You shouldn’t trust them, they are practicing to get you. This is also happening in Miami, Chicago, Boston and Minneapolis.

Take a look – http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8971311

dancertx on February 2, 2013 at 3:19 PM

This isn’t practice. Practice was Waco in 1993 where the federal government murdered 84 people including 21 children under the age of 16. (look it up Waco massacre, and Branch Davidians) This is preparation and the reason the federal government agencies are buying BILLIONS of rounds of hollow point ammunition. Get out of line and they will kill you. And your family. Including your infant children.

I’m frustrated by this “lesser evil” business too, but sitting out this election was inexcusable. : (

listens2glenn on February 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM

I’m in the same boat. Romney was no conservative, but “sitting out” is barely one step of blasphemy to me because I know what it took to give me the right to vote. Even if the only person I can vote for in good conscience is 3rd-party.

It is just morally inexcusable to stay home. Write in Daffy Duck if you wanna make a point, just frigging GO!

If Romney couldn’t give people a reason to vote for him, there’s no sense in blaming anyone else.

There Goes The Neighborhood on February 3, 2013 at 12:59 AM

.
What I said to rrpjr earlier:
.

I predict that ALL of you who didn’t vote for a POTUS candidate this last time because “there’s no difference between them”, will eventually learn just how badly you (expletive) yourselves, and the REST of us.
That’s not saying “I hope you will” … That’s saying “you WILL.”

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

Citizens who don’t vote, HAVE NO SAY. . . . Translation:

“If you didn’t vote for a president this past election, then you’ve lost ALL VALIDITY as regards complaining about, or criticizing President Barack Obama. Period.”

listens2glenn on February 2, 2013 at 5:35 PM

.
I’m frustrated by this “lesser evil” business too, but sitting out this election was inexcusable. : (

Romney deserved to lose, and I think everyone knows it. I’d be fine with that if Obama could have lost also. But instead we’re stuck with him.

Pew: Majority now believes federal gov’t a threat to their freedom

.
Yeah, that gun control push was a brilliant idea!

There Goes The Neighborhood on February 3, 2013 at 12:49 AM

.
They have GOT to disarm the American citizen, before they can accomplish their ultimate goal.

They were CHEERING (behind closed doors) when news of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre hit the airwaves and computer networks.
They seriously believed this was “in the bag” for them, and that the wave of emotion calling for more “gun-control” would carry the day.
They milked it for all it was worth, and then some.
But pro-Second Amendment advocates reacted stronger, and with more numbers than they originally counted on.

Well, the resistance had held strong for the last month and a half, but they’re not through by a long-shot.
They’re not giving up on that ultimate goal, and the armed American citizen stands in the way.

I see that all of the “blame Romney” folks are here today. You folks are a bunch of fools – who the hell do you people think could have beat santa obambi in November? The a$$holes that stayed home are the ones to blame and some of the folks complaining did just that.

VegasRick on February 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM

NOT ROMNEY!!

If Romney couldn’t give people a reason to vote for him, there’s no sense in blaming anyone else.

Pew: Majority now believes federal gov’t a threat to their freedom

Yeah, that gun control push was a brilliant idea!

I don’t get it.

verbaluce on February 1, 2013 at 2:11 PM

Of course you don’t.

But you will.

Behaviors and actions have consequences. The idea that every republican or conservative is blood-bound to vote for a pathologically risk-averse, mealy-mouthed “lesser evil” because the threat to the nation is so dire at some point can’t sustain itself. Blaming people isn’t going to change anything, or change their behavior. You need to inspire and motivate them. You ALWAYS need to do that.

rrpjr on February 2, 2013 at 4:42 PM

.
.
Citizens who don’t vote, HAVE NO SAY. . . . Translation:

“If you didn’t vote for a president this past election, then you’ve lost ALL VALIDITY as regards complaining about, or criticizing President Barack Obama. Period.”

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

.
Give it a rest. Romney sucked donkey balls. I’m surprised he got as many votes as he did, especially after hiring endless surrogates who endlessly trashed conservatives beyond any point of political usefulness or reasoning then dumping tens of millions of dollars of negative ads on their heads whose vicious tone and substance he couldn’t come close to matching against Obama.

Really — is it any surprise he couldn’t deliver the goods on election day?

rrpjr on February 2, 2013 at 12:58 PM

.
Like (expletive), I’m “giving it a rest”.

Mitt Romney IS (present tense) a “lesser evil.”

Mitt Romney’s imperfections were NOT a valid “grounds basis” for sitting out the election.

My prior statement still STANDS:

I predict that ALL of you who didn’t vote for a POTUS candidate this last time because “there’s no difference between them”, will eventually learn just how badly you (expletive) yourselves, and the REST of us.
That’s not saying “I hope you will” … That’s saying “you WILL.”

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

.
“GIVING IT A REST” BE DAMNED !

Take a look – http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8971311

Schadenfreude on February 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM

Amen to that…

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

Give it a rest. Romney sucked donkey balls. I’m surprised he got as many votes as he did, especially after hiring endless surrogates who endlessly trashed conservatives beyond any point of political usefulness or reasoning then dumping tens of millions of dollars of negative ads on their heads whose vicious tone and substance he couldn’t come close to matching against Obama.

Really — is it any surprise he couldn’t deliver the goods on election day?

Where was this so called ‘majority’ on Nov. 6th, 2012 ???

BillyPenn on February 2, 2013 at 7:23 AM

.
At home refusing to vote for the two big government parties.

sharrukin on February 2, 2013 at 7:27 AM

.
Some of the “majority” saw NO difference between Obama and Romney.

Some of the “majority” saw Mitt Romney as a SIGNIFICANTLY lesser evil.

I totally stand by my 7:48 PM statement:

I predict that ALL of you who didn’t vote for a POTUS candidate this last time because “there’s no difference between them”, will eventually learn just how badly you (expletive) yourselves, and the REST of us.
That’s not saying “I hope you will” … That’s saying “you will “.

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

There ain’t no way you’re going to get me to agree that “he essentially stood for nothing.”

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 10:42 PM

.
So what did he stand for?

Was he going to keep Obamacare, or get rid of it?

Was he for entitlement promising to restore and protect them, or was he against them?

sharrukin on February 1, 2013 at 10:50 PM

.
I’m totally convinced he would have gone for an abolition of Obamacare, reduction in taxes, and MUCH better SCOTUS replacements.

The SCOTUS replacements alone would have made Romney “worth it”.

Also, he’s opposed to abortion.

While polls show broad support for expanding background checks…

Yeah… all the libs need is an inch. Give them an inch of legislation and they will strip you of everything.

“Nobody is going to take your guns. We just want to expand background checks, silly”

Yeah… expand the background check time to 10 years and expand the cost to a $1000. and expand the criteria to include an analysis from your local government trained pre-crime psychiatrist. Some of the questions he/she will be asking you “Are you pro-life? Have you ever been a member of the TEA party? Do you get agitated standing in long lines? Have you ever used the words “legitimate rape” or supported the political party of any candidate who has?”

Where was this so called ‘majority’ on Nov. 6th, 2012 ???

BillyPenn on February 2, 2013 at 7:23 AM

At home refusing to vote for the two big government parties.

Spreadin’ the fear…and livin’ in fear.
verbaluce on February 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM

That’s that same thing they said to German Jews back in 1936