“Solly,” but endorsing primary candidates in 2014 isn’t going to suddenly make Palin significantly any more likely to run, win the nomination or the general.

bluegill on March 18, 2013 at 9:21 AM

Fishy girl, you really don’t know SQUAT about politics. You need to attend TEA Party meetings more than most of the Romneycare Willard supporters, and that is not a compliment at all.

I can only imagine what goes through your little mind when you look in the mirror, and I’m sure none of that is good.

Why not admit that you hate her because she did more than most American women when she decided to get involved in politics. We all know how much your type hates being shown up.

ULTIMATE HUMILIATION: Palin comes in last place behind even Christie who wasn’t invited.

idesign on suicide watch. Ddrintn unavailable for comment. Renalin continuing to be his slithery greasy self. Bmore, like a grownup lady, managed to hold back her tears.

bluegill on March 17, 2013 at 8:01 AM

Bwaaahahahahahahahahahahahaaaa

So solly, but right now we are concentrating on the 2014 election cycle where we hope Sarah will again lend her support to our TEA Party grass roots activism.
IF she AGAIN proves herself to be THE KINGmaker she could easily continue on to run for POTUS…
DannoJyd on March 18, 2013 at 4:08 AM

“Solly,” but endorsing primary candidates in 2014 isn’t going to suddenly make Palin significantly any more likely to run, win the nomination or the general.

A majority of Republicans 1) don’t want her to run, and 2) think she’s FAR from the most qualified choice. And that’s a majority of Republicans, not even a majority of the voting population. She has zero chance at winning the general, but I wish her the best in speaking out against Obama. I just wish she’d do it in a classier and more effective way that doesn’t make it so easy for people to dismiss her as some goofy kook.

After her excellent response to Obama’s pathetic SOTU address, I was expecting something more substantive from Palin. She was quite at ease before the adoring crowd and the BIG GULP was great theatre but I didn’t think she was up to par. She didn’t explain why her and her supporters are the genuine common folk, but that the people who voted for Obama are not. And the skewering of Obama lacked its usual punch.
She is obviously in great physical shape and she will no doubt continue to gin up enthusiasm among the faithful but I think it’s clear there are too many formidable opponents who want the job and she’s not going to run for the presidency. Once this sinks in the reaction of the palinistas is going to be a big gulp.
Basilsbest on March 17, 2013 at 10:25 AM

Well said.

What I found interesting is the applause of Dr. Carson, Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz for example, didn’t translate into votes.

bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 10:55 PM

Which takes us back to the voting happening BEFORE ALL SPEECHES WERE MADE. Stupid way to run any poll.

Once this sinks in the reaction of the palinistas is going to be a big gulp.

Basilsbest on March 17, 2013 at 10:25 AM

So solly, but right now we are concentrating on the 2014 election cycle where we hope Sarah will again lend her support to our TEA Party grass roots activism.

IF she AGAIN proves herself to be THE KINGmaker she could easily continue on to run for POTUS, but at this point who would blame her for deciding to keep out of the Washington muck?

NEVER FORGET the shelf life of any Washington politician. They seem to go liberal within 6 short years. It has to be something in the water over there.

She is obviously in great physical shape and she will no doubt continue to gin up enthusiasm among the faithful but I think it’s clear there are too many formidable opponents who want the job and she’s not going to run for the presidency. Once this sinks in the reaction of the palinistas is going to be a big gulp.

idesign on suicide watch. Ddrintn unavailable for comment. Renalin continuing to be his slithery greasy self. Bmore, like a grownup lady, managed to hold back her tears.

MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 11:32 PM

tell me another way to ease back into freedom

/mulligan post

zosophil on March 17, 2013 at 12:19 AM

There will be no way to ease back into freedom. Resorting American freedom will require maturity and responsibility and self reliance. It will require well functioning traditional families, rather than selfish disconnected “individuals”. We will need to work hard. Fostering a generation of American stoners ain’t the way to do it.

Undermining the civil foundations of democratic society, especially further undermining the institution of traditional marriage will likely undermine any effort to resort American freedom for generations.

Too many American Libertarians are shallow thinking self-indulgent virtual political allies of the Progressive-Left. In a real sense too many American Libertarians are but putty in Antonio Gramsci’s hands.

MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 11:32 PM

tell me another way to ease back into freedom

/mulligan post

Despite some on the evangelical right, libertarianism is the future of the GOP.

Tater Salad on March 16, 2013 at 11:01 PM

Since you’re a drive-by troll, by “libertarianism” you mean “legalized pot, prostitution, and any number of people of any gender can get ‘married’ “.

Gosh, isn’t progress awesome?

MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 11:32 PM

tell me another way to ease back into freedom

Despite some on the evangelical right, libertarianism is the future of the GOP.

Tater Salad on March 16, 2013 at 11:01 PM

Since you’re a drive-by troll, by “libertarianism” you mean “legalized pot, prostitution, and any number of people of any gender can get ‘married’ “.

Gosh, isn’t progress awesome?

Could be. How can one vote before all of the Speakers are heard?

Hmmmmm.

bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 9:16 PM

ACORN?

DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 10:05 PM

LOL, ballot manipulation? Hard to tell.

I’m not familiar with what the procedures of the Straw Poll Vote are.
What I found interesting is the applause of Dr. Carson, Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz for example, didn’t translate into votes.

Could be. How can one vote before all of the Speakers are heard?

Hmmmmm.

bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 9:16 PM

ACORN?

I’ll bet it was RomneyCare Willard supporters who PWN3D that poll.

DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 8:46 PM

Could be. How can one vote before all of the Speakers are heard?

Hmmmmm.

I hope the GOP establishment can begin to understand the social issues they get tied up in their own underwear are not national issues. They need to be taken locally (AR, ND). See Rand Paul’s response to SSM. Nah, ain’t gonna happen… Fortunately the 52% of 25 to 30 year olds at CPAC have figured that out. Might have to wait a little while longer for common sense and liberty to run the party.

In the mean time I am concerned we’ll get Hillary and 8 more years of progressive hate, intolerance and feel good nonsense The GOP machine can’t allow a ‘wacko birds’ to take a presidential primary. We’ll end up with a dip stick like Christie. “…the harshest of all sounds is the braying of the ass.”