Jay Carney has to be feeling the strain of the tremendous load of BS that he carries day by day.

Is there a bigger idiot than Hagel around? Sure.

Hagel “unimpressive and unprepared”

Which means that he’s a shoo-in. Come on, there is no question that democrats will support him unanimously … and Republicans simply can’t wait to cave-in on Hagel, just like they caved on Kerry and everything else.

The bizarre spectacle left everyone wondering why Obama decided to pick someone so obviously unprepared — and obviously unwilling to prepare even when given the chance.

Chances are, Hagel was the least-worst-qualified among those who said yes and would submit to the Obamabot mind implant.

chu
kegel
sotomoto
hillary

any of the countless minions that are running our country at unelected and unregulated by minor documents such as the constitution, common law, statutory law, ethics and common sense?

“unimpressive and unprepared,”

\

That should be the title to obozo’s third autobiography.

Flange on February 4, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Would eventually make a great epitaph too.

How do you know a nominee is in trouble?

Hagel did what was probably the worst confirmation testimony in recent history if not ever. Yet, there is no evidence his nomination is in trouble. The Dems will vote for him lockstep.

Which leads me to the GOP. If ever there were a time for filibuster, this is the nomination to do it on. Face it, when the chairman of the committee has to send you a note explaining that the administration’s position in Iran is not one of containment then you are utterly unfit for the job. It would be nice to see the GOP show some spine and say so but I suspect they will cave.

“unimpressive and unprepared,”

That should be the title to obozo’s third autobiography.

Mr. Hagel had come by this wisdom, we were informed, because he had been at the front, seen men die, and knew, as we were frequently reminded, what the ordinary soldier thought and felt. All of this, the argument ran, gave him a unique capacity to head the Defense Department.

So why didn’t the POTUS have to serve “at the front” so to speak before becoming the world’s most powerful executive? We were told Bark’s inexperience was a good thing because he was untainted by D.C.

Shameless hacks protected by a bootlicking media.

Perfect !

I think the answer is obvious — To give his horridly incompetent and corrupt administration the appearance of bipartisan support and to act as a rubber stamp for the draconion cuts Obama has in store for national defense.

“unimpressive and unprepared,”

That response makes me curious how Mr. Obama would have performed under such direct scrutiny- which he still has never received.

Hagel, while bumbling and at times borderline incoherent, accurately reflected both the positions and competence of Mr. Obama’s policies.

I frankly blame the message as equally as the messenger. While Mr. Hagel may be many things, at least he is honest. And the next nominee may leave us longing for that.

Thanks Gibbs, I needed a good laugh since I hate Monday mornings.