Rubio favorability drops 15 points among GOP in Rasmussen poll

posted at 10:41 am on June 24, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Marco Rubio started off the year as one of the most popular Republicans among the GOP, and according to the latest poll from Rasmussen, he’s still more popular than not.  After several months of working on immigration reform, though, Rubio’s numbers have slid significantly within his party — by fifteen points (via Byron York):

Rubio, the most visible advocate of the Senate’s comprehensive immigration reform plan, is now viewed favorably by 58% of Republican voters nationwide. That down 10 points since May  and 15 points since February.  A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 16% of GOP voters have an unfavorable opinion of him, while 25% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

The level of enthusiasm for Rubio has declined significantly. Today, just 21% of GOP voters have a Very Favorable opinion of the Florida senator. That’s down sharply from 44% in February and 31% in May.

Among all voters, 37% view Rubio favorably, down five points from February, while 35% have an unfavorable opinion of the first-term senator. Twenty-seven percent (27%) are undecided.

The reaction from overall voters hasn’t actually changed much since May, when Rubio was at 39/32.  That change is within the margin of error.  The reaction among GOP voters has been a little more significant over the last six weeks.  In May, Rubio got a 68/10 rating, but now it’s 58/16.

However, a 58/16 is still not exactly a damning favorability rating.  There are a lot of 2016 wannabes that wouldn’t mind trading Rubio for those numbers. Six weeks ago, Ted Cruz got a 42/12, and now Rand Paul has a 63/19, but Paul has a 37/43 with overall voters.  Among independents, Rubio gets a 41/35 to Paul’s 37/37.

The trend line has to be worrisome (assuming that Rubio’s interested in running for anything more than Senator in 2016), but at a certain point the immigration issue will become fixed in those ratings.  So far, it looks as though Rubio has a long way to fall, and not much more downside to risk.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

For me, the word ‘quisling’ does it.

Fenris on June 24, 2013 at 12:51 PM

never thought of it as a curse word. But I can see where you would.

heard thatcher use it once and a great book series by EE Knight uses the term a lot which is where I picked it up and added it to my vocab in everyday usage I guess.

unseen on June 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM

Its more than that. Polls are always late to the game.

I bet its 30$%.

He’s a traitor to the conservative movement.

TX-96 on June 24, 2013 at 1:03 PM

He’s being tossed under the bus because he lied to us !
( don’t offer to eat your hat over this one )

Lucano on June 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM

My “hat cuisine” days are over :P

Ironic too, that it was Rubio vs Crist that started it all.

Still, I just don’t understand what everyone wants with this whole illegals situation and any sort of “pathway to citizenship”. I fully understand these people are in the US illegally. I also understand the borders need a serious upgrade. It’s always been my belief that a sovereign nation cannot be without secure borders.

The answer to this issue isn’t to simply catch the estimated 12-20 million illegals and ship them out. The basic logistics of such an action makes it unrealistic and pretty much impossible. It would be chaos on every front.

What we need is the most comprehensive solution we can get. At least there’s an effort to come up with a plan. No fix will get 100% support…and the longer the wait, the worst it will get.

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:03 PM

Rubio / Hillary

Great for Venezuela.

TimBuk3 on June 24, 2013 at 1:09 PM

What we need is the most comprehensive solution we can get. At least there’s an effort to come up with a plan. No fix will get 100% support…and the longer the wait, the worst it will get.

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:03 PM

unless you secure the border first the problem will never be fixed because any fix will be destroyed as more millions come across the border. It’s really simple. The American people will support by a factor of 70-30 if not more amnesty if the border is secure and the immigration security system is fixed.

Once we get the borderS under control internal enforcement of visa and student visas etc then and only then will the American people trust the gov enough to grant amnesty to all

unseen on June 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM

People who aren’t having to deal with the problems that people here illegally have caused and will continue to cause if the border is not secure are too preachy towards those of us who do. People who are deciding these issues should be forced to live in border states and send their kids to schools where half the kids don’t speak english and the other half can’t be taught because they have to wait for them. They should have to live next door to small homes packed with 12 to 15 people who use their yards for bathrooms and throw their beer cans all over. Cities are increasingly dangerous because of illegal gangs. I’m tired of preachy Republicans telling those who have to endure these problems that they are racists and mean spirited. Any plan that does not secure the border first will only increase the problems.

Rose on June 24, 2013 at 1:17 PM

There will never be another Republican elected president of this country. The re-election of Barack Hussein Obama proved that we clearly have passed the tipping point. It will only get worse over time as the welfare hatcheries, and now amnesty,will continue to assure future one party rule with new democrats being produced in large numbers. The real question is how long it will take before we become a sorry combination of Rhodesia and Venezuela?

Rockshine on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

unseen on June 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM

I agree…the border needs to be secured. And like you brought up, student/work visas, are how more than half of those here illegally got here. This brings me back to logistics…who foots the bill and controls what happens to illegals? Do the states run it, or the feds? Do we wait for an illegal to be arrested for some crime, or actively persue all leads to flush them out? What about families/children of illegals?

There’s far too much involved here. Again, every single day we sit here poo-pooing every option that comes up, the more ridiculous the amnesty is, and the harder it will be to fix it. I’m not saying we need to support the first options for dealing with this, but there’s going to have to be a little give from all sides of the issue.

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Rubio’s a pandering schmuck. G-d bless Texas…and Ted Cruz!

annoyinglittletwerp on June 24, 2013 at 1:19 PM

Trying to destroy Rubio is about the dumbest thing my fellow “conservatives” have done in 30 years.

AYNBLAND on June 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_GwDYFxb8piY/R76OFjHf7gI/AAAAAAAABGg/5r4ptGX-tlc/s400/aztlan.gif

http://www.americanpatrol.com/RECONQUISTA/MEXICANWARMApaztlan.gif

http://beforeitsnews.com/immigration/2013/03/city-billboard-urges-hispanics-to-revolt-aztlan-rising-2445702.html

“Arriba Mi Gente” by Nancy Guevara depicts a hoard of people with clenched fists and flags raised, over an image of the U.S.-Mexico border and a heart emblazoned with the Mexican flag logo. The slogan, in Spanish, plastered prominently over the artwork translates “Rise up, my people,” with the idea of uprising clearly suggested.

The Austin Visual Arts Association has teamed up with Reagan Outdoor Advertising to put up 10 pieces of art on billboards on major highways across the city of Austin, where it will be seen by hundreds of thousands in the city and millions more driving through.

One can understand why border issues would inspire art, but why did AustinArtBoards.org, which is city funded, decide to project a such a loaded racial message over major highways that English-speaking drivers can’t even understand and which drivers speeding by who could read Spanish would interpret as a call for uprising?

They even have their own flag.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glowing_flag_of_Aztlan.jpg

You better get on your freaking phones and get your friends to call the U.S. Capitol switchboard and contact their Senators and Representatives.

(202) 224-3121.

(202) 224-3121.

(202) 224-3121.

(202) 224-3121.

A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.

PappyD61 on June 24, 2013 at 1:24 PM

who foots the bill and controls what happens to illegals? Do the states run it, or the feds? Do we wait for an illegal to be arrested for some crime, or actively persue all leads to flush them out? What about families/children of illegals?

There’s far too much involved here. Again, every single day we sit here poo-pooing every option that comes up, the more ridiculous the amnesty is, and the harder it will be to fix it. I’m not saying we need to support the first options for dealing with this, but there’s going to have to be a little give from all sides of the issue.

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

triage approach I would think. Get the really bad actors off the stage first. The Islamic terrorists, the gangs, the criminals. Deport them. I say let the local, state and federal governments handle it. As long as all are following the same laws it shouldn’t be a problem who enforces it. the more boots on the ground and eyes looking the better.

The families/children should be the least concern to us, most are hard working people trying to make abetter life. Once the border is secure then these will be the first ones that should be looked at at giving a pathway to citizenship if they want it. If they don’t they can go back to their country.

assimilation must also occur and the country needs time to digest the new immigrants into the culture.

It really isn’t a complex problem to deal with, it’s hard but the answers are very simple.

unseen on June 24, 2013 at 1:27 PM

Republicans can do better than this bill. Wait tell we have a republican president, and better congressional numbers. And put security first as a prerequisite for amnesty.

This bill couldn’t be any worse for Repubs even if the Dems had super majorities in both houses. So don’t bite at the bait this time.

Repubs need to be respected for standing up for the rule of law, not ridiculed for caving to the leftists.

GET THE BORDER SECURED AND HAVE E-VERIFY (or functional equivalent) for 5 years, then do amnesty. 5 years, then amnesty, is that too much to ask?

anotherJoe on June 24, 2013 at 1:27 PM

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:03 PM

Dems said “Amnesty!” GOP said “Secure the border!” So we get a bill that gives amnesty and fails to support the border…

…and Rubio tries to sell it? It was a bad choice on his part, borne most likely of being a noob. He should have been self-aware enough to realize Chuck Schumer was playing him. He was not. I think this will have died down enough in FL by the time his reelection rolls around for him to win, and I expect him to be in the Senate for a while. I do think he killed his 2016 presidential chances, but that is a good thing. He isn’t savvy enough yet to not get rolled.

alwaysfiredup on June 24, 2013 at 1:27 PM

while 25% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

That 25% probably don’t know what Rubio is up to.

cajunpatriot on June 24, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Trying to destroy Rubio is about the dumbest thing my fellow “conservatives” have done in 30 years.

AYNBLAND on June 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM

I see it as an opportunity to destroy McCain and Graham while they were still young. Wouldn’t many Republicans relish that opportunity?

cajunpatriot on June 24, 2013 at 1:31 PM

He is a TRAITOR to the rule of law, and the borders of the sovereign nation he pretends to serve.

….and I wasted money supporting him in 2010.

PappyD61 on June 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM

Are conservatives finally beginning to understand that Rubio and his ilk are globalists, and that their interests are–and always have been–elsewhere?

Rae on June 24, 2013 at 1:32 PM

Are conservatives finally beginning to understand that Rubio and his ilk are globalists, and that their interests are–and always have been–elsewhere?

Rae on June 24, 2013 at 1:32 PM

Here’s hoping!

But it seems that what will happen is that when Rubio wins the nomination white turnout is going to be even more depressed than it was in 2012. Here’s hoping the Dem primary produces some kind of critique of globalization, cause its certainly not going to come out of the GOP and the GOP candidate has no chance.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM

the GOP candidate has no chance.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM

LOL!

alwaysfiredup on June 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM

He is a TRAITOR to the rule of law, and the borders of the sovereign nation he pretends to serve.

….and I wasted money supporting him in 2010.

PappyD61 on June 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM

Are conservatives finally beginning to understand that Rubio and his ilk are globalists, and that their interests are–and always have been–elsewhere?

Rae on June 24, 2013 at 1:32 PM

2010 was a different animal.

Limited government Conservatives were lied to in Florida. The choice was between Charlie Crist who had already snuggled up to Obama and the young Speaker of the House who was supposed to be one of the good guys. The D.C. establishment even publicly backed Crist. And let’s not forget Rush and all of talk radio was supporting Rubio as the great hope…….Once I found out that Jeb was supporting him then I stopped the contributions.

We got fooled. I admit it. I was wrong.

PappyD61 on June 24, 2013 at 1:42 PM

Here’s hoping!

But it seems that what will happen is that when Rubio wins the nomination white turnout is going to be even more depressed than it was in 2012. Here’s hoping the Dem primary produces some kind of critique of globalization, cause its certainly not going to come out of the GOP and the GOP candidate has no chance.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM

What our low-information perfesser doesn’t understand is that Rubio can’t win the primary in a year when the democratics will also be running a hot primary. In an off-year like 2012 he could have won by getting democratic crossover votes. In 2016 that won’t work.

He’ll still be the darling of the progressive media, Johnny Mac-style, but that buys a candidate fewer votes every election cycle.

If we’re really lucky, the REB will endorse him.

slickwillie2001 on June 24, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Dude is severely conservative. Lots of them kind in the party.

a capella on June 24, 2013 at 1:57 PM

JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:03 PM

Secure the border , E verify for employment , biometric or whatever for visas .
Folks that want to stay have to work at it , not have it handed to them .
If they don’t want to work for citizenship they can leave or we can deport
them .
We tried to sponsor a couple from The Netherlands several years ago .
These folks had plenty of money and a brother with family in FL .
Trust me , it was a nightmare . They really wanted to live in the US .
We couldn’t help make that happen . They would have been an asset
to this country . All they wanted to do was retire with family . Guess I’m
a little sensitive on the subject .
I’m sure we can unwind this immigration mess if we take the time and
inject a little honesty . Rubio blew it , I would not trust him again .

Lucano on June 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM

Sad to see this happen to who was once considered a rising star in the GOP.

avagreen on June 24, 2013 at 2:04 PM

May Rubio go to Hades, pronto.

All who’re for amnesty are traitors.

Schadenfreude on June 24, 2013 at 2:10 PM

Here’s hoping the Dem primary produces some kind of critique of globalization, cause its certainly not going to come out of the GOP and the GOP candidate has no chance.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM

Yer hoping for fairytales. Both parties are bought like harlots.

All other is b/s.

Schadenfreude on June 24, 2013 at 2:11 PM

There will never be another Republican elected president of this country. The re-election of Barack Hussein Obama proved that we clearly have passed the tipping point. It will only get worse over time as the welfare hatcheries, and now amnesty,will continue to assure future one party rule with new democrats being produced in large numbers. The real question is how long it will take before we become a sorry combination of Rhodesia and Venezuela?

Rockshine on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Amen.

Cleombrotus on June 24, 2013 at 2:11 PM

Trying to destroy Rubio is about the dumbest thing my fellow “conservatives” have done in 30 years.

AYNBLAND on June 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM

Being for amnesty is destroying the land, traitor.

Schadenfreude on June 24, 2013 at 2:12 PM

Trying to destroy Rubio is about the dumbest thing my fellow “conservatives” have done in 30 years.

AYNBLAND on June 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM

Shamnesty, the vote for corrupt Jack Lew, traitor Kerry, and advocating arming the Syrian rebels is the dumbest thing a conservative could do. Bush Crime Family agenda is not conservative. It’s “Bought and Paid For” corrupt crony capitalism.

Jayrae on June 24, 2013 at 3:12 PM

Do we wait for an illegal to be arrested for some crime, or actively persue all leads to flush them out?

The latter.

What about families/children of illegals?
JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Too bad for them. They get to go home too.

Dunedainn on June 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM

“The answer to this issue isn’t to simply catch the estimated 12-20 million illegals and ship them out. The basic logistics of such an action makes it unrealistic and pretty much impossible. It would be chaos on every front. ”

Again with this tired old strawman. And please detail the “basic” logistics involved that make it so impossible to do, if anyone were actually proposing to do it.

We can somehow manage the “basic” logistics of a worldwide supply chain and the use of military force anywhere on the planet, but gradually deporting a population of interlopers who had no difficulty with the “basic” logistics of entering (and leaving, and then returning to) the country, why, that’s just UNPOSSIBLE.

B.S.

A Balrog of Morgoth on June 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM

What about families/children of illegals?
JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Too bad for them. They get to go home too.

Dunedainn on June 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Conservatism. Raises a stink that the children are scarred because they saw a flash of Janet Jackson’s boob. But gleefully awaits when citizen kids are forcibly separated from their non-citizen parents. Because family values or something.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 3:35 PM

What about families/children of illegals?
JetBoy on June 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Too bad for them. They get to go home too.

Dunedainn on June 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Conservatism. Raises a stink that the children are scarred because they saw a flash of Janet Jackson’s boob. But gleefully awaits when citizen kids are forcibly separated from their non-citizen parents. Because family values or something.

libfreeordie on June 24, 2013 at 3:35 PM

As usual, our low-information perfesser fails on reading comprehension.

slickwillie2001 on June 24, 2013 at 3:40 PM

What about the families/children of every other class of criminal?

A Balrog of Morgoth on June 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM

KILL IT TODAY!

Call your Senator – or ANY Senator or Congressman – for free,
using a liberal open borders front group’s toll free number

1-888-979-7506

option 1 then Zip code for your Congressman
option 2 for Senators, then your ZIP code,
then use option 0 for Capitol switchboard and ask for anyone in DC

and open borders PICO front group pays for your call!!

http://www.piconetwork.org/issues/immigration

fred5678 on June 24, 2013 at 3:55 PM

This is Rasmussen. After the last election if I have to choose between Rasmussen and Gallup, I am going with Gallup. BTW, 58% is nothing to sneeze at. But, hey if talk radio and the blogs keep it up maybe they can destroy the guy and replace him with someone they can turn on someday.

I saw this today and thought it was interesting:

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) has put out a “myth vs. fact” sheet on the Corker-Hoeven border security amendment.

A sample:

MYTH: There’s no guarantee the Hoeven-Corker amendment will decrease illegal immigration. There are no results triggers, so there’s a chance we spend $46 billion “securing the border” and not see a substantial decrease in illegal immigration.

FACT: The amendment contains tangible, concrete triggers which ensure that Registered Provisional Immigrants (RPIs) cannot receive green cards until at least 10 years after the enactment of the bill, AND the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, the Inspector General, and GAO, certifies that:

An unprecedented surge of an additional 20,000 Border Patrol agents are deployed, maintained and stationed along the southern border, more than doubling the current force.

The Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy is deployed and operational, which includes, at a minimum, full implementation and activation of the $4.5 billion in specific technology and equipment requested by the Border Patrol to achieve full surveillance of the border.

The Southern Border Fencing Strategy has been implemented, and at least 700 miles of fencing has been completed along the southern border. (There are 350 miles of pedestrian fencing already deployed along the southern border. This amendment would double that and ensure a total of 700 miles of fencing along the border.)

The mandated electronic visa entry/exit system has been fully implemented at all air and sea ports of entry where U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers are currently deployed, which will improve the identification of those who overstay their visas.

E-Verify is being used by all employers in the country, making it virtually impossible to work in the United States illegally. . . .

MYTH: Hoeven-Corker grants instant amnesty.

FACT: In order to adjust to lawful RPI status, unlawful immigrants would be required to pay a fine, pass criminal and national security background checks, and start paying taxes. Only after ALL FIVE “triggers” of the Hoeven-Corker Amendment have been fully implemented AND at least 10 YEARS have passed can RPIs apply for a green card.

Maybe it would be more factual to say fact vs bold faced lie. If hardliners refuse to accept any of this and kill this deal no one will ever take them seriously again when they are start yapping about border control. I mean really.

Terrye on June 24, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Nudge me when his approval/disapproval is 0/100.

In the meantime KILL THIS BILL ASAP!!

Call your Senator – or ANY Senator or Congressman – for free,
using a liberal open borders front group’s toll free number

1-888-979-7506

option 1 then Zip code for your Congressman
option 2 for Senators, then your ZIP code,
then use option 0 for Capitol switchboard and ask for anyone in DC

and open borders PICO front group pays for your call!!

http://www.piconetwork.org/issues/immigration

fred5678 on June 24, 2013 at 4:12 PM

Gee, becoming Schumer’s buddy and his Republican face didn’t win Rubio one vote, who knew?
/S

Not to worry Marco, if your immigration surrender bill passes the Republican Party will cease to exist as a political force, so losing your Senate seat will of little loss.

RJL on June 24, 2013 at 4:56 PM

Rubio had better hope he accomplishes all he set out to do in term one because there’ll be no term two. He’s either incredibly stupid or a world class deceiver.

rplat on June 24, 2013 at 5:33 PM

Maybe it would be more factual to say fact vs bold faced lie. If hardliners refuse to accept any of this and kill this deal no one will ever take them seriously again when they are start yapping about border control. I mean really.

Terrye on June 24, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Maybe, you should read this:

Corker’s statement that this piece of legislation is now is just his and Hoeven’s amendment added onto the pre-existing bill is not entirely true. There are other kickbacks and loopholes laced throughout the text, as Breitbart News has reported. As Heritage Action has detailed, many other senators’ amendments to the original bill were stuffed into this repackaged of the whole bill too, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is moving toward pushing the passage of the repackaged bill out of the Senate by the end of this coming week.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/23/Sen-Bob-Corker-questions-Drudge-s-accuracy

avagreen on June 24, 2013 at 6:12 PM

Who cares what Rubio’s favorabilities are?

Let me remind here – Willard had some of the most disastrous favoribilities with the base that you could possibly get.

He was still the GOP nominee.

Nuff said.

The Ayatollahs work all that sh*t out. They’ll ensure only one establishment Repubelican is running and sally the rest of the field with conservatives that will feed on each other. Then their boy gets in by default.

And then – it’s no problem getting the conservative slaves to vote for their squish in the general – they just hype the election as “the most important in the history of the world” or something like that – and conservatives march lock step to the polls to vote for who they’ve been told is the lesser of two evils.

Rubio’s nomination chances hinge on his favorability with the GOP Ayatollahs – NOT the GOP base.

HondaV65 on June 24, 2013 at 6:50 PM

HondaV65 on June 24, 2013 at 6:50 PM

You voted for Obama and you would have no matter who the Republican nominee was.

slickwillie2001 on June 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM

avagreen on June 24, 2013 at 6:12 PM

More info on this “wonderful” bill on immigration per Lou Dobbs.…the 20,000 extra border patrol agents which are to be hired according to this bill…….won’t be hired until 2017!!. Great./

And, Lou says that “experts” say it may take up to 5 (five) years to hire all of them. And, that the powers-that-be can call it off IF the $$ are deemed to be better spent elsewhere.

In the meanwhile, the “path’ to amnesty will begin on……..DAY ONE of the passage of this bill.

And, that the powers-that-be can call it off IF the $$ are deemed to be better spent elsewhere……just like the 700 miles of border fence that was mandated to be built in 2006……
The fact that the government has built only 32 miles of double-layer fencing — out of the 700 miles that Congress mandated in 2006 — is partly the result of an amendment that Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) slipped into an omnibus appropriations bill enacted in December 2007.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/feds-have-built-only-32-miles-700-mile-double-border-fence-originally-mandated-congress

(I”m so glad that Kay Bailey is gone, I could spit.)

avagreen on June 24, 2013 at 7:50 PM

If his numbers continue to go down, Rubio will just switch parties. That’s how much of a “conservative” he REALLY is!

DixT on June 25, 2013 at 12:10 AM

Right now, I have more respect for Snowden.

TimBuk3 on June 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM

“Knock knock”

“Who’s there?”

“Marco Rubio”

“Marco Rubio who”

“Good”

NOMOBO on June 25, 2013 at 11:33 AM

Don’t worry Marco, any conservative support you lose can be made up by Hispanic illegals voting for you. Right? Right!

virgo on June 26, 2013 at 3:42 AM

Comment pages: 1 2