<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scarborough: Why is Ted Cruz ignoring the Heller decision in his Second Amendment arguments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Low information network : Urbin Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6847888</link>
		<dc:creator>Low information network : Urbin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6847888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the mis-information MSNBC is passing on to it&#8217;s core audience of low information voters.   Hot Hair has a couple of videos that illustrate how MSNBC carefully edits the information they pass... in order to advance their left wing extremist political agenda.  In the first video, the MSNBC [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the mis-information MSNBC is passing on to it&#8217;s core audience of low information voters.   Hot Hair has a couple of videos that illustrate how MSNBC carefully edits the information they pass&#8230; in order to advance their left wing extremist political agenda.  In the first video, the MSNBC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Cruz&#8217;s Patronizing Constitutional &#8216;Lesson&#8217; for Dianne Feinstein</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6814347</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Cruz&#8217;s Patronizing Constitutional &#8216;Lesson&#8217; for Dianne Feinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6814347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scarborough: Ted Cruz &#039;willfully ignorant&#039; on the U.S. ConstitutionDaily CallerHot Air (blog)&#160;-Business Insiderall 61 news articles&#160;&#187; Read more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scarborough: Ted Cruz &#039;willfully ignorant&#039; on the U.S. ConstitutionDaily CallerHot Air (blog)&nbsp;-Business Insiderall 61 news articles&nbsp;&raquo; Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloppy: CNN&#8217;s Lemon Ignores Ted Cruz&#8217;s Own Words and Hits Him as &#8216;Inaccurate&#8217; and &#8216;Misleading&#8217; - Rise of the Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6805415</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloppy: CNN&#8217;s Lemon Ignores Ted Cruz&#8217;s Own Words and Hits Him as &#8216;Inaccurate&#8217; and &#8216;Misleading&#8217; - Rise of the Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6805415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So Cruz misled the public to believe the Second Amendment has no limits? Again, Lemon provided no transcript of what Cruz said in the highly-touted exchange with Feinstein. Nor did he provide video. So here are Cruz&#8217;s actual words that the CNN anchor failed to report (H/T HotAir): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Cruz misled the public to believe the Second Amendment has no limits? Again, Lemon provided no transcript of what Cruz said in the highly-touted exchange with Feinstein. Nor did he provide video. So here are Cruz&#8217;s actual words that the CNN anchor failed to report (H/T HotAir): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominigan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6804214</link>
		<dc:creator>dominigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6804214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.”… We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, at the time of the Revolution and later when the Constitution was written... many farmers had access to the Kentucky Long Rifle, which had longer range and better accuracy, than the common muskets used in the armies.

So if we use that for comparison, we should indeed have access to military grade weaponry.  After all, most of us are members of the militia, as defined by our respective State Constitutions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.”… We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, at the time of the Revolution and later when the Constitution was written&#8230; many farmers had access to the Kentucky Long Rifle, which had longer range and better accuracy, than the common muskets used in the armies.</p>
<p>So if we use that for comparison, we should indeed have access to military grade weaponry.  After all, most of us are members of the militia, as defined by our respective State Constitutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclesmrgol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6804087</link>
		<dc:creator>unclesmrgol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 03:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6804087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court is obviously oriented towards prohibiting those weapons which are in excess of those which are commonly carried by our police for their own self defense.  On the other hand, the court is disposed to allow those weapons which are commonly carried by our police for their own self-defense.

If a policeman needs a certain class of weapon to confront criminals, than a private citizen is entitled to same.

That means you can&#039;t have a nuke or an RPG or a tank, but what you can have is certainly everything the liberals have named as wanting to prohibit today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Court is obviously oriented towards prohibiting those weapons which are in excess of those which are commonly carried by our police for their own self defense.  On the other hand, the court is disposed to allow those weapons which are commonly carried by our police for their own self-defense.</p>
<p>If a policeman needs a certain class of weapon to confront criminals, than a private citizen is entitled to same.</p>
<p>That means you can&#8217;t have a nuke or an RPG or a tank, but what you can have is certainly everything the liberals have named as wanting to prohibit today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kettlewell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803891</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kettlewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 01:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assume the 2nd Amendment is not in the U.S. Constitution....

Where do they derive authority for their Law-making on this? 

It is amusing that if the Bill of Rights was not there, that there would be no targets. Wonder what that world would be like; and how soon after ratification would we have lasted until.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assume the 2nd Amendment is not in the U.S. Constitution&#8230;.</p>
<p>Where do they derive authority for their Law-making on this? </p>
<p>It is amusing that if the Bill of Rights was not there, that there would be no targets. Wonder what that world would be like; and how soon after ratification would we have lasted until.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywaiter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803808</link>
		<dc:creator>graywaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 01:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Resist We Much on March 15, 2013 at 6:48 PM&lt;/em&gt;

*~Fist Bump~*! You go girl!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Resist We Much on March 15, 2013 at 6:48 PM</em></p>
<p>*~Fist Bump~*! You go girl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruz Control and Powerless DiFi &#124; Babalú Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803678</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruz Control and Powerless DiFi &#124; Babalú Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Allahpundit at HotAir points out the video viral exchange between the two senators is only a small part of what went on, and that there is far more to this story than the &quot;rude&quot; Ted Cruz, &#039;who knows not of the cited Heller case&#039;, the liberal MSM (MSNBC&#039;s Joe Scarborough in this instance) is now trying to project ... and here it is: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allahpundit at HotAir points out the video viral exchange between the two senators is only a small part of what went on, and that there is far more to this story than the &quot;rude&quot; Ted Cruz, &#039;who knows not of the cited Heller case&#039;, the liberal MSM (MSNBC&#039;s Joe Scarborough in this instance) is now trying to project &#8230; and here it is: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803615</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...are we sure Joe isn&#039;t one of Uncle Joe&#039;s kids?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;are we sure Joe isn&#8217;t one of Uncle Joe&#8217;s kids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803559</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &lt;em&gt;Heller&lt;/em&gt; decision said that &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;dangerous and unusual weapons which are not in the common usage&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; can be regulated or banned by the government. It said that there was an individual right to bear arms; the Second Amendment &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;“extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (p 8); the handgun bans &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;amounted to a prohibition of an ENTIRE CLASS OF &#039;ARMS&#039; that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Dangerous:&lt;/strong&gt;

The AR-15 is the #1 rifle sold in the United States. It is no more dangerous than handguns. In fact, it kills FAR less. In 2011, 72.5% of all gun-related homicides were committed using handguns. In 2011, 3.8% (323) of ALL gun-related homicides in 2011 committed with rifles of &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;ALL KINDS, INCLUDING &quot;ASSAULT RIFLES&quot; LIKE AR-15s.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Unusual:&lt;/strong&gt;

There is NOTHING unusual about AR-15-style rifles...unless one is afraid of black, skeery, plastic thingies.

Don&#039;t believe me? Then, look at the pictures of these two guns and ask yourself, &quot;Does one really look that much more &#039;dangerous, unusual and uncommon&#039; than the other?&quot;

http://tinyurl.com/ctyyo2u

&lt;strong&gt;Uncommon:&lt;/strong&gt;

Really? AR-15s are uncommon? Since when?

In 2009, it was estimated that there were 3,261,725 of AR-15s - alone, not just AR-15-style - in the United States...and the homicide rate was 5.0.

In contrast, in 1994 when the original Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, there were approximately 1.5 million AR-15s in the United States and the homicide rate was 9.0.

Feinstein, Scarborough, and Mitchell should really go back and read the Heller decision. Cruz knows it...since he was one of the attorneys that won it before the Supreme Court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Heller</em> decision said that <strong><em>&#8220;dangerous and unusual weapons which are not in the common usage&#8221;</em></strong> can be regulated or banned by the government. It said that there was an individual right to bear arms; the Second Amendment <strong><em>“extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”</em></strong> (p 8); the handgun bans <strong><em>&#8220;amounted to a prohibition of an ENTIRE CLASS OF &#8216;ARMS&#8217; that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose.&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Dangerous:</strong></p>
<p>The AR-15 is the #1 rifle sold in the United States. It is no more dangerous than handguns. In fact, it kills FAR less. In 2011, 72.5% of all gun-related homicides were committed using handguns. In 2011, 3.8% (323) of ALL gun-related homicides in 2011 committed with rifles of <strong><em>ALL KINDS, INCLUDING &#8220;ASSAULT RIFLES&#8221; LIKE AR-15s.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Unusual:</strong></p>
<p>There is NOTHING unusual about AR-15-style rifles&#8230;unless one is afraid of black, skeery, plastic thingies.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Then, look at the pictures of these two guns and ask yourself, &#8220;Does one really look that much more &#8216;dangerous, unusual and uncommon&#8217; than the other?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ctyyo2u" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ctyyo2u</a></p>
<p><strong>Uncommon:</strong></p>
<p>Really? AR-15s are uncommon? Since when?</p>
<p>In 2009, it was estimated that there were 3,261,725 of AR-15s &#8211; alone, not just AR-15-style &#8211; in the United States&#8230;and the homicide rate was 5.0.</p>
<p>In contrast, in 1994 when the original Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, there were approximately 1.5 million AR-15s in the United States and the homicide rate was 9.0.</p>
<p>Feinstein, Scarborough, and Mitchell should really go back and read the Heller decision. Cruz knows it&#8230;since he was one of the attorneys that won it before the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloppy: CNN&#8217;s Lemon Ignores Ted Cruz&#8217;s Own Words and Hits Him as &#8216;Inaccurate&#8217; and &#8216;Misleading&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803536</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloppy: CNN&#8217;s Lemon Ignores Ted Cruz&#8217;s Own Words and Hits Him as &#8216;Inaccurate&#8217; and &#8216;Misleading&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So Cruz misled the public to believe the Second Amendment has no limits? Again, Lemon provided no transcript of what Cruz said in the highly-touted exchange with Feinstein. Nor did he provide video. So here are Cruz&#8217;s actual words that the CNN anchor failed to report (H/T HotAir): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Cruz misled the public to believe the Second Amendment has no limits? Again, Lemon provided no transcript of what Cruz said in the highly-touted exchange with Feinstein. Nor did he provide video. So here are Cruz&#8217;s actual words that the CNN anchor failed to report (H/T HotAir): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joated</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803523</link>
		<dc:creator>joated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe is playing the role of the useful idiot here. He knows damn well what Cruz was getting at and what the duties of a Senator and Congressman are vis-a-vis writing constitutional laws. In this particular argument he&#039;s attempting two things: 1) CYA for Fienstien and the gun grabbers and 2) smearing Ted Cruz. In so doing he has exposed himself as a tool of the left.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe is playing the role of the useful idiot here. He knows damn well what Cruz was getting at and what the duties of a Senator and Congressman are vis-a-vis writing constitutional laws. In this particular argument he&#8217;s attempting two things: 1) CYA for Fienstien and the gun grabbers and 2) smearing Ted Cruz. In so doing he has exposed himself as a tool of the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TarheelBen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803496</link>
		<dc:creator>TarheelBen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Levin is leading off his show with this.  He&#039;s not a big fan of the &lt;em&gt;Morning Schmoe&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Levin is leading off his show with this.  He&#8217;s not a big fan of the <em>Morning Schmoe</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803406</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals for the most part lie.

Scarborough: You lie with dogs....you get fleas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals for the most part lie.</p>
<p>Scarborough: You lie with dogs&#8230;.you get fleas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803391</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;You&#039;ll have to pardon Joey.  He thinks he&#039;s an intellectual.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You&#8217;ll have to pardon Joey.  He thinks he&#8217;s an intellectual.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffinOrlando</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803273</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffinOrlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe knows who pays his salary. He tries to say in this clip that the people that support or agree with Cruz are ignorant of facts and don&#039;t know how to read. And he says that after not watching all of the testimony.... only what his employers showed him. So he is basically flying blind, &lt;strong&gt;and stupid&lt;/strong&gt;. If he didn&#039;t speak nonsense, especially while being arrogant about his and the vast majority of his guests and viewers being ignorant, he would have no ratings, show, or job. He fits right in at MSNBC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe knows who pays his salary. He tries to say in this clip that the people that support or agree with Cruz are ignorant of facts and don&#8217;t know how to read. And he says that after not watching all of the testimony&#8230;. only what his employers showed him. So he is basically flying blind, <strong>and stupid</strong>. If he didn&#8217;t speak nonsense, especially while being arrogant about his and the vast majority of his guests and viewers being ignorant, he would have no ratings, show, or job. He fits right in at MSNBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjexcite</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803205</link>
		<dc:creator>tjexcite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Dangerous and unusual
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So when are they going to ban civilian style sonic cannons such as the Long Range Acoustic Device. It has to fall under the unusual weapon and LRAD could very easily be turned into something as simple as a car alarm deterrent.  

Computer speakers do not do it justice on the sound. &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtu.be/QSMyY3_dmrM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://youtu.be/QSMyY3_dmrM&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dangerous and unusual
</p></blockquote>
<p>So when are they going to ban civilian style sonic cannons such as the Long Range Acoustic Device. It has to fall under the unusual weapon and LRAD could very easily be turned into something as simple as a car alarm deterrent.  </p>
<p>Computer speakers do not do it justice on the sound. <a href="http://youtu.be/QSMyY3_dmrM" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/QSMyY3_dmrM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_Crater</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803183</link>
		<dc:creator>J_Crater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was Senator Ted Cruz who drafted the amicus brief signed by attorneys general of 31 states, which said that the D.C. handgun ban should be struck down, aka Heller.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Senator Ted Cruz who drafted the amicus brief signed by attorneys general of 31 states, which said that the D.C. handgun ban should be struck down, aka Heller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhatSlushfund</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803179</link>
		<dc:creator>WhatSlushfund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;So, honestly; how many of you could make it through the entire clip? I lasted about 30 seconds and that may be a record when Scarborough is involved.

DDay on March 15, 2013 at 4:40 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

LOL. I made it about half-way through. And even that was like fingernails on a chalk board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, honestly; how many of you could make it through the entire clip? I lasted about 30 seconds and that may be a record when Scarborough is involved.</p>
<p>DDay on March 15, 2013 at 4:40 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL. I made it about half-way through. And even that was like fingernails on a chalk board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDay</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803124</link>
		<dc:creator>DDay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, honestly; how many of you could make it through the entire clip? I lasted about 30 seconds and that may be a record when Scarborough is involved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, honestly; how many of you could make it through the entire clip? I lasted about 30 seconds and that may be a record when Scarborough is involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803091</link>
		<dc:creator>riddick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Wonder if mccain has made a nasty comment about Cruz yet?
L

letget on March 15, 2013 at 2:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, McLaim did. Since Cruz was a big part of Paul&#039;s filibuster, and IMO was as on point as Rand and sometimes even more so, when McLaim next day called Rand &quot;wacko&quot; Cruz was also included in that smear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wonder if mccain has made a nasty comment about Cruz yet?<br />
L</p>
<p>letget on March 15, 2013 at 2:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, McLaim did. Since Cruz was a big part of Paul&#8217;s filibuster, and IMO was as on point as Rand and sometimes even more so, when McLaim next day called Rand &#8220;wacko&#8221; Cruz was also included in that smear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803087</link>
		<dc:creator>Midas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cruz is obviously doing things right, given the amount of sh1t he&#039;s catching from the left.

Go Cruz!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cruz is obviously doing things right, given the amount of sh1t he&#8217;s catching from the left.</p>
<p>Go Cruz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WisRich</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803079</link>
		<dc:creator>WisRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you sb your]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you sb your</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WisRich</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803063</link>
		<dc:creator>WisRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all want to accept the premise that Ole Joe is just ignorant of the fact that Cruz is very familiar with the Heller decision.

Question you assumptions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all want to accept the premise that Ole Joe is just ignorant of the fact that Cruz is very familiar with the Heller decision.</p>
<p>Question you assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpduq</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/15/scarborough-why-is-ted-cruz-ignoring-the-heller-decision-in-his-second-amendment-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6803045</link>
		<dc:creator>dpduq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249791#comment-6803045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Cruz, Paul and Rubio, please...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Cruz, Paul and Rubio, please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>