Ecuador to US: Take your trade and shove it

posted at 2:01 pm on June 27, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Ecuador’s government has only just received an asylum application from Edward Snowden and warns that it might take weeks or months to make a decision about it, but it appears that they are already making preparations for its approval. The small South American nation on the Pacific has enjoyed a generous trade deal with the US for its cooperation in narcotics-interdiction efforts.  Today, however, Ecuador suddenly renounced the deal, claiming that the US uses it for imperialism and interference — and offered to send $23 million to the US for education in human rights:

Ecuador unilaterally cancelled its trade deal with the United States on Thursday and offered to give the country $23 million a year to help with its “human rights” education in the latest twist in the two countries’ showdown over NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

The move aims to reject lawmakers’ “threat” not to renew an expiring preferential trade deal with Ecuador if the country grants Snowden’s request for political asylum, Communications Secretary Fernando Alvarado told reporters in Quito. Snowden remains in the transit area of the Moscow airport and Ecuador has said it could take months to process his application.

“Ecuador gives up, unilaterally and irrevocably, the said customs benefits,” Alvarado said, according to Reuters. “What’s more, Ecuador offers the United States economic aid of $23 million annually, similar to what we received with the trade benefits, with the intention of providing education about human rights.”

Yesterday, Senate Foreign Relations chair Robert Menendez threatened to block renewal of the pact if Ecuador granted Snowden asylum, which President Rafael Correa called “blackmail.” However, the deal delivered badly-needed open entry to US markets for energy (oil) and agricultural products, such as fruits, roses, and other floral products:

The ATPDEA agreement was initially signed by President George H.W. Bush in December 1991, allowing the countries involved to sell goods to the U.S. without paying import duties. It was designed to boost trade between the U.S. and Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.

The idea was to incentivize alternatives to cocaine production here. Colombia and Peru now have their own free trade agreements with the U.S. while Bolivia was kicked out in 2008. The U.S. said that it had failed to “cooperate with U.S. counternarcotics efforts.”

More than 50% of Ecuador’s exports go to the U.S., according to Cristian Espinosa, executive director of the Quito-based Ecuadorian-American Chamber of Commerce.

“The U.S. is our main trading partner,” said Espinosa. “We’ve been trying for years to make this relationship richer and deeper. When we see political events that might hinder our work, we of course are … concerned. We hope that these political events do not affect trade because both countries benefit a lot from bilateral trade.”

CNN also highlighted the stakes involved for Correa:

Alvarado, however, may be hoping to win a deal through back channels:

The program, initially meant to help Andean countries aiding in the fight against drugs, was facing an uphill fight for renewal. Alvarado did not explicitly mention a separate effort to win trade benefits under a presidential order.

With Menendez and House Democrat Sander Levin both vowing to kill any deal with Ecuador if Snowden gets asylum, Alvarado shouldn’t be holding his breath on a deal with Barack Obama.  Perhaps Alvarado or Correa might want to spend the $23 million to educate his own country on the benefits of a free press.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Snowden reminds me of another self-glorifying young idiot who inserted himself into international affairs in 1972, “negotiating” with the Viet Cong when he had no authority to do so, since the Secretary of State was Henry Kissinger.

The bad news: that other young self-glorifying idiot is now Secretary of State.

Exit question: is today’s self-glorifying young idiot more dangerous in Russia or in Ecuador?

Steve Z on June 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM

So I ask you: at this point, what would it have mattered?

BillH on June 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM

Heh. Indeed. Hillary is still a quitter and isn’t ready.

Christien on June 27, 2013 at 4:48 PM

ROTFL It’s bad enough that Putin told Obama to stuff it. It’s much worse when a little country like Ecuador tells him to pound sand, including an offer to send America millions for ‘human rights education’.

Too funny!

Liam on June 27, 2013 at 2:07 PM

Actually abd n all honesty Ecuador told the US to ‘stuff it’., not O in particular. They listed the usual US imperialist shtick among their motivations, well that’s the Latin America’s shtick for a long time now, nothing to do with who’s in the WH. They have been hating the US over there for decades now. It wouldn’t have made an iota of difference to them if somebody else was in the WH.

jimver on June 27, 2013 at 5:10 PM

‘And in all honesty’ that is…

jimver on June 27, 2013 at 5:10 PM

Why? Do you think we have a free press here?

The Rogue Tomato on June 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM

Rrright, journalists are jailed and silenced in this contry day in and day out…jeeez…am sure you can tell the difference beween deliberate, self-imposed basis of the press and coerced one. Last time I checked our journolisters were more than happy to oblige and sing paeans to O, but forced to? Let’s get serious…

jimver on June 27, 2013 at 5:15 PM

My, my, my, top brass sure is getting feisty ordering other countries around. Maybe this will wake up some of the sleepy heads there in DC.

mixplix on June 27, 2013 at 5:41 PM

Exit question: is today’s self-glorifying young idiot more dangerous in Russia or in Ecuador?

Steve Z on June 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM

Russia, without any doubt.

Ecuador is a pissant socialist nation we could reduce to a near-lifeless moonscape without even breaking out any WMD’s. By contrast Russia has nukes and the means to send them flying, conventional armed forces that would give us quite a fight and a lot of land they could lose before being truly defeated.

MelonCollie on June 27, 2013 at 6:05 PM

Comment pages: 1 2