would have them….. in our current practice of legal abortion, the unborn child has rights only if they are granted by the mother. For if the mother wishes to have an abortion, then the child has no rights, and its death is considered inconsequential; but if the mother wishes to continue her pregnancy, then an attack on the child is considered unlawful and even murderous. Hence the child–and presumably also the adult who grows from the child–has rights only because they have been originally granted by the mother. But Wendy isn’t this incompatible with the fundamental equality of all human beings

roflmmfao

donabernathy on June 28, 2013 at 7:30 PM

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Missing the point

Notorious GOP on June 28, 2013 at 7:31 PM

The funny thing is – they are butt ugly shoes.

gophergirl on June 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM

I’m thinking the women wearing them aren’t all that fun to look at either.

Expect to see scads of them in your neighborhood soon.

Bishop on June 28, 2013 at 7:31 PM

Who, in their right mind or possession of a human soul, could be against that?

Murf76 on June 28, 2013 at 7:16 PM

Your basic standard-bearer, run-of-the-mill Democrat.

They are not these mythical “low-information voters” that GOPers stupidly label on a regular basis. They believe this stuff, and will go to the ends of the earth to make sure that they never give up one iota of ground. They are militant in their beliefs, and will force it on you until it hurts.

When GOPers call them “low-information voters” (as even Rush has) they miss the boat so badly on this, it’s downright depressing. Pardon me as I sit next to AP on the Eeyore bench.

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:33 PM

Wendy, the new face of the womenz lib abortion cartel… Sorry Sandra….

sandee on June 28, 2013 at 7:34 PM

Latest fluke of the left.

Schadenfreude on June 28, 2013 at 7:34 PM

There’s a better than 50% chance they ask her if she’s running in 2016.

Robert_Paulson on June 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM

There’s a better than 50% chance they ask her if she’s running in 2016.

Robert_Paulson on June 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM

I read somewhere that she isn’t in a “safe” district for Dems…

sandee on June 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM

I happen to have an exact pair of the same type sneakers for sale to the highest bidder. I’ve started the bidding at a modest $5000. Okay Lefties! Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity!

Mahdi on June 28, 2013 at 7:37 PM

Missing the point

Notorious GOP on June 28, 2013 at 7:31 PM

How? This is such a predictable storyline.

ABC and NBC deify Ms. Whatshername on their shows without a care in the world. Most pro-lifers that would object to it wouldn’t even be watching the shows to begin with as they air. Church services occur during that same timeframe, usually between 9am and 1pm on Sundays.

That’s why I’ve never bothered to see any of the shows. Sunday Mass is a bit more important. IMO.

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:40 PM

I’m sure they’ll ask her about Gosnell or the wannabe Gosnell in her own State right?

sandee on June 28, 2013 at 7:40 PM

She may have tripped on her new shoe laces.Look at the Ft Worth papers and see what her constituancy is saying about her.Some of the comments look like they came from this site.

docflash on June 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM

She may have tripped on her new shoe laces.Look at the Ft Worth papers and see what her constituancy is saying about her.Some of the comments look like they came from this site.

docflash on June 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM

Wouldn’t it be funny if they successfully recall her before the next election?

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:55 PM

On the local news here in Houston, they are reporting that Democrats are urging her to run against Perry. I’m sure it’s the same Dems that thought running Bill White was a good idea.

opustx on June 28, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Certain members of the Texas GOP really dropped the ball on this one.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM

…Like Senator Robert Duncan(R-Lubbock)

annoyinglittletwerp on June 28, 2013 at 8:13 PM

opustx on June 28, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Might a done better with Ron White.

coldwarrior on June 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Is that a wart on the end of her nose?

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 8:39 PM

I’m in her district. One of the most Conservative in Texas.

And as I stated before, she ran against a Pediatrician from the Arlington area who would be State Senator had he not opposed abortion in the instance of rape. Wendy Davis had one TV-commercial theme her whole campaign, and only one.

Marcus on June 28, 2013 at 8:41 PM

Marcus on June 28, 2013 at 8:41 PM

Lucky little witch.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Is that a wart on the end of her nose?

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 8:39 PM

…a hard booger!

KOOLAID2 on June 28, 2013 at 8:57 PM

KOOLAID2 on June 28, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Heh!

snack during phillybuster

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:05 PM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Maybe you support abortion right up to the moment the fetus baby passes through the birth canal. I mean 20 weeks? Seriously? What a ghoul?

Btw, you haven’t made a decent movie in decades.

Bitter Clinger on June 28, 2013 at 9:07 PM

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

She didn’t stand up for me.

.
.
I don’t believe in murdering babies.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:07 PM

Btw, you haven’t made a decent movie in decades.

Bitter Clinger on June 28, 2013 at 9:07 PM

Old phart.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:08 PM

Pics of babies……this link should should a 20-wk one. If not you can go through the slides.
http://www.webmd.com/baby/ss/slideshow-fetal-development

Ghoul is right!

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:11 PM

Maybe she should show up with a jar fully of baby feet. Or better yet, show how proud she of this young woman aborting her twins at 20 weeks (you will NOT believe how big her belly is): http://www.lifenews.com/2012/08/14/woman-20-weeks-pregnant-with-twins-has-abortion-last-week/

sybilll on June 28, 2013 at 9:13 PM

But does she have a nice set of pleats for her skirt?

Chris Matthews wants to know. He needs some tingles again.

ajacksonian on June 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM

Ghoul is right!

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:11 PM

Babies feel pain.

A wealth of anatomical, behavioral and physiological evidence shows that the developing human fetus is capable of experiencing tremendous pain by 20 weeks post-fertilization.

Anatomical:

Pain receptors are present throughout the unborn child’s entire body by no later than 16 weeks after fertilization, and nerves link these receptors to the brain’s thalamus and subcortical plate by no later than 20 weeks. For unborn children, says Dr. Paul Ranalli, a neurologist at the University of Toronto, 20 weeks is a “uniquely vulnerable time, since the pain system is fully established, yet the higher level pain-modifying system has barely begun to develop.” As a result, unborn babies at this age probably feel pain more intensely than adults.

Behavioral:

By 8 weeks after fertilization, the unborn child reacts to touch. By 20 weeks post-fertilization, the unborn child reacts to stimuli that would be recognized as painful if applied to an adult human—for example, by recoiling. Surgeons entering the womb to perform corrective procedures on unborn children have seen those babies flinch, jerk and recoil from sharp objects and incisions. In addition, ultrasound technology shows that unborn babies at 20 weeks and earlier react physically to outside stimuli such as sound, light and touch.

Physiological:

The application of painful stimuli is associated with significant increases in the unborn child’s stress hormones. During fetal surgery, anesthesia is routinely administered to the unborn baby and is associated with a decrease in stress hormones compared to their level when painful stimuli is applied without such anesthesia.

http://www.doctorsonfetalpain.com/

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:22 PM

ajacksonian on June 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM

Ummmm…..don’t think she is Matthew’s type. For tingles, that is.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:23 PM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

One more reason why the GOPe will BETRAY you.

I am not a Republican. A pro-life libertarian-leaning conservative, yes… but not a Republican.

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 9:24 PM

Needless to say I hate the witch that killed this bill and her bussed in cohorts.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:25 PM

Maybe they can put a line of clothing together with her name on them….maybe doctors scrubs with blood stains on them….now it is fashionable on what you are wearing to show support for baby genocide…..let the sodomites rejoice and the baby killers cheer but Judgment Day is coming…….smell the sulpher minions of satan

crosshugger on June 28, 2013 at 9:30 PM

Needless to say I hate the witch that killed this bill and her bussed in cohorts.

avagreen on June 28, 2013 at 9:25 PM

That’s the thing. The bill isn’t dead yet, not in the least.

Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 9:30 PM

Here. Have it all. I’m gonna search for dirty laundry on this… elected… representative until I find something nasty!

ExpressoBold on June 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Why bother searching? Do what the left does and just make up crap.

Lost in Jersey on June 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

20 weeks. That is 5 months. You are one sick fk.

crrr6 on June 28, 2013 at 9:36 PM

We all know for a fact that abortion is the only method of birth control available to American women, right? //

coldwarrior on June 28, 2013 at 9:37 PM

I only wish this ghoul would be on the set when Will drops the hammer on her.

crrr6 on June 28, 2013 at 9:43 PM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

The thousands of unborn females that die daily in abortion? What about them…yes you are one sick f uck. ES.

CW on June 28, 2013 at 10:06 PM

Are any of the shows inviting Rick Perry to talk about the special session that makes this extremist Davis irrelevant?

Ellis on June 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM

I read somewhere that she isn’t in a “safe” district for Dems…

sandee on June 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM

State Senator, District 10 County TARRANT
Mark M. Shelton REP 140,656
Wendy R.Davis DEM 147,103
Votes 287,759

It may get worse for her if they decide to go back to the maps that weren’t allowed last year. After this stunt you can probably bet that her district will be redesigned.

jffree1 on June 28, 2013 at 10:16 PM

OT
From the Texas SOS


Required Identification for Voting in Person

In 2011, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 14 (SB 14) creating a new requirement for voters to show photo identification when voting in person. While pending review within the judicial system, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively ended all pending litigation. As a result, voters are now required to present an approved form of photo identification in order to vote in all Texas Elections.


This requirement is effective immediately.

jffree1 on June 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM

She’s a good looking, even semi-hot blonde. Do you know how long Democraps have waited for a good-looking woman pol? Take a look at the battle axes and homely women who are their top stars. They’re all dogs. Last year they put forward two homely gals to talk about sex(yuck) in the context of the Presidential election — Sandra Fluke and Lena Dunham. Real bow-wows.

Meanwhile we conservatives have a plethora of beautiful, smart, hot women pols and talking heads, lead by the beauteous Sarah Palin.

This is like the first good looking femme Democrap ever. Of course they’re excited.

I’m a woman, BTW.

str8tface on June 28, 2013 at 10:57 PM

Well, if there is one thing that obama’s state-run media loves, it’s some nasty, hagged-out bimbo talking about the joys of murdering children.

Pork-Chop on June 28, 2013 at 11:20 PM

Oh, goody!

I just got my game card for Sunday’s Talking Heads’ Bullchit Bingo and every square reads “Eugenics”.

I’m not going to win, am I?

ya2daup on June 28, 2013 at 11:22 PM

In the end this is Texas. I say let Perry keep calling special sessions and get this thing passed. I hate this sneaker wearing sneakers. Heres to the final victory. If I see this b walking down Main in Ft Worth I’m calling her out!

neyney on June 29, 2013 at 12:38 AM

Succubus.

John the Libertarian on June 29, 2013 at 2:34 AM

If she could determine that the 20 week old fetus was an illegal alien and future Democrat voter she would never support this.

profitsbeard on June 29, 2013 at 2:57 AM

BABY KILLING.

Isin’t that a great platform?

TX-96 on June 29, 2013 at 6:08 AM

Here. Have it all. I’m gonna search for dirty laundry on this… elected… representative until I find something nasty!

ExpressoBold on June 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM

If her filibuster doesn’t already revolt the general public, I doubt there’s anything you’ll find that will…

zoyclem on June 29, 2013 at 8:04 AM

Rick Perry has been governor for a few years, besides this noisy abortion legislation, how is he shoring up his conservative state? I am not sure he has control over it, I don’t think he has any agenda, I think he is just like George Bush, and that was good once, but he needs to pass some laws in Texas that preserve conservative/traditional American notions. Perhaps Cruz would have been the superior Governor. But now, he is needed where he is.

Fleuries on June 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM

I am a Republican…I am a pro-choice

Kudos to this woman for standing up for WOMEN…

Redford on June 28, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Being pro-choice has deeper meaning than you think. Today, society is coming to accept the killing of its most vulnerable members–babies. Tomorrow, it will be the elderly, infirm, and those in need of life-saving medical treatments. One day, it will be any member not deemed suitable to society.

You’ve made the fool’s choice.

zoyclem on June 29, 2013 at 8:24 AM

I wonder how long it will be before ‘pro-choice’ people turn abortion into a religious experience, tossing the newborns into the fire as sacrifices to the state.

It’s almost, well…biblical.

zoyclem on June 29, 2013 at 8:28 AM

She is this year’s Fluke. How is it in a sane world can a woman stand up in front of millions of people and become the face of murdering an unborn child. Asking for someone else to pay for your contraception is mild stuff compared to this woman who has blood on her hands, if her story is true.

Kissmygrits on June 29, 2013 at 9:28 AM

Wouldn’t it be funny if they successfully recall her before the next election?
Myron Falwell on June 28, 2013 at 7:55 PM

No worries – her Senatorial district has already been gerrymandered out of existence. Thanks to the SCOTUS ruling on VRA earlier this week, she’s outta there come 2014.

TeresainFortWorth on June 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM

First, they said it was acceptable to kill children as long as it was before birth, but that’s OK with me as I was already born.

Now they are saying it would be compassionate to terminate the lives of the elderly and the seriously ill, but that’s OK with me as I am neither.

Soon they will be saying that letting the poor and the destitute die sooner rather that later reduces their burden on society, but that’s OK with me as I have a place to live and means of support.

Eventually, they will mandate that my “right to life” be limited to my perceived value to society, and that’s…when I will realize…that it’s not OK with me.

But then, it will be too late.

lonestarleeroy on June 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM

Pro-abortion advocates don’t see anything wrong with killing the child when it is womb. They are deemed to be sane. But when an insane gunman kills children in a schoolhouse, well they are insane. Am I the only one that their something not logical the pro-abortionist position?

SC.Charlie on June 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM

Pro-abortion advocates don’t see anything wrong with killing the child when it is womb. They are deemed to be sane. But when an insane gunman kills children in a schoolhouse, well they are insane. Am I the only one that their something not logical the pro-abortionist position? – SC.Charlie on June 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM

Correction to above:

Pro-abortion advocates don’t see anything wrong with killing a child when a child is the womb. They are deemed to be sane. But when an insane gunman kills children in a schoolhouse, well they are insane. Am I the only one that sees that there is something not logical the pro-abortionist position?

SC.Charlie on June 29, 2013 at 5:02 PM

Coupla questions:

Have you ever had an abortion?

How old would that child be?

Do you regret not having that child in your life now?

You grew up in a trailer park . . . have you or any member of your family every owned a gun? Have you or any member of your family ever used the ‘n’ word?

Labamigo on June 29, 2013 at 6:57 PM

Low information journalism for a low information America.

MNHawk on June 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM