Who wants to be a millionaire U.S. ambassador?

posted at 5:11 pm on February 1, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

There is a long and rich tradition of U.S. presidents awarding cozy and glamorous diplomatic posts to their friends, allies, and donors, but as with many other dubious and/or nefarious political “business as usual” practices that go on within the historic halls of the White House, the Obama administration only ever seems to have only taken things up a notch.

The NYT reports that the competition for ambassadorships is so tight this year, and President Obama’s reelection fundraising was so rife with mega donors and bundlers, that it likely means prospectives will have to have amassed upwards of a million dollars for his campaign to even be considered in the running — and there’s a new study that puts a theoretical “cost” on the most choice posts and ambassadorships.

Not surprisingly, the authors found that politically connected ambassadors, including former aides as well as donors, were statistically more likely to be posted to countries in the Caribbean, North America and Central America. But those whose political connections to Mr. Obama were measured in dollars, rather than administration service, had an increased chance of representing the United States in Western Europe, and a markedly smaller chance of serving in, say, Central Asia or sub-Saharan Africa. The study found that political ambassadors who had made campaign donations of $550,000, or bundled contributions of $750,000, had a 90 percent chance of being posted to a country in Western Europe.

And what do these postings “cost?” Ambassadorial appointments do not, of course, come with price tags. But by combining information on what current ambassadors contributed along with data on the desirability of the ambassadors’ host countries, Dr. Fedderke and Dr. Jett arrived at “implied prices” for a selection of highly sought positions. …

When isolating a country’s wealth over other factors, Luxembourg came in at the top of the chart, with a posting there valued at $3.1 million in direct contributions, while an appointment to Portugal was predicted to have a value of $602,686 in personal contributions. The model suggests that bundlers can get the same posts for less: Portugal was valued at about $341,160 in bundled contributions, Luxembourg at $1.8 million.

As ViaMeadia explains, the longstanding practice of appointing friends to ambassadorships isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but President Obama does appear to be all about the dollars:

But before OWS and the Tea Party join forces to tear this system down, it’s important to understand that in many countries having a “political” ambassador as opposed to a “professional” one is actually something they want. The theory is that if the president appoints a close friend to represent America in your country, you will have better access to the White House. A professional diplomat can call his bureau in the State Department; a well-connected political appointee can go a lot higher than that.

Theoretically… But the system seems to be coarsening, with the buying and selling of embassies becoming more transactional. President Obama probably doesn’t even remember the names of all the people who gave or bundled hundreds of thousands of dollars to his record-setting re-election campaign. These rich ambassadors don’t always have the political access that people overseas think they have.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Not for this clown of a President

TheAudacityofNOPE on February 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM

lets hope none are flambouyantly gay or they’re gonna see the business end of sec def

t8stlikchkn on February 1, 2013 at 5:15 PM

There is a long and rich tradition of U.S. presidents awarding cozy and glamorous diplomatic posts to their friends, allies, and donors

It is really a stupid tradition.

Diplomats s/b educated in diplomacy, the world, and speak at least 3 foreign languages, alas.

There s/b NO ambassador anywhere, without speaking the local language.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:16 PM

One can’t observe or influence the local culture without being fluent in the local tongue.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:17 PM

It is utterly shameful that the Sec. of State only speaks English.

In this regard the US is very rubeish.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:18 PM

I wonder who’s standing in line for the next Libyan assignment?

Rat bastards, the lot of them.

Mr. Arrogant on February 1, 2013 at 5:19 PM

I forgot to credit Obama with speaking Austrian, if nothing else – mea culpa.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:19 PM

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:16 PM

So whats wrong with repeating yourself louder and slower in English?

BobMbx on February 1, 2013 at 5:20 PM

Nice perks, but the retirement sucks. Just ask Chris Stevens.

Socratease on February 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM

…but as with many other dubious and/or nefarious political “business as usual” practices that go on within the historic halls of the White House, the Obama administration only ever seems to have only taken things up a notch.

Well put, Erika, well put.

KS Rex on February 1, 2013 at 5:26 PM

How’s that hope and change working out for ya?

rbj on February 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM

How much will cost to be the ambassador to Palestine?

*ducks* lol

abobo on February 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM

But those whose political connections to Mr. Obama were measured in dollars, rather than administration service, had an increased chance of representing the United States in Western Europe, and a markedly smaller chance of serving in, say, Central Asia or sub-Saharan Africa.

Seems kind of… RACIST!!!!

Fallon on February 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM

How much does the Libya spot cost?

Curtiss on February 1, 2013 at 5:33 PM

I forgot to credit Obama with speaking Austrian, if nothing else – mea culpa.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:19 PM

I understand he’s also fluent in Swiss.

Liam on February 1, 2013 at 5:33 PM

New Steyn…

Containing Hagel

M2RB: Guns ‘N Roses

Resist We Much on February 1, 2013 at 5:43 PM

One can’t observe or influence the local culture without being fluent in the local tongue.

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 5:17 PM

Arab countries really hate it when we appoint ambassadors that speak Arabic.

slickwillie2001 on February 1, 2013 at 5:45 PM

There is a long and rich tradition of U.S. presidents awarding cozy and glamorous diplomatic posts to their friends, allies, and donors

Reminds me more of the kiss of death. Ambassadors should get hazard pay under this President…

dominigan on February 2, 2013 at 6:17 PM