Video: Media meets Pope Francis in first public papal audience; Update: Video fixed

posted at 9:31 am on March 17, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

(VATICAN CITY) Pope Francis gave his first public audience yesterday morning, speaking for twelve minutes to some of the gathered media and a few of their guests.  As you will see in the very beginning of the video, the line to get into the hall for the audience stretched forward from roughly my place in it for a couple of hundred feet, and behind me for a few hundred yards by the time we started filing slowly into the media center.  (So much for irrelevance.) Not everyone made it in, unfortunately, but I ended up in the front half of the hall, with plenty of opportunity to take photos with a longer-range lens.

The video has Pope Francis’ remarks in full with some my photographs merged into it.  His speech was in Italian, but the official Vatican transcript follows (update: video fixed):

Dear Friends,

At the beginning of my ministry in the See of Peter, I am pleased to meet all of you who have worked here in Rome throughout this intense period which began with the unexpected announcement made by my venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI on 11 February last. To each of you I offer a cordial greeting.

The role of the mass media has expanded immensely in these years, so much so that they are an essential means of informing the world about the events of contemporary history. I would like, then, to thank you in a special way for the professional coverage which you provided during these days – you really worked, didn’t you? – when the eyes of the whole world, and not just those of Catholics, were turned to the Eternal City and particularly to this place which has as its heart the tomb of Saint Peter. Over the past few weeks, you have had to provide information about the Holy See and about the Church, her rituals and traditions, her faith and above all the role of the Pope and his ministry.

I am particularly grateful to those who viewed and presented these events of the Church’s history in a way which was sensitive to the right context in which they need to be read, namely that of faith. Historical events almost always demand a nuanced interpretation which at times can also take into account the dimension of faith. Ecclesial events are certainly no more intricate than political or economic events! But they do have one particular underlying feature: they follow a pattern which does not readily correspond to the “worldly” categories which we are accustomed to use, and so it is not easy to interpret and communicate them to a wider and more varied public. The Church is certainly a human and historical institution with all that that entails, yet her nature is not essentially political but spiritual: the Church is the People of God, the Holy People of God making its way to encounter Jesus Christ. Only from this perspective can a satisfactory account be given of the Church’s life and activity.

Christ is the Church’s Pastor, but his presence in history passes through the freedom of human beings; from their midst one is chosen to serve as his Vicar, the Successor of the Apostle Peter. Yet Christ remains the centre, not the Successor of Peter: Christ, Christ is the centre. Christ is the fundamental point of reference, the heart of the Church. Without him, Peter and the Church would not exist or have reason to exist. As Benedict XVI frequently reminded us, Christ is present in Church and guides her. In everything that has occurred, the principal agent has been, in the final analysis, the Holy Spirit. He prompted the decision of Benedict XVI for the good of the Church; he guided the Cardinals in prayer and in the election.

It is important, dear friends, to take into due account this way of looking at things, this hermeneutic, in order to bring into proper focus what really happened in these days.

All of this leads me to thank you once more for your work in these particularly demanding days, but also to ask you to try to understand more fully the true nature of the Church, as well as her journey in this world, with her virtues and her sins, and to know the spiritual concerns which guide her and are the most genuine way to understand her. Be assured that the Church, for her part, highly esteems your important work. At your disposal you have the means to hear and to give voice to people’s expectations and demands, and to provide for an analysis and interpretation of current events. Your work calls for careful preparation, sensitivity and experience, like so many other professions, but it also demands a particular concern for what is true, good and beautiful. This is something which we have in common, since the Church exists to communicate precisely this: Truth, Goodness and Beauty “in person”. It should be apparent that all of us are called not to communicate ourselves, but this existential triad made up of truth, beauty and goodness.

Some people wanted to know why the Bishop of Rome wished to be called Francis. Some thought of Francis Xavier, Francis De Sales, and also Francis of Assisi. I will tell you the story. During the election, I was seated next to the Archbishop Emeritus of São Paolo and Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal Claudio Hummes: a good friend, a good friend! When things were looking dangerous, he encouraged me. And when the votes reached two thirds, there was the usual applause, because the Pope had been elected. And he gave me a hug and a kiss, and said: “Don’t forget the poor!” And those words came to me: the poor, the poor. Then, right away, thinking of the poor, I thought of Francis of Assisi. Then I thought of all the wars, as the votes were still being counted, till the end. Francis is also the man of peace. That is how the name came into my heart: Francis of Assisi. For me, he is the man of poverty, the man of peace, the man who loves and protects creation; these days we do not have a very good relationship with creation, do we? He is the man who gives us this spirit of peace, the poor man … How I would like a Church which is poor and for the poor! Afterwards, people were joking with me. “But you should call yourself Hadrian, because Hadrian VI was the reformer, we need a reform…” And someone else said to me: “No, no: your name should be Clement”. “But why?” “Clement XV: thus you pay back Clement XIV who suppressed the Society of Jesus!” These were jokes. I love all of you very much, I thank you for everything you have done. I pray that your work will always be serene and fruitful, and that you will come to know ever better the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the rich reality of the Church’s life. I commend you to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Star of Evangelization, and with cordial good wishes for you and your families, each of your families. I cordially impart to all of you my blessing. Thank you.

I told you I was cordially imparting my blessing. Since many of you are not members of the Catholic Church, and others are not believers, I cordially give this blessing silently, to each of you, respecting the conscience of each, but in the knowledge that each of you is a child of God. May God bless you!

As you can hear, Pope Francis has a sense of humor, and at least some of this was clearly off-script.  Frs. Federico Lombardi and Thomas Rosica at the Vatican press office had told us earlier in the week that they would probably not provide embargoed copies of remarks before they were given, as Francis’ spontaneity makes it impossible. Those who didn’t understand Italian had to wait to read the speech to see what he said.

I understand enough Italian to have grasped the main thrusts of his speech.  It’s clear that this pontificate will focus on the poor, and that his personal example (at least, if not his management) will be to introduce humility and poverty into the Holy See’s approach to the world.  Francis himself emphasized in the speech that his choice of name was explicitly from Francis of Assisi and not the Jesuit founder Francis Xavier or Francis de Sales, although the story about how the cardinals joked with him before his decision escaped me during his speech. Francis of Assisi was, like this Francis, a man who eschewed pomp for personal connection to pastoral work. Even Pope Francis’ spontaneity speaks to that impulse.

If the speech was in Italian, why include the audio, which I recorded separately? The words on the page don’t give as clear a sense of Francis as his own voice and images do.  As you can see and hear — even without understanding Italian — Francis brings a sense of joy, as other Popes have, but also a sense of personal connection, a humility and a humanity that sometimes has been lost in the trappings of the office.  He’s not afraid to tell self-effacing jokes or personal anecdotes, even to a gathering of the media.  That has a purpose, which he emphasized in this passage:

Christ is the Church’s Pastor, but his presence in history passes through the freedom of human beings; from their midst one is chosen to serve as his Vicar, the Successor of the Apostle Peter. Yet Christ remains the centre, not the Successor of Peter: Christ, Christ is the centre. Christ is the fundamental point of reference, the heart of the Church. Without him, Peter and the Church would not exist or have reason to exist.

The media also widely reported this passage:

How I would like a Church which is poor and for the poor!

Don’t expect Francis to divest the Church of its art and other resources, however; in an exhortation to the media, he noted that the Church protects and communications “truth, beauty, and goodness.”  What he means is a poverty of approach, an end to the pomp and excess of the Church, and he means to set that example personally from the start.   In yesterday’s briefing, the press office noted that he told the nuncio in Argentina that the people there should not come to the installation Mass on Tuesday, as it’s too expensive to travel to Rome, and that the money would be better off being spent on the poor.  (Fr. Rosica noted at the time with a hearty laugh, “This is not a prohibition, of course!”)

My personal sense of Pope Francis is that of a humble man perhaps thrown into a high-profile role, but with a very clear sense of himself and of a mission of reform.  Most of all, in my very first audience with any pontiff, I get the sense of a man who wants to focus on being the Pastor of the World more than on refining theology.  He wants to put into personal action — with prayer at the center — the efforts he sees as needed to evangelize the faith in the same way Francis of Assisi once advised: “Proclaim the Gospel … use words if necessary.”

This should be a very interesting — and different — pontificate. In a very real sense, it has already started to capture the world’s attention, and Francis’ personal touch will confound the skeptical and delight the rest.

Addendum: The Anchoress, with whom I had lunch yesterday along with Christiane Ried of the German wire service EPD, also attended the audience and has more thoughts.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

NYT, WaPo, USA Today editorial boards blast Obama

Don’t worry, they will be back on their knees by next week.

Alabama Infidel on May 15, 2013 at 11:53 AM

It’s breathtaking.

Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM

Not inclined to waste cells on it and not into entertainment at this time, but she has a pretty appropriate nom, the duncette.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM

Fenris on May 15, 2013 at 11:35 AM

I still think they could make better arguments. And why do some of them bother trying to convince us they have an open mind? I guess it’s hard to steal talking points from the paid hacks while HotAir and others are refuting them.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM

A Republic/democracy cannot survive without an educated people and a strong, free, and unbiased press.

Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM

…and a 1st Amendment these creeps live well off of, and which they encouraged to be destroyed (not to diminish the other amendments, but this applies to their existence).

They brung/kept Obama, along with all the other dunces, from both sides. May he destroy all, in full.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:57 AM

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM

You will seldom see me request the ban hammer. I’m completely interested in differing opinions. Just wondering where the middle ground on the ability to convey those different opinions could be found.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM

Liam on May 15, 2013 at 11:07 AM

You spoke too soon. The “glee over the white Boston bomber” showed up, ahead of you. Glee must have vanished, all of a sudden.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:02 PM

Obama’s aloof mien and holier-than-thou rhetoric have left him with little reservoir of good will, even among Democrats.

Yeah, that’s it. Sure. He’s not enough of a people person. He’s too aloof. If he only slapped some more backs, the media would all be supporting him more. Where’s LBJ when you need him? (sarc)

This analysis by Politico is stupid and wrongheaded on too many levels to count.

Burke on May 15, 2013 at 12:03 PM

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM

He’ll hang himself. He’s good for HA Capitalism.

I like to know how they are. Only strenghthens my contention that they are all thugs, claiming to be so erudite, enlightened, egalitarian, free…compared to us, the rubes :)

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM

I glory in being a rube.

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 12:09 PM

When he promised TRANSFORMATION WAS COMING TO AMERICA, he wasn’t kidding, and all the idiots followed.

rjoco1 on May 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM

…And why do some of them bother trying to convince us they have an open mind?…

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM

Because they actually believe that they do have an open mind. To positions they find reasonable, the type of ‘reasonable’ having nothing to do with reason.

Fenris on May 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM

Me too, Cindy.

———-
Expose this waste of dough, for retraining the obvious, fools of Obama. I wouldn’t be surprised if Brennan and Hagel would by now be converted to Islam already.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM

Color me unimpressed by the press’s sudden burst of interest in executive branch overreach. They’ve been spiking stories for the last 5 years that document this SOB’s gross abuse of power, corruption, incompetence, and utter contempt of the law and civil society. Obama and his Stalinist followers have demonized and abused entire swaths of American society for years. Only now that he’s been caught abusing the press they finally take notice? They can eat crap and die for all I care.

RobertE on May 15, 2013 at 12:24 PM

Yes, it was pleasing.

cozmo on May 15, 2013 at 11:49 AM

lol

Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM

Not inclined to waste cells on it and not into entertainment at this time, but she has a pretty appropriate nom, the duncette.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM

Her name is Allison. I call her Allidunce.

Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 12:32 PM

Don’t worry, they will be back on their knees by next week.

Alabama Infidel on May 15, 2013 at 11:53 AM

Exactly, a few phone calls, a couple of “beer summits”, a nice dinner, some “inside info”, and all will be forgiven…

right2bright on May 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM

This is bad news people. I am really sickened by the idea that BigGov sees fit to encroach upon my freedom. There is a reason the First Amendment leads the BOR.

I am almost sure that I have used one of the phones that was tapped. Breathe, it was years ago at Hartfod’s, Courant.

Without giving up too much info here are a few details:

Scores if not hundreds of people have used the phones all over that newsroom. Imagine your own office or home? Does anybody let a landline ring ceaselessly? No. People answer and use landlines at will. That likely means that people who have NOTHING to do with their investigation are now dockets and potential witnesses. (Would defense attorneys would be entitled to interview every person captured in those recordings?)

Feds trapped phone numbers and IDs for incoming calls to varying AP offices. This means that reporters, staff, custodians even third-party vendors could have incoming calls routed through the newsroom. How could they possibly filter thousands of incoming sources to protect your privacy? They can’t and likely did not.

I don’t know what the exact arrangement is but AP reporters seemin to freely use Courant facilities and vice-versa. Though the latter seemed somewhat limited access. That being said, I know that Courant reporters were able to login to AP photo and article DB from Courant workstations.

Also, AP files are accessable remotely from anywhere in the world I believe. Why not tap every phone in America? The potential for witnesses would be unmatched.

This is not a report. It is recalled off the top and simply meant to add context.

If you’re a fed, consider everything I just wrote a lie. Also **** you for violating our primary tool for freedom.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:27 PM

a former senior Obama administration official said. “When there’s no narrative, stuff like this consumes you.”

Translation: “When there’s no false narrative, stuff like this the truth consumes you.”

novaculus on May 15, 2013 at 1:27 PM

They’ve been spiking stories for the last 5 years that document this SOB’s gross abuse of power, corruption, incompetence, and utter contempt of the law and civil society.

Do you know what “spiking” means? If so you realize that making such a statement requires specific instances or you’re simply making stuff up. I’m not saying stories don’t get spiked. I’ve seen it happen. I’ve been told to stop calling or interviewing subjects.

I don’t disagree with you. I just don’t believe you know what you’re talking about.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM

At least we know they investigated the Fast & Furious scandal to it’s fullest. So, they dodged that bullet.

BKeyser on May 15, 2013 at 1:30 PM

Reporter: How many reporters records were seized?
Holder: I’m not sure.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:56 PM

Reporter: How many reporters records were seized?
Holder: I’m not sure.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:56 PM

Well, there you go. He’s not good at math either.

Barnestormer on May 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM

Though it’s difficult to plumb the depths of leftist stupidity, especially the fools in the WH, turning on the media has to be one of the greatest blunders in ever. They made Obama, & by extension the low lifes around him. AG Holder quickly comes to mind in that area. So what do the lower order apes do, they contrive to wreck the relationship

arand on May 15, 2013 at 2:44 PM

“They’re just jealous they don’t have relatives of their top execs setting White House policy like we do. Holder, crush them!” – CBSABCCNNPMSDNC cabal

Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 2:51 PM

So the Press is crying because it’s about them, of course.

Awwww, poor babies…

Your Lord & Master has betrayed you, has he? Did he forget to leave the $20 on the night table this time?

You created him. You protected him. You never vetted him. You lied, concealed & did everything you could to help elect him – twice.

F*ck you. You own him. He owns you.

ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on May 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM

This would have been the Comment of the Day™, but you had the wrong owner/owned relationship. Presstitute organs don’t own who they spew for.

Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 2:53 PM

They thought their endless bum-nuzzling would give them an exemption. All they got for their effort was a brown mustache . . .

tpitman on May 15, 2013 at 2:56 PM

Charles Johnson over at LGF:

Republicans Oddly Silent Over DOJ Raid on AP Records
They’ve never been that big on freedom of the press anyway

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Up-Chuck Oddly Blind

Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM

The media is so utterly corrupt.

The result of this will be a couple people fired and the continued cover up of Fast and Furious and Bengazi. The left will continue to oppress those that fight their power with Big Government. This is just standard opporating procedure in any statist regime.

GardenGnome on May 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM

NYT, WaPo, USA Today editorial boards blast Obama over seizure of AP phone records

Aww, it’s never fun when the Brownshirt mob comes a’knockin on YOUR door, is it?

You dolts always said the “Pen is Mightier than the Sword”…prove it now. Otherwise, suck it up and put some ice on it…

Maggots.

BlaxPac on May 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM

BlaxPac on May 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM

Michelle Malkin’s header image alludes to that same cliché.

I don’t understand how so many conservatives fail to believe in and promote the importance of journalism. FOP comes before gun-owner rights. Dismissing all journalists is perilous.

This scandal has the potential to inspire more conservative journalists. But it won’t. Tea Partiers prefer extremism to being informed. GOP and moderates are too stupid, feckless and wussified to think outside the Tea Party box.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:55 PM

And Obama’s answer: No you can’t drive!

“After they drove the car into the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now they want to keys back. No! You can’t drive. We don’t want to have to go back into the ditch. We just got the car out.”

socalcon on May 15, 2013 at 4:23 PM

I’m not treated with respect…But I am the Atty. Gen. of the United States – Holder

workingclass artist on May 15, 2013 at 5:04 PM

CSPAN: WH asks Schumer to reintroduce a Press Shield law…

d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 5:19 PM

They treated the AP more like a hardened criminal than an upstanding news organization.

Since when has the AP behaved like an upstanding news organization? They use the power of the press to attack Tea Party groups and conservatives and Republicans. Note how quick they are to jump on scandals involving these groups and how they provide minimal coverage of Dem scandals. Often they leave out the political affiliation if a Dem is involved in a scandal.

Media elites have such a high opinion of themselves that this is the first time they’re really mad at Obama. How dare the administration attack the holy media! 4 dead Americans and a big lie about a stupid cartoonish video = no big deal. NDAA = no big deal. Fast & Furious = no big deal. AP phone records seized = (as Biden would say) a BFD.

Ibanez Lotus on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM

I don’t understand how so many conservatives fail to believe in and promote the importance of journalism. FOP comes before gun-owner rights. Dismissing all journalists is perilous.

This scandal has the potential to inspire more conservative journalists. But it won’t. Tea Partiers prefer extremism to being informed. GOP and moderates are too stupid, feckless and wussified to think outside the Tea Party box.

Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:55 PM

I do believe in the importance of true journalism. However, the MSM has not practiced true journalism in a long time. The majority of MSM reporters are registered democrats and that leaves us with a one-sided Pravda-like press.

Nice way to pretend to care about having more conservative journalists. Inspirational, the sweeping attack on such a large group of Americans. There are decent MSM reporters like Jake Tapper out there, but I think I’ll borrow your broad brush and call MSM reporters the Joseph Goebbels and Leni Riefenstahls of journalism.

Ibanez Lotus on May 15, 2013 at 8:30 PM

However, the MSM has not practiced true journalism in a long time. The majority of MSM reporters are registered democrats and that leaves us with a one-sided Pravda-like press.

Screw the MSM you dolt.

Hmmm, did you know Michelle Malkin was one a mainstream media journalist? There are others here at HotAir too. I have always asserted that the right is well-suited to reproduce the Tea Party enthusiasm and growth in journalism instead of outrage.

You mention Jake Tapper. He’s pretty solid. But I bet you more Republicans conservatives listen to Glenn Beck who is mostly full of shiite. But I’m sure you’ll defend him. Per my presumption, you embody the problem. (Pardon my endogenous sleight of hand if you will.)

The Tea Party disgusts me. Journalism gives me hope. Too bad Republicans have screwed themselves by embracing the wrong avenue to extend the party’s lifeline. GOP is on an IV drip as evidenced by the hysterics which would normally be played out on the left.

Yes, there are people like Kevin Williamson and NR. There’s Howard Portnoy who now blogs/reports at Liberty Unyielding. He used to be in the Green Room here. Counter to that, there are so many angry voices that just rant and rave. Good reporting gets buried. Ha, bury the lede as a lifestyle.

Any so-called conservative who doesn’t long for conservative reporters is an idiot. You sound like an idiot.

Nice way to pretend to care about having more conservative journalists. Inspirational, the sweeping attack on such a large group of Americans

Then I’ve been pretending for a long time.

You’re just so tragically partisan that you deign not to think for yourself. The thought of doing so frightens you. Also you must not know me very well because I don’t need an excuse. Read any one of my comments and you’ll figure that out quickly. I’m that a-hole. Got it?

You react to moderation like liberals react to black-conservatives. Since you make an assertion. I’d love to see you back it up. You can accuse me of being an insensitive jerk but you must realize that I back up what I say as often as time permits.

(This reply was a perfect excuse to blow my workout this morning. Thank you for being daft.)

Capitalist Hog on May 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM

MKH’s Green Room post shows the importance of conservative journalism is necessary. Angry voices don’t reach as many people as conservatives like to think. Americans still like their news soft-serve.

Jake Tapper is not enough. We need more unbiased voices in news.

Capitalist Hog on May 16, 2013 at 11:44 AM

The Tea Party disgusts me.

Capitalist Hog on May 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM

I’m not surprised. Normal everyday people do disgust those who think themselves better than the mere rabble. Thank you for illustrating so succinctly what is wrong with “journalism” today.

dominigan on May 19, 2013 at 7:40 AM

Comment pages: 1 2