Jindal at CPAC: Be the Party of More
posted at 7:51 pm on March 15, 2013 by Mary Katharine Ham
I must confess to being a longtime fan of Gov. Bobby Jindal, having written to defend him even in his darkest hour— the day after his State of the Union response. He’s a smart guy who’s overcome cultural and political obstacles to be elected a second-term governor Louisiana with 66 percent of the vote in a race with nine opponents. But mostly I like that he’s demonstrably made Louisiana a better place to live and work.
I wish he’d talked more about that today. Jindal’s speech to CPAC was not a stemwinder or designed to be a crowd pleaser. It was more of an overview and light critique of the movement, in the style of a Mitch Daniels more than a Rick Perry. I like those kinds of speeches, though they’re sometimes better read than delivered. Jindal started off by reading a few of his Gridiron Dinner jokes, confessing that he was pilfering from himself but acknowledging the crowd might like something different after CPAC’s 70 political speeches.
The thrust of his speech, which some read as a contrast if not a rebuke to Paul Ryanism, is that focusing on the everyday crises of Washington, D.C. and the budget numbers too much is playing entirely on the opponent’s turf, conceding the idea that the nation runs on Washington and the capital is the hub of its existence. Instead, Jindal suggests focusing on the real economy of America, not the “phony economy” of Washington. I actually think the two can easily be complementary, and that educating people about how out of hand Washington is is part of turning them on to the idea of getting it out of their lives. But he’s right about falling into this uninspiring trap:
If our vision is to better manage the disaster that is the federal government, you can count me out. I won’t sign up for that. (I don’t want to) slow-manage the decline of America. That’s why we have Democrats.
Yes, the message must be more than that, even while it educates on Washington’s failings. “We’re not going to simply win elections by pointing out the failures of the other side,” he said. Jindal’s pitch today: Be the party of MORE. Democrats only offer more government, but we offer more prosperity, bigger American dreams, more success for everyone.
I assume the contrast he’s subtly drawing with Ryan will become complete nearer to 2016 when Jindal finishes his pitch by touting the successes in the “real economy” of himself and other Republican governors across the country. The speech didn’t quite make that landing today, mentioning school choice in Louisiana only briefly, but I look forward to hearing more in the future.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
That didn’t take long, did it?
Liam on April 8, 2013 at 7:25 PM
Any alternative plan proposed by a Democrat is simply going to be “raise and create more taxes”, not reform or reduce them.
catmman on April 8, 2013 at 7:27 PM
speaking as the resident Jindalista….Coward
annoyinglittletwerp on April 8, 2013 at 7:28 PM
OT: Drudge Headline: THE 1,500-PAGE IMMIGRATION BILL?
—–
On Jindal, keep it up Bobby, I’m still with ya. You’re moving the Overton window and that’s all to the good.
Dusty on April 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM
GONE: TAX REFORM AND PERFORM
HERE: TAX COMPROMISE AND DEMISE
Varchild on April 8, 2013 at 7:32 PM
LMAO – taxing whitey to add to Obama’s stash doesn’t qualify as a serious plan.
Daemonocracy on April 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM
People just do not like the idea of swapping income tax for sales tax.
It feels like a con, and you’re going to pay more via sales than income.
budfox on April 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM
And I am disappointed Jindal has backed off so soon, but who knows, maybe he’s asking for what he knew he couldn’t get to force some kind of reform.
Daemonocracy on April 8, 2013 at 7:36 PM
5.88% is less sales tax than Michigan’s 6%
Varchild on April 8, 2013 at 7:37 PM
“Working together” with demorats means one thing to them: Bend over.
Bishop on April 8, 2013 at 7:37 PM
I know plenty of people who would love to swap a sales tax for an income tax.
At least you can control the amount of money you give to the state with a sales tax. Most day to day stuff is exempted (food primarily). With a sales tax you at least have control of where and how much.
With an income tax, it’s involuntarily confiscated and most of it is wasted.
Don’t see what the big deal would be.
catmman on April 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM
SteelBendy Straw Spine.portlandon on April 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM
I suppose there isn’t a White Caucus in the Louisiana Legislature or I would have seen an expose of the endemic racism of the South.
Drained Brain on April 8, 2013 at 7:43 PM
lolololololololololol.
Even the crazy fringe conservatives who live in LA are seeing the light. For a while i could have sworn they were for paying their bosses taxes as long as said bosses promised to keep them on the job.
HotAirLib on April 8, 2013 at 8:06 PM
Bobby, Bobby, you must at least start on the “Right” side, then you can move closer to the center. If, as most of you tend to do, start in the middle, you always move left…always!
rgranger on April 8, 2013 at 8:08 PM
Getting rid of the Income Tax would be a boon for Louisiana. His critics were just that critical of any idea as they have none of their own.
Grunt on April 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM
KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 10:14 PM
…so how is he different?
KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 10:21 PM
Just for shits’n'giggles, I did an experiment with the taxes where I live.
I used an online tax tool to fill out annual income taxes as if I were a single mom with two kids making $40,000 per year, living in Toronto (Ontario, Canada), and paying $950 per month in rent. I took advantage of every deduction that she could get for her kids. I then assumed that all money left after income tax and rent is spent on taxable goods at our current sales tax rate of 13%. I did not try to take into account items that don’t have sales taxes, like basic groceries.
I then calculated what would happen if there was no income tax and, instead, just a 20% sales tax. Assuming that the mom spends everything after rent on taxable goods (again, not trying to account for non-taxable items like staple foods), she pays a total of… $2000 a year less in total taxes with the sales tax-only approach.
Whenever I argue for eliminating income taxes and moving to a higher sales tax, my left-leaning cow-orkers always freak out and call me a racist, a Nazi, and so on.
Then I show them the math.
Then I ask them why they hate single moms.
Then they stop talking to me.
Lickmuffin on April 8, 2013 at 11:49 PM