Whistleblower: Hillary cut State’s counter-terrorism bureau out of Benghazi loop

posted at 8:41 am on May 6, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

In the previous post, I noted that Darrell Issa’s witnesses in the House Oversight hearings on Benghazi would make life difficult for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.  Fox News reported late yesterday that one witness in particular will testify that Hillary purposefully cut out of the loop the State Department’s bureau for counter-terrorism as Benghazi burned — which will prompt all sorts of questions as to why any Secretary of State would make that decision:

On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut the department’s own counterterrorism bureau out of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a “whistle-blower” witness from that bureau who will soon testify to the charge before Congress, Fox News has learned.

That witness is Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell Fox News Thompson will level the allegation against Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Fox News has also learned that another official from the counterterrorism bureau — independently of Thompson — voiced the same complaint about Clinton and Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy to trusted national security colleagues back in October.

Thompson considers himself a whistleblower, Fox reports, and wanted to tell this story all along — but the Accountability Review Board suppressed it:

Thompson considers himself a whistle-blower whose account was suppressed by the official investigative panel that Clinton convened to review the episode, the Accountability Review Board (ARB). Thompson’s lawyer, Joseph diGenova, a former U.S. attorney, has further alleged that his client has been subjected to threats and intimidation by as-yet-unnamed superiors at State, in advance of his cooperation with Congress.

Sources close to the congressional investigation who have been briefed on what Thompson will testify tell Fox News the veteran counterterrorism official concluded on Sept. 11 that Clinton and Kennedy tried to cut the counterterrorism bureau out of the loop as they and other Obama administration officials weighed how to respond to — and characterize — the Benghazi attacks.

“You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night,” the second official in State’s counterterrorism bureau told colleagues back in October.  Those comments would appear to be corroborated by Thompson’s forthcoming testimony.

To quote Hillary, what difference at this point would it make? It’s about to rain all over her 2016 parade by painting her as an incompetent, of course, but that’s actually a by-product of her own choices.  The bigger issue now is the cover-up.  Why would the Obama administration try to keep a counter-terrorism response group on the sidelines during a terrorist attack?  Who got to the ARB and made it into a CYA exercise rather than a real investigation?

Who knew what, and when?

Stay tuned, because Issa’s carrying dynamite, and it’s not clear exactly how the explosion will manifest itself.  Expect lower-level officials to throw themselves on it to protect both Obama and Clinton, but so far it looks like higher-level officials want to go on the record, and that’s bad news for the White House.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Was the purpose to protect Obama’s re-election or Hilary’s 2016 bid?

ctmom on May 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM

Mostly to cover up that Barky Hussein had more important thinks to do like rapping and partying with Jay-Z and his other hoodlum friends in Vega$.

That, and the “smartest woman in the World” is an idiot.

viking01 on May 6, 2013 at 10:27 AM

You know…. The conspiracy part of me has a question. One of the big excuses for not sending help has been “we didn’t know how long it would last”. But, what if they thought they did know? What if they were given the impression that the first attack was all there would be? Because it would be “mission accomplished” for the bad guys at that point, with the Ambassador dead. But, somebody got a taste of American blood and decided that they should take out the safe house, too – against orders. Hence, the pause between attacks, as some arguments were had, fighters rounded back up, and the second attack instigated.

Now, I won’t say who might have given the administration “impressions” or who might have given orders to the muj. But, my conspiracy side says that you probably all know who I’m thinking of. (OK, except maybe LFoD and verbaluce and a few others who couldn’t pass the Midvale School for the Gifted entrance exam [think FarSide].)

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM

This is the most despicable thing to happen during a president’s term that I can think of, it’s certainly more loathsome than anything that came out of the Nixon administration. There can be no excuse for it. None. Once this investigation is complete, will Republicans demand an impeachment?

scalleywag on May 6, 2013 at 10:15 AM

True.

Will Republicans demand an impeachment?

Obama is a historic president…Hillary represents the democratic party hopes for another historic presidency.

So my skeptical guess is…NO.

But I really hope I’m wrong and they go down in flames…Nobody is above the law.

workingclass artist on May 6, 2013 at 10:31 AM

Susan Rice was not sent to the back of the bus, she was set up and thrown under the bus and the first black president did nothing.

meci on May 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM

(OK, except maybe LFoD and verbaluce and a few others who couldn’t pass the Midvale School for the Gifted entrance exam [think FarSide].)

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM

Kid pushing on a door that says “Pull”?

Bishop on May 6, 2013 at 10:36 AM

o Hillary & Obama both argued in a Presidential Party Nominee Debate how they were each the most qualified to answer the proverbial ’1am phone call’ when this nation needed them….their cataclysmic failure that is Benghazi is a testimonty to how wrong both of them were and directly reflects their ability to be President of the United States.

o Obama administration: “The War on Terror is over / Al Qaeda is on the decline”
– Underwear bomber reaches his target & sets off his bomb, thankfully turning out to be a dud
– Maj Hassan, in communication with Al Qaeda leaders, perpetrates the Fort Hood TERRORIST ATTACK…
– Obama orders our military, who had been fighting Al Qaeda for 8 years, to aid the Al Qaeda-backed rebels (the same Al Qaeda who perpetrated 9/11) to defeat Qaddafi and take over their own nation…
– Documents show Obama orders a ‘Low Profile’ strategy in Libya which consists of NO American protection for Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi. Instead Obama/the State Dept hires those same Al Qaeda backed rebels to protect Stevens. Despite the growing presence of Al Qaeda in Benghazi (Stevens reports their flags flying over govt buildings in Benghazi & 10 new terrorist camps opened) & despite 2 previous terror attacks, Obama/Hillary rejects Stevens’ requests for additional security.
– Documents show Hillary’s signature on one document rejecting additioal security, despite her PERJURY declaring she never knew about the reqests…
– Documents show 2 months prior to the final 9/11 attack the group the State Department hired to protect Stevens notified them that with the arrival & growing presence of Al Qaeda in Benghazi that they would no longer protect Stevens. With the denial of additional security to Stevens, THIS means Stevens had / was given NO PROTECTION by the State Department/Obama administration the final 2 months he was alive.

o The CIA proved they sent cables to the White House ‘War Room’ (where Obama watched UBL be taken down) & to the State Department as soon as the attack on 9/11/12 began informing Obama/Hillary this was a terrorist attack…documents/whislteblowers now prove the administration doctored the report & concocted the cover-up LIE, the lie which Obama, Hillry, Rice & others pushed to the American people as well as under oath before Congress – perpetrating the FELONY CRIME of PERJURY!

o Someone within the administration ordered the response team 3 1/2 hrs away preparing to respond to ‘ Stand Down’ & fired the AFRICOM Commander, relieving him of command after he voiced his intent to ignore the order. The order was a BETRAYAL of Ambassador Stevens & the Navy SEALs who fought for 12 hours for their lives while waiting for help that never came! This adminsitration abandoned those Americans, & it has already been established that the response team would have gotten there in time to save those men! In order to contain the lie that the attack on Benghazi was just a protest that had gotten out of hand & the lie that Al Qaeda was on the decline (thus incapable of perpetrating this attack in such large numbers – 100+ attackers), Obama ordered the abandonment & betrayal of Americans under fire!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM

If the Middle East doesn’t erupt this week, the hearings on Wednesday should be the only headline news for the day. Good for us and bad for them.

Stand by for some media-created crisis that day as a distraction.

Fort Marcy Park should be on lockdown.

JetBlast on May 6, 2013 at 10:39 AM

2nd Presidential Debate:

ROMNEY: And there was no demonstration involved. It was a terrorist attack and it took a long time for that to be told to the American people. Whether there was some misleading, or instead whether we just didn’t know what happened, you have to ask yourself why didn’t we know five days later when the ambassador to the United Nations went on TV to say that this was a demonstration. How could we have not known?
But I find more troubling than this, that on — on the day following the assassination of the United States ambassador, the first time that’s happened since 1979, when — when we have four Americans killed there, when apparently we didn’t know what happened, that the president, the day after that happened, flies to Las Vegas for a political fund-raiser, then the next day to Colorado for another event, other political event.
I think these — these actions taken by a president and a leader have symbolic significance and perhaps even material significance in that you’d hope that during that time we could call in the people who were actually eyewitnesses. We’ve read their accounts now about what happened. It was very clear this was not a demonstration. This was an attack by terrorists.
And this calls into question the president’s whole policy in the Middle East. Look what’s happening in Syria, in Egypt, now in Libya. Consider the distance between ourselves and — and Israel, the president said that — that he was going to put daylight between us and Israel.
We have Iran four years closer to a nuclear bomb. Syria — Syria’s not just a tragedy of 30,000 civilians being killed by a military, but also a strategic — strategically significant player for America.
The president’s policies throughout the Middle East began with an apology tour and — and — and pursue a strategy of leading from behind, and this strategy is unraveling before our very eyes.

CROWLEY: Because we’re — we’re closing in, I want to still get a lot of people in. I want to ask you something, Mr. President, and then have the governor just quickly.
Your secretary of state, as I’m sure you know, has said that she takes full responsibility for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Does the buck stop with your secretary of state as far as what went on here?

OBAMA: Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job. But she works for me. I’m the president and I’m always responsible, and that’s why nobody’s more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do.
The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we’re going to hunt down those who committed this crime.
And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families.
And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That’s not what we do. That’s not what I do as president, that’s not what I do as Commander in Chief.

luckybogey on May 6, 2013 at 10:41 AM

Sources tell Fox News Thompson will level the allegation against Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013: The body of Mark I. Thompson, deputy coordinator for the State Department’s counter-terrorism bureau, was found in a Washington, DC park this evening. Park Police have concluded that Thompson died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Disclaimer: This is not (yet) true, but these things happen to Enemies of Hillary. Remember Vince Foster???

Thompson needs to be careful about telling “sources”, even those at Fox News, what he “will” testify on Wednesday, due to what can go bump in the night between now and then. Let him drop his bombshell by surprise before Congress and C-Span, then watch Hillary squirm.

Steve Z on May 6, 2013 at 10:41 AM

ALL Americans should contact their Reps and DEMAND that HILLARY CLINTON be charged with the FELONY VRIME of PERJURY before Congress, as she has been proven to have done so (they have her signature on a document denying Stevens of additional security despite her testifying she never knew anything about any request)!

If Americans do NOT demand Hillary Clinton be charged then they now and forever more concede to the wlitist politicians & this administration in Washngton that the laws of this nation do NOT apply to them & that we are ok with that!

Furthermore, those NAVY SEALs – our military – were there when Obama called to go kill UBL. Obama was NOT there for them when they called for help from him than night on 9/11/12 in Benghazi! If you do not call your representatives ASAP and demand justice for these men & for Hillary’s CRIMES…do NOT salute of clap/cheer for our troops ever again. Don’t stand and salute the flag, don’t support the ‘Wounded Warriors’ project, the USO, or any other program/project as NOT fighting for them NOW – the guys who have fought for you, is as much as a betrayal as what Obama & Hillary did on 9/11/12! Don’t just rign your hands and say, “That’s just horrible” — DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 10:43 AM

Remember when everyone believed that the democrats were out of their depth when prosecuting a war? Frankly, I believe any politician is incompetent of directing a war effort because they have too many advisers trying to cover their a$$es.

I don’t believe that Clinton or Obama wanted the ambassador dead. I do believe that they don’t care who gets hurt or dies if it protects or furthers their career and their quest for power.

Vince on May 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM

The ineptness of ‘What difference does it make’ may come to light to more than just those who already had a brain.

TerryW on May 6, 2013 at 10:47 AM

“Fast and Furious” is a prime example of what happens to whistleblowers in this government. The politicians will use them for their self interest and then discard them like they were garbage when done with them. There is to much corruption and money in Washington DC to have an effective government that protects it’s citizens. In 2016 the liberals will vote for Hillary no matter what she has done, and the Republicans will run another RINO that the grassroot Republicans will not vote for. The whistleblowers had better watch their backs, because nobody in this government will watch it for them.

savage24 on May 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM

Kid pushing on a door that says “Pull”?

Bishop on May 6, 2013 at 10:36 AM

Yep.

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM

And isn’t it fascinating that on Thurs Barry is going to Texas for the start of another I Created Jobs tour. I would love to see one brave soul shout out to him about his reaction to what these people will have testified to on Wed and watch him uh and ah and say he knows nothing about it and will have to “look into it.”

Xyz22 on May 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Steve Z on May 6, 2013 at 10:41 AM

Steve, they don’t even need him — Issa has a copy of a letter SIGNED BY HILLARY denying Stevens of additional security in Benghazi. That proves she perpetrated the Felony CRIME of Perjury before Congress last time when she declared she knew nothig about any requests for additional security!

The real questions are 1) Do the GOP have the b@lls & the moral/ethical fortitude to charge / demand Hillary be charged with a crime, & 2) If they do, will the same Justice Department that refused to charge their boss, Eric Holder, with crimes (3 felony counts of Perjury proven over Fast & Furious) agree to charge Hillary Clinton?

There are people who are ‘the glass is half full’ people, and there are ‘the glass is half empty’ people. In the question regarding the contents of the moral/ethical/legal ‘glass’ as it pertains to Obama/Hillary/this administration, I am the ‘the d@mn glass is EMPTY…and shattered’ type of guy….afraid the answer to the 2 questions above is ‘No’. :(

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Every small vision into what make the entire Obama Administration tick reveals that the Obama administration is a collection of supremely adept liars and obfuscators who cover their’s and the main dude’s ash at every opportunity, making it look like that a public record of that ability is all that is required to gain entry.

Of course, this is mainly due the fact that not one of them has any respect for any oaths of office they may have been required to take.

The coming Benghazi hearings will expose the total lack of respect for anything but the Obama agenda.

dockywocky on May 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM

I want to see Shrillary, Obumble, Slo Joe, and F&F Holder all in orange prison jumpsuits.

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Yep.

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM

Love those. I think I’ve got every Far Side collection book ever published. Those and Dilbert – which accurately portrays every company I’ve worked in.

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM

But, my conspiracy side says that you probably all know who I’m thinking of. (OK, except maybe LFoD and verbaluce and a few others who couldn’t pass the Midvale School for the Gifted entrance exam [think FarSide].)

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM

One of the best cartoons of all time.

pookysgirl on May 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Next step, Issa needs to call the film maker, Mark Basseley Youssef (AKA Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) to testify, and the law enforcement folks that arrested him need to be called in to find out who “sent” them to do that deed.

Somebody at high levels, probably in the White House, pulled the strings to get him charged and draw attention/blame away from the 0 administration.

iurockhead on May 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM

Life Imitates Art:

That witness is Jack Ryan Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the CIA’s agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell Fox News Ryan Thompson will level the allegation against Cutter Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Senator Mayo Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Rich H on May 6, 2013 at 11:03 AM

Why would the Obama administration try to keep a counter-terrorism response group on the sidelines during a terrorist attack?

.
The SCOAMF Administration had TWO driving forces regarding the Benghazi:

1) This was the most telegraphed terrorist attack EVER. We heard last fall that the bad guys spent the entire day staking out the compound. There was plenty of time to move assets into position (Predator drones with Hellfire missiles to start, SOF rescue team, etc) to deter, fight off and rescue our personnel BUT …

… that would have meant “Arab street” casualties which the SCOAMF et al were terrified of having world wide media coverage and the potential for foreign media outlets to ask, “Why was there such a large CIA presence in Benghazi?”.

2) The “Al Qaeda on the run” line from the convention would have been shown up as a complete lie and someone in the foreign press might have posed the question, “Was the large CIA operation in Benghazi using enhanced interogation techniques the Obama Administration claimed to have stopped?”

The State Department counter-terrorism response group would not have let these political problems override their mission … so they were as big of a political liability as all the U.S. personnel in Benghazi.

PolAgnostic on May 6, 2013 at 11:05 AM

I don’t believe that Clinton or Obama wanted the ambassador dead. I do believe that they don’t care who gets hurt or dies if it protects or furthers their career and their quest for power.

Vince on May 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM

o The knew 2 months before 9/11/12 that Stevens HAD NO SECURITY, and that was after 2 previous terrorist attacks. (We now know the rebels hired to protect him had ‘resigned’.)

o We know despite KNOWING the rebels would no longer protect him (if you call 2 attacks previously during which they never responded ‘protecting him’), they still DENIED requests for additional security.

o Despite in the weeks prior to his assassination Stevens reporting that Al Qaeda flags were flying over Benghazi government buildings, that 10 new Al Qaeda training camps had been opened, & that if a 3rd attack occurred & he did not have additional security HE WOULD DIE, Obama & Hillary STILL denied him additional security.

KNOWING he had no protection & would di in another terrorist attack they HED TO KNOW WAS COMING (& what better time than on the anniversary of 9/11 – especially when an Al Qaeda leader was encouraging Al Qaeda in Libya to carry out that attack on that day in response to a Libyan-born Al Qaeda leader’s death several months earlier) – KNOWING all of that & still not taking action means they KNEW he was going to die & did nothing. A lack of action WAS action – it was a death sentence. So, in a way, they DID want him dead.

And I still say that Obama & Hillary ordered the response team not to go & relieved Gen Ham from his position to prevent U.S. troop – or anyone from outside of Benghazi – from going to Benghazi during the attack. If that happened it would destroy their moronic plan to claim that the attack was nothing more than a ‘demonstration’, which is the idea they immediately pushed in the wake of the attack. “It was over a video.”

Unfortunately for THEM reality undermined their story:
– What demonstrators go to protest and just happen to be carrying AK-47s, mortars, & rocket launchers?
– The CIA testified they immediately at the start of the attack notified the WH & State Department that it was a terrorist attack.
– Those involved stepped forward to report the Response team 3 1/2 hrs away was told to Stand Down & Gen Ham was relieved of command…

and on and on….

They did not mean for those Americans to die? The order to ‘Stand Down’ really was an order that mean ‘Let them DIE’! ‘No witnesses!’ ‘No eyes on what is going on there thus no dispute of our lie that this was a demonstration!” THAT is a DESIRE for Americans to die!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 11:06 AM

Hmmmm….

“Some Obama-defenders will note that Nakoula was jailed for probation violations, of which he may have even been guilty. But, as I note in my Due Process When Everything Is A Crime piece — to be published next month, in substantially revised and updated form, by the Columbia Law Review — prosecutors can always find a reason to put someone away if they really want to. The question is, why, exactly, were they so eager to put Nakoula away?

The fast-tracking of Nakoula’s jailing was highly irregular. Among other things, I’d like to see the Congressional investigators get Nakoula’s prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Dugdale — and perhaps his boss, U.S. Attorney André Birotte Jr. — under oath about communications from the White House or the Justice Department regarding this case.

Because what it’s looking like is that Nakoula was targeted and jailed so as to provide a scapegoat/villain in a politically motivated cover story that the White House knew was false. If that’s the case, it’s extremely serious indeed, and in some ways more significant than whatever lapses and screwups took place in Benghazi. I’d also be interested in hearing from Nakoula’s attorney, Steven Seiden, about any threats made by the government to secure a plea deal.

If there’s an impeachable offense anywhere in the Benghazi affair — and at this point, I’m not saying there is — it’s more likely in what happened with Nakoula than in the problems abroad, which by all appearances are simple incompetence, rather than something culpable. Railroading someone in to jail to support a political story, on the other hand, is an abuse of power and a breach of trust….”

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/168332/

workingclass artist on May 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM

This is the most despicable thing to happen during a president’s term that I can think of, it’s certainly more loathsome than anything that came out of the Nixon administration. There can be no excuse for it. None. Once this investigation is complete, will Republicans demand an impeachment?

scalleywag on May 6, 2013 at 10:15 AM

This is another one of those “what if it was a republican” things. My guess is, if Fox is the only major net reporting on it, then probably not.

hopeful on May 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM

Some great posts. Funny troll free.

CW on May 6, 2013 at 11:09 AM

If half of what these people are saying is true, Hillary should not only “not” be allowed to run in 2016, her large ass-end should be in federal prison.

And obama should be investigated and if the fact warrant it, be impeached for bungling and then covering up Benghazi.

hawkdriver on May 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM

Looking forward to seeing this hag on the hotseat…

Pest on May 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM

Isn’t it funny how us ig’ant “Bitter Clingers were right from the get-go about this whole, horrible attack.

kingsjester on May 6, 2013 at 11:15 AM

This is HUGE. And I really dont think its gonna be swept under the rug with fast and furious.

Jack_Burton on May 6, 2013 at 11:18 AM

The last time she was ‘on the hot seat’, however, it was a disgutingly vomitous ‘love fest’ desiplay by sineless and extremely partisan politicians! “Oh, Mrs. Clinton you are so awesome, the best Sect of State we have ever had, the most incredible 1st lady – aside from Michelle Obama – to ver grace the WH living quarters, we are so honored and graced by your precense here today,….(vulgar sound of losing my lunch)…”

The MOST DISGUSTING thing to watch last time was NOT SEEING one d@mn politician angrilly jumping her @$$ & down her throat when she theatricly feigned anger and shouted ‘What does it matter who killed them’! I would have jumped so far down her throat at that point they would have had to pull me out by my boots!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM

Stay tuned, because Issa’s carrying dynamite, and it’s not clear exactly how the explosion will manifest itself.

“Who cares? It happened a long time ago.”–Jay Carney

Burke on May 6, 2013 at 11:22 AM

If you are interested in a refresher on what was happening before, during and after, here are 3 posts that I wrote on my blog last Fall, which debunked the lies then with the facts and links proving them so…

It’s 3 AM, The Phone Is Ringing, And No One In The Obama Administration Is Answering

Hey, Alice, What Does A Timeline Look Like At The Bottom Of A Rabbit Hole?

Benghazi: What Obama Really Said

ANYONE, who was paying attention, knew the truth and realised that the Obama administration was lying to the American people.

People like nobrain and brayam should be furious. They vouched for the Obama administration and have been betrayed by their Love God.

Resist We Much on May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM

They did not mean for those Americans to die? The order to ‘Stand Down’ really was an order that mean ‘Let them DIE’! ‘No witnesses!’ ‘No eyes on what is going on there thus no dispute of our lie that this was a demonstration!” THAT is a DESIRE for Americans to die!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 11:06 AM

Maybe but for what purpose? It would have been easier to bring them home.

I don’t think they have anyone to advise them on how dark and dirty the world is. I think that every day would be a new revelation to them if they were allowed outside of their cocoon of protection.

They are incompetent, figureheads but I agree that they should be held accountable as well as the people close to them.

Vince on May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM

May they rot in prison, and then, in Hell.

ultracon on May 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM

Here’s a question. If Richard Nixon had been the first Democrat black President, would there have been a Watergate?

archer52 on May 6, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Media response: “Hey is the Jody Arias verdict in yet?”

Hill60 on May 6, 2013 at 11:41 AM

Have not been able to get this song out of my head for the past few months.
Funny, reading the lyrics it seems appropriate for the Obama/Clinton dysfunctional and co-dependent relationship

All men have secrets and here is mine
So let it be known
For we have been through hell and high tide
I think I can rely on you
And yet you start to recoil
Heavy words are so lightly thrown
But still I’d leap in front of a flying bullet for you
So, what difference does it make?
So, what difference does it make?
It makes none
But now you have gone
And you must be looking very old tonight
The devil will find work for idle hands to do
I stole and I lied, and why?
Because you asked me to
But now you make me feel so ashamed
Because I’ve only got two hands
Well, I’m still fond of you, oh ho oh
So, what difference does it make ?
Oh, what difference does it make ?
Oh, it makes none
But now you have gone
And your prejudice won’t keep you warm tonight

…the Smiths 1984

breffnian on May 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM

Here’s a question. If Richard Nixon had been the first Democrat black President, would there have been a Watergate?

archer52 on May 6, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Of course not. The burglary would have been declared legal intelligence gathering, and Woodward and Bernstein would have been crucified as racists trying unfairly attack the lib messiah – who would have been conveniently out on the golf course when everything happened so he couldn’t possibly have been involved.

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM

Resolved, That [Barack Hussein Obama], President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against [Barack Hussein Obama], President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors

A transgendered lesbian can dream can’t he?

Nutstuyu on May 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM

Hey.. where’s the gay community on this? Obama sat by and allowed an openly gay ambassador to be murdered.

JellyToast on May 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM

Yeah, where’s Dan Savage? Too busy hoping for oral cancer on Sarah Palin?

Nutstuyu on May 6, 2013 at 11:57 AM

Maybe but for what purpose? It would have been easier to bring them home.

Vince on May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Again, Obama’s LIE had been for a long time that “Al Qaeda was on the run, there was no more ‘War on Terror’, & all Muslims & followers of Islam are our friend”.

He had cultivated this lie for quite a while, even going as far as declaring that the Fort Hood terrorist attack was a case of ‘Workplace Violence’, despite the massive amount of evidence to the contrary, all designed to support his lie above. A terrorist screaming ‘Allah Ackbar’ undermines the lie, so it had to be labeled a ‘case of workplace violence’!

The reason Obama wanted a ‘Low Pofile’ policy in Benghazi was because he was WELL AWARE of Al Qaeda’s growing presence there. They have the documents proving Stevens warned them about the flags over government buildings and the 10 new terrorist training camps there. Having a strong contingency of U.S. Military personnel there would most probably create a massive conflict due to the massive increase of Al Qaeda there. So, keeping a low profile, 1 Ambassador who is pretty much liked by the locals & entrusting his security to the local group of rebels was a gamble that he would draw little attention & thus be left alone.

That proved to be false as Stevens’ compound was attacked twice before 9/11/12…AND the rebel group 2 months prior to 9/11/12 informed the State Dept they would no longer protect him. The group was associated with Al Qaeda, & the new Al Qaeda leaders from the outside would not put up with them protecting him. o, Obama gave Stevens no additional security….meaning NO SECURITY.

On 9/11/12, with his lie of ‘Al Qaeda on the run/ No war on terror already on shaky ground due to his dumb@$$ decision to call the Ft. Hood attack a case of ‘workplace violence’, Obama probbly had already built the excuse that any reported attack there would be called a ‘demonstration’. This time, unlike the 1st 2 attacks, Al Qaeda succeeded in their attempt to assassinate Stevens. Obama underestimated the attack, though, which lasted 12 HOURS! The ‘lie’ could still be used, though, as long as NO ONE WAS ALLOWED INTO BENGHAZI TO SEE & REPORT DIFFEENTLY! (Why do you think it took so long for the FNI to be allowed into Benghazi? The area/site had to be ‘cleaned up’!)

The Obama LIE had to be supported….so the administration concocted the ‘Demonstration over a video’ BS that they kept pushing despite the evidence until the toilet paper on which the story was writtn began to fall apart under the weight of the evidence!

One final comment on this post….Nixon was removed from office for helping hide a few minutes of audio tape. If that was all it took to remove 1 President, this is WAY MORE THAN ENOUGH to Impeach Obama!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 11:58 AM

Has ESPN asked Zero for his Benghazi Under The Bus brackets yet?

I would guess that Zero and the Pig have enough on each other to keep each other dishonest, so expect no infighting there.

The Pig should be in prison. Think Scooter Libby, who committed no crime.

MrKleenexMuscles on May 6, 2013 at 11:59 AM

But, but Hillary is the greatest Sec State ever because she flew over a million miles!

Buy Danish on May 6, 2013 at 11:59 AM

I don’t think they have anyone to advise them on how dark and dirty the world is.
Vince on May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Dude, Obama came from CHICAGO — it don’t get no darker & dirtier than that! LOL!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM

Hillary is as slippery and slimy as a greased eel and is just trying to slip and slide out of another problem.

rplat on May 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM

Hillary’s lies are a side show.

What did Obama know and when did he know it?

farsighted on May 6, 2013 at 12:08 PM

I would feel a lot better if they just handed this whole investigation and questioning over to Rep Trey Gowdy. There is no time for pontificating. Ask the pertinent questions and nail them All to the wall.

Issa’s track record and credibility ain’t where it needs to be.

can_con on May 6, 2013 at 12:11 PM

Remember those infamous words from “Starship Troopers”.:

Hiliary Clinton, the most unyeilding President in US history

J_Crater on May 6, 2013 at 12:12 PM

What does it matter, Hillary?

“Judge Who Ended Interrogation Of Boston Bomber Without DOJ Knowledge Linked To Muslim Brotherhood”

Obama stepped in to declare the captured Boston Bomber NOT to be an ‘Enemy Combatant’ which gave the Judge the Green Light to step in to stop the questioning (potentially before too much information was gotten). Obama, the Islamic Extremist-sypathizer/supporter strikes again to protect Islamic Extremists, aided by his trusty pals the muslim Brotherhood and their associates.

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:17 PM

Life Imitates Art:

That witness is Jack Ryan Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the CIA’s agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell Fox News Ryan Thompson will level the allegation against Cutter Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Senator Mayo Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.
Rich H on May 6, 2013 at 11:03 AM

I prefer the one where the Japanese airliner crashes into the Capitol building.

Nutstuyu on May 6, 2013 at 12:19 PM

More tweets from CBS’s Attkisson:

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: U.S. Ambassador Stevens’ Deputy, Greg Hicks, has told Congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from..

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
..Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by SOCAFRICA [U.S. Special Operations Command S. Africa]

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: The account from Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama Administration…

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized.

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA cmder Lt. Col. Gibson & his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi..

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound “when [Col. Gibson] got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, ‘you can’t go now…

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight… They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Rovin on May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM

What does it matter?

From the Muslim Purchasing of the U.S. Presidentcy” 1979 article:

“Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution. Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. …

Lastly, it’s very important to note that the main source for the article is Khalid Mansour, “the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988. Though by no means definitive, it provides an interesting insight, at least, into how Chicago politics intersected with the black power movement and Middle Eastern money at a certain point in time.

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/obama-vetting-1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-arab-purchase-of-u-s-presidency/

I don’t believe in ‘consequences’…

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:24 PM

Hillary bragged that she was the quintessential expert at answering the 3am phone call when everyone knows Bill doesn’t even bother to call when he’s out that late.

Basilsbest on May 6, 2013 at 12:28 PM

This Administration should resemble a giant bag of Cheetos.

Everyone in Orange Jumpsuits

ToddPA on May 6, 2013 at 12:28 PM

I want justice done. I’m praying for justice to be done. I’m praying because I have very little hope that the humans in office right now will have the guts to make sure justice is done. I’m of a mind that it might take a little supernatural intervention to get justice done.

And not just for Bengazi, either. I’m thinking President Baby Killer and Secretary of State “Who’s Vince Foster?” have a lot to answer for.

God have mercy on our country, and deliver us from evil.

theotherone on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA cmder Lt. Col. Gibson & his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi..

Rovin on May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM

Interesting…since the AFRICOM Commander that night was General HAM, who was relieved of command that night for voicing his intent to ignore the order to stand down. Ham was since given the approval to quietly resign.

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight… They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Rovin on May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM

This just makes me sick. They could have helped…could have been there…could have responded.

But somebody’s legacy (“Al Quaeda is on the run!”) was on the line.

theotherone on May 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

Does anyone know where he is, if he’ll be called ??

pambi on May 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM

Mostly to cover up that Barky Hussein had more important thinks to do like rapping and partying with Jay-Z and his other hoodlum friends in Vega$.

That, and the “smartest woman in the World” is an idiot.

viking01 on May 6, 2013 at 10:27 AM

+1

SparkPlug on May 6, 2013 at 12:39 PM

CW just came looking for me on another thread and asked me to come post here –
For all the ‘troll go away!’ rhetoric…was a bit surprised at the invite.
But ok…here I am!

In a nutshell…my take…
This all very been here/heard that.
For all those 100% convinced of Obama’s/Hillary’s guilt here…well now you’re gaming to be 120% convinced.
I’ve always welcomed and supported a real investigation as to what went wrong.
I just don’t endorse Issa’s’ “Guilty! Now let’s have a trial.” theater.

verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM

More tweets from CBS’s Attkisson:

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: U.S. Ambassador Stevens’ Deputy, Greg Hicks, has told Congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from..

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
..Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by SOCAFRICA [U.S. Special Operations Command S. Africa]

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: The account from Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama Administration…

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized.

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
CBS: Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA cmder Lt. Col. Gibson & his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi..

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound “when [Col. Gibson] got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, ‘you can’t go now…

Sharyl Attkisson @SharylAttkisson 8m
…you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight… They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Rovin on May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM

Interesting…since the AFRICOM Commander that night was General HAM, who was relieved of command that night for voicing his intent to ignore the order to stand down. Ham was since given the approval to quietly resign.

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

So if Issa subpoenas Gen. Ham….

workingclass artist on May 6, 2013 at 12:45 PM

Let’s not forget that Benghazi happened on 9/11.

Benghazi-911

So each Clinton has their own 911.

SparkPlug on May 6, 2013 at 12:46 PM

despicable
low information voters will never know this thanks to the lsm…they rather focus on bashing palin and the nra convention

cmsinaz on May 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM

This all very been here/heard that.
verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM

So when exactly has all of this been heard before?
Care to identify when this testimony was presented in the previous Congressional hearings?

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM

Rovin on May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM

More from Breitbart.com: Benghazi Witness: Special Forces Told to Not to Provide Backup in Benghazi

CBS News is reporting that Benghazi witness Greg Hicks told congresisonal investigators that “a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command South Africa.”

Hicks also reported that SOAFRICA commander Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were prepared to board a C130 from Tripoli before the attack on the Benghazi annex. Gibson received a call saying ” you can’t go now, you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight … They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Deep doo-doo here.

petefrt on May 6, 2013 at 1:03 PM

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

Yes, subpoena Gen. Ham.

petefrt on May 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM

When everything comes out, and it WILL come out, zero and clinton’s names will be Mudd.

On top of reports of nearby military resources, it was reported on WRKO this mornign (I posted this on the other thread) A RESCUE TEAM was inbound to Benghazi. They were ORDERED TO TURN AROUND and STAND DOWN.

The president and his administration gave orders that directly caused the death of the US Ambassador. This is, without any equivocation, an act of treason, and a high crime.

Then, Obama went to bed.

dogsoldier on May 6, 2013 at 1:09 PM

In the words of that distinguished , accomplished and revered General in the eyes of the all knowing media, noted supporter of this administration (and Pottery Barn), “you broke it, you own it.”

Put on your big boy pants (and pantsuits). The cheque is past due!

can_con on May 6, 2013 at 1:10 PM

With Clinton involved – don’t be too surprised if these people started disappearing, or showing up dead – suicide of course, just like Vince Foster…..

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 1:11 PM

On top of reports of nearby military resources, it was reported on WRKO this mornign (I posted this on the other thread) A RESCUE TEAM was inbound to Benghazi. They were ORDERED TO TURN AROUND and STAND DOWN.

dogsoldier on May 6, 2013 at 1:09 PM

Whoah…

petefrt on May 6, 2013 at 1:14 PM

dogsoldier on May 6, 2013 at 1:09 PM

I don’t doubt it. One bit.

kingsjester on May 6, 2013 at 1:15 PM

Who in their right mind would send a Gay Ambassador to a Radically devout Muslim nation, with no stable government?

kingsjester on May 6, 2013 at 1:17 PM

I don’t believe in ‘consequences’…

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:24 PM

I think you meant “coincidences”.

General HAM, who was relieved of command that night

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

This point needs some backing up. I’ve seen claims about this, yet General Ham was still in charge after the incident. Flag officers are not typically “relieved of command” then reinstated to the same position within hours.

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM

I believe this was debunked awhile ago as well. Something about some other indiscretions around the same time Patraeus was canned.

can_con on May 6, 2013 at 1:24 PM

(OK, except maybe LFoD and verbaluce and a few others who couldn’t pass the Midvale School for the Gifted entrance exam [think FarSide].)

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM

Kid pushing on a door that says “Pull”?

Bishop on May 6, 2013 at 10:36 AM

Or what passes for substantive debate for some.

verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Whoah…
petefrt on May 6, 2013 at 1:14 PM

And I’ll add…..ruh roh!?!

can_con on May 6, 2013 at 1:26 PM

jon1979 on May 6, 2013 at 9:14 AM

Correct. Biden has a very strong incentive for this scandal to grow legs. First, it punctures Hillary’s ride to the nomination. Better still: if it takes Obama down, though highly unlikely, Joe becomes POTUS.

matthew8787 on May 6, 2013 at 1:31 PM

Ironically, Hillary first became known for her role in investigating a president accused of lying and cover ups.

tom on May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM

I want to see Shrillary, Obumble, Slo Joe, and F&F Holder all in orange prison jumpsuits.

dentarthurdent on May 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM

You are not the only one, sir.

kim roy on May 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM

Ironically, Hillary first became known for her role in investigating a president accused of lying and cover ups.

tom on May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM

A job from which she was ultimately fired (and nearly disbarred) for writing a legal brief that was entirely false and for stealing documents (to cover for her lies) from the Senate archives.

Stu Gotts on May 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Hillary needs her government pension[s] removed as a forfeit for incompetence as Sec. of State.

And any future political moves stopped cold.

profitsbeard on May 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM

Ironically, Hillary first became known for her role in investigating a president accused of lying and cover ups.

tom on May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM

A job from which she was ultimately fired (and nearly disbarred) for writing a legal brief that was entirely false and for stealing documents (to cover for her lies) from the Senate archives.

Stu Gotts on May 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM

It’s only bad when Republicans do it…

tom on May 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM

So Hicks was told that it would take 2-3 hrs to launch Aviano birds and no tankers were in theater. Unbelievable.

Q: Was there ever any thought at that time of the night to have an F-16, you know, fly over?

A: I called — when we knew that — I talked with the Defense Attache, Lt. Col. Keith Phillips, and I asked him, “Is there anything coming?” And he said that the nearest fighter planes were Aviano, that he had been told that it would take two to three hours to get them airborne, but that there were no tanker assets near enough to support a flight from Aviano.

******

A: And for the second time that night [Before 5:15 AM attack], I asked the Defense Attache, is there anything coming, is there anything out there to help our people from, you know, big military? And the answer, again, was the same as before.

Q: And what was that answer?

A: The answer was, it’s too far away, there are no tankers, there is nothing, there is nothing that could respond.

Source: CBS

luckybogey on May 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM

After Ham voiced his intent to ignore the order a call was made to relieve him of command so that he would not be able to send the team. He was later quietly given the approval to retire. I would subpoena am in a heart-beat. I know for a fact that he, as is the entire SpecOp community was/is outraged about what occurred on 9/11/12! I am not sure what, if any, pressures or leverage the Obama administration would/does have / had had thus far with which to threaten a retired General like Ham, though, not that this is the case.

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 2:46 PM

Ironically, Hillary first became known for her role in investigating a president accused of lying and cover ups.

How ironic…and funny as h#ll…it would be to see this b!t@% be taken down in the same way!

easyt65 on May 6, 2013 at 2:52 PM

my take…
This all very been here/heard that.
For all those 100% convinced of Obama’s/Hillary’s guilt here…well now you’re gaming to be 120% convinced.
I’ve always welcomed and supported a real investigation as to what went wrong.
I just don’t endorse Issa’s’ “Guilty! Now let’s have a trial.” theater.

verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM

Just yet another ‘Fox news says Issa’s about to prove it all’ story..
Figured I’d leave you guys to it on that one.
(And isn’t that what so many of you are always asking of me??)

verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 12:27 PM

Ooops thought this was just another FOX News piece…..not worth your time. Played.

CW on May 6, 2013 at 2:57 PM

CBS News is reporting that Benghazi witness Greg Hicks told congresisonal investigators that “a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command South Africa.”

Hicks also reported that SOAFRICA commander Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were prepared to board a C130 from Tripoli before the attack on the Benghazi annex. Gibson received a call saying ” you can’t go now, you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight … They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Funny what Verbal chooses to address eh???

Or what passes for substantive debate for some.

verbaluce on May 6, 2013 at 1:25 PM

CW on May 6, 2013 at 2:58 PM

Stay tuned, because Issa’s carrying dynamite

Oh, please. Am I the only one getting tired of the “we’re going to get ‘em this time” meme?

Has everyone forgotten these people are pro’s at the cover up AND they have the MSM in their hip pocket?

The counter argument will be:
“Streamlining communications during a crisis is necessary.”

The MSM will buy and sell that until the cows come home and will have completely dismissed this story come Friday.

CBS will have fooled you with their concern for the story on Sunday only to say “no big deal” later in the week.

Carnac on May 6, 2013 at 4:06 PM

luckybogey on May 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM

It is possible there weren’t any tanker assets in the Med. Though I doubt it. We always have birds going through the Med or Germany. This also didn’t have to be an Air Force operation* – there might have been Navy birds at Sigonella or such, as well. (Note – Navy refuelers could not support Air Force F16s, they don’t fit together.) I’m guessing (without checking the math, mind you) F16s could have reached Benghazi with drop tanks, though their return options would have been severely limited.

If they were truly serious about this, however, I know the tanker guys in England (if they were notified) would immediately begin recalling crews and making all sorts of contingency plans, just in case they were asked to help. And, I’m willing to bet every other Air Force unit did the same. And, all with the attitude that they would do whatever it took to secure our people and the site, and to begin operations against whomever had attacked.

* The Army folks in Italy work with Aviano, though, and that’s their first call – always. Whether they thought outside the box, I don’t know.

GWB on May 6, 2013 at 4:16 PM

And I’ll add…..ruh roh!?!

can_con on May 6, 2013 at 1:26 PM

Hahaha! Definitely. That’s my favorite.

petefrt on May 6, 2013 at 4:18 PM

That, and the “smartest woman in the World” is an idiot.

viking01 on May 6, 2013 at 10:27 AM

I’d like to see a takeoff on “the most interesting man in the world” starring Hillary. We need a conservative version of SNL.

slickwillie2001 on May 6, 2013 at 4:32 PM

Hillary’s CHICKENS.. are coming home to roost.

mmcnamer1 on May 6, 2013 at 5:18 PM

Keep your eyes and ears on Hannity. (Posted of this on other thread)
He just spoke with a guy who claims to have been in charge of cameras in the drone over Benghazi that night. Saw a lot; was there because of threats of impending attack/s; were not allowed to be armed.

pambi on May 6, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Of course we knew what happened from the get-go, but why bother with all this? We can’t win these things against a state-controlled media. It’s a lost cause.

MarkNY on May 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3