Breaking: Obama proposes delay in sequester

posted at 10:41 am on February 5, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Well, well, well.  Sometimes a short-term budget fix looks pretty darned good.  Barack Obama, who had earlier criticized Republicans for offering a short-term fix for the debt ceiling, now wants a short-term fix for the sequester:

So far, we’re not seeing any details, but David Freddoso believes this shows “Maneuver X” is working:

Philip Klein explained this strategy three weeks ago:

Consider, then, “Maneuver X.” As modified to fit the current political environment, it would mean that Republicans remove all pressure. They should give Obama his debt limit increases without preconditions, and they shouldn’t allow any government shutdowns.

Meanwhile, Republicans should use their majority in the House to pass bills that actually do address the nation’s problems — its economic stagnation, rising energy and health care costs, mounting debt and so on. At the same time, they can keep blocking major new expansions of government.

This two-pronged strategy would allow Republicans to isolate Obama and establish themselves as the responsible ones. If he refuses to get serious about addressing the nation’s debt problem, it will be a lot harder to escape responsibility if he can’t point and say, “Hey, look over there, House Republicans want to blow stuff up.”

In the unlikely event that this forces Obama to get serious about tackling the national debt, great. But if he doesn’t, Obama’s legacy will be that of a president who came into office promising to make the “tough choices” necessary to solve our nation’s problems, then proceeded to duck them. Meanwhile, Republicans will have laid out their own vision, and their candidates will have a stronger case to make in 2014 and 2016.

We’ll see whether that plays out in this scenario.  More details as they come.

Update: The Huffington Post has a little more detail, emphasis mine:

White House officials say President Barack Obama will ask Congress to come up with tens of billions of dollars in short-term spending cuts and tax revenue to put off the automatic across the board cuts that are scheduled to kick in March 1.

Obama will make his request Tuesday afternoon in a public statement at the White House.

Well, the tax revenue won’t be forthcoming.  Republicans already gave Obama tax revenue in January, and unlike at that time, the pressure is now on the White House.  In January, tax hikes were coming without any other action. Now, spending cuts will happen without any other action.  That’s what’s known as leverage, which Obama seemed to enjoy when he had it six weeks ago.

John Boehner said earlier today that they’re waiting for Obama to make the House an offer:

House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday urged President Barack Obama to offer ideas to replace the looming, automatic budget cuts known as the sequester. Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, Boehner said the House has passed legislation to replace the cuts due to take effect on March 1. About $85 billion in cuts would start on March 1 without congressional action. Leaders of both parties approved the sequester, which was included in the Budget Control Act of 2011 that passed both the House and Senate.

And the sequester was Obama’s idea in the first place.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Forward

blatantblue on February 5, 2013 at 10:42 AM

Obama! Obama, the Merciful!

Ben Hur on February 5, 2013 at 10:44 AM

Answer: NO!

Tater Salad on February 5, 2013 at 10:44 AM

My copy of the Constitution doesn’t have the section on political ju-jit-su.

Can someone forward me the most recent version?

BobMbx on February 5, 2013 at 10:44 AM

Obama does not want to lose all the leftys that work for defense contractors.

redguy on February 5, 2013 at 10:44 AM

The light we see at the end of the tunnel is the oncoming locomotive.

SunSword on February 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM

Screw them all and their mothers and they silly political posturing. The country burns like Hell with a can of gasoline poured over it, and all they can think of is the chances of their future candidates. I don’t give a flying fock if they lose the House in 2014 because as things are now, it could as well be run by Democrats – and, in fact, it likely is.

Archivarix on February 5, 2013 at 10:46 AM

Isn’t it nice how he can do a lot of things on his own. He just speaks, and it’s law. He doesn’t speak, and the law disappears.

It’ll be nice when a conservative gets this kind of power. Since we’re no longer a nation of law, just of men.

JellyToast on February 5, 2013 at 10:47 AM

White House officials say President Barack Obama will ask Congress to come up with tens of billions of dollars in short-term spending cuts….

Sorry, this isn’t how it works. The Executive submits a budget request to Congress. If he wants cuts, he names them. If he wants more revenue, he provides a number.

Its a trap!

BobMbx on February 5, 2013 at 10:47 AM

Just a delay?

Mord on February 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM

Now would be a good time for Boner to shove the power of the purse right up the Democrats’ a$$ and force a budget. If he can stop digging around in it looking for a Kleenex.

rayra on February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM

Man you sure do love you some Kabuki Theater don’t you Ed.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM

It’ll be nice when a conservative gets this kind of power. Since we’re no longer a nation of law, just of men.

JellyToast on February 5, 2013 at 10:47 AM

Not just men. Immigrant men. Illegal immigrant ment. Isn’t that what we were recently told?

CrimsonFisted on February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM

Boehner should highlight the fact they’re waiting on a budget from the President. A budget that could outline what he plans on doing with the cuts.

A budget that is overdue.

ButterflyDragon on February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM

The budget manuever as well as standing firm on the sequester has been a good play for the Republicans. The first time they’ve actually won a battle. Probably Ryan and co. pointing out that the sequester is staying and standing firm on defense cuts. Defense needs to be cut and our allies in NATO really need to start contributing to the common defense. I think that Republicans have come to the realization that no spending is sacred. On the other hand, Barry is a Keyensian and needs all the spending he can get even icky defense spending.

Illinidiva on February 5, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Leverage is painful when used effectively isn’t it?

Mord on February 5, 2013 at 10:51 AM

Be very careful r’s, bho does NOT DO anything good for the nation, just for him!

bho is not known for telling the truth and will stab you in the back in a minute if he thinks you will cave r’s!
L

letget on February 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Nevermind, just read the last bit from the Stupid Party. Sitting back, WAITING. While the Obamunists wait for them to negotiate with themselves again.

Idiots. Put forward a real budget, with cuts. When Obama demagogues, CUT IT SOME MORE.

/Stupid Party. Party of Cowards.

rayra on February 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Oh my. I think Teh One just cried uncle.

PattyJ on February 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Nothing but meaningless empty Kabuki Theater, a gesture to keep fools and rubes from seeing what has already happened.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has signed into law a bill raising the government’s borrowing limit, averting a default and delaying the next clash over the nation’s debt until later this year.

The legislation temporarily suspends the $16.4 trillion limit on federal borrowing. Experts say that will allow the government to borrow about $450 billion to meet interest payments and other obligations.

The Senate gave the bill final approval last week and sent it to Obama, who signed it Monday shortly after returning from Minneapolis.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 10:53 AM

Kicking the can down the road again?

NO! to delaying sequester.

BetseyRoss on February 5, 2013 at 10:53 AM

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken

roflmmfao

donabernathy on February 5, 2013 at 10:53 AM

gasoline poured over it,

Archivarix……..Way too expensive !

Lucano on February 5, 2013 at 10:54 AM

Oh my. I think Teh One just cried uncle.

PattyJ on February 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Don’t give up your day job for one that requires thinking then, cause you just got played.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 10:55 AM

See what George Stephanotus does.

tomas on February 5, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Fox is reporting that bho will get his face on the tube at 1:30. Just as Rush is on as per usual. bho probably won’t be on time for this either?
L

letget on February 5, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Just shut the feral government down, already. The GOP House should be pulling all sorts of funding that the Executive branch is using to violate the Constitution, America, and Americans. But … the cowards in the GOP House have just passed a “run amok” debt-ceiling bill that just gives the Executive branch more room to do more damage when they should have forced this insanity to stop.

On top of it all, the sequester is a joke, anyway. It isn’t a cut in anything but cuts in growth. Give me a break, already. And this hated sequester was what Barky and the Crybaby had both crowed about as being so brilliant when they colluded against America to initially do it in order to allow the feral government to continue on with its insane spending for the duration of the pathetic 2012 campaign.

This is all too pathetic for words.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on February 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM

Seriously , why do I get the feeling we’re being rolled again ?
No new revenue ( taxes ) ? Bet me . Or possibly … Bite Me !

Lucano on February 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM

Thank you once again you 50.8% of the country who are genuinely imbeciles.

President Alinsky presiding for Lucifer.

tom daschle concerned on February 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM

Distraction.
Does anyone actually believe that he would rethink ANY of his progressive goosestepping agenda?

Mimzey on February 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Sequester=Spending Reductions=Good.

The President now says he’s willing to let the GOP keep their precious defense spending, in return for more taxes. That’s a trap, if it isn’t already obvious to you.

Keep the sequester intact.

MTF on February 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Obama is going to blame Republicans and spending cuts for the weak economy so he is positioning himself as against the sequester even though his administration created it, pushed it and signed it into law.

rayra on February 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Yup. Republicans have been negotiating with themselves on taxes, spending and immigration. They’re digging their own grave.

Wigglesworth on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

The Gop needs to just sit tight and do nothing, despite the presidents words, the sequester is going to happen.

Tater Salad on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

Gov. Kasich(D-spit) observed nodding in approval.

Mr. Arrogant on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

Now, spending cuts will happen without any other action. That’s what’s known as leverage, which Obama seemed to enjoy when he had it six weeks ago.

Leverage is now racist.

Happy Nomad on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

What good is a government when laws enacted by the legislature, and signed by the President, can so easily be circumvented with delays and waivers (Obamacare)?

Mitoch55 on February 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM

Gas prices on the rise.
Vegetable prices spinning upward.
Everything becoming more and more expensive.
Money is becoming less and less worth anything.

And this putz wants to BORROW 450 billion more to stop a default on the debt payment?

My mind is screaming, YOU EFFING IDIOT!

There seems to be no stopping this fiscal INSANITY!!

Scrumpy on February 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM

Heh

Sadly the lsm will still defend dear leader and the evil gop are playing politics witj the economy yada yada yada

cmsinaz on February 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM

As previously mentioned, Boehner needs to do nothing until the President and the Senate produce a budget.

Treat the President as persona non grata.

Tater Salad on February 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM

Just shut the feral government down, already. The GOP House should be pulling all sorts of funding that the Executive branch is using to violate the Constitution, America, and Americans. But … the cowards in the GOP House have just passed a “run amok” debt-ceiling bill that just gives the Executive branch more room to do more damage when they should have forced this insanity to stop.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on February 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM

The only place I disagree with your assessment here is… Where you assume that it is cowardice on the part of the GOPe that prevents them from taking action, whereas I believe that the GOPe are willing conspirators with the Marxist Democrats.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM

Hmmmmm…….
Wondering how Boehner is going to get the president out of this mess.

ROCnPhilly on February 5, 2013 at 11:08 AM

If the GOP trades in the sequester for other cuts, then they will get played. The Dems have years of experience at gaming this process.

The answer is NO.

matthew8787 on February 5, 2013 at 11:08 AM

The only place I disagree with your assessment here is… Where you assume that it is cowardice on the part of the GOPe that prevents them from taking action, whereas I believe that the GOPe are willing conspirators with the Marxist Democrats.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM

I agree with you as regards the Crybaby and the GOP leadership. They are clearly Vichy collaborators. The cowards I was referring to are some of the rank and file (especially the Tea Party reps) who have been knuckling to the Vichy Right in leadership. I will never forgive them for re-electing that miserable POS loser Boner. My head is still spinning from that.

And I would add that the Crybaby is a coward in addition to being a willing collaborator with the America-hating Indonesian and his leftist junta – though collaboration and hate of conservatives is what drives him more.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on February 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM

No.

No delays, no compromises. Cuts are needed everywhere and this is apparently the only way we’ll ever get any.

And I might lose my job because of the cuts.

Spade on February 5, 2013 at 11:14 AM

The Gop needs to just sit tight and do nothing, despite the presidents words, the sequester is going to happen.

Tater Salad on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

It seems like the next demand from the Republicans is that Obama produce a plan to balance the budget or explain why he cannot on an annual basis. The manuevers the Rs have made since the GOP retreat have been really good. It is really difficult for the Ds to demagogue the idea of not having a budget and lambasting a do nothing Congress is always popular (the no pay provision). As well as pointing out Obama’s inability to get a budget to Congress on time yesterday. The whole idea seems to be laying the failures of spending at Obama’s feet (Plan X) as well as manuevering Obama into things like the sequester to delay the debt crisis until the next Republican administration.

Illinidiva on February 5, 2013 at 11:15 AM

It seems dear joe is doing his gaffes in europe? Wonder who is the most embarrassment to the US when they go overseas, bho or joe?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-gaffes-his-way-across-europe_700254.html
L

letget on February 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM

His second term mantra is “common sense”, rubes.

Schadenfreude on February 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM

Hmmmmm…….
Wondering how Boehner is going to get the president out of this mess.

ROCnPhilly on February 5, 2013 at 11:08 AM

The current strategy wasn’t Boehner’s idea; it was definitely Ryan’s. And Ryan has absolutely no incentive to give Obama anything.

Illinidiva on February 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM

Lsm are digging on the gop for bashing dear leader missing his budget date…. how about the senate day #1387 without a budget you idgits

cmsinaz on February 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM

This two-pronged strategy would allow Republicans to isolate Obama and establish themselves as the responsible ones. If he refuses to get serious about addressing the nation’s debt problem, it will be a lot harder to escape responsibility if he can’t point and say, “Hey, look over there, House Republicans want to blow stuff up.”

Yeah, but that’s what Obama is gonna do anyway.

Doughboy on February 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM

Doesn’t matter. If the economy improves due to anything the house proposes, Obammy gets all the credit. Repubs are screwed.

UncleZeb on February 5, 2013 at 11:20 AM

Chef Obama, you cook the turd..you eat the turd…

hillsoftx on February 5, 2013 at 11:20 AM

I’m so sick of this crap.

forest on February 5, 2013 at 11:21 AM

House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday urged President Barack Obama to offer ideas to replace the looming, automatic budget cuts known as the sequester.

The Obama administration already answered that issue Boehner, when they said:

“We’re not coming before you to say we have a definitive solution to our long-term problem. What we do know is we don’t like yours.”

Cavalry on February 5, 2013 at 11:21 AM

We’ll see whether that plays out in this scenario. More details as they come.

How is your scenario coming along, Ed?

Dusty on February 5, 2013 at 11:21 AM

King Putt has all the air cover he needs to try to spin this, his plan into ‘GOP evil cuts on everything but defense.”

Manoover X or whatever we’re going to call ‘doing your job” this week is a good play but the American voter crapped all over punishing the law breaking Hairy Reed and Sir Golfsalot.

Let it burn

harlekwin15 on February 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM

House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday urged President Barack Obama to offer ideas to replace the looming, automatic budget cuts known as the sequester.

He should have said we’d like to help out but we don’t have your budget, that was due yesterday, so we can find cuts to make in a responsible manner.

Dusty on February 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Fox is reporting that bho will get his face on the tube at 1:30. Just as Rush is on as per usual. bho probably won’t be on time for this either?
L

letget on February 5, 2013 at 10:56 AM

he’ll wait until Rush can’t respond for a day so he can let his media try to frame it for him…he’s a petty little man that is being challenged for the first time in his life

DanMan on February 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Sick and tired of their shenanigans, on both sides.

We are not stupid you know!

Scrumpy on February 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM

We are not stupid you know!

Scrumpy on February 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Oh yea? Then how did Obama get elected and then reelected. Yes, we are stupid, vain and arrogant, and we are getting what we deserve.

SWalker on February 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM

And the sequester was Obama’s idea in the first place.

A little point we must never allow to be forgotten…

JohnGalt23 on February 5, 2013 at 11:29 AM

Let’s raise taxes on an economy that’s contracting! (-0.1% GDP growth) That’ll get the economy moving again! (in the wrong direction)

– Obama White House

Nethicus on February 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM

oould Ralph Benko be right?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2013/01/28/how-president-obama-lost-his-shirt-to-john-boehner/

Recall the egg on face disaster of the Sandy Hook bill peeled of 20% of the moderates in the house GOP topass it. The Tea Party members held firm (except for John Culberson). My hunch is Boehner is not going to have that happen again.

DanMan on February 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM

Gov. Kasich(D-spit) observed nodding in approval.

Mr. Arrogant on February 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM

Again… the Dems win by default. Our side caves at the first sign of a struggle.
Well.. not all. I shouldn’t say that. Governor Walker is a hero. There are a few others.

JellyToast on February 5, 2013 at 11:34 AM

It would appear that the sequester is all we are going to get for the foreseeable future (until 2015), unless and until Obama and Senate Dems come to their senses on entitlement reform.

If the GOP throws away the sequester, which is their Ace in the hole and the only guarantee of any real savings, then they will lose the House in 2014. This is the last straw.

matthew8787 on February 5, 2013 at 11:38 AM

Politico is defending dear leader’s delay natch

cmsinaz on February 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM

So the snarky version … which I shouldn’t even say because it will get me in trouble is death panels and sales taxes is how we do this.Paul Krugman

J_Crater on February 5, 2013 at 11:52 AM

Boehner should highlight the fact they’re waiting on a budget from the President. A budget that could outline what he plans on doing with the cuts.

A budget that is overdue.

ButterflyDragon on February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM

+ a bazillion!!

Khun Joe on February 5, 2013 at 11:57 AM

Hmmmmm…….
Wondering how Boehner is going to get the president out of this mess.

ROCnPhilly on February 5, 2013 at 11:08 AM

Thats what McConnell is for.

BobMbx on February 5, 2013 at 12:01 PM

Cut Breakfast for the troops…Cuz Drones are expensive or something…

workingclass artist on February 5, 2013 at 12:07 PM

So basically, the sequester is nothing more than a tool for blackmailing republicans into doing what Obama wants. And republicans like Ryan and Boehner gave it to him with smiles on their faces, lol.

Anyone thinking Obama has any less leverage now than he did a month ago is fooling themselves.

And the sequester was Obama’s idea in the first place.

And 174 republicans in the House voted for it.

xblade on February 5, 2013 at 12:07 PM

Isn’t the problem that Obama is TOO LAZY (come and get me, liberals) to sit down and do his job of putting together his proposal for cuts, which he’s REQUIRED to do and is late in doing so.

When he was in school, did Obama give excuses for late homework too?

BuckeyeSam on February 5, 2013 at 12:08 PM

Internal political calculus revealed many Democrats invest in defense industries that also employ Democrat-voting union tools.

novaculus on February 5, 2013 at 12:12 PM

What will happen is Obama will come across looking like he cares due to the result of what the sequestration will do knowing full well our side will say no. Sequestration stays-we will then look like the bad guys and we do care about the people that will be hurt by this. Everything this guy does is a political calculation.

Static21 on February 5, 2013 at 12:17 PM

Anyone who votes for this should be shot.

burt on February 5, 2013 at 12:21 PM

So basically, the sequester is nothing more than a tool for blackmailing republicans into doing what Obama wants. And republicans like Ryan and Boehner gave it to him with smiles on their faces, lol.

Maybe O will get lost while out killing skeet and save the Republic.

Our only hope.

LetsBfrank on February 5, 2013 at 12:23 PM

Just a delay?

Mord on February 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM

Sure, ’cause after all recovery summer is just a few months away, and the moron hasn’t yet figured out it’s HIS policies that are hurting the economy now.

WryTrvllr on February 5, 2013 at 12:23 PM

But..but…but Barry WANTED the sequester. NOW he doesn’t? Hmmmm……..wonder if this is some of that “failed leadership” that SENATOR Obama was always talking about.

GarandFan on February 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM

Here’s the choice. If the House lets sequestration happen, Obama looks good and the Republicans look bad because Obama asked the Republicans to look for alternatives and they coldheartedly did not. Or do as the President asks and look for alternatives. Since we know how this option ends we already know that Obama will not like any alternatives the House offers. The House probably should just say give us a copy of the current budget for this fiscal year (since we sent one to the Senate to be voted on) and we will do the heavy lifting and go through it line by line and pick some alternatives. What? No budget? But we sent you one. Maybe you should talk to Harry Reid and ask what happened to it.

DaveDief on February 5, 2013 at 12:45 PM

Eff him. Let it burn.

The Schaef on February 5, 2013 at 12:45 PM

Don’t give up your day job for one that requires being civil, SWalker.

PattyJ on February 5, 2013 at 12:56 PM

Just fulfilling another campaign promise; “the sequester will not happen”. Because if it does I will be in violation of the law and will be sued by defense workers for not giving them proper layoff notice.

DDay on February 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM

Actually I am impressed how the GOP House Leadership played this one – whether Boehner or Ryan or whomever.

Obama assumed the GOP would run to protect defense spending – but it appears that his calculus was wrong. I have read in several places – including this site – that Boehner has the GOP caucus prepared to accept defense cuts. And he has already given tax increases too, so it is Obama’s turn. He is in a little bit of a box. Any revenue will have to come from simplifying the tax code, not raising rates, and its price will be spending cuts for constituencies will create a hardship for Obama. Otherwise, Obama’s constituents are going to get cut anyway.

That Obama has asked for this shows that his calculation was wrong and he has advanced far too fast and without fully understanding his flanks are exposed.

As we laugh regarding McConnell, he probably right now is the deal maker Obama needs since Reid is worthless. A few have noted the defense friendly democrats who are sweating big time right now. But we have no reason to expect Obama has the moxie to either a) realize that or b) have any ability to make that happen.

Very interesting situation.

Zomcon JEM on February 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM

Memo to the President:

Payback’s a bitch, isn’t it.

That said, $85 billion is a mere drop in the bucket when it comes to our trillion dollar budget deficit THIS YEAR. Let the sequester begin.

Old Fritz on February 5, 2013 at 1:10 PM

Why would House Republicans want to raise taxes in an effort to avoid a measly $85 billion in cuts? Obama and Harry Reid came up with sequestration as being something so ridiculous, nobody would want it to happen. Obama got his tax increases in January without any spending cuts. The sequestration cuts don’t seem so ridiculous now.

supernova on February 5, 2013 at 1:18 PM

The republican leadership DOES NOT WANT TO FIGHT.

This is NOT NEW.

So, are we going to sit around and keep whining about it or are Conservatives willing to accept the fact that the gop HATES true limited government politics.

gop………DEAD.

PappyD61 on February 5, 2013 at 1:20 PM

House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday urged President Barack Obama to offer ideas to replace the looming, automatic budget cuts known as the sequester.

The last thing Boehner or any other Republican should do at this point is talk to Obama.

Rich H on February 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Congress should just go home for a few months. It would do wonders for the economy.

txmomof6 on February 5, 2013 at 2:26 PM

The correct answer to Obama’s request is NO!!!!

(Wish I could make that NO is 164 pt font.)

WannabeAnglican on February 5, 2013 at 2:38 PM