Insurers pressured by Sebelius to fund WH-related Enroll America

posted at 9:21 am on May 23, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

At any other time in Barack Obama’s time as President, this might have qualified as a top priority for a Congressional probe.  As it is, Kathleen Sebelius’ attempt to pressure insurers to fund a White House-linked organization as a means to save ObamaCare will have to wait while Congress tries to get to the bottom of at least three other scandals — Benghazi, the IRS, and the Department of Justice’s snooping on reporters.  However, they shouldn’t ignore the Enroll America shakedown, say insurers:

The links between a nonprofit promoting President Obama’s healthcare law and the White House have created an “air of expectation” that insurers will contribute to the group, according to an insurance industry official.

Current and former administration officials have taken on leadership and fundraising roles for Enroll America, a nonprofit aiming to make sure people sign up for new coverage options. As the ties grow deeper, the organization has come to feel like “just an arm of the administration,” said one official who works closely with insurers.

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has already come under fire from congressional Republicans because she has raised money for the organization.

Thanks to ObamaCare, Sebelius and HHS can deliver devastating impacts to insurers by delaying or denying approval of their health-insurance plans for federally-approved exchanges.  After seeing what the IRS did with Tea Party and other conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, insurers have to be doubly concerned about keeping Sebelius happy.  A failure to support Enroll America might be the difference between profit and collapse, especially given the ambiguities and top-down control in the law that leaves most of the regulation to the whims of the HHS Secretary.

What are the ties between the White House and Enroll America that has insurers feeling pressured?

Several industry sources also believe the White House orchestrated a recent leadership change in which a former administration official took the reins of Enroll America. The group’s chairman disputed that account.

At the beginning of this year, Anne Filipic left the White House Office of Public Engagement to become president of Enroll America. …

Obama reportedly sat in for an hour-long meeting he was initially not scheduled to attend at all last month, and told insurance executives that the White House and the industry were now “joined at the hip” trying to make the healthcare law work.

Other big names from the administration have also pitched in to help raise money.

Nancy-Ann DeParle, a former White House deputy chief of staff and director of the White House healthcare office, has made fundraising calls on Enroll America’s behalf.

Yeah, hey …  no pressure there.  With those kind of connections, no one needs to even speak the words, “Nice business ya got there, kid. Shame if something happened to it.”

Joined at the hip indeed.  It may take a while to get to this, but the House committee overseeing HHS should start preparing to investigate this shakedown scheme soon.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Big Gubmint Shakedown…

Shocking…

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM

I Will Not Comply.

BeachBum on May 23, 2013 at 9:27 AM

Thanks to ObamaCare, Sebelius and HHS can deliver devastating impacts to insurers by delaying or denying approval of their health-insurance plans for federally-approved exchanges.

Just your run-of-the-mill fascist enterprise. Nothing new for this criminal administration.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 23, 2013 at 9:29 AM

Go get’em

cmsinaz on May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Goebbels probably pressured producers of pesticides and special sealed vehicles to fund an advertising campaign about the benefits of state killings of undesirables.

“Granny is getting old, isn’t it time to help her move on by giving her a final ride in our special exhaust-recirculating truck? Or your disabled brother, wouldn’t he be better off leaving in dignity with a lungful of Zyklon-B?”

Bishop on May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Unbelievable.

There was Hope, but there was no Change,

And there appears to be an endless supply of “theres” there….

Tenwheeler on May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM

In a courtroom, this is known as extortion.

BobMbx on May 23, 2013 at 9:31 AM

They learned from Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson.

hawkdriver on May 23, 2013 at 9:31 AM

On the Five yesterday, Gutfeld said something about the government going on a sabbatical or a time out during which it performs only the most basic functions–defense, run a court system–while we sort out all the scandals.

BuckeyeSam on May 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM

So Obama is unexpectedly going full throttle Fascist now…Cause the End justifies the Means & It’s for the children or something…

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM

First thought: the only way to permanently block shakedowns like this is to pass a law that makes it illegal for private companies to promote government programs, whether directly or through intermediaries.

slickwillie2001 on May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM

The really infuriating thing is that you know Frau Sebellius will never have to live under her own rules. Look at the woman’s face, her dead eyes, she wouldn’t even blink over signing an order to deny a few million people healthcare resources.

They’re all stone-hearted thugs, the only difference between them and the Khmer Rouge is that they’re better dressed.

Bishop on May 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM

On the Five yesterday, Gutfeld said something about the government going on a sabbatical or a time out during which it performs only the most basic functions–defense, run a court system–while we sort out all the scandals.

BuckeyeSam on May 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM

Moo and the girls are contemplating another long island vacation…Cause Y’know scandalpalooza takes a toll…

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM

Barack Hussein Capone

fogw on May 23, 2013 at 9:35 AM

Fascist, turn to the left
Fascist, turn to the right left
We are the goon squad and were coming to town
Beep beep

forest on May 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM

slickwillie2001 on May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM

ehemmmm…

The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision is to prohibit employees (civil servants) in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of the executive branch, from engaging in partisan political activity.

This is a run around Congress by Il Duce.

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM

Obama reportedly sat in for an hour-long meeting he was initially not scheduled to attend at all last month, and told insurance executives that the White House and the industry were now “joined at the hip” trying to make the healthcare law work.

Attention Lefties: This ^^^^^ is the definition of a Fascist approach to economics. That may be difficult to accept. It might even sound outrageous. But it’s not hyperbole.

visions on May 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM

Perfect opportunity to put amnesty on hold while scandals are pursued and I believe most Americans would acquiesce…but no, full throttle ahead it looks like.

hillsoftx on May 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM

These individuals are no longer afraid of the American
people….they are daring us to stop them…this is
very apparent to anyone who chooses to See it.

The Speaker of the House, John B. (and others, such as Issa)
have a singular task in front of him/them. Stop these people from carrying out their agenda…. they are not our “friends”, they
mean us harm…..IF the Republicans in the House do not
understand this, our Nation is finished.

IT IS THAT SIMPLE.

ToddPA on May 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM

Thanks to ObamaCare, Sebelius and HHS can deliver devastating impacts to insurers by delaying or denying approval of their health-insurance plans for federally-approved exchanges. After seeing what the IRS did with Tea Party and other conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, insurers have to be doubly concerned about keeping Sebelius happy. A failure to support Enroll America might be the difference between profit and collapse, especially given the ambiguities and top-down control in the law that leaves most of the regulation to the whims of the HHS Secretary.

And a month ago, I could see the Obama regime thinking they’d get away with it. But do they really think this is gonna pass the smell test with the IRS scandal getting worse by the day and the AP/FoxNews fiasco turning even the biggest Obama buttsniffers in the press into actual journalists again(even if it is only momentarily)?

Doughboy on May 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM

What are the insurers going to do when she come back for another bite at their apple and then another. This bunch in DC is never going to quit asking for more dough to fund whatever scheme they think up. Better to stand together now and take whatever hit they decide on. Maybe this banana republic house of cards will fall apart.

Kissmygrits on May 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM

The Administration has so many ongoing scandals being uncovered it’s impossible for Congress to keep up with them. Obama&Co are sure to get away with something.

Liam on May 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM

The Queen of Death – may her reign end soon

22044 on May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM

so….the insurance companies made a deal with the devil in anticipation of BIG profits, and now we’re supposed to feel sorry because the devil is going to collect its pound of flesh?

olesparkie on May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM

For those who don’t know the definition of corporatism this is what it looks like.

NotCoach on May 23, 2013 at 9:42 AM

Maybe we should just ASSUME every government agency abuse(d) their power, it’d be easier to ‘track’ all the scandals, both known and unknown.

And more believable, too.

Sir Napsalot on May 23, 2013 at 9:45 AM

Yesterday: Muslim terrorists decapitate unarmed British soldier on public street.

Today: Obama announces plan to release Guitmo prisoners to Yemen.

Way to send a message douche. Why don’t you just roll out a red carpet for these savages.

Worst and most Un-American president ever. Any color.

fogw on May 23, 2013 at 9:45 AM

Secretary Syphilis has already been caught violating the Hatch Act before, now this

J_Crater on May 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM

The really infuriating thing is that you know Frau Sebellius will never have to live under her own rules. Look at the woman’s face, her dead eyes, she wouldn’t even blink over signing an order to deny a few million people healthcare resources.

They’re all stone-hearted thugs, the only difference between them and the Khmer Rouge is that they’re better dressed.

Bishop on May 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM

And thanks to the IRS, they have lots of names to flag in health care databases for such denial. How convenient…

englishqueen01 on May 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM

As the ties grow deeper, the organization has come to feel like “just an arm of the administration,”

Is this not an example of the exact thing liberals accuse our side of doing? I think the evidence is clearly available to back up this theory: When liberals are accusing someone of doing something sinister, it’s not really an accusation…they are confessing their own sinister hearts.

Alinsky on May 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM

One of the benefits of being a corrupt, fascist government is that there are so many scandals that it’s hard to keep track of even one of them. Thus each individual tree gets lost amidst the forest.

rbj on May 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM

Way to send a message douche. Why don’t you just roll out a red carpet for these savages.

Worst and most Un-American president ever. Any color.

fogw on May 23, 2013 at 9:45 AM

Wait till those freed get good lawyers and the lawsuits start.

Liam on May 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM

Enroll America? A non-profit organization? Everything becomes a campaign fundraising opportunity. Bribe solicitation in other words. This is a group whose only function is to push a political agenda and comes right out of the White House. I’m sure it is very convenient that the Regime controls a friendly IRS. It’s tax-exempt status was probably approved before the charter ink was even dry in the West Wing warrens.

ironked on May 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM

Joined at the artificial hip.

docflash on May 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM

Somebody on another thread said it as simply as I ever could:

These people cannot be trusted with public money.

RiverCocytus on May 23, 2013 at 8:52 AM

Aitch748 on May 23, 2013 at 10:00 AM

“Nice insurance company you have there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

Hey it’s the Chicago Way. Al Capone would be proud of her.

simkeith on May 23, 2013 at 10:01 AM

Obama reportedly sat in for an hour-long meeting he was initially not scheduled to attend at all last month, and told insurance executives that the White House and the industry were now “joined at the hip” trying to make the healthcare law work.

Attention Lefties: This ^^^^^ is the definition of a Fascist approach to economics. That may be difficult to accept. It might even sound outrageous. But it’s not hyperbole.

visions on May 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM

But, but, but… ‘historians’ tell us that fascism is a feature of the political right. How can this happen?

slickwillie2001 on May 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM

Aebilius BROKE THE LAW that states the Federal Government can only spend the money it collects via TAXES. Being ‘over’ these companies, what she basically did was EXTORT money from them – Extortion, by the way, is ANOTHER crime!

The government is out of control. The only way to retake it is to take much needed, overdue steps…like putting people in JAIL…starting with this arrogant elitist bee-atch!

easyt65 on May 23, 2013 at 10:03 AM

The Obama administration is a criminal enterprise.

How much longer are we going to tolerate this crap?

AZCoyote on May 23, 2013 at 10:06 AM

so….the insurance companies made a deal with the devil in anticipation of BIG profits, and now we’re supposed to feel sorry because the devil is going to collect its pound of flesh?

olesparkie on May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM

The devil is going to collect his pound of flesh from the insurance companies . . . who are then going to raise premiums for customers who buy health insurance (like me, and millions of others), so that they can pay the devil his due.

It isn’t about feeling sorry for the insurance companies. It’s about feeling enraged at the criminal enterprise that is the Obama administration once again screwing over ordinary Americans.

AZCoyote on May 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM

And now for something completely different…but related…

“The long-awaited revised American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-V, was released this weekend, and it could result in more people being classified as having conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder and social (pragmatic) communication disorder.

That sets employers up for demands for “reasonable accommodation” and potential lawsuits, employers’ lawyers say — an area that already has seen dramatic growth, with the number of lawsuits alleging disability discrimination nearly doubling in five years.

“There’s potential here where every time the psychiatric profession makes changes, there tends to be an increase in diagnoses, and then it has an impact on the number of claims” in courts and equal employment opportunity offices, said James J. McDonald, a lawyer at Fisher & Phillips LLP, which represents employers in discrimination suits.

“It’s going to result in more employees going to their employers and saying ‘I have this diagnosis from my doctor and I need reasonable accommodation.’ It’s one thing to say ‘I need an adjusted work schedule because I take medication,’ another to say ‘I can’t communicate effectively with my co-workers’ or ‘I have neurocognitive disorders and can’t remember things.’ Those are going to pose challenges to employers,” Mr. McDonald said.

Mild neurocognitive disorder, as well as binge eating disorder and premenstrual dysphoric disorder, are among new diagnoses, Mr. McDonald said.

When the psychiatric professional group makes changes, there can be unintended consequences in courts and human resources offices, where an official diagnosis from a doctor can carry significant weight.

But there is not a straight line between the manual and findings of discrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and a lawyer who represents employees said.

“If there is something that is recognized as an impairment that previously wouldn’t have been recognized, that doesn’t mean that the person is either protected or that unlawful discrimination occurred. It’s just a small piece of the puzzle,” said Chris Kuczynski, a lawyer for the EEOC. “There are things in the DSM-IV that wouldn’t necessarily qualify It’s a piece of evidence, its relevant, but not necessarily dispositive.”

Still, there already has been dramatic growth in the number of disability discrimination allegations, and lawmakers repeatedly have expanded the types of disabilities spelled out in legislation.

In recent years, the EEOC drafted a letter warning that some employers could be violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by requiring a high school diploma, explaining that in some cases the requirement “‘screens out’ a person who is unable to graduate because of a learning disability.”

The act applies to businesses with 15 or more employees.

Mr. Kuczynski said that if an employee violates a workplace policy that a nondisabled employee would be fired for, a disabled employee, too, can be fired under the EEOC’s interpretation of the rules. But Mr. McDonald noted that two federal court circuits disagree…”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/19/discrimination-suits-for-disabilities-could-rise-w/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS#ixzz2U7pI3GcT
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM

“Nice insurance company you have there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

Hey it’s the Chicago Way. Al Capone would be proud jealous of her.

simkeith on May 23, 2013 at 10:01 AM

FIFY

Liam on May 23, 2013 at 10:17 AM

RICO…It’s what’s for Breakfast

workingclass artist on May 23, 2013 at 10:18 AM

Wonder how long it took the IRS to approve Enroll America’s non-profit application?

mbs on May 23, 2013 at 10:20 AM

Geez, this Administration is like a remake of The Untouchables. Is Kathleen Sebelious from Chicago too?

lea on May 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM

Visited Alcatraz this Spring. Too bad it is no longer open, it would be a great place for Sebelius, Holder, Obama et al. to spend their days. Following in Capone’s footsteps.

txmomof6 on May 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM

Barack personally shook-down the CEO of British Petroleum (BP) for $20 Billion in the Oval Office and absolutely NOTHING became of any of it. And you think shaking down insurance companies for money means anything? If Congress had any balls a special prosecutor would’ve already been appointed.

Mahdi on May 23, 2013 at 10:31 AM

And now for something completely different…but related…

“The long-awaited revised American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-V, was released this weekend, and it could result in more people being classified as having conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder and social (pragmatic) communication disorder. denied their right to own firearms.

Fixed.

BobMbx on May 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM

I want this woman in an orange jumpsuit.

CurtZHP on May 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM

We should invoke the RICO Act and nail this administration for it’s blatant racketeering.

thatsafactjack on May 23, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Goebbels probably pressured producers of pesticides and special sealed vehicles to fund an advertising campaign about the benefits of state killings of undesirables.

“Granny is getting old, isn’t it time to help her move on by giving her a final ride in our special exhaust-recirculating truck? Or your disabled brother, wouldn’t he be better off leaving in dignity with a lungful of Zyklon-B?”

Bishop on May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM

The German Propaganda Ministry made dozens of “instructional” films equating “inferior races” and other people they disapproved of with insect pests. You can find several of them excepted in the 1991 documentary Selling Murder: The Killing Films of the Third Reich.

And BTW, the first people the gas was tested on weren’t Jews or Gypsies. They were the aged, infirm, and mentally ill. That is, Germans who had the misfortune to be “insufficiently perfect”.

clear ether

eon

eon on May 23, 2013 at 10:58 AM

Somebody please help me to hope again. I just don’t see us ever getting the democrats (socialists) out of power. We are about to legalize millions of illegal immigrants that will never vote against the democrats (socialists). Catholics, as a general rule vote democrat (socialist). The Jewish community votes democrat (socialist). The blacks vote democrat (socialist). Single women vote democrat (socialist). College grads are indoctrinated and generally vote democrat (socialist). Our school age children are being indoctrinated into the socialist agenda. Who will ever be able to win an election from here into the future that is not bent toward socialism?
I want to believe we will be able to restore our republic, but it seems so very doubtful.

hilchar on May 23, 2013 at 11:01 AM

For those who don’t know the definition of corporatism syndicalist socialism this is what it looks like.

NotCoach on May 23, 2013 at 9:42 AM

Fixed for accuracy. “Corporatism” is control of government by corporate interests. The control of private enterprise by government, with government making corporate decisions based on political or “social engineering” grounds, is syndicalism.

Never confuse the two. The One really likes it when you blame his victims and rent-seekers for His machinations.

BTW, another term for syndicalist socialism is… Fascism.

clear ether

eon

eon on May 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM

We should all start learning the Horst Wessel song.

Vanceone on May 23, 2013 at 11:27 AM

And a month ago, I could see the Obama regime thinking they’d get away with it. But do they really think this is gonna pass the smell test with the IRS scandal getting worse by the day and the AP/FoxNews fiasco turning even the biggest Obama buttsniffers in the press into actual journalists again(even if it is only momentarily)?

My prediction: of course they will get away with it! This is exactly the kind of issue that they can get past the majority of people in this country who are too lazy to do the work required to maintain their freedom — even a task as simple as staying informed.

And after that they will jam “comprehensive” (oh, I how hate that word) immigration reform down our throats.

natasha333 on May 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM

What was the definition of facism again?

Don L on May 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM

Sebelius is attempting an end-run around Congress, raising money which the Congress has not authorized or appropriated.

Article I of the U.S. Constitution does not permit government officials to spend money that Congress has refused to authorize or appropriate. The Antideficiency Act makes it unlawful.

Even the bipartisan majority of the Iran-Contra Select Committee got in on the act in 1987:

“The Constitution does prohibit receipt and collection of such funds by this government absent an appropriation. This appropriation may not be evaded by use of a nominally private entity of the entity is in reality an arm of the government and the government is able to direct how the money is spent…

“Congress’s exclusive control over the expenditure of funds cannot legally be evaded through the use of gifts or donations to the executive branch. Were it otherwise, a president whose appropriation requests were rejected by Congress would raise money through private sources or from other countries for armies, military actions, arms systems or even domestic programs.” [!!!]

Katy meet Ollie. Meet Iran-Contra.

de rigueur on May 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM

Don’t forget the FDA pressuring Wrigley on their caffeinated gum too.

Mr. Bingley on May 23, 2013 at 12:05 PM

And after that they will jam “comprehensive” (oh, I how hate that word) immigration reform down our throats.

natasha333 on May 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM

Don’t blame the left for what the elitist GOP right eagerly helps do.
There is no RINO wing in the GOP, just pretend “good cop” “bad cop” wings. The GOP is the problem and Cruz has finally told the truth about them: “they can’t be trusted” or put another way, “they too are the enemy of America as founded.

Don L on May 23, 2013 at 12:05 PM

On my next tax return I am going to fill in the lines concerning Obamacare with “GFY”. I’ll let them figure out what it means.

NOMOBO on May 23, 2013 at 1:00 PM

Giatn octopus

Schadenfreude on May 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM

On the Five yesterday, Gutfeld said something about the government going on a sabbatical or a time out during which it performs only the most basic functions–defense, run a court system–while we sort out all the scandals.

BuckeyeSam on May 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM

They’ll argue about what functions are basic just like they do now.
(Cowboy Poetry Festivals, anyone?)

AesopFan on May 23, 2013 at 3:42 PM

“Corporatism” is control of government by corporate interests. The control of private enterprise by government, with government making corporate decisions based on political or “social engineering” grounds, is syndicalism.

Never confuse the two. The One really likes it when you blame his victims and rent-seekers for His machinations.

BTW, another term for syndicalist socialism is… Fascism.

eon on May 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM

We seem to be running corporatism (via lobbying and rent-seeking) and syndicalism (GM, Solyndra) at the same time.
Is there a word for that?
(In political science official jargon, not the obvious ones we can all come up with here.)

AesopFan on May 23, 2013 at 3:47 PM

We seem to be running corporatism (via lobbying and rent-seeking) and syndicalism (GM, Solyndra) at the same time.
Is there a word for that?
(In political science official jargon, not the obvious ones we can all come up with here.)

AesopFan on May 23, 2013 at 3:47 PM

“Lobbying and rent-seeking” are inherent to syndicalism. Because in its purest form (the form The One is putting in place) only those inside the club get to play, period. If you’re not on the members’ list, and not abiding by the bylaws, you’re “blackballed”, which is another way of saying “sh!t out of luck”. You won’t get contracts, you won’t get loans, and you will see your competitors getting any help they need to put you out of business.

This will include help from the unions their, and your, workers are members of. They will get “sweetheart contracts” signed, sealed, and delivered by the union bosses. You will get work stoppages, sabotage, wildcat strikes, union enforcers ensuring you cannot fire troublemakers or hire replacements, and the whole nine yards. With government “labor negotiators” accusing you of bad faith, and backing the union every step of the way.

Corporatism hasn’t existed in this country for almost three-quarters of a century, no matter what the left claims. It died before World War Two, mainly due to FDR, the New Deal, the National Recovery Act, and etc. “Coal Oil Johnny” Rockefeller, E.I. DuPont, and Tom Edison wouldn’t have gotten to first base if they’d been around half-a-century later. Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone were the last of the “robber baron” corporatist heads, and they were thoroughly tamed by FDR, using his cousin Theodore’s anti-trust laws.

We were never supposed to notice the resemblance of FDR’s NRA and Civilian Conservation Corps (aka the “Three-C Camps”) to Hitler’s German Labour Front;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Labour_Front

And even that was nothing but a copy of Mussolini’s “collectivization of industry”;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Charter_of_1927

The present “confusion” about what corporatism is, is deliberate. It’s intended to keep you from noticing what’s really going on. And to ensure that if you do notice, you’ll blame the private sector, not the ideologues in the government.

cheers

eon

eon on May 23, 2013 at 4:18 PM