The 52 who didn’t make it into the Oscar winner last night
posted at 8:41 am on February 25, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
Last night, Hollywood honored Argo as the Best Picture of 2012, a not-unexpected outcome, and there isn’t any doubt that Argo is a gripping, well-made tale. National Journal reminded us yesterday, though, that it’s only a sliver of a much larger story, a rare moment of triumph in a fifteen-month saga of impotence and failure in the face of injustice, extremism, and terrorism. The movie celebrates the courageous effort made by Canada and the US to rescue six Americans from the clutches of revolutionary Iran, but mostly ignores the 52 Americans held in captivity for 444 days while their government stood helpless.
Jill Lawrence makes sure we remember what happened to them during and after their captivity, and highlights an effort by the hostages to use the film’s success to finally get some justice:
Argo has been showered with honors, and is a strong contender for the best-picture Oscar at tonight’s Academy Awards. There’s no dispute that it is historically inaccurate and ignores a larger tragedy to focus on a tiny sliver of success associated with a humiliating chapter in the nation’s history. But give Argo its due. The film is serving to remind the country of a time, a place, and a debacle at what could be a pivotal moment in the history of the Iranian hostage crisis.
The former hostages and their advocates are mobilizing for a Capitol Hill push that they hope will be the final chapter in a 33-year quest for relief and for justice. In a few weeks, members of Congress will receive a packet of information that includes powerful statements and videos from the former hostages and their survivors. Some will be telling their stories publicly for the first time. One of them is Steven Lauterbach, whose written account opens with this sentence: “I slashed my wrists while in captivity in Iran.”
The hostages were among the first victims of Islamic terrorism — yet unlike subsequent victims, they have never received the satisfaction of a court judgment against a state sponsor of terrorism, or financial compensation drawn from its assets. For decades they have tried and failed to navigate a web of conflicting legal opinions, court reversals, and changing terrorism policies. And for decades they have been thwarted by the 1981 Algiers Accords, in which Iran agreed to release the hostages and President Carter agreed to bar lawsuits by them and their families. One Congress after another has been unable or unwilling to surmount presidential administrations and court rulings that have kept the accords in force. The Supreme Court last year ended the possibility of suing under current law, leaving Congress to find a solution.
With its suspected march to nuclear weaponry and broad sponsorship of global terrorism, Iran presents America and the world with problems much deeper than how to tie up the loose ends of a 1980 crisis. Yet the dark details of their captivity and its long-term impact – the depression, the nightmares, flashbacks, divorces, and physical illnesses– are bound to add urgency to the former hostages’ cause, as is their advancing age (a dozen of the 52 have since died).
Read it all, and be sure to take some time to watch a few of the videos of the former hostages and their families to understand just how little attention has been paid to providing them justice. Here is Foreign Service officer Steven Lauterbach on just how desperate he was to be allowed some human contact:
You can read my review of Argo here, but Bill Daugherty’s may carry a lot more weight in relation to historical perspective:
I doubt these people will see real justice in their lifetimes, but it would be nice if the American government took more of an interest in an attempt to provide it. If Argo provides the impetus to make that effort, then it deserves every accolade it receives.
Related Posts:








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6
There’s a whole fleet in the Med. One aircraft or drone would have ended the attack. The SEALs fighting for their lives just needed a little help, any help and they got none.
The people in Tripoli could have helped, but they got turned around and told to stand down.
The child running things was paralyzed with political fear and indifference.
He’s told America’s enemies that attacks on us will go unanswered because he doesn’t give a crap.
dogsoldier on May 9, 2013 at 6:15 AM
Sadly Benghazi was ,figuratively speaking, demoted to page 33 in the tabloids (even by Fox News)by a highly sensational murder trial verdict and an equally bombastic kidnapping-rape arrest. Although these two titillating stories had fortuitous, feel good results, they have no more effect on our nation’s destiny and security than a frog fart.Yet they both buried the far more important Benghazi coverup and extortion– which does not augur well for any substantive corrections and prosecutions coming from these hearings.Of course, a MSM in the tank for Obama, would not have adequately covered the hearings anyway but Fox’s relegating Benghazi to the “back pages” tells you all you need to know about the American public–Fox is ratings driven 24/7 and they knew they would lose market share by covering the more crucial story.
MaiDee on May 9, 2013 at 6:25 AM
Not to mention the lack of ambassadors left to die.
The Schaef on May 9, 2013 at 7:04 AM
The Media should be ashamed. My take.
kingsjester on May 9, 2013 at 7:09 AM
As I said before, Hillary will get all the justice that will be left after she remembers and recalls “witnesses” that nobody ever knew about coming to testify in her favor.
Arkysaw was just the warm up. And when the Foster evidence up and disappeared, she was running the show in Virginia and DC.
dockywocky on May 9, 2013 at 8:29 AM
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3017194/posts
To me one of the seminal moments was when talking points woman speirer asked Hicks “if he could be stationed anywhere in the world where would it be.”
She had ask him twice. Few caught on the threat of “do as we say or you go to Siberia.” But it was a direct threat form the Chicago thuggery if you know how they play the game.
rodguy911 on May 9, 2013 at 9:15 AM
Question for Stewart – what attacks like this occurred under Bush with no hearings afterwards?
Seven hour sustained attacks (which could have lasted longer for all anyone in DC knew when they refused to send help), missing and then dead ambassadors, with no help from anyone on the ground, in the middle of an election?
Seriously, I want to know.
Sure, there have been bombs, where it’s a blast or two and then over. And yes, people have been killed by those bombs.
But sustained attack from armed terrorists? Ambassadors with almost no security killed and dragged through the streets? On the anniversary of 9/11 when boosted security ought to have been an no-brainer?
I really want to hear about these.
Missy on May 9, 2013 at 9:18 AM
Does Hicks have grounds for a civil suit against his bosses for the demotion, or is that not allowed? I realize he is a white male hair challenged person, but that doesn’t usually count for much.
Fleuries on May 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM
How on earth do you know that American bodies were never dragged through the street after bombings under Bush? Stewart’s segment made you all look like fools, and I’m glad you’ve all seen it.
libfreeordie on May 9, 2013 at 9:59 AM
54 attacks on American diplomatic centers, 13 killed under Bush. 3 hearings.
One attack under Obama, 4 killed, 9 hearings.
Do the math.
libfreeordie on May 9, 2013 at 10:03 AM
Missy said Ambassadors. How can you willing be so stupid?
No, Stewart’s segment made him look like a partisan fool.
blink on May 9, 2013 at 10:03 AM
Zero lies.
Dozens of lies and cover-ups.
Do the math.
blink on May 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM
libfreeordie, can you at least admit that the Obama administration lied about Benghazi because the truth ruined their attempt to maintain the impression that Libya was a big success story???
blink on May 9, 2013 at 10:07 AM
Except that there aren’t really any cover ups, just lots of conjecture.
libfreeordie on May 9, 2013 at 10:07 AM
Yes, there is. They lied about who changed Rice’s talking points.
How on earth can you deny this? Are you deliberately keeping your head in the sand?
blink on May 9, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Subpoena both Hillary & Rice, confront them with the proof of their lies, charge Hillary with Felony Crimes of Perjury as she lied last time while under oath (do so with Rice if she testified last time and also lied under oath), & begin Impeachment proceedings immediately!
easyt65 on May 9, 2013 at 10:17 AM
<
Yes, there is. They lied about who changed Rice’s talking points.
How on earth can you deny this? Are you deliberately keeping your head in the sand?
blink on May 9, 2013 at 10:09 AM
It was PROVEN FURTHER yesterday that Ambassador Stevens HIMSELF passed on at the start of the THIRD terrorist attack against him that the attack was indeed a TERRORIST ATTACK – “We are under ATTACK”! This was passed on by one of the witnesses to the State Department / the WH before contacting the military attache, the Libyan Govt POC, and the Libyan Military POC to request assistance. The State Dept ws contacted & notified of the ATTACK at 3am Libya time – 9pm Washington DC time
It was proven FURTHER yesterday that the administration knew inside of 12 hours that this was a terrorist attack, the identity of the group that perpetrated it & was claiming responsibility.
It was proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that a CIA report was sent via CABLE explicitly calling this a terrorist attack & providing much detail – we know the administration then edited that report no less than 3 times, stripping out every reference to terrorism or a terrorist attack. We KNOW that the administration – OBAMA, Hillary, & Rice along with others – were shoveling the BS ‘video’ LIE WEEKS AFTER THE ATTACK!
These 3 men yesterday proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that 1) this whole Benghazi story coming out of the White House – which Obama himself participated in by insisting it was over a video weeks after the attack – was a calculated conspiratorial LIE to cover up what went on in Benghazi to shelter Obama from the event & protect his re-election chances. Even more heinous, it proved Americans who fought for their lives for hours while waiting for help to come were abandoned – BETRAYED – LEFT TO DIE, that there were assets available & closer that could have responded & that there WAS a ‘stand down’ order given! Opposed to the Lie the administration told, the Libyan Govt was never contacted to coordinate approval through Libyan airspace to go to the rescue in Benghazi!
The very President who promised to find out who did this & make them pay, to find out the truth so this would never happen again,is the man responsible for the lack of security, the death of Stevens, the abandoning / betrayal of 3 Americans, & the top man in this massive coverup! DESPICABLE…and IMPEACHABLE!
easyt65 on May 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM
Mostly because we also have the reports from those events, and no one was working their butts off to cover up what happened, or deny the terrorist nature of the attack.
Also, most of the “attacks” that took place, no one was killed and in more than a few of them there were not even any injuries.
Also, it is a lie to say this is the one and only attack. Those who claim thus are deliberately leaving numerous attacks out of the count for arbitrary reasons, and in focusing on embassy attacks they are further ignoring the number of attempts here at home, most of which were thwarted by dumb luck.
The Schaef on May 9, 2013 at 12:55 PM
Can Jon Stewart name one ambassador killed on Bush’s watch? Um…I thought so. He’s a washed out comedian who’s getting old and unfunny, he’s following so close into Letterman’s steps that it’s almost sad…
jimver on May 9, 2013 at 2:44 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6