Jay Carney: Hey, Benghazi happened a long time ago

posted at 4:01 pm on May 1, 2013 by Allahpundit

Via the Free Beacon, here’s Carney doing his own version of Hillary’s “What difference, at this point, does it make?” wave-off of an attack that killed a U.S. ambassador and three others. By “a long time,” he means seven and a half months. The Newtown murders happened four and a half months ago; the Aurora murders happened nine and a half months ago. Both were highly germane to goings-on on the Hill last month. Is there a different standard for foreign policy? The first alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria occurred in December, a week or two after Newtown, so maybe Carney’s inadvertently previewing O’s next big “red line” dodge. Sure, Assad might have gassed some people. But it was a long time ago.

What he really means here by saying it happened “a long time ago” is that hearings have already been held such that any whistleblower who wants to speak to Congress has had plenty of time to do so. Which is nice, but doesn’t answer the whispers in the press about diplomats being intimidated into silence; as Erika noted earlier, Darrell Issa is promising “new facts and details that the Obama administration has tried to suppress” at the next hearings, which may or may not relate to suspects in the attack. The book isn’t closed on this. Just ask the FBI:


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

It will report you to mum, er HA, that you want to KILL it for real, being ignorant of the HAL ‘decapitation’.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

uhhh….

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:21 PM

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

It sure is.

A+

Del gets all the credits on grading.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM

Columbia BA

Harvard JD

Harvard Law Review

First black president of HLR

Law Professor at Chicago

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

And how do you know? All the records of the most transparent president ever are sealed.

Woof, woof.

davidk on May 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM

What?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM

do you live in a cave, have you not heard the man speak?

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Indeed

A++

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

I actually didnt think obama lost badly in the first one, until I watched tv commentary

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM

Why would your mind be changed by TV commentary? Are the commentators your betters? Do they have degrees that impress you? You’re like a soggy pretzel.

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM

do you live in a cave, have you not heard the man speak?

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

rogerb, your treasure chest is getting richer, by the minutes.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM

uhhh

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:21 PM

*similar sound*

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Oh, good heavens. Look, Law Review is a political thing. I know. I’m a graduate of law school…an Ivy, too. He wrote ONE ‘note’ and it was UNSIGNED, which is VERY ABNORMAL for the President of ANY law review, ESPECIALLY HARVARD (See Tort Law- Prenatal Injuries – Supreme Court of Illinois Refuses to Rcognise Cause of Action Brought By Foetus Against Its Mother For Unintentional Infliction of Prenatal Injuries, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 823 (1989 – 1990). He was NOT a constitutional law ‘professor.’ He was a lecturer. Here is a syllabus from his SEMINAR (see his syllabus). If you are into CRIT, racialism, and Derrick Bell, but I repeat myself, then ‘Professor’ Obama would have been the lecturer for you.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM

do you live in a cave, have you not heard the man speak?

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

Yep. He’s a real master ‘bater.

davidk on May 1, 2013 at 7:26 PM

Adam Housley ‏@adamhousley 3h
We report yesterday on the Benghazi mastermind walking free in Libya…and whatta ya know. Today the FBI releases suspect pics.

Was the Justice Dept. (Eric Holder) obstructing justice for his President?

Rovin on May 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

So did Hitler. That doesn’t mean that I would have wanted to live in a Germany with him as Fuhrer.

Without oratorical skills, demagogues have nothing.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Here’s a prime example.

BobMbx on May 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM

he destroyed governor romney in debates:

“Please proceed, governor”

nonpartisan
on May 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM

You really are partisan, aren’t you?
Actually, O got his clock cleaned during the first debate and seemed rather dazed that he’d been so outclassed.

The second one from which you quoted was won by the moderator, Candy Crowley, speaking from “notes”about the Rose Garden “speech” …..where did those come from???…..who wouldn’t let Romney reply.

The third, Romney lost it by trying to be so conciliatory. O didn’t win it.

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:28 PM

It will report you to mum, er HA, that you want to KILL it for real, being ignorant of the HAL ‘decapitation’.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Just figuratively speaking. No Islamabad-style ‘mani, pedi, and decapi’ scheduled for nobrain…yet.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:29 PM

CRIT = Critical race theory?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:30 PM

do you live in a cave, have you not heard the man speak?

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

Before you run off to wherever, answer my post from 7:19.

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:30 PM

Oh, good heavens. Look, Law Review is a political thing. I know. I’m a graduate of law school…an Ivy, too. He wrote ONE ‘note’ and it was UNSIGNED, which is VERY ABNORMAL for the President of ANY law review, ESPECIALLY HARVARD (See Tort Law- Prenatal Injuries – Supreme Court of Illinois Refuses to Rcognise Cause of Action Brought By Foetus Against Its Mother For Unintentional Infliction of Prenatal Injuries, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 823 (1989 – 1990). He was NOT a constitutional law ‘professor.’ He was a lecturer. Here is a syllabus from his SEMINAR (see his syllabus). If you are into CRIT, racialism, and Derrick Bell, but I repeat myself, then ‘Professor’ Obama would have been the lecturer for you.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Law Review was a meritocratic process at the law school I went to, Harvard. You had to write on to get on.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:31 PM

Law Review was a meritocratic process at the law school I went to, Harvard. You had to write on to get on.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:31 PM

Is this the one in which the “winner” had to be voted on by the students after reading the applicants work?

Rumor was that he won on an Affimative Action vote.

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM

Law Review was a meritocratic process at the law school I went to, Harvard. You had to write on to get on.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:31 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

Columbia BA

Harvard JD

Harvard Law Review

First black president of HLR

Law Professor at Chicago

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Kinda funny, with all the education, he’s never had a job in his entire life…

..but you can relate with that can’t you?

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

*rubs temples*

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

we have more pressing issues to deal with.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 6:08 PM

And trolling HA is one of them. That’s important. Benghazi? Not so much.

farsighted on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

Yes, he can move millions with his words. He moved millions of government dollars to Solyndra and other campaign supporters.

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

He has the ability to move millions minions by reading what other people tell him to say. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

Kinda like a puppet!

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

LOL..were you delivering a sandwich for Jimmy Johns???

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

Snort.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

Get a refund.

katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

hue alone…’cause you sure is dumb.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM

Law Review was a meritocratic process at the law school I went to, Harvard. You had to write on to get on.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:31 PM

That’s not how you get ELECTED President of the HLR, which is what we were discussing.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM

Snort.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

\(^o^)/

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM

Snort.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

you prob went to a lesser school…perhaps cornell, since you called it an ivy. had it been harvard or yale, you would’ve said as much.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM

LOL..were you delivering a sandwich for Jimmy Johns???

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:35 PM

Wait, what was I thinking..yer too stupid to own/drive a car. You were there to give a speech on skeet shooting?

Snipe hunting??

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

Let’s rephrase that. You were a student at Harvard? Did you graduate from Harvard?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

rotf

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

Let’s rephrase that. You were a student at Harvard? Did you graduate from Harvard?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

yes to both.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

CRIT = Critical race theory?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:30 PM

Of course. What else would you expect Obama to teach?

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:40 PM

Let’s rephrase that. You were a student at Harvard? Did you graduate from Harvard?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

. . . I can’t type for awhile. It’s hard to stop staring at the screen.

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:40 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM
yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

6th grade field trips don’t count as going.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:41 PM

. . . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

Kind of explains the hatefulness, I guess.

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:41 PM

yes to both.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

Still waiting from 7:19, Perry Mason.

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:41 PM

I…can’t….stop….laughing…..LOL

BeachBum on May 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM

you prob went to a lesser school…perhaps cornell, since you called it an ivy. had it been harvard or yale, you would’ve said as much.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM

A bit snobish there aren’t we? I only went to the University of Persian Gulf, so I guess I am really low life, trailer park white trash!

MarshFox on May 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Still waiting from 7:19, Perry Mason.

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:41 PM

why so many presents? frankly, Im not informed enough to give an answer. Perhaps, he, unlike most politicians, was not afraid to show that he didn’t have an answer for every issue and didn’t want to just vote the party line mindlessly like many pols do

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

yes to both.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

rogerB…I hope yer taking this down.

You claim to be a Harvard graduate and yet last week claimed to think that people that shot clay pigeons (Skeet) used paint ball guns…

You’re doing your alma matter proud.

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

I…can’t….stop….laughing…..LOL

BeachBum on May 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM

You don’t belive she went to Harnerd.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

. . You went to Harvard Law?

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM

yes

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Yes, of course, I believe that. Why wouldn’t I?

farsighted on May 1, 2013 at 7:45 PM

Let’s rephrase that. You were a student at Harvard? Did you graduate from Harvard?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

yes to both.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

Seriously, start a suit for every dime they took from you. We’ll round up your comments for your lawyer. Any jury would award you the tuition and billions for mental anguish. Look at what they did to you!

katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM

Oh wait, I left out being a rube, and a hillbilly, who evidently hasn’t seen his private parts in years according to DBear. Axe, have I left anything out of my resume?

MarshFox on May 1, 2013 at 7:47 PM

You claim to be a Harvard graduate and yet last week claimed to think that people that shot clay pigeons (Skeet) used paint ball guns…

BigWyo on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

Isn’t such profound ignorance just support for the claim of a Harvard Law indoctrination?

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:47 PM

Columbia BA

Harvard JD

Harvard Law Review

First black president of HLR

Law Professor at Chicago

His speaking prowess is on display for everyone to witness

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM

I think it’s odd that nobody who took the same core courses or who were active in the Black student union there (in which Barry claims to have been an active participant) remembers him at all.

Barry’s placement on the HLR had nothing to do with academics.

Law Professor? He taught one class three times a year. He was a lecturer, hardly a Professor.

His “speaking prowess” does not exist without reading prepared text from a teleprompter.

Stu Gotts on May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

you prob went to a lesser school…perhaps cornell, since you called it an ivy. had it been harvard or yale, you would’ve said as much.

nonpartisan
on May 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM

So, is this you?

Gender : Male

Birthday : October 10, 1959

Occupation : Victim of Circumstance

Location : This is Nowhere, Ontario, Canada

http://profile.ultimate-guitar.com/nonpartisan/

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

What?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM

.
do you live in a cave, have you not heard the man speak?

He has the gift for oratory prowess…the ability to move millions with words. It is a major asset and a big reason why he won.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

.
The gift of being “able to move millions with words” is an extreme liability in the hands of a disingenuous charlatan.

listens2glenn on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

There must be a hamburger joint in partisan’s hometown called Harvard’s. I aint buying the other lie.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

i guess harvard doesnt care bout punctuation capitalization and grammar and stuff like that cause doooods who study law dont need like that stupid stuff …. Ya, Alrighty then.

BeachBum on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:39 PM

Oh, dear. See katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM. Maybe Resist We Much will represent you.

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:50 PM

Okay. I’m supposed to believe YOU went to Harvard?

I’ll need waders to walk through this bullsh!t.
Fer sure.

What year did you graduate?

You lie.

wolly4321 on May 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM

why so many presents? frankly, Im not informed enough to give an answer. Perhaps, he, unlike most politicians, was not afraid to show that he didn’t have an answer for every issue and didn’t want to just vote the party line mindlessly like many pols do

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

Do you enjoy being obtuse? I asked you not just that question but once more. Where are all his writings, statements, position papers from college and after?

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM

you prob went to a lesser school…perhaps cornell, since you called it an ivy. had it been harvard or yale, you would’ve said as much.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM

Nope. Try, again. In the meantime, Oliver Wendell Holmes, let’s get ready to rummmmmmbbbbllllllllllee and play my favourite game: LAW!

Explain the evolution in the line of legal reasoning that started with Vidal v Girard’s Executors, where the Court recognised that the Christian religion was part of common law then, fold in the very first mention of the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ in Reynolds v United States, and Church of the Holy Trinity v United States, which not only ignored the dicta in Reynolds about Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists, but recounted in great detail how all 44 state constitutions referenced God and Christianity. Then, take Holy Trinity and meld it into Everson v Board of Education, which saw the adoption of the ‘Doctrine of Separation Between Church and State’ and explain how the Court moved from Vidal to Everson.

Oh, and, if you really are a law school graduate, you will also be able to tell us the back story on Everson.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:24 PM

Oh my God. If he is off teleprompter the only thing he can do is string together a bunch of platitudes that at best could qualify as a filibuster to keep anyone from asking him anything else. He issues insults and complains of maltreatment rather fluidly but then that’s his M.O. isn’t it?

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM

Im sorry but I have to go get dinner

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

There must be a hamburger joint in partisan’s hometown called Harvard’s. I aint buying the other lie.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

I think he dreamed he went to Harvard after mom told him he was special.

I wonder if he notices that when he drops by his “friend’s” houses they are either not home or on the way out the door?

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Oh, and, if you really are a law school graduate, you will also be able to tell us the back story on Everson.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM

Did you hear a faint “ohsh!t”?

katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

More evidence that he really did go to Harvard Law… just like Obama, he’s hiding his records.

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 7:55 PM

Well thanks RWM, now we know how to get rid of him when he gets boring in the future.

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 7:56 PM

Im sorry but I have to go get dinnerI don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

I wonder if he notices that when he drops by his “friend’s” houses they are either not home or on the way out the door?

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

I just LOL twice! And I never LOL.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 7:56 PM

Seriously, start a suit for every dime they took from you. We’ll round up your comments for your lawyer. Any jury would award you the tuition and billions for mental anguish. Look at what they did to you!

katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM

I don’t buy nonpartisan’s claim of being a Harvard Law grad. I fully expect that he/she/it will next claim that they also received a Nobel Peace Prize.

Happy Nomad on May 1, 2013 at 7:56 PM

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM

Im sorry but I have to go get dinner

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

and that means I was had—-nonpartisan, aka Dave Rywall’s little stain.

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 7:57 PM

Im sorry but I have to go get dinner

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

\(^o^)/

Alrighty, then.
.

.

.
What’s french for chicken?

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:57 PM

frankly, Im not informed enough to give an answer.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM

That’s the understatement of the century.

Nobrain, if I were you, I’d just keep this post and use it on every thread. Save yourself the typing.

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

Mom sent him out to pick up the pizza.

BeachBum on May 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

A bit snobish there aren’t we? I only went to the University of Persian Gulf, so I guess I am really low life, trailer park white trash!

MarshFox on May 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM

. . . before I go eat my pizza and contemplate life’s ability to take you places you never thought you’d go — let you meet people you never imagined existed, which is sometimes amazing and awesome, and let you hear things you never thought you’d hear, which is always interesting — and so on — for the record, I went to a dull, technical state school and didn’t complete my degree.

I do own an MIT t-shirt though. :) And I’ve been hearted by at least one ivy-league babe and almost married at least one lingerie model . . . so . . . put that on there too, in the margin or whatever.

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Everyone knows attention seeking trolls have no reason to lie about their “credentials”.

They may lie about everything else, but never about that.

farsighted on May 1, 2013 at 7:59 PM

What’s french for chicken?

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:57 PM

Poulet

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 7:59 PM

Hey nonP, how much wheat can a chicken farmer grow? If a chicken farmer can grow wheat?

It’s like the woodchuck thang.

wolly4321 on May 1, 2013 at 7:59 PM

I do own an MIT t-shirt though. :) And I’ve been hearted by at least one ivy-league babe and almost married at least one lingerie model . . . so . . . put that on there too, in the margin or whatever.

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

I watched the Paper Chase on Netflix a few months ago… does that count as going to Harvard Law?

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 8:01 PM

. . . I can’t type for awhile. It’s hard to stop staring at the screen.

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:40 PM

Sometimes the show is free :)

Im sorry but I have to go get dinner

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Show/’suspense’ is over. RWM KILLED nobrain.

Gosh, was it fun.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM

nonP- what’s up with barky knocking the Lochner era?

wolly4321 on May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM

What’s french for chicken?

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:57 PM

I think it is pronounced “nonpartisan”.

VegasRick on May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM

Does Harvard Law have tours for tourists? … “Obama slept here”.

farsighted on May 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM

What’s french for chicken?

avagreen on May 1, 2013 at 7:57 PM

KFC

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you. If you dont believe me, fine. I have no reason to lie, but think what you wish.

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

You’re the one that put your credentials out there. Your lack of coherency- like a squirrel in a hailstorm- makes your claim of being an Ivy League educated law school grad dubious at best.

But most importantly, it has been my experience that people with real credentials don’t have to bring them up. Particularly to strangers on a blog site.

Happy Nomad on May 1, 2013 at 8:05 PM

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM

Guess who turned up on the Gosnell thread.

thatsafactjack on May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM

I watched the Paper Chase on Netflix a few months ago… does that count as going to Harvard Law?

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 8:01 PM

Only if watching The Right Stuff and Apollo 13 makes me an astronaut.

Happy Nomad on May 1, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Crow taste like sh!t, huh, nonP?

Cmon back, I’ll help you. RWM is making all that legal stuff up. ;)

wolly4321 on May 1, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

Sophie was a lingerie model? Hmmmm, Axe lets work this as a hypothesis, that Sophie and SE Cupp are one in the same. Or maybe twins?

MarshFox on May 1, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Jason Pack, a spokesman for the FBI, which provided intelligence and agents in the manhunt, declined to comment.

Obama’s FBI is a joke.

Kjeil on May 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM

I watched the Paper Chase on Netflix a few months ago… does that count as going to Harvard Law?

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 8:01 PM

Only if watching The Right Stuff and Apollo 13 makes me an astronaut.

Happy Nomad on May 1, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Sure, that’s enough to qualify for door gunner on the space shuttle.

malclave on May 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM

g’night folks!

nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

lol — Yup.

Axe on May 1, 2013 at 8:12 PM

If nonpartisan is on the level it just goes to prove I can be wrong. I didn’t think I could think any less of Harvard but apparently I can.

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM

Benghazi….sooooo last week!

Blaise on May 1, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Benghazi was a failure at State, but a very small scale one. Iraq was x1000 times the failure in lives and treasure lost.

No one cares about Benghazi in the context of American ventures in that part of the world over the past decade.

Why doesn’t anyone on the right demand investigations that explore the failed war strategy in Iraq that’s ultimately descending into another era of chaos where terrorists thrive? Thousands of lives and trillions of dollars lost is suddenly less important than the death of a few Americans in Libya?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/iraq-on-the-brink/2013/04/30/144b9274-b0f0-11e2-bbf2-a6f9e9d79e19_story.html?wprss=rss_opinions

bayam on May 1, 2013 at 4:42 PM

If you can’t come up with something better than that, just don’t bother. Iraq was an actual war, which was won. Benghazi was just a fiasco of the State department sending ambassadors to dangerous places without any security, then letting them just die there instead of trying to rescue them.

You’re not just comparing apples and oranges. You’re comparing apples with orange groves.

There Goes the Neighborhood on May 1, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Sorry Marsh, S.E. isn’t THAT smart. not even close.

wolly4321 on May 1, 2013 at 8:16 PM

If nonpartisan is on the level…

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM

Hold that thought and mull it over.

farsighted on May 1, 2013 at 8:17 PM

I don’t need to waste my time proving my credentials to you.

- nonpartisan on May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM

In response to being proven catastrophically wrong by even the New York Times…

‘I DON’T NEED TO WASTE MY TIME READING YOUR GOP PREPARED REMARKS YOU F*CKING HACK.’

- HotAirLib on April 29, 2013 at 11:47 PM

Ever notice that the only time liberals don’t ‘need’ something is when they’ve been, to use nobrain’s lingo, PWNed?

Resist We Much on May 1, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5