“We made one mistake this time”

Your pants are aflame.

Liar.

bluegill on February 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM

Um, yeah, your Crowley comment was the reasonable one.

They jumped from third-stringer to third-stringer because the field had been thoroughly prepped for 3 years with “only Romney is electable” b.s.

ddrintn on February 20, 2013 at 2:53 PM

They jumped because Palin wasn’t there. That she didn’t run was a shock.

Gelsomina on February 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM

I wasn’t shocked by it at all.

Since when did the Republican candidates EVER get a break from ANY Liberal media personality? The answer is NEVER!

I don’t have any issue with Palin. My “can’t stand that woman” comment was about Candy Crowley. As for the Palin thing, the people I really can’t stand are the Palin worshipers. These are the people who listen to Mark Levin to know what to think and who whine nonstop about “the establishment” and attack any Republican not named Palin.

bluegill on February 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM

I’ve heard you say this so many times in your own defense that it’s become like Chinese water torture..drip…drip…drip!
Goodness,get some professional help for your palin-phobia obsession and set us free.

As I wrote at the time….especially since she had to walk her statement back immediately afterward.

What a game. Even the senile old Perry Mason fans know full well that the well-honed lawyer trick is to blurt it out there to shock the jury (voters) and then retract it with a skillful “I must apologize to the court,” and the judge shrugs and instructs the jury to pretend they never heard it.
So she retracts and the world will then pretend it never heard or saw the knife go into Oromney’s back.

Walking it back is part of the act!

bluegill on February 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM
Why oh why, do you follow every reasonable comment that you ever make with“!!!ARG!!!STUPID PALIN!!!? Hmm?
S. D. on February 20, 2013 at 7:21 PM

I don’t have any issue with Palin. My “can’t stand that woman” comment was about Candy Crowley. As for the Palin thing, the people I really can’t stand are the Palin worshipers. These are the people who listen to Mark Levin to know what to think and who whine nonstop about “the establishment” and attack any Republican not named Palin.

That was a HUGE mistake.

[I]f you’re going to fact check in the middle of a debate you’re moderating, you’d better be sure you have the facts straight yourself. Otherwise, you end up having to go on your own network, where you’ve already been fact-checked in the negative, and dance your statement back[.]

Don’t know if this was stated on the first page or not, but it really didn’t matter that she had to walk the statement back; by then the damage had already been done.

bluegill on February 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM

Why oh why, do you follow every reasonable comment that you ever make with“!!!ARG!!!STUPID PALIN!!!? Hmm?

Hate that woman.

bluegill on February 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM

…you know they are talking about a cow that grazes on the lower 48…right?

AGAIN you have a reading COMPREHENSION problem, because my ORIGINAL post was in RESPONSE to A ROMNEY SUPPORTER BLAMING ANTI-ROMNEYS FOR LOSING THE ELECTION FOR ROMNEY I.E., BEATING A DEAD HORSE. I got over the election just fine. You guys are the ones that can’t get over that your savior Romney lost. I didn’t bring it up… Get it.. Tator twits did.

melle1228 on February 20, 2013 at 3:05 PM

Tater Salad didn’t blame anti-Romneys for losing the election. He said that every Republican candidate would have been treated like Romney.

Read his comment again. It seems that you only read the first half of the first sentence and jumped to conclusions.

They jumped from third-stringer to third-stringer because the field had been thoroughly prepped for 3 years with “only Romney is electable” b.s.

ddrintn on February 20, 2013 at 2:53 PM

They jumped because Palin wasn’t there. That she didn’t run was a shock.

That’s because we see the very same game being played all over again. That horse is nowhere near dead yet.

ddrintn on February 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM

LOL– I love how they come on a thread blame us for being anti-Romney and when you respond it is YOU who hasn’t gotten over the election and YOU who is beating a dead horse.

It is as bad as telling us we lost the election for Romney even though we voted for him despite our hatred for him as a candidate. Ugh..

I don’t blame you for Romney’s loss. I blame you for beating a dead horse.

Many of you anti-Romneys are still fighting the primaries and yelling at us about what a bad candidate Romney is. But it’s over. Your candidate didn’t win the primaries. Somehow you can’t get over that.

The big mistake of the anti-Romneys was that they jumped from candidate to candidate, because nobody was good enough for them. Romney was the last man standing.

Gelsomina on February 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM

AGAIN you have a reading COMPREHENSION problem, because my ORIGINAL post was in RESPONSE to A ROMNEY SUPPORTER BLAMING ANTI-ROMNEYS FOR LOSING THE ELECTION FOR ROMNEY I.E., BEATING A DEAD HORSE. I got over the election just fine. You guys are the ones that can’t get over that your savior Romney lost. I didn’t bring it up… Get it.. Tator twits did.

What did this mean, I wondered. A conservative moderator? Someone from the blogosphere or talk radio or a thinktank or conservative media, such as it is? Breitbart? Blaze?

Frank gushed that Candy Crowley would be the FIRST WOMAN to moderate a Town Hall debate!!!! That’s diversity! And Martha Raddatz would be moderating the VP debate! First Something woman something!

Right. That’s what diversity means to this tool. He accepts that having a woman is good in and of itself because it’s diverse, which is good in and of itself. Diversity means gender, color, race, whatever. As we have learned from politics, the media, and academia, this kind of diversity leads only to more and more ultra left wingism.

This clown cannot be allowed to get anywhere near the “debates” next time.

The big mistake of the anti-Romneys was that they jumped from candidate to candidate, because nobody was good enough for them. Romney was the last man standing.

Gelsomina on February 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM

They jumped from third-stringer to third-stringer because the field had been thoroughly prepped for 3 years with “only Romney is electable” b.s.

That’s not a straw man argument. It’s a rant.

Gelsomina on February 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM

No, it’s a straw man. Object to a squish candidate, and it’s because the objector considers him/herself “perfect”. That’s a load of logically fallacious bullshit and it’s really gotten old.

I don’t blame you for Romney’s loss. I blame you for beating a dead horse.

Many of you anti-Romneys are still fighting the primaries and yelling at us about what a bad candidate Romney is.

Gelsomina on February 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM

That’s because we see the very same game being played all over again. That horse is nowhere near dead yet.

Candy Crowley
Sandra Fluke
Tina Fey

Happy Nomad on February 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM
uote>

Very Well Said!!!!

I say to hell with these spoiled losers, that always find every candidate “not good enough” and therefore not worthy of support or a vote. This past election seperated the wheat from the chaff..It was the Makers vs the Takers and if you are a so called conservative and sat it out…then you sir are pathetic. Let’s reach out and expand our party to team members that understand how important the elections are.

I will rephrase my post for you since you seem to have reading comprehension issues: Stop blaming me for Romney’s loss. I did not endorse Romney, but like a good soldier I still voted for him.

melle1228 on February 20, 2013 at 1:26 PM

I don’t blame you for Romney’s loss. I blame you for beating a dead horse.

Many of you anti-Romneys are still fighting the primaries and yelling at us about what a bad candidate Romney is. But it’s over. Your candidate didn’t win the primaries. Somehow you can’t get over that.

The big mistake of the anti-Romneys was that they jumped from candidate to candidate, because nobody was good enough for them. Romney was the last man standing.

Some libertarians on HA, of all the people on Earth, use the same idiotic tactic. None makes it real. The truth is very tough to swallow.