Weekly jobless claims fall to lowest level in 5 years

posted at 10:01 am on May 2, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Yesterday’s ADP employment report was a bust, but two other indicators out this morning ahead of tomorrow’s April jobs report look a little more promising.  Weekly initial jobless claims dropped to their lowest level in five years at 324K, a level that has correlated to significant job growth in the past:

In the week ending April 27, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 324,000, a decrease of 18,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 342,000. The 4-week moving average was 342,250, a decrease of 16,000 from the previous week’s revised average of 358,250.

The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.3 percent for the week ending April 20, unchanged from the prior week’s unrevised rate. The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending April 20 was 3,019,000, an increase of 12,000 from the preceding week’s revised level of 3,007,000. The 4-week moving average was 3,055,500, a decrease of 18,000 from the preceding week’s revised average of 3,073,500.

Two years ago, I ran the numbers from nearly a decade of data to refute the Reuters/AP myth that the 400K level correlated to strong jobs growth.  (The job-growth stagnation of the last two years put paid to that myth as well.)  The numbers showed that the correlation to stronger job growth came at the 325K level.  However, it should be noted that the correlation comes with a consistent performance at that level, and that this took place in an era of 66% labor-force participation rates, too.  And, as always, correlation is not causation, and is not a perfect indicator in any sense.

Still, Gallup also sees reasons to cheer up.  Their measure of employment to population rose sharply in April, and their measure of unemployment dropped significantly as well:

The U.S. Payroll to Population employment rate (P2P), as measured by Gallup, was 44.5% for the month of April, up from 43.4% in March. This is the highest P2P rate so far in 2013, but is still more than a percentage point lower than the 45.7% seen last October, the highest P2P rate Gallup has measured since it began tracking employment in 2010. …

Gallup defines the “workforce” as adults who are working or are actively looking for work and available for employment. The U.S. workforce participation rate in April was 68.5%, an increase over both March 2013 (67.7%) and last April (67.5%).

Gallup’s unadjusted unemployment rate for the U.S. workforce was 7.4% for the month of April, down more than half a point since March 2013, and nearly a one-point drop from April 2012. This is the second-lowest monthly employment rate Gallup has measured since it began tracking employment in 2010. The lowest monthly unemployment rate Gallup has found is 7.0%, in October 2012.

Gallup’s seasonally adjusted U.S. unemployment rate for April was 7.8%, unchanged from March 2013, but down almost a full point compared with April 2012. Gallup calculates a seasonally adjusted employment rate by applying the adjustment factor the government used for the same month in the previous year. Last year, the government adjusted April’s rate upward by 0.4 percentage points, while March was adjusted downward by 0.2 points. This explains the lack of change in the adjusted employment rate, despite the decline in the unadjusted number.

In other good news, the trade gap fell to its lowest level in three years:

Finally, the March trade deficit fell more than expected, to $38.83 billion.

The trade deficit gap dropped as imports recorded their biggest decline since 2009, the latest sign of slowing domestic demand.

The Commerce Department said on Thursday the trade gap narrowed 11.0 percent to $38.8 billion – the second smallest since January 2010.

So perhaps this may be one month where ADP undershoots the actual job-growth figure.  What do you expect it to be?  I’ll guess that the unemployment rate and participation rate remain unchanged, and we’ll see 120,000 jobs added.  Take the poll on the jobs figure:


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

why no one on Wall Street has been prosecuted for the massive fraud involved in the housing bubble crash.

libfreeordie on May 2, 2013 at 10:32 AM

I’d be happy to pile on with everyone else for this question.
I think it’s a really good question.
Can you answer it for yourself?
Here’s a corollary question that might give you a hint: How long has Obama been in the WH and Holder been the head of the DOJ?

dentarthurdent on May 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM

dentarthurdent on May 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM

I think he must have drew the short straw this morning after coming off the shortbus down at OFA/MMFA/OWS/SEIU headquarters this morning.

can_con on May 2, 2013 at 1:53 PM

drew…drawn

can_con on May 2, 2013 at 1:55 PM

The U.S. Payroll to Population employment rate (P2P), as measured by Gallup, was 44.5% for the month of April, up from 43.4% in March.

I absolutely don’t understand this statistic. How can this jump over 1% in one month. The US population is what, 310 million? Where did 3 million jobs come from? Even if you only count population that is employment aged, this is still an enormous number of employed that have magically appeared.

trigon on May 2, 2013 at 10:54 AM

It is a survey of roughly 30,000 (half of the BLS Current Population Survey) that measures those who are working full-time for a traditional employer, one that is not adjusted for seasonal variations. It appears to be in line with the two previous March-to-April increases noted by Gallup, which suggests that this increase is essentially meaningless.

Steve Eggleston on May 2, 2013 at 4:19 PM

Comment pages: 1 2