Document dump: White House releases 100 pages of Benghazi e-mails

posted at 8:01 pm on May 15, 2013 by Allahpundit

Jake Tapper has all of them in PDF form. Click the link and let’s start crowdsourcing. This one’s the standout so far:

aq

“FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.” AQIM is “Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,” a.k.a. the group’s north African offshoot. The FBI evidently had reason to believe — and still does — that members of Al Qaeda from outside the region were involved in the attack. That didn’t make it into the final version of the talking points on September 14.

Via John Nolte and Stephen Hayes, another one. Remember when Jay Carney said in November that a “single adjustment” had been made to the initial talking points? Nope:

tp2

“Major reservations.” The very next e-mail (page 46), addressed to State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland, says that the FBI had no major concerns with the talking points. It was State who objected — specifically to the paragraph in the original talking points noting that the CIA had warned of jihadi activity before, a fact already reported by Hayes in the Weekly Standard:

nu1

Here, a bit later in the evening (page 63), is the CIA’s big scrub in response to Nuland’s concerns. The references to Al Qaeda and previous warnings by the CIA in paragraph four are gone:

nu2

Another State Department deputy, David Adams, complained earlier in the evening (page 40) that that fourth paragraph “will read to members like we had been repeatedly warned.” But they had been repeatedly warned: That was the whole point of the initial Benghazi testimony last year from Eric Nordstrom, culminating in his claim that the “Taliban is on the inside of the building” at State because they wouldn’t listen to repeated requests for more security. On the day he died, Stevens sent a cable to State emphasizing his concerns about “growing problems with security” in Benghazi. O’s critics have chased a thousand different strands of this story, but that remains the most egregious element of it. State’s diplomatic team in Libya begged them for more security and were refused. And after it was over, Nuland and Adams fretted that the public might conclude they hadn’t done enough to protect their troops if the talking points were left as is. Heaven forbid.

When push comes to shove, I think Dave Weigel’s right about tonight’s document dump. It doesn’t tell us much that Steve Hayes hadn’t already told us. The biggest point in the administration’s favor remains the fact that, from the beginning, the CIA itself erroneously thought the attack was the product of a spontaneous protest — which, of course, doesn’t justify the scrubbing of the rest of the document at State’s behest. Just one note in parting, though: Why do the e-mails start on September 14? There’d been three days of government verbiage, some of it blaming the Mohammed video, before this. When do we get those e-mails?

Update: Ace is needling me on Twitter for assuming that the “spontaneous protest” talking point was part of the CIA’s assessment from the very beginning when we’re still missing three days of interagency communications to confirm that. Fair enough.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

this proves dear leader is innocent, you racists
-tingles

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

this proves dear leader is innocent, you racists
-tingles

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

well, he certainly does seem like he’s trying to hide anything.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

When do we get those e-mails?

hell will need to freeze methinks

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM

It’s jummah already ?

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

I just can’t figure out if you believe you’re getting away with it.

Axe on May 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

a start but as allah indicated this does leave us with more questions…

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM

BUT it isn’t Friday after 4:00 PM EDT!

ProfShadow on May 15, 2013 at 8:06 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Elaborate on his Exec Priv claim on Fast and Furious.

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM

What they didn’t dump is the dynamite…

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:08 PM

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM

good point

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Interesting that the emails covering the day of the attack and two days following are “missing”. I was just a kid but wasnt there something about missing minutes on a tape that led to a resignation by some other President named Nixon? Wow its deja vu all over again.

neyney on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head).
I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Typical Lib..1) He resigned 2) He has admitted his temp role was up in June. Does that change context now?

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Yeah, when do we get the emails saying to throw the guy in California who made the video in jail.

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Look at this mess, our lives are controlled by lawyers (no offense AP) turned politicians. We should be very afraid.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

1. The emails are 3 days after the event itself.
2. The guy he fired was already going to leave next month.

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

I just can’t figure out if you believe you’re getting away with it.

Axe on May 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM

Oh, I truly think he does. He’s like his hero, believes his own BS.

BeachBum on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Yep, these emails are from September 14, 2012…so, so long ago. Did they have email back then?

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Oh, good question, probably done by Holder but not in writing. Apparently it’s a thing with him.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Benghazi, IRS Scandal, AP wiretaps, and Fast and Furious. When are impeachment proceedings against 0bama going to start?

Wolftech on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

and anyone with a brain cell knew this was forthcoming when David Axelrod was conveniently demanding this morning that Pres turn over the emails..WOLAH, 10 hrs later, we have emails….ALL STAGED.

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:11 PM

The guy he fired was already going to leave next month.

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM

leadership

cmsinaz on May 15, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Wow. I feel better now.

NOT!

ted c on May 15, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want…

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

They’re providing documentation of what ABC already scooped, not what everyone wants to know: who came up with “it was the video’s fault”? The lie that was promulgated from the top down. Obama at the U.N., Obama and Hillary in the faces of the families of the slain, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on five tv news shows. Who came up with that lie and why did everyone fall in with it? Document that.

de rigueur on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Typical Lib..1) He resigned 2) He has admitted his temp role was up in June. Does that change context now?

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM

I love how liberals never come out and admit they are liberals. They always claim to be “non-partisan” or “independent” or “moderate.”

midgeorgian on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

BUT it isn’t Friday after 4:00 PM EDT!

ProfShadow on May 15, 2013 at 8:06 PM

The way all of the scandals are growing the filthy rat-eared passerby couldn’t afford two more days of pretending he is above it all.

Special Report did a pretty good job of de-bunking some of the key points Carney was claiming even yesterday. There was nothing at all in the IRS statement other than a call for accountability which Krauthammer points out never happens with this administration. And both Holder and the rat-eared passerby tried to turn their scandals and crimes into a partisan witchhunt.

Happy Nomad on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

Were the emails just full of investigators tying the Youtube guy to the attack in Benghazi..?

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

I suggest Rudy Giuliani as the Special Prosecutor. He has experience with organized crime. Who better to investigate the RICO administration.

meci on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Yes and Nixon stood on stage and presented his tapes and told the world he was not a crook.

tbrickert on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

this is Fast/Furious II ……what % of communication was ever provided? Something like 14%….MEANINGLESS.

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

The biggest point in the administration’s favor remains the fact that, from the beginning, the CIA itself erroneously thought the attack was the product of a spontaneous protest — which, of course, doesn’t justify the scrubbing of the rest of the document at State’s behest.

As Ace is saying to you right now on twitter, are we really sure about this?

https://twitter.com/AceofSpadesHQ

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

Will David Patreus make an appearance before Issa’s committee..?

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head).
I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

The Boss just found out…
Being clueless and all..
Now he fired a person..

The new boss..
Same as the old boss..
Clueless.

Electrongod on May 15, 2013 at 8:13 PM

I was hoping there would be some pics of Hussein and his honchos looking at a live feed from Benghazi, Hussein in his mighty high-chair, Killery shreiking with delight, some underlings from Pantygone in crisp uniforms, all huddled in the Situation Room ……what happened ?

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:14 PM

What they didn’t dump is the dynamite…

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:08 PM

And likely shredded by now.

Liam on May 15, 2013 at 8:15 PM

I get that many emails in a day or two and I am several years retired. All they had to release was 100 pages? Come on this is just too dumb for anyone to swallow. He is counting on the pess to come to his rescue and I think it is only days away, then good bye scandals.

Pardonme on May 15, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

LOL! It is not over for Hillary….:)

And the IRS story is far from done for Obama…

William Eaton on May 15, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Yes, let’s see those emails from the night of the 11th to the 14th. where did the CIA get this “protest” idea. From what I’ve heard from testimony, it certainly wasn’t from the people on the ground.

Remember, State was watching and communicating in real time with the consulate.

WisRich on May 15, 2013 at 8:17 PM

Kirsten Powers just said again on Fox that the POTUS lied to the American people about Benghazi…why?

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:17 PM

How heavily redacted are they?

davidk on May 15, 2013 at 8:17 PM

Of course just like the Janet BBQ Reno DOJ scam days….

99 pages of the emails chosen to be released are “how to enlarge your manhood permanently.”

viking01 on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM

There’d been three days of government verbiage, some of it blaming the Mohammed video, before this. When do we get those e-mails?

Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Do you even know how to read?

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM
——————————

And the IRS story is far from done for Obama…

William Eaton on May 15, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Nonp’s clicking its heels faster than Dorothy.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:19 PM

Paraphrasing–”are we sure we want Congress to know that we failed to recognize the warning signs”…they knew from minute one–you boned it, you own it Shillary.

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

So is today the first time you’re proud to be an American.

RickB on May 15, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Dear Leader has problems within the White House on Benghazi…he must be insulated on the IRS and Ass. Press.
Oh, the HHS Sec may have to resign as well…

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:21 PM

I was hoping there would be some pics of Hussein and his honchos looking at a live feed from Benghazi, Hussein in his mighty high-chair, Killery shreiking with delight, some underlings from Pantygone in crisp uniforms, all huddled in the Situation Room ……what happened ?

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:14 PM

Reggie Love came over a little early and ruined the party. barkster had to leave.

VegasRick on May 15, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Obama counts on the dimwits like NonP to act like his stonewalling never existed.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Not good enough.

September 11 to 14 please.

redacted PDBs from July to Sept 15 please.

verified transmission and receipt of any Cross Border Authority Documents issued by BHO on Sept. 11/12 please.

and hurry up!

can_con on May 15, 2013 at 8:21 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Do you even know how to read?

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM

nonbrain can barely comprehend and follow simple verbal instructions. Must be related to Slow Joe Biden.

viking01 on May 15, 2013 at 8:23 PM

Let’s see the situation room photos like we did when OBL was killed.

Heh.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:23 PM

This will be as much fun as deconstructing W’s Texas ANG OERs and the 1972. variable pitch font letters. Anyone want to go over to LGF and ask Charley “The Commie Bike Racer” Johnson if he’d like to join us?

Anyone? Anyone?

The War Planner on May 15, 2013 at 8:24 PM

I love how liberals never come out and admit they are liberals. They always claim to be “non-partisan” or “independent” or “moderate.”

midgeorgian on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

Mostly seen in liberal men.

Admitting they are liberal is admitting they are less than a man.

Real men don’t rely on uncle sugar to take care of them.

cozmo on May 15, 2013 at 8:24 PM

I just can’t figure out if you believe you’re getting away with it.

Axe on May 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM

It is a parody or an HA auto-comment-machine.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 8:25 PM

I love how liberals never come out and admit they are liberals. They always claim to be “non-partisan” or “independent” or “moderate.”

midgeorgian on May 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

or “capitalisthog”.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:26 PM

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Where are the emails from 9/11, 9/12 and 9/13? And why is the there a You Tube video maker in jail?

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM

and from Jake Tapper, over 25,000 docs have not been released….but he wants Americans to believe this will appease us….

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM

i know that hyper-partisan leftists could care less, but Drudge is totally aflame

keep scrolling thru the Holder stuff

http://www.drudgereport.com/

it is a good thing that barry is such a charismatic cute lovable little leftist else the press would be having on-air meltdowns

r keller on May 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

..hope you have laid in a good supply of undies and/or Depends for the next half year or so. You’ll need to be changing your u-trau pretty regularly as this drama unfolds, tool.

The War Planner on May 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM

Will the White House make the survivors of Benghazi available for media inquiries even without revealing their identities…

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:28 PM

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM

..”hi back” from the other thread, Cindy!

The War Planner on May 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM

Kirsten Powers just said again on Fox that the POTUS lied to the American people about Benghazi…why?

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 8:17 PM

Why is she telling the truth?

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM

Anyone want to go over to LGF and ask Charley “The Commie Bike Racer” Johnson if he’d like to join us?

Anyone? Anyone?

The War Planner on May 15, 2013 at 8:24 PM

Nope. I was booted out of there years ago, back when chuckie lost his marbles.

VegasRick on May 15, 2013 at 8:30 PM

Benghazi is Fast and Furious–the islamic edition.
Eye on the ball people !!

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Obongo is already demanding credit for betraying to death at least four people? Okay then, give Zero ten years credit per count to be served at Sing Sing in the general lockup population.

viking01 on May 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Non-partisan must mean something different at Harvard Law then it does everywhere else.

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

Does it bother anyone that this is even the process? Would all of this look different if The Won had already been safely reelected? This is a lot of people trying to cover their, or their respective departments, hindquarters.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

Non-partisan must mean something different at Harvard Law then it does everywhere else.

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

He wouldn’t know. he lied about that too.

cozmo on May 15, 2013 at 8:33 PM

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

I’m starting to think that he’s trying to blackmail Harvard into paying him to shut up.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:33 PM

He wouldn’t know. he lied about that too.cozmo on May 15, 2013 at 8:33 PM

O_O that’s my shocked face.

VegasRick on May 15, 2013 at 8:35 PM

Non-partisan must mean something different at Harvard Law then it does everywhere else.

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

Some people have imaginary friends and some have imaginary schools.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM

Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

And hilarity ensues. Priceless.

Do you know why we are getting this email dump (and still many not released)? Because the Obama admin outsmarted themselves with claims that the emails being reported on were doctored. At first they wouldn’t allow their release, only to be viewed by a select few without cameras. Of course someone working from memory was going to misremember something. Once this admin played this cute little game they trapped themselves because reporters then demanded, en masse, that the emails be released.

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:38 PM

I’m starting to think that he’s trying to blackmail Harvard into paying him to shut up.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:33 PM

LOL!

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:38 PM

Non-partisan must mean something different at Harvard Law then it does everywhere else.

NotCoach on May 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM

I’m pretty sure his handle there is “janitor.”

viking01 on May 15, 2013 at 8:38 PM

This was a long time ago……
/

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:40 PM

Do you even know how to read?

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM

well, he certainly does seem like he’s trying to hide anything.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Or write.

VegasRick on May 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM

So we still don’t know who ordered a stand-down , right ?

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM

Some people have imaginary friends and some have imaginary schools.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM

And you might as well go big or go home.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:42 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

You are a weapons grade moron. The guy that got “fired” was going to leave anyways, and there are probably 100,000 emails related to Benghazi. They just threw out a bone to try to satisfy the MSM.

chewmeister on May 15, 2013 at 8:43 PM

Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

*snicker*

Keep this for future use, folks.

RedNewEnglander on May 15, 2013 at 8:44 PM

maybe it’s time to send a few hundred reporters to Benghazi and see what turns up.

they went to Alaska already.

can_con on May 15, 2013 at 8:44 PM

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

NonP concurs.

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM

. Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

That’s not even true but remember what WAS promised:

“most transparent administration in history”

BTW slug where did you run off to?

CW on May 15, 2013 at 8:50 PM

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM

What stand down? Nothing happened between 9/11 and 9/13.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 8:50 PM

maybe it’s time to send a few hundred reporters to Benghazi and see what turns up.

they went to Alaska already.

can_con on May 15, 2013 at 8:44 PM
but how will that help Moochell’s kids ?

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:52 PM

Watch out for the limited hangout, or partial hangout propaganda technique:

The Limited Hangout tactic is a form of propaganda that is used to reduce backlash against an immoral or would-be illegal act (usually considered a cover-up), by making it seem like the perpetrators have come clean about their role, while still keeping important details hidden. By releasing information that was previously secret or not yet acknowledged, backlash is reduced because some people will believe the cover-up has been fully exposed and admitted to.

Because only some information is hung out or revealed, it is called a limited hangout. Like a pressure valve releasing steam to keep the pipes in order, the perpetrators release a limited amount of information to keep the full truth hidden and to save them from further repercussions.

INC on May 15, 2013 at 7:12 PM

http://wideshut.co.uk/limited-hangout/

Fallon on May 15, 2013 at 8:56 PM

burrata on May 15, 2013 at 8:52 PM

can’t begin to imagine their dinner conversations this week. shudder

can_con on May 15, 2013 at 8:58 PM

gaze

APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 15, 2013 at 9:00 PM

INC on May 15, 2013 at 7:12 PM
Dang! beat me to it.

flackcatcher on May 15, 2013 at 9:00 PM

Jake Tapper has all of them in PDF form.

Tapper may have gotten them in pdf form, but CNN converted it to 100 individual gifs and put it in an online container which prevents you from downloading the them.

Amazing, though, that in an era of e-mail and digital printing, these copies of emails are about as good a quality as carbon copies from the 1960′s. Do they run these things through some special printing software that has a ‘speckle and blur mode’?

Dusty on May 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM

Only way Obama could look worse would be him doing the News Conferance tomorrow with his finger up his bung hole.

Man has no pride, no honor, and the whole is just a fading faked up troll type.

APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM

The White House is in a flat spin, and losing attitude fast. Welcome to the 21st century news cycle.

flackcatcher on May 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM

“scandals”

sesquipedalian on May 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM

We need to just say no.

APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM

More of a low altitude stall spin , may have been a back stall near the ground.

APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 15, 2013 at 9:05 PM

What kind of leak is there that the DOJ needs to be able to get phone records from AP journalists and the House of Representatives without either Obama or Holder knowing about it?

ninjapirate on May 15, 2013 at 9:06 PM

Gotta give the WH credit, they’re giving their critics what they want (this doc release plus Obama’s quick firing of the IRS head). Obama has kept his promise of having a transparent administration.

I hope ppl here can give some credit when its due.

nonpartisan on May 15, 2013 at 8:03 PM

LOL!

The IRS guy was leaving in 2 weeks.

And, the doc dump tonight doesn’t change ANY of this:

Benghazi: The Definitive Timeline

Read it and weep, princess.

Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM

Comment pages: 1 2