Letters show IRS abuse took place above Cincinnati office

posted at 8:41 am on May 29, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

We’ve heard this, more or less sotto voce, for the last couple of weeks, but until now haven’t seen solid evidence.  NBC News got the hard evidence last night from Jay Sekulow, who represents dozens of conservative groups harassed by the IRS, in the form of letters that originate well above the structure in Cincinnati that the agency claims went rogue in its enforcement of tax-exempt certifications:

Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations’ activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agency’s Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups. At least one letter requesting information about one of the groups bears the signature of Lois Lerner, the suspended director of the IRS Exempt Organizations department in Washington.

Jay Sekulow, an attorney representing 27 conservative political advocacy organizations that applied to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status, provided some of the letters to NBC News.  He said the groups’ contacts with the IRS prove that the practices went beyond a few “front line” employees in the Cincinnati office, as the IRS has maintained.

“We’ve dealt with 15 agents, including tax law specialists — that’s lawyers — from four different offices, including (the) Treasury (Department) in Washington, D.C.,” Sekulow said. “So the idea that this is a couple of rogue agents in Cincinnati is not correct.”

Among the letters were several that bore return IRS addresses other than Cincinnati, including “Department of the Treasury / Internal Revenue Service / Washington, D.C.,” and the signatures of IRS officials higher up the chain. Two letters with “Department of the Treasury / Internal Revenue Service / Washington, D.C.” letterhead were signed by “Tax Law Specialist(s)” from Exempt Organizations Technical Group 1 and Technical Group 2. Lerner’s signature, which appeared to be a stamp rather than an actual signature, appeared on a letter requesting additional information from the Ohio Liberty Council Corp.

It might have been a stamp, but even that would have had to originate in Lerner’s office.  (It’s doubtful in the extreme that the IRS commissary sells Lois Lerner signature stamps as souvenirs to employees at other facilities.) That moves the scandal up a few notches, affirming the accusations of critics that the IRS targeting was systematic, and that IRS officials who downplayed it as limited to a few agents in one office may have intentionally misled Congress.

Lois Lerner pled the Fifth, of course.  Darrell Issa has already subpoenaed her to return, thanks to her declaration of innocence at the start of that session.  She may have inadvertently waived her right to refuse to testify, but even if all she does is plead the Fifth again, Darrell Issa will undoubtedly demand answers about her signature being on these letters.

But now this is bigger than Lois Lerner.  The IRS commissioners, Douglas Shulman and Steve Miller, testified that they knew nothing of what was happening in Cincinnati.  Shulman barely acknowledged any visit at all to the branch office.  With these letters coming out of the Washington DC office, Shulman and Miller may need to start claiming the Fifth on their next Capitol Hill appearances, too.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Rogue LEADERS.

hillsoftx on May 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM

Maybe they too will read about it in the newspaper with a creeping sense of remorse.

esr1951 on May 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM

What, no Louis Renault award Ed?

geojed on May 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM

NBC must be mighty pi$$ed at the DOJ for spying on journos to keep stirring this pot. They’re practicing journalism without a Republican in the White House.

Bitter Clinger on May 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM

Bengahzi, AP, Rosen and IRS. The story for each keeps changing.
And it always changes in an upwards direction.

Jabberwock on May 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM

Need a new squirrel
-dear leader

Holder?

cmsinaz on May 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM

Here comes the Stampapalooza defense.

hillsoftx on May 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM

Bitter Clinger on May 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM

Yep, and Jay Sekulow no less.

esr1951 on May 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM

I guess NBC has now lost all credibility among liberals, obviously having been secret Tea Party shills all along.

I still think this is only the tip of the iceberg, though we’re on the way to getting to the bulk of it.

Liam on May 29, 2013 at 8:48 AM

Bush!

Good Lt on May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM

Well, someone please let the IG know about this. It seems he missed that trail apparently others are easily finding.

By the way, I see liberals have doubled down and are suggesting some of the Tea Party groups who were targeted “may have been” involved in something “unseemly”. I suppose their implication is the IRS was…right to engage in criminal activity?

More popcorn please.

Marcus Traianus on May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM

But- but- but the head of the IRS is a Bush appointee.

Lerner has bus tracks all over her now…
and they will keep their feet on her to keep her under the bus unless she comes clean.

Bensonofben on May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM

Just as there is only one person who could have authorized the “Stand Down” Order regarding Benghazi, so, the targeting of Conservatives by a branch of the US Governvent goes all the way to its CEO.

kingsjester on May 29, 2013 at 8:53 AM

Too bad the no one any longer tapes conversations in the White House, since Watergate.

SC.Charlie on May 29, 2013 at 8:53 AM

This proves more oversight is needed.

Obama is not at fault.

What difference does it make?

They deserved it, being all tea party-ish and what not.

If the sequester cuts didn’t hit the IRS so badly those left wing investigations would have been just as tough as the right!

….

HEADWINDS! BUSH!

Gatsu on May 29, 2013 at 8:53 AM

Marcus spot on…the lib talking heads are pushing the ‘groups were doing unseemly political things and should never have been declared 501c4 in the first place’ meme….so its OK that the IRS was doing their jobs defense

cmsinaz on May 29, 2013 at 8:54 AM

It might have been a stamp, but even that would have had to originate in Lerner’s office. (It’s doubtful in the extreme that the IRS commissary sells Lois Lerner signature stamps as souvenirs to employees at other facilities.) That moves the scandal up a few notches, affirming the accusations of critics that the IRS targeting was systematic, and that IRS officials who downplayed it as limited to a few agents in one office may have intentionally misled Congress.

UH OH!!

What say you Lois???

Oh, btw, Darrell, if you keep turning a blind eye to these punk democrats lying to you and failing to do anything about it, then you are letting tyranny run amok and you are weakening your Congress. Bring the hammer down on this biotch.

ted c on May 29, 2013 at 8:54 AM

By the way, I see liberals have doubled down and are suggesting some of the Tea Party groups who were targeted “may have been” involved in something “unseemly”.

Marcus Traianus on May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM

Unseemly, as in Biden or a Kennedy playing around with waitresses in a diner?

Unseemly, like OWS types defecating on police cars?

Unseemly, like six Dem senators writing the IRS to crack down on Tea Party groups?

Unseemly, like liberal pundits saying the Tea Party shouldn’t be allowed to have all that money from donations?

Is that the kind of ‘unseemly’ liberals are talking about?

Liam on May 29, 2013 at 8:55 AM

Time to give Ms. Lerner use immunity and compel her testimony.

Syzygy on May 29, 2013 at 8:55 AM

When the Obama pigs try insinuating that Tea Party and conservative groups were unseemly, simply point out to them how Obama fast-tracked his own brother’s criminal charity.

northdallasthirty on May 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM

Jay Sekelow is a good man to have on our side. Maybe it’s time for another modest donation to ACLJ, just to say thanks.

petefrt on May 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM

The Kalkines Warning

“The Kalkines warning is an advisement of rights usually administered by federal agents to federal employees and contractors in internal investigations when it is suspected that a crime has occurred. The Kalkines warning compels suspects to make statements or be fired, but also provides suspects with criminal immunity for their statements. It was promulgated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Kalkines v. United States, 473 F.2d 1391 (Ct. Cl. 1973).”

“You are being questioned as part of an internal and/or administrative investigation. You will be asked a number of specific questions concerning your official duties, and YOU MUST answer these questions to the best of your ability. Failure to answer completely and truthfully may result in disciplinary action, including dismissal. Your answers and any information derived from them may be used against you in administrative proceedings. However, neither your answers nor any information derived from them may be used against you in criminal proceedings, except if you knowingly and willfully make false statements.”

http://www.zodrow.com/archives/175

Viator on May 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM

A fish rots from the head.

myiq2xu on May 29, 2013 at 8:59 AM

Keep following the trail of breadcrumbs.

It goes all the way to the top.

bitsy on May 29, 2013 at 8:59 AM

Anybody who isn’t royally PO’ed over this is partisan to the extent that they will break laws themselves for political purposes. Or so ignorant they are incapable of taking care of themselves.

If a republican I admired had been in charge of this I would be more furious because I would have expected better.

This goes beyond partisanship and if the liberals had even a hint of integrity this would be page one, above the fold every day.

That it isn’t, proves that the liberal media has no integrity, or intention of protecting the public.

cozmo on May 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM

This proves more oversight is needed.

Obama is not at fault.

What difference does it make?

They deserved it, being all tea party-ish and what not.

If the sequester cuts didn’t hit the IRS so badly those left wing investigations would have been just as tough as the right!

….

HEADWINDS! BUSH!

Gatsu on May 29, 2013 at 8:53 AM

Don’t forget that they will also need more money to either shrink the size of the feral government OR keep control of it…

Also recall that during the beginnings of the eruptions of this latest Obamagate, that the Proggies openly cheered the oppression of those Tea Party Patriot groups by their side.

Galt2009 on May 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM

The IG report was SO THOROUGH wasn’t it? Geez mon.

PackerBronco on May 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM

the lib talking heads are pushing the ‘groups were doing unseemly political things and should never have been declared 501c4 in the first place’ meme….so its OK that the IRS was doing their jobs defense

cmsinaz on May 29, 2013 at 8:54 AM

Problem with that meme is ALL Tea Party groups were automatically red-flagged for extra scrutiny on receipt of their applications. The Left’s lie won’t fly. But they have to say something, now, I guess.

Liam on May 29, 2013 at 9:04 AM

This is way off topic but I can’t help myself.

Several weeks ago there was a post here at HA (here where made a snarky comment about a “Gatling pen” that had a link to a picture of a 4-color pen.

Today, I get an email ad from Amazon for 4-color pens.

We’re being watched.

BobMbx on May 29, 2013 at 9:08 AM

Even my little kids understand the compounding damage that can occur when trying to keep a lie going.

Bishop on May 29, 2013 at 9:08 AM

Liam: Nice one!

LASue on May 29, 2013 at 9:09 AM

Indeed liam

cmsinaz on May 29, 2013 at 9:13 AM

Notice the time/excuse line of things.

First, it was rogue agents.

Then, it was the fault of SCOTUS for its ruling in Citizens United. The logic of that line escapes me completely. Not that it matters, anyway, because it was another lie.

Now, ‘some’ Tea Party groups were ‘fishy’ (with the corollary that ALL had to have their applications held up because of that).

When will liberals get tired of being made to look like fools by their precious Obama and/or his minions?

Liam on May 29, 2013 at 9:13 AM

It might have been a stamp, but even that would have had to originate in Lerner’s office. (It’s doubtful in the extreme that the IRS commissary sells Lois Lerner signature stamps as souvenirs to employees at other facilities.)

There are over a dozen IRS employees named “Lois Lerner”. I know 3 of them personally.

~J

BobMbx on May 29, 2013 at 9:13 AM

Oh come on guys, lay off… Those agents were just at the White House for the “weekly” Easter Egg hunt practice!

Tilly on May 29, 2013 at 9:15 AM

The IG report was SO THOROUGH wasn’t it? Geez mon.

PackerBronco on May 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM

Stuff happened.
Nameless low level people are to blame.
End of report.

And that’s pretty much the same report as the one on Ben-what’s-his-name…

climbnjump on May 29, 2013 at 9:17 AM

Ask all of them flat out: What were the signals that prompted the anal probing the IRS gave to these groups?

Dog Eater has his feminine claw-prints on this, it’s just a matter of time until all the arrows point directly at his ugly mug.

Bishop on May 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM

I seem to remember the same kinds of obfuscation happening during the ’50s, was it?, when members of Congress were trying to get at the communist problems in the State Dept & elsewhere.
And nothing happened of any value.
I expect nothing will happen with any of this.
Bcs people suck.

Badger40 on May 29, 2013 at 9:19 AM

Well, here’s a warm n fuzzy thought for the morning…

In regards to the information the IRS DID collect on the TP groups that did comply…submit…to the IRS questions: Where did all this information go to?

To those lovable rascals on the Progressive Left (redundant, I know) that say that there will be “no databases” kept on the American people, I ask again, where did all those questionnaires GO to?

If they’re in a file somewhere in DC, then isn’t that a database?

If they’re not, then that really does smell a lot like harassment against a political opponent, doesn’t it?

BlaxPac on May 29, 2013 at 9:20 AM

This will go all the way to Zero.

Holder?

cmsinaz on May 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM

He’s doing a meet the press dealy to try to calm things down. I predict that event will down amazingly badly…

dogsoldier on May 29, 2013 at 9:20 AM

Don’t worry, according to Rush’s theorem, Obummer will swoop in and save the day and come out smelling like a rose.

hip shot on May 29, 2013 at 9:21 AM

Libfree has been in the Bachmann comment gloating….wonder if she will bother to make an appearance and explain to us why there is nothing to see here….

goflyers on May 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM

My sense is that Holder will be out within weeks and the WH will try to tie as much of this scandal and Benghazi to Holder as possible.

Then, they’ll dust off their hands and say. “Problem solved! Lets not dwell in the past. Forward!”

LASue on May 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM

Bigger government will prevent all this in the future…

PatriotRider on May 29, 2013 at 9:25 AM

When will liberals get tired of being made to look like fools by their precious Obama and/or his minions?

Liam on May 29, 2013 at 9:13 AM

I was thinking about this exact question over the weekend and the unfortunate answer in short is…….never.

antipc on May 29, 2013 at 9:26 AM

Don’t forget: the criteria were established a year BEFORE the number of applications increased.

OT: One thing this IRS mess is proving is that there’s no accountability. Conservatives should be screaming that we should extract as many activities from government’s hands because when it goes south, there’s no one to hold accountable. At least with conduct in the private sector you have access to the courts–assuming that liberals haven’t so compromised that system that it no longer adheres to the rule of law.

BuckeyeSam on May 29, 2013 at 9:27 AM

My sense is that Holder will be out within weeks and the WH will try to tie as much of this scandal and Benghazi to Holder as possible.

Then, they’ll dust off their hands and say. “Problem solved! Lets not dwell in the past. Forward!”

LASue on May 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM

I can’t believe they didn’t dump Holder over Memorial Day. It would have been a big deal this week, but it would have been like ripping the bandaid off quickly. Now, they might have to stick with Holder until July 4 and dump him then.

BuckeyeSam on May 29, 2013 at 9:29 AM

By the way, we can forget the polls that show that the majority of the country is tuning all of this out. It doesn’t matter. What matters is how much of the electorate, those who actually vote, are paying attention to all of these scandals. The majority of those people certainly are paying attention. Bye, bye, marxist liars.

HiJack on May 29, 2013 at 9:30 AM

A real president would fire the people who did it, and fire the people who failed to let him know it was happening.

An incompetent bystander president would just ignore the whole thing.

A president who not only knew about it, but was behind the scandal would promote some of the people involved.

The Rogue Tomato on May 29, 2013 at 9:30 AM

At least with conduct in the private sector you have access to the courts–assuming that liberals haven’t so compromised that system that it no longer adheres to the rule of law.

BuckeyeSam on May 29, 2013 at 9:27 AM

You assume too much. And way too late.

HiJack on May 29, 2013 at 9:32 AM

A real president would fire the people who did it, and fire the people who failed to let him know it was happening.

An incompetent bystander president would just ignore the whole thing.

A president who not only knew about it, but was behind the scandal would promote some of the people involved.

The Rogue Tomato on May 29, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Near-perfect. I would only add that a president who was behind the scandal would end up pardoning everyone involved at the end of his presidency. January, 2017 is going to look very interesting, indeed.

HiJack on May 29, 2013 at 9:34 AM

Well obviously people the definition of “low-level employee” is “anyone not president”.

dirtseller on May 29, 2013 at 9:34 AM

A fish rots from the head.

myiq2xu on May 29, 2013 at 8:59 AM

That’s why flies like to land on the REB’s head.

slickwillie2001 on May 29, 2013 at 9:36 AM

BobMbx on May 29, 2013 at 9:08 AM

I’m surprised we aren’t all audited.

ORconservative on May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM

The IRS must have the creepy sense that the jig is up.

The part that is missing is the timing.

One sentence one of the lawyers said yesterday on TV has baffled me. She said there was no surge in applications after the Citizens decision.

One of the big excuses has been… too many applications. But if that is a lie too?

Some one should pursue that lie, if it is a lie.

The timing was about stopping the opposition to Obama before the election.

This election fraud needs to be exposed and connected to the Press scandal and the Benghazi cover up.

The big picture indicates someone very very high up ordered all of this to get Obama re-elected.

Each individual scandal is bad, but combined they prove mass election fraud.

Is anyone looking into the involvement of the DNC and the campaign heads? That is where you will likely find the smoking guns.

petunia on May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM

Never forget, Obama knew nothing about any of this, right?
The in-the-bag-media should be laughing long and loud at this.

arand on May 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM

I’m surprised we aren’t all audited.

ORconservative on May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM

I have to wonder if Eric Withholder ever goes to orgs like HA with demands for information on posters and what the response would be.

slickwillie2001 on May 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM

Libfree has been in the Bachmann comment gloating….wonder if she will bother to make an appearance and explain to us why there is nothing to see here….

goflyers on May 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM

Brain free is a Soros troll. I’m sure it is paid to be here and other conservative leaning blogs.

njrob on May 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM

Like one of the previous posters stated.

Time for a squirrel distraction.

Some American will be sacrificed for the good of our leader.

My guess is some South American country. Not many muslims and they are doing well economically. I don’t think two diplomats getting shot at a strip club will do it.

Probably some sort of embassy attack or an enviromental incident will do the trick.

acyl72 on May 29, 2013 at 9:43 AM

I am being audited… or questioned.

petunia on May 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM

That moves the scandal up a few notches, affirming the accusations of critics that the IRS targeting was systematic, and that IRS officials who downplayed it as limited to a few agents in one office may have intentionally misled Congress.

Old hotness- low level rogue employees.

New hotness- rogue Presidency

Happy Nomad on May 29, 2013 at 9:45 AM

Like one of the previous posters stated.

Time for a squirrel distraction.

acyl72 on May 29, 2013 at 9:43 AM

It would have to be something where the rat-eared coward can show up in a photo-up, bite his lip, and hug a few victims.

Happy Nomad on May 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM

The Cincinnati office is where I had to send a huge check last month.
Just sayin’.

annoyinglittletwerp on May 29, 2013 at 9:48 AM

I seem to remember the same kinds of obfuscation happening during the ’50s, was it?, when members of Congress were trying to get at the communist problems in the State Dept & elsewhere.
And nothing happened of any value.
I expect nothing will happen with any of this.
Bcs people suck.

Badger40 on May 29, 2013 at 9:19 AM

I keep praying for a rogue Japanese airline pilot to take out the rogue government employees…

Nutstuyu on May 29, 2013 at 9:48 AM

Isn’t there some federal rule about how a company can’t receive any funding or grants from the feds if they are also under investigation?

Shouldn’t we be able to use this on the IRS–no tax payments until the investigation is concluded?

Nutstuyu on May 29, 2013 at 9:50 AM

+1 gazillion. For me this is the heart of it from the political side. It really points out how far the left has fallen.

Anybody who isn’t royally PO’ed over this is partisan to the extent that they will break laws themselves for political purposes. Or so ignorant they are incapable of taking care of themselves.

If a republican I admired had been in charge of this I would be more furious because I would have expected better.

This goes beyond partisanship and if the liberals had even a hint of integrity this would be page one, above the fold every day.

That it isn’t, proves that the liberal media has no integrity, or intention of protecting the public.
cozmo on May 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM

WitchDoctor on May 29, 2013 at 9:58 AM

Sometimes it’s not just what you see, but what you don’t see.

IG report out, the media is covering the story… no question IRS is up to no good. No excuses for the low information prez. Yet, no one has said “get those applications processed”.

The targeted conservative groups are still in limbo, aren’t they.

itsacookbook on May 29, 2013 at 10:00 AM

Rogue LEADERS.

hillsoftx on May 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM

There are no leaders in this administration.

bopbottle on May 29, 2013 at 10:03 AM

I keep praying for a rogue Japanese airline pilot to take out the rogue government employees…

Nutstuyu on May 29, 2013 at 9:48 AM

Dude…Not EVEN funny.

BlaxPac on May 29, 2013 at 10:03 AM

It would have to be something where the rat-eared coward can show up in a photo-up, bite his lip, and hug a few victims.

Happy Nomad on May 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM

Like in ‘Monroe’ OK ?
Oh, yeah, he called Moore by the wrong name.
Genius.

pambi on May 29, 2013 at 10:09 AM

Like in ‘Monroe’ OK ?
Oh, yeah, he called Moore by the wrong name.
Genius.

pambi on May 29, 2013 at 10:09 AM

But he was there so it shows he cares!
-lsm

Only haters would accuse him of phoning it in. Just like he did in is speech at Arlington National on Monday- completely without passion or emotion but all about him.

Calling Navy medics corpse-men, signing the wrong year in the guest book at Westminster Abbey, a strange sense of geography…… It is almost like all that education was wasted on a minority with less than average intelligence.

Happy Nomad on May 29, 2013 at 10:19 AM

It looks like Jay is doing this Breitbart style. Heh. :)

Bob's Kid on May 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM

A fish rots from the head.

myiq2xu on May 29, 2013 at 8:59 AM

…and the smell… when she uncrossed her legs!

KOOLAID2 on May 29, 2013 at 10:50 AM

If a republican I admired had been in charge of this I would be more furious because I would have expected better.

This goes beyond partisanship and if the liberals had even a hint of integrity this would be page one, above the fold every day.

That it isn’t, proves that the liberal media has no integrity, or intention of protecting the public.

cozmo on May 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM

Amen.

Chris of Rights on May 29, 2013 at 10:52 AM

I can’t believe they didn’t dump Holder over Memorial Day. It would have been a big deal this week, but it would have been like ripping the bandaid off quickly. Now, they might have to stick with Holder until July 4 and dump him then.

BuckeyeSam on May 29, 2013 at 9:29 AM

As I said before, it’s all about math. Right now, Obama believes that an independent Holder is more dangerous to him than one under his thumb.

Or it may be that Jarrett believes that and it’s her thumb. The point is still valid, however. Right now, they don’t want him Going Rogue.

At some point, the math may change, and they’ll decide they can live with whatever damage may come from him being outside.

Chris of Rights on May 29, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Troll free thread.

CurtZHP on May 29, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Well, someone please let the IG know about this. It seems he missed that trail apparently others are easily finding.

By the way, I see liberals have doubled down and are suggesting some of the Tea Party groups who were targeted “may have been” involved in something “unseemly”. I suppose their implication is the IRS was…right to engage in criminal activity?

More popcorn please.

Marcus Traianus on May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM

The problem with trying to pretend that the IRS was doing it’s job is the FACT that they were NOT REJECTING these groups within the normal processing time!

As odd as it is, there were NO REJECTIONS of ANY Tea Party groups in the IG report. Just endless paperwork obfuscations that only an absolutely UNACCOUNTABLE government office can apply.

In spite of all these hearings, this policy of non-responsiveness is STILL ACTIVE at the IRS TODAY!

Freddy on May 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Today, I get an email ad from Amazon for 4-color pens.

We’re being watched.

BobMbx on May 29, 2013 at 9:08 AM

I’ve had the same thing happen to me with books. Not sure how they are doing that. Is Salem selling lists of email addys?

a capella on May 29, 2013 at 12:06 PM

BobMbx on May 29, 2013 at 9:08 AM

a capella on May 29, 2013 at 12:06 PM

Look up google bot.

Its here now (with two bot). Along with bing bot.

cozmo on May 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM

Take down this biatch!

Decoski on May 29, 2013 at 3:48 PM

Well, here’s a warm n fuzzy thought for the morning…

In regards to the information the IRS DID collect on the TP groups that did comply…submit…to the IRS questions: Where did all this information go to?

BlaxPac on May 29, 2013 at 9:20 AM

Indeed.
And what was there in all of the requested information that would have PROVED that the applying organization was exceeding its allowed quota of politicking?

AesopFan on May 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM