Takeover: Michigan governor announces he’ll appoint an emergency manager for Detroit

posted at 2:01 pm on March 1, 2013 by Allahpundit

Any volunteers for the second-most thankless job in America? Speaker of the House being first, of course.

Snyder said the city has not been able to solve its financial crisis and that outside help is needed. Today “is a day to call all hands on deck… to say there’s been too much fighting, too much blame, not enough resources, not enough people working together. The key answer I believe all of us want to get to is growing the city of Detroit.”…

The review team found Detroit’s cash-flow deficit is nearly $100 million. That’s on top of an accumulated deficit of $327 million. The city also has $14.9 billion worth of unfunded pension and employment retirement liabilities, according to the review team report. In five years, it needs $1.9 billion to begin making payments on the debt…

Greg Bowens, a political expert and former press secretary for former mayor Dennis Archer, said an emergency manager would be a devastating blow for the morale for the people of Detroit.

“In the end, it means the governor does not have the faith in the people of Detroit to govern themselves in a responsible manner,” Bowens said.

Why … yes, that’s what it means. I can’t believe there’s any serious constituency outside Detroit that would disagree, and Detroiters themselves would disagree only out of pure pride. The city’s a byword for terminal liberal sclerosis. How can this be a blow to their morale when their morale’s already reached this point? Look no further than their statuary to see that they’re desperate for a savior to ride in and impose order on a dystopian nightmare.

Snyder says he has someone in mind for an 18-month stint as emergency manager. But who? Who’s qualified to be the half-man, half-robot civic protector that Detroiters are dreaming of? Dave Weigel has the perfect cyborg for the job:

Romney’s got a mixed record as a politician, but nobody’s ever questions his skill as a brutal operator and turnaround artist. He’s got a good relationship with Republicans in the state—they even scrapped an electoral vote split plan in 2012 because they wanted him to win! He’s got a larger Rolodex of possible investors than anyone else who might be reasonably expected to take this job.

UPDATE: I’ve gotten some interesting email about this tossed-off idea, so I should reiterate: It’s not a joke! Any Michigan Democrat will tell you that Detroit politicians are among the most irrelevant in the state legislature. Republicans view aid to the city as good money tossed into a sinkhole. So butter them up with a Republican they know and can do business with. Romney’s ties to the city are tighter than most city emergency managers, roving technocrats who do a few years at a time in troubled metro governments.

Having a very prominent Michigan native as manager might make the idea of an emergency manager a little more palatable in Detroit. He is, as Weigel says, a renowned turnaround artist from his time at Bain and at the Salt Lake Olympics. He’s eager to regain a place in American politics too; this would put him back in the spotlight without having to worry about running for office. And Erika makes a good point: After being demagogued by Obama for his Detroit managed-bankruptcy op-ed, Romney might have something to prove. Two questions, though. It’s one thing to want to dip a toe back into policy, it’s another to jump hip-deep into quicksand. I realize Romney enjoys a challenge but is this really how this guy wants to spend his retirement, jumping from the agony of presidential defeat to the agony of trying to make Detroit sustainable again? I don’t know. Maybe; his sense of duty might force him if Snyder asks. Second, is a guy who’s most famous to liberals for being really rich, criticizing Obama, and dumping on the “47 percent” really someone who’ll be welcomed in Detroit? Snyder’s going to have to tread lightly here in imposing Republican management on an overwhelmingly Democratic city. Romney’s an odd choice in that regard, even if he’s willing to volunteer. But maybe Weigel’s right that a few whirls of that Rolodex and a few hundred million in investments from friends of Mitt will soothe things over. I’m interested to hear Romney on this. Maybe that’s what Chris Wallace meant when he teased about Mitt’s future plans.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

More Agenda 21. Grabbing up as much land as possible.

katy on May 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM

Washington, DC aside, why does the federal government own any land..?

affenhauer on May 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM

Ya know, I think the GOP has stumbled upon a brilliant way to force some budget cuts. First we had it at the FAA, now at Interior:

1) Cut everything by XX%
2) People start screeching
3) You point out that “well, here’s where you could have saved that money”
4) Pass legislation reallocating the would-have-been-wasted funds to actual good stuff
5) Obama signs it.

If Step 2 doesn’t happen, we’ve won. If step 4 doesn’t happen, point out that “the democrats wouldn’t let us reopen the parks!”. If step 5 doesn’t happen, scream and shout that “Obama wouldn’t let us reopen the parks!”

Mohonri on May 1, 2013 at 5:37 PM

The federal government needs to start getting rid of land, not acquiring more, and stop infringing on local economies and communities with their micro-level political power grabs while contributing to the national deficit.

Le bravo, Erika!

More Agenda 21. Grabbing up as much land as possible.

katy on May 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM

Yup. Filthy sob’s.

petefrt on May 1, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Washington, DC aside, why does the federal government own any land..?

affenhauer on May 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM

So they can hire people to manage it.

WryTrvllr on May 1, 2013 at 5:41 PM

And the really sad thing (and if you’re a liberal you would be intellectually dishonest to admit it) the properties would have been LESS developed and LESS crowded and BETTER managed if the gubmint had just kept their grubby paws off….

WryTrvllr on May 1, 2013 at 5:45 PM

deny it…sorry

WryTrvllr on May 1, 2013 at 5:46 PM

Katy got it on comment number one.

tom daschle concerned on May 1, 2013 at 5:47 PM

I suggest either:

1. The US Government sells all its lands back to the states in which the land is located, or

2. The US Government turns over operations to private, competitively bid contractors. Present US park employees would have first dibs on jobs, now private, assuming they are qualified. A small staff of government employees would remain to handle oversight of private companies.

#2 would shift the burden of federal employees from the government to the private secor. This would increase tax revenue because now the government would not have to pay these employees and the private contractor would pay taxes on profits. I expect that the private sector would be more efficient, being profit oriented, than the employees that have now no or little accountability.

If #1 goes ahead, I suggest the sale be contingent on the states adopting #2 making park operations private.

I’d like to see this across the board with as many agencies as possible.

billrowe on May 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM

The federal government needs to start getting rid of land, not acquiring more, and stop infringing on local economies and communities with their micro-level political power grabs while contributing to the national deficit.

That would be giving up power. Not gonna happen. They can’t even get rid of empty buildings that we are paying for, or empty bank accounts with monthly fees. How could this clown troupe ever actually get rid of LAND?

iurockhead on May 1, 2013 at 5:54 PM

And you wonder why “tin hats” believe government is buying up ammunition in order to drive prices sky high.

GarandFan on May 1, 2013 at 5:55 PM

They own most of the West. Why don’t we give it back to the Native Americans? At least they are savvy businessmen and would let energy companies lease it back!

PattyJ on May 1, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Since I cancelled satellite I’m getting reaquinted with OTA TV. Been watching PBS distort history and embellish socialism via a retelling of Ken Burns’ old dust bowl documentary. They are pulling out all the stops to make it as current to events and policy initiatives as possible. Fascinating in a “we need to defund this crap” kind of way.

Having read “The Roosevelt Myth” and seeing how dems are operating right now it confirms what we know about them. Fcae it, they are communists that won’t let us define them as such. Progressive, European socialists, whatever. They want to control people by any means necessary.

DanMan on May 1, 2013 at 6:12 PM

LOVELY picture of the Tetons :)

Jackalope on May 1, 2013 at 6:25 PM

National Park lands sure do make GREAT COLLATERAL for our debt!

Wouldn’t the Chinese love to get hold of some of the natural resources under the ground?

PappyD61 on May 1, 2013 at 6:28 PM

Why can’t I post links on here????

katy on May 1, 2013 at 6:39 PM

the Federal government should sell at least 90% of the land it holds. States hold too much land as well.

forest on May 1, 2013 at 7:08 PM

Why can’t I post links on here????

katy on May 1, 2013 at 6:39 PM

If you are trying to post CNN or CNBC links, HA has judged those sources unreliable and the whole post will be blocked.

slickwillie2001 on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

New Mexico …..dopes are going for a land grab in Taos Co. . Believe me
they can’t manage any of the land they now ” own ” . But call it a National
Monument and the morons cheer . The locals don’t care ( they foul their
turf with trash galore ) not realizing that there are no tax $s for the county
in this grab . These are the good folks that write about how they can hear
their lettuce scream when cut it in their gardens .
Susanna Martinez R Gov. has injected a good bit of sanity in an otherwise
nuts state .
If only they could get the idea that cocktail hour doesn’t start at 11am !

Lucano on May 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM

That’s an interesting photo shot on the home page.

Cleombrotus on May 1, 2013 at 9:25 PM

I live just over the hill to the left of that cover photo. Just love it in the summer. Especially if summer comes on a weekend!

IdahoAl on May 1, 2013 at 10:35 PM

slickwillie2001 on May 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM

Thanks. It was a cbnc link

katy on May 1, 2013 at 11:09 PM

cnbc duh

katy on May 1, 2013 at 11:09 PM

It is tremendously irresponsible for the federal government to be in the business of adding to the federal estate when we can’t even afford to to properly take care of the parks and properties they already own.

FIFY, Erika.

Washington, DC aside, why does the federal government own any land..?

affenhauer on May 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM

There are *some* legitimate reasons, including military bases and ranges. And, I don’t mind a few national parks. One third of the land area of the US, though? Wow.

That would be giving up power. Not gonna happen.

iurockhead on May 1, 2013 at 5:54 PM

BINGO!

GWB on May 2, 2013 at 10:20 AM

The whole idea of these land grabs really frosts me !
Great piece Erika , wish it got more attention .

Lucano on May 2, 2013 at 10:53 AM