<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: starboardhelm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6745691</link>
		<dc:creator>starboardhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6745691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conversation with Liberal facebook friend:

Her: Even though he&#039;s a republican, I agree with Hagel completely about Irael, the israeli lobby and Iran.

Me: Which Hagel positions on Israel and Iran do you completely agree with? The earlier ones that run counter to Obama&#039;s official positions, yet Obama somehow &quot;overlooked&quot; when he nominated Hagel, or the completely opposite ones Hagel swore before congress he holds now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conversation with Liberal facebook friend:</p>
<p>Her: Even though he&#8217;s a republican, I agree with Hagel completely about Irael, the israeli lobby and Iran.</p>
<p>Me: Which Hagel positions on Israel and Iran do you completely agree with? The earlier ones that run counter to Obama&#8217;s official positions, yet Obama somehow &#8220;overlooked&#8221; when he nominated Hagel, or the completely opposite ones Hagel swore before congress he holds now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morning Flap: February 22, 2013 - Flap&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6745258</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morning Flap: February 22, 2013 - Flap&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6745258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too? « H... &#8211; Looks like Chuck Hagel is the next Sec Defense. Let the sequestration begin: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too? « H&#8230; &#8211; Looks like Chuck Hagel is the next Sec Defense. Let the sequestration begin: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROCnPhilly</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6745004</link>
		<dc:creator>ROCnPhilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6745004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the opposition was just for show. And we have a letter basically stating that: We expect Hagel is going to do a bad job. We are not willing to sink a nominee just because he is unqualified and incompetent. 

Mr. Toomey, you just lost my support and my vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the opposition was just for show. And we have a letter basically stating that: We expect Hagel is going to do a bad job. We are not willing to sink a nominee just because he is unqualified and incompetent. </p>
<p>Mr. Toomey, you just lost my support and my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greataunty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744845</link>
		<dc:creator>greataunty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t believe our Sec of Def is going to be someone with ties to Hamas. We&#039;re doomed, all is lost]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe our Sec of Def is going to be someone with ties to Hamas. We&#8217;re doomed, all is lost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too? &#8211; NOT Good &#124; Little Bytes News on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744648</link>
		<dc:creator>The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too? &#8211; NOT Good &#124; Little Bytes News on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] See on hotair.com [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See on hotair.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoran</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744499</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that no matter who is SecDef, he will be implementing Obama policies.  It&#039;s not like Bush putting Rumsfeld in there and saying, &quot;Run the damn place.&quot;  So do we want to make this the big story for weeks, Republican intransigence over a former Republican Senator, and if we &quot;succeed&quot; end up with someone else just as bad?  Is this the hill we want to die on?

Of course, for many conservatives, it&#039;s a matter of wanting to die on some hill, sometime.  For some, it&#039;s a matter of wanting to die on every hill, every time.  Anger and frustration aren&#039;t the parents of sound policy or sound politics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that no matter who is SecDef, he will be implementing Obama policies.  It&#8217;s not like Bush putting Rumsfeld in there and saying, &#8220;Run the damn place.&#8221;  So do we want to make this the big story for weeks, Republican intransigence over a former Republican Senator, and if we &#8220;succeed&#8221; end up with someone else just as bad?  Is this the hill we want to die on?</p>
<p>Of course, for many conservatives, it&#8217;s a matter of wanting to die on some hill, sometime.  For some, it&#8217;s a matter of wanting to die on every hill, every time.  Anger and frustration aren&#8217;t the parents of sound policy or sound politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744398</link>
		<dc:creator>riddick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And once the idiot destroys military, should be rather quick, all we&#039;ll hear is that &quot;but a Republican did it!&quot;. No other reason for liberals to stick up for this nomination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And once the idiot destroys military, should be rather quick, all we&#8217;ll hear is that &#8220;but a Republican did it!&#8221;. No other reason for liberals to stick up for this nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744244</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...ba11-less basturds!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;ba11-less basturds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlaMurph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744082</link>
		<dc:creator>FlaMurph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You people just don&#039;t get it.
This incompetent boob of an ex-senator, who is totally clueless and prefers the anti- semitism .......... 
IS THE ONLY PERSON capable of filling this job for President Revenge.

Lower your standards for goodness sake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people just don&#8217;t get it.<br />
This incompetent boob of an ex-senator, who is totally clueless and prefers the anti- semitism &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
IS THE ONLY PERSON capable of filling this job for President Revenge.</p>
<p>Lower your standards for goodness sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As expected, spineless Republicans cave &#8211; Chuck Hagel has enough votes to be confirmed now : Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744079</link>
		<dc:creator>As expected, spineless Republicans cave &#8211; Chuck Hagel has enough votes to be confirmed now : Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and Mississippi RINO Thad Cochran. Even tea-party backed Senate candidate in the last election Deb Fischer will vote for Hagel. No matter what happens, they always betray [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Mississippi RINO Thad Cochran. Even tea-party backed Senate candidate in the last election Deb Fischer will vote for Hagel. No matter what happens, they always betray [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panther</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6744055</link>
		<dc:creator>Panther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6744055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you think the repubs can&#039;t go any lower, they grab another shovel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when you think the repubs can&#8217;t go any lower, they grab another shovel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743852</link>
		<dc:creator>RJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot of folks round about these (Hot Air) part genuinely hate Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts because he refused to rule Obamacare unconstitutional. In his majority opinion Chief Justice Roberts said point blank, “I refuse to absolve the American people of the responsibility of who they elected as their Congressional Representatives”. 

SWalker on February 21, 2013 at 2:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Constitutional Traitor in Chief, Chief Justice John Roberts, rewrote legislation making a &quot;penalty&quot; a &quot;tax&quot;.  When a Justice legislates from the bench they shouldn&#039;t be surprised when they are regarded and treated as the cheapest and most corrupt of legislators.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A lot of folks round about these (Hot Air) part genuinely hate Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts because he refused to rule Obamacare unconstitutional. In his majority opinion Chief Justice Roberts said point blank, “I refuse to absolve the American people of the responsibility of who they elected as their Congressional Representatives”. </p>
<p>SWalker on February 21, 2013 at 2:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The Constitutional Traitor in Chief, Chief Justice John Roberts, rewrote legislation making a &#8220;penalty&#8221; a &#8220;tax&#8221;.  When a Justice legislates from the bench they shouldn&#8217;t be surprised when they are regarded and treated as the cheapest and most corrupt of legislators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatekeeper</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743793</link>
		<dc:creator>Gatekeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F*ck this S*it.

I quit.

WTF is going on in the country?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F*ck this S*it.</p>
<p>I quit.</p>
<p>WTF is going on in the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoxHead1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743785</link>
		<dc:creator>BoxHead1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my correction]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my correction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoxHead1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743779</link>
		<dc:creator>BoxHead1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The first time I was REALLY scared &lt;strike&gt;for&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;of&lt;/strong&gt; my country was when
the A$$hat was voted in for a second term.

Amjean on February 21, 2013 at 2:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This  was my feeling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The first time I was REALLY scared <strike>for</strike> <strong>of</strong> my country was when<br />
the A$$hat was voted in for a second term.</p>
<p>Amjean on February 21, 2013 at 2:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>This  was my feeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743722</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;lostmotherland on February 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM
sesquipedalian on February 21, 2013 at 3:02 PM 
Trolls emerging from the bunker.

Bitter Clinger on February 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;...I think...from under the covers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>lostmotherland on February 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM<br />
sesquipedalian on February 21, 2013 at 3:02 PM<br />
Trolls emerging from the bunker.</p>
<p>Bitter Clinger on February 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;I think&#8230;from under the covers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefox</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743689</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM
 
Well then why is there this constant buzzing overhead?
 
I think it would be nice if AP/ED put up an open thread on site suggestions before tinkering.
 Was thinking that this site could be a lot more intuitive and user friendly with some minor tweaks.
 
More news headlines/feeds
 Possibly a news ticker.
 No disques commenting.

can_con on February 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thot you were joking about the buzzing. I don&#039;t get that if you weren&#039;t.

What I&#039;ve found for the last 2 weeks or more is that the front page has to be refreshed many times when you first open a window. Then the comments are not advancing ( updating )automatically as before. Also I get a small yellow alert from Internet Explorer at the base of a thread sometimes saying &quot;only secure content is being displayed&quot; &quot;show all content?&quot; I just x it out. 

Your ideas are good too. An edit button would be nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM</p>
<p>Well then why is there this constant buzzing overhead?</p>
<p>I think it would be nice if AP/ED put up an open thread on site suggestions before tinkering.<br />
 Was thinking that this site could be a lot more intuitive and user friendly with some minor tweaks.</p>
<p>More news headlines/feeds<br />
 Possibly a news ticker.<br />
 No disques commenting.</p>
<p>can_con on February 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I thot you were joking about the buzzing. I don&#8217;t get that if you weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve found for the last 2 weeks or more is that the front page has to be refreshed many times when you first open a window. Then the comments are not advancing ( updating )automatically as before. Also I get a small yellow alert from Internet Explorer at the base of a thread sometimes saying &#8220;only secure content is being displayed&#8221; &#8220;show all content?&#8221; I just x it out. </p>
<p>Your ideas are good too. An edit button would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743539</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RePUBEicans ... you can always count on them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RePUBEicans &#8230; you can always count on them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pardonme</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743503</link>
		<dc:creator>Pardonme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is becoming more clear every day that we can certainly trust the GOP in everything.  Trust them to fold and acquiesce to the left.  Why even have 2 parties if all they do is agree for political reasons alone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is becoming more clear every day that we can certainly trust the GOP in everything.  Trust them to fold and acquiesce to the left.  Why even have 2 parties if all they do is agree for political reasons alone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can_con</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743390</link>
		<dc:creator>can_con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;LOL, well it’s not doing very well, shorts out. HA has been messing with the site for over two weeks. Wish they would update it with some more modern features.
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well then why is there this constant buzzing overhead?

I think it would be nice if AP/ED put up an open thread on site suggestions before tinkering.
Was thinking that this site could be a lot more intuitive and user friendly with some minor tweaks.

More news headlines/feeds
Possibly a news ticker.
No disques commenting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>LOL, well it’s not doing very well, shorts out. HA has been messing with the site for over two weeks. Wish they would update it with some more modern features.<br />
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well then why is there this constant buzzing overhead?</p>
<p>I think it would be nice if AP/ED put up an open thread on site suggestions before tinkering.<br />
Was thinking that this site could be a lot more intuitive and user friendly with some minor tweaks.</p>
<p>More news headlines/feeds<br />
Possibly a news ticker.<br />
No disques commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s the Spirit!  Mediocrity to the bitter end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the Spirit!  Mediocrity to the bitter end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeaPartyNation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743337</link>
		<dc:creator>TeaPartyNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Jews who stupidly supported OBOZO will now have put their &quot;home&quot; country in grave peril. I wonder if they&#039;re happy about that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American Jews who stupidly supported OBOZO will now have put their &#8220;home&#8221; country in grave peril. I wonder if they&#8217;re happy about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Republican comes out in support of Hagel; 15 others ask Obama to &#8230; &#8211; NBCNews.com (blog)&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743329</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Republican comes out in support of Hagel; 15 others ask Obama to &#8230; &#8211; NBCNews.com (blog)&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hagel NominationNPR (blog)Republican senators call on Obama to withdraw Hagel nominationFox NewsThe 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update &#8230;Hot Air (blog)DefenseNews.com&#160;-Huffington Post&#160;-The Reporterall 51 news [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hagel NominationNPR (blog)Republican senators call on Obama to withdraw Hagel nominationFox NewsThe 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update &#8230;Hot Air (blog)DefenseNews.com&nbsp;-Huffington Post&nbsp;-The Reporterall 51 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefox</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743310</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:04 PM
 
I heard that when you seethe red submit button on here, it is an indication that your being tracked by…..damn buzzing overhea

can_con on February 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL, well it&#039;s not doing very well, shorts out. HA has been messing with the site for over two weeks. Wish they would update it with some more modern features.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
bluefox on February 21, 2013 at 3:04 PM</p>
<p>I heard that when you seethe red submit button on here, it is an indication that your being tracked by…..damn buzzing overhea</p>
<p>can_con on February 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL, well it&#8217;s not doing very well, shorts out. HA has been messing with the site for over two weeks. Wish they would update it with some more modern features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Strozek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/comment-page-2/#comment-6743308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Strozek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777#comment-6743308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whigs.

Yup.  

Bring me a 3rd party.

Crazy ol&#039; Jesse Ventura might even be lookin&#039; purty good com &#039;16.

He may be nuts, but he&#039;s a &quot;stands for something nuts&quot;.

What the GOP stands for, I dunno.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whigs.</p>
<p>Yup.  </p>
<p>Bring me a 3rd party.</p>
<p>Crazy ol&#8217; Jesse Ventura might even be lookin&#8217; purty good com &#8217;16.</p>
<p>He may be nuts, but he&#8217;s a &#8220;stands for something nuts&#8221;.</p>
<p>What the GOP stands for, I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>