White House holds Benghazi briefing with reporters — off the record; Update: More whistleblowers coming? Update: “Deep background”

posted at 2:41 pm on May 10, 2013 by Allahpundit

If there’s one thing you want to do when accusations are flying about an attempted cover up and a disinterested, collusive media, it’s holding an off-the-record briefing.

Time for the team to huddle.

The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO.

The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting.

The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

Were they discussing troop movements or something? What reason could there be to go off the record, and why would the press agree to it? If there’s classified material involved, just redact the bits that can’t be publicized. Or maybe I have this wrong; maybe the reason Carney wanted to huddle is because Ron Fournier was onto something this morning in sensing that the White House is trying to point a finger at Hillary and the State Department for redacting the first draft of the CIA’s talking points. For obvious reasons, if Carney wants to steer them in that direction, he wouldn’t want to do it on the record. Then again, there’s no reason to task the White House press secretary with that; if Team O wants to push Hillary under the bus, they’ll do it the old-fashioned way, through anonymous leaks. So again, why is this briefing off the record?

Fun sidenote via Ari Fleischer:

While we’re on the subject of media collusion, what on earth does this mean?

“Scandal is a strong word,” Roberts replied, to which Scarborough asked, “What is a couple notches below a scandal? Kerfuffle? Four people are dead.”

“The first ambassador killed since 1979 — it is serious,” he continued. “You talk about overplaying your hand. If a lot of people on the far right hadn’t overplayed their hand on Benghazi and were screaming — before they knew what they were screaming about — I think we would all be much harder on the administration right now.”

What?

Because the “far right” was screaming about Benghazi, you couldn’t judge for yourself whether it was a bona fide scandal? Or is he saying that he could judge, but chose not to because any scandal that might potentially vindicate the “far right” isn’t worth exploring unless/until there’s been six-to-eight months of revelations?

I’ll leave you with this from loyal Clintonite water-carrier Paul Begala, the same hack troll who defended Harry Reid’s nasty conspiratorial smear about Mitt Romney’s tax returns last year: “I think the way [Hillary] has dealt with this has been admirable. And Republicans are treading awfully close to the tin foil hat.”

Update: Did this come up at the briefing? I guess we’ll never know.

Update: As if by magic, now that there’s been an outburst about it online and on Twitter, the “off the record” meeting has transformed into one that’s “deep background,” whatever that means. Dylan Byers explains:

Correction: An earlier version of this post incorrectly referred to the meeting as “off the record.” Though the existence of the meeting was off the record, it was conducted on “deep background.”

UPDATE (3:05 p.m.): I asked Earnest to explain the meaning of “deep background,” as defined by the White House, for my readers. He emails:

“Deep background means that the info presented by the briefers can be used in reporting but the briefers can’t be quoted.”


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 6

Well this won’t pour gasoline on the fire. Especially since the media has never been known to carry water for this administration.

Doughboy on May 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM

Off the record??? The most transparent administration for sure. Go back to Chicago and take your thugs with you

jaywemm on May 10, 2013 at 2:44 PM

Too bad all this didn’t involve a break-in at Dem Party HQ.

Akzed on May 10, 2013 at 2:45 PM

The libs are scared of this. They haven’t forgotten watergate. They know this can bring down alot of beloved libs. So they’ll Gosnell this story as fast as they can.

Iblis on May 10, 2013 at 2:45 PM

Optics…it’s what’s for breakfast.

squint on May 10, 2013 at 2:45 PM

If a lot of people on the far right hadn’t overplayed their hand on Benghazi and were screaming — before they knew what they were screaming about — I think we would all be much harder on the administration right now.”

Kinda like Toomey saying that Manchin/Toomey failed because Repubs didn’t want to give the President a victory.

So if only the far right hadn’t overreacted, the Progs might have looked into Benghazi.

Suuuuure.

Bishop?

Hill60 on May 10, 2013 at 2:46 PM

From the ‘most transparent administration’…EVAH!

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM

The lap dogs got their lock step marching orders. What will be the words or phrase they will all repeat as a chorus on the Sunday morning shows? Rush will have the montage on Monday.

Brat on May 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM

Is this a Journolist reunion?

geojed on May 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM

media collusion

That. Or maybe coercion.

Arnold Yabenson on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

if Team O wants to push Hillary under the bus, they’ll do it the old-fashioned way, through anonymous leaks.

Keep an eye on Biden and his people. Biden wants to be POTUS and, he believes, that Hillary stands in his way.

Of course, there is MUCH more standing in the way of a Biden presidency.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Was anyone from FOXnews there?

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Off-the-record briefing, messaging strategy session…po-tay-to, po-tah-to

Christien on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Most transparently corrupt administration ever.

Incompetence would explain embracing the Arab “spring” and the Muslim Brotherhood. Incompetence would explain setting up a light footprint consulate in Benghazi. But when your intelligence agencies, foreign intelligencies and your own, on the ground, ambassador are screaming that security is a major issue and you do nothing, that’s not incompetency. That’s a depraved indifference to reality.

Dear Liar is divorced from reality.

rbj on May 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM

Carney pressed delayed to be at 3:15. Friday doc dump.

Brat on May 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM

When would a Bush press secretary get away with an off-the-record meeting on the Iraq war?

Bitter Clinger on May 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM

Can you imagine a Republican administration asking for such a thing?

“Off the record?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!”

CurtZHP on May 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM

White House holds Benghazi briefing with reporters — off the record

Translation :
Fluffernutters given kneepads to do their ” jobs”
in the White House

burrata on May 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Can you say John Kerry 2016?

Brat on May 10, 2013 at 2:52 PM

Keep an eye on Biden and his people. Biden wants to be POTUS and, he believes, that Hillary stands in his way.

Of course, there is MUCH more standing in the way of a Biden presidency.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Such as Joe Biden.

Bitter Clinger on May 10, 2013 at 2:53 PM

Four dead in Benghazi is not optimal.

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 2:53 PM

White House holds Benghazi briefing with reporters — off the record; Update: More whistleblowers coming?

May 10, 2013 2:41 PM by Allahpundit
12 Comments »

The most transparent administration ever.

This is still on the White House web site:

President Obama has committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history…

Ramirez’s take:

http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?id=616043

ITguy on May 10, 2013 at 2:54 PM

On the up-date about more whistleblowers, I sure hope to goodness this is true.
L

letget on May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM

Popcorn stocks….. on the way up, eh AllahP/???

ted c on May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM

Just another day at the WH, cover up…

Yeah, make sure the LSFM is in total lock step as ya’ll report the same wet shinola!!

Bushs’ fault, Repub witch hunt, raaaaaaaaacist rightists…blah blah blah…

Fother Muckers…

* SPIT *

Four MEN died for heavens sake… no one is gonna be held accountable?

The LIES!

My Ire is Irked all over again…

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM

Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.

- David Burge ‏@iowahawkblog
http://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/332494589934047234

ITguy on May 10, 2013 at 2:56 PM

ITguy on May 10, 2013 at 2:54 PM

hahaha… thanks for posting :-)

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 2:57 PM

You don’t have to be transparent, you just have to say you are. The “low information” public/voters don’t pay much attention to what is going on anyway…..Just give them Bread & Circus!

gullxn on May 10, 2013 at 2:57 PM

We are currently 3 whistleblowers, 1 drum beater and a trombonist away from a marching band.

Perhaps, just perhaps, someone can start to hear the music?

It’s musical chairs.

Obama is still standing which is bad news in musical chairs.

ajacksonian on May 10, 2013 at 2:57 PM

Very odd indeed. Suspicious, too.

WannabeAnglican on May 10, 2013 at 2:57 PM

Was anyone from FOXnews there?

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Not that I believe in conspiracy theories, but my Fox News has been off the air for about one hour.

esr1951 on May 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM

“several more” #Benghazi whistleblowers are considering coming forward, including CIA officials.

Folks, we’re witnessing the status quo of scandals.

Everyone knows that once it gets out that something nefarious is going on and its just a matter of time before it explodes wide open, the first people to come out and “get clean” are the ones who are forgiven and get the best deals. After that, its the bloodbath.

Or, rats leaving the sinking ship?

BobMbx on May 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM

If a lot of people on the far right hadn’t overplayed their hand on Benghazi and were screaming — before they knew what they were screaming about — I think we would all be much harder on the administration right now.”

What the hell does one have to do with the other?

Facts are facts. Is he really arguing that because somebody who was inclined to disagree with Obama from the start was stating facts that said facts were somehow not worthy of consideration? That the importance of the facts matter only when it comes from somebody who agrees with the administration? That’s insanely idiotic.

Perish the thought of journalists being seen doing something highly treasonous like questioning the administration without their permission or clearance.

Good Lt on May 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM

O/T, but goes along with today’s theme of cover-up, whistleblower intimidation, IRS illegality and tyranny, lies, secrecy, etc…

Pic of the Day: Book Burning Isn’t Fascist When We Do It – EnviroNazi Professors

They will always accuse you of being that which they are.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM

Say, if this is the Friday Newsdump, then what else is being hidden today that is worse than this stuff?

ajacksonian on May 10, 2013 at 2:59 PM

Rounding up the usual suspects for a circle…fest. Drafting volunteers; “We need bus drivers and bus divers!”

onomo on May 10, 2013 at 3:00 PM

If a lot of people on the far right hadn’t overplayed their hand on Benghazi and were screaming — before they knew what they were screaming about — I think we would all be much harder on the administration right now.”

Except we KNEW that which we were screaming about, Slo Joe.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 3:00 PM

Fundamentally change the way we are governed.

Ring a bell, anyone?

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:00 PM

White House staff to secret reporter meeting:

“Listen up….any of you m***er f***ers print a single word that even smells like a negative for this administration, you and your entire family will disappear into GITMO. Questions? Now get out there shovel that shit for your President”

BobMbx on May 10, 2013 at 3:03 PM

Were they discussing troop movements or something? What reason could there be to go off the record, and why would the press agree to it?

They’re getting their stories straight. Probably a few threats tossed in for good measure.

BigWyo on May 10, 2013 at 3:04 PM

I thought the president was in Texas, you know, laser focusing on jobs.

This is probably a last ditch effort to stress this is nothing more than a GOP conspiracy and give Carney his new spin orders.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:04 PM

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM

Just makes ya sick doesn’t it!

Double fracking standards…

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:05 PM

What?

Because the “far right” was screaming about Benghazi, you couldn’t judge for yourself whether it was a bona fide scandal?

When your assumption is the right is always wrong, this naturally follows.

No need to look at the facts, ask questions, and do a little investigating.

Apparently all it takes for the MSM to undergo a complete personality change — from reflexively super-skeptical, hyper-critical, and ultra-suspicious to disinterested, incurious, and trusting — is for some “right-winger” to be skeptical, critical, and suspicious about someone with a D after their name.

There is probably a psychiatric term for this condition and behavior.

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM

This administration is playing roulette in a house of cards. I’m not one to say they must be guilty of something just because the White House chose to have an off-the-record interview with the press, but if you really, REALLY didn’t want to appear to be hiding something, why not put a spotlight on it?

I mean, the White House is not hiding anything… right??

Turtle317 on May 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Can hardly wait to hear what Dana Perino has to say aout this clandestine little briefing today on The Five.

marybel on May 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Just a historical sidebar from an old timer:

Everything you are seeing now with Benghazi is reminiscient of Watergate.

The drip … drip … drip … of facts

The attempts to discredit witnesses WHILE they are testifying

The ‘off the record’ briefings for members of the press known to favor the Administration

The breakdown of the efforts to keep people from telling what they know

“It’s deja vu all over again” – C.S.

PolAgnostic on May 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Well for this time only! I will tune in to hear what Circus Clown Carney has to say…

Tho it pains me to do so :-(

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM


Beginning to look like the dam on information is breaking apart.

MSNBC hardest hit. Maybe they’ll do a ‘special’ on hamburger tonight.

GarandFan on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM

A REAL president would call a press conference and take questions.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM

Dang, just flicked over to Fox and there is a small protest outside the WH. Anyone clued in?

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM

Just a called meeting of the New Pravda…

kingsjester on May 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM

ajacksonian on May 10, 2013 at 2:59 PM

And…in the midst of this “distraction,” Putin is going to go ahead and re-arm Assad…Assad is an ally, you know. Al-Qaeda is Russia’s enemy. Not so much, for the United States, under Obama.

David Cameron, was in Russia today…trying to talk Putin into changing Russian “policy” towards Syria. Apparently, Putin is not about to toss Assad to the wolves of Mohammedist jihad.

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM

Ssss, Boom, Bah.

Pom Poms (and Kneepads) at the ready!

Del Dolemonte on May 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM

Off the record?
Cripe…… transparency at its finest
No problem we got your back
-wh press corps

Who wasn’t invited from whpc

cmsinaz on May 10, 2013 at 3:10 PM

They’re already circling the wagons:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/abcs-jon-karl-no-evidence-hillary-clinton-was-aware-163686.html

If there is any plausible deniability left in the tank it will be milked to the last drop.

stout77 on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Wow 1933 Germany. anyone supporting this is a Nazi

Conservative4ev on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

HUMA! What do I do now!

can_con on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

MSNBC hardest hit. Maybe they’ll do a ‘special’ on hamburger tonight.

GarandFan on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM

Or an in depth investigation into the possible connections between Ariel Castro and George Zimmerman.

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Tingles should be fun defending the WH and Hillary today

cmsinaz on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Any chance Candy Crowley was in the room? That would be awesome. Regardless, she should be contacted and asked about her take on this meeting and its purpose.

Christien on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Ari Fleischer ✔ @AriFleischer

Time Magazine reporter Jay Carney would have been the 1st person to object to how the WH is handling the press today.

What, Ari, did the pods snatch him away?

You still don’t get it, do you Ari? Time was never interested in being objective about the Bush administration. Nor was Jay Carney interested in being objective. The Bush media strategy was a disaster.

You think his liberal bias wasn’t there until after Rahm and Axelrod got a hold of him? What — you think this is like Jagger and Richards getting hold of Mick Taylor and burning him out?

Well-placed Republicans believing their own nonsense like this is like rowing upstream while the guys in the back are tossing out anchors.

EastofEden on May 10, 2013 at 3:12 PM

HUMA! What do I do now!

can_con on May 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Adjust your Mini-Koala, Hillgirl.

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:12 PM

“It’s deja vu all over again” – C.S.

PolAgnostic on May 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM

No kidding. I was a teen back then and didn’t pay close attention, but it was still disturbing. This is downright pathetic. If this were a GOP president in charge the news would be 24-7 Benghazi. It’s ironic though, the last scandal in the White House involved a Clinton too.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM

There is political fear all over Carney and this entire White House. A cancer approaching this presidency. You can smell it from hundreds of miles away – just watching their words and actions.

matthew8787 on May 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM

Out of the view of the public eye, the Obama administration is trying to circle the proverbial wagons and win the media over, trying to contain this potential wildfire & get them to help cover this up ‘for the good of the country’….

easyt65 on May 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM

A REAL president would call a press conference and take questions.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM

A REAL President and Commander-in-Chief wouldn’t have gone to bed while one of our diplomatic missions was under attack and the first Ambassador since 1979 was missing. He wasn’t told that Stevens had been killed until the morning of the 12th.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM

And…in the midst of this “distraction,” Putin is going to go ahead and re-arm Assad…Assad is an ally, you know. Al-Qaeda is Russia’s enemy. Not so much, for the United States, under Obama.

David Cameron, was in Russia today…trying to talk Putin into changing Russian “policy” towards Syria. Apparently, Putin is not about to toss Assad to the wolves of Mohammedist jihad.

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM

Putin probably wiped his a$$ the other day with a photo of JF’nK, laughing as he did it, while making him wait a few hours for a scheduled meeting.

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 3:12 PM

Nice line up :-)

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM

Ha, how did I scratch out my whole comment? :)

matthew8787 on May 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM

THATs what that smell is, I’m 2 hours south of DC.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM

Yepper stout… building leadership doesn’t mean Hillary

Puhleeze Karl

cmsinaz on May 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM

I believe Hillary had no idea.

Just ask Scooter Libby for the “How to go to jail when your boss screws you” manual.

budfox on May 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM

“O, what a tangled web we weave when we practice to decieve.”

Guess nobody, to include the smartest guy in the room, bothered to read their Sir Walter Scott.

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Scarborough really is a toad.

Fox’s @JamesRosenFNC reports that “several more” #Benghazi whistleblowers are considering coming forward, including CIA officials.

Boehner needs to get off his azz and set up some sort of special panel that can offer people blanket immunity in return for testimony. Under the present circumstances, if you knew something, would you risk your job, career, and life on betting that the repubs would follow through on it enough to end the nightmare? (Looking at you, Fast & Furious.)

bofh on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Anybody remember in March 1973 when the Nixon Admin unsuccesffully tried to parlay Watergate into a national security blunder that eminated from the “Bay of Pigs,” “the Cuba thing” etc etc in an effort to the get the MSM to back off to protect JFK and RFK?

matthew8787 on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Let’s ask some of the trolls why this is off the record.

docflash on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

bofh on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Totally agree with you…

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:17 PM

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM

That’s the other unanswered question…where was he?

I get the feeling that someone told the president he needed to hop on AF1 asap and get back to DC and get a handle on this thing. Maybe Hillary was threatening to spill the beans?

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:17 PM

Like we’ve said. The press is getting more brazen about their bias by the day. What lap dogs.

[MSM] “Off the record? You bet, this is really looking bad for us…um..we mean you. Do I get my scooby snack!

WisRich on May 10, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Beginning to look like the dam on information is breaking apart.

MSNBC hardest hit. Maybe they’ll do a ‘special’ on hamburger tonight.

GarandFan on May 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM

Nah, MSNBC will start running hard-core gay porn to console the masses.

redguy on May 10, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Boehner needs to get off his azz and set up some sort of special panel that can offer people blanket immunity in return for testimony. Under the present circumstances, if you knew something, would you risk your job, career, and life on betting that the repubs would follow through on it enough to end the nightmare? (Looking at you, Fast & Furious.)

bofh on May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM

This.

Boehner needs to act, quickly.

farsighted on May 10, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Yep, there is a cancer in the White House and it is the State Run Media. We need the names of the “journalists” that attended this off the record meeting…I bet it had something to do with the cover story around the CIA mission in Benghazi…WH will say we had to do it to save these CIA operators.

d1carter on May 10, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Oh to be a fly on the off the record wall :)

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM

This opinion piece from the Times says it all:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/opinion/the-republicans-benghazi-obsession.html?hp&_r=0

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:20 PM

AYFKM? An off the record press event on Benghazi…

I smell Panic on the Potomac…

workingclass artist on May 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM

Briefing now scheduled for 3:15. Stalling.

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM

Times already got their talking points, links and all…

Fer crying out loud!

* spit *

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Gosh, good thing the pro-Dem media didn’t throw a fit when Cheney held closed meetings on energy policy. Because, if they had, that would make an off-the-record meeting like this and their ignoring it rather…awkward.

Christien on May 10, 2013 at 3:22 PM

He wasn’t told that Stevens had been killed until the morning of the 12th.

Resist We Much on May 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM

So the mutt-muncher saw Americans being attacked by armed muzies in muzieland and said ” don’t wake me up until some Americans are killed” ??

burrata on May 10, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Did Nixon have off the record meetings with reporters during Watergate???…

PatriotRider on May 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM

scalleywag on May 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM

It’s already late…

Lol they working on OET!! O-0

(O Eastern Time ) wanted to say tho CPT!

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM

WH will say we had to do it to save these CIA operators.

d1carter on May 10, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Oh, sweet irony…

“We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”

Was a major source of mockery by the progressive Left back in 1968 as they marched, rioted, occupied or blew up campus buildings to protest the Vietnam War.

“We had to destroy our CIA/special ops guys in order to save them?”

Not gonna have the same heft…ya think?

coldwarrior on May 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM

I believe Hillary had no idea.

Just ask Scooter Libby for the “How to go to jail when your boss screws you” manual.

budfox on May 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM

Issa has Hillary’s signature on a document denying Stevens additonal security after 2 previous terror attacks….a cable was sent to the State Dept informing her Benghazi was a terror attack…hell, Stevens passed the word when it began that this was a terrorist attack…Obama is now admitting that HER State Department was involved in the re-write of the CIA report SHE received…when she feigned anger yelling ‘What does it matter’ she already knew the truth…and on 24 Octobe – a month and a half after the attack / she knew she was still spreading the ‘video’ lie.

Good grief…what more do people need?

easyt65 on May 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM

Um… WHAT THE F*CK?

Midas on May 10, 2013 at 3:25 PM

easyt65 on May 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM

It wasn’t her it was Robo Pen!!! /

So she never actually signed it! Can’t you hear that?! (:

Scrumpy on May 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM

Panic on the Potomac…

workingclass artist on May 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM

That has a nice ring to it.

oldroy on May 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM

Carney is asking his peeps (off the record) what he should say in the press briefing at 3:15.

LetsBfrank on May 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 6