Chuck Schumer: I refuse to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals

posted at 6:51 pm on January 31, 2013 by Allahpundit

Skip to 10:15 for the key bit. Is this endgame already for Rubio? He’s sworn up and down that unless Democrats agree to make border security the trigger for a path to citizenship — i.e. measurable security improvements first, before any path is created — he’ll walk away. Now here’s Schumer sounding an awful lot like he’s saying we can’t make border security the trigger for a path to citizenship. Quote:

“We want the border to be secure. It’s more secure than it was several years ago, but it has a ways to go. And different sectors need different types of security. It’s a lot different having security in the Tucson sector than off the stretch in Texas, which is bounded by the Rio Grande,” Schumer said on Thursday.

“But we’re not using border security as an excuse or block to the path of citizenship. We just want to make sure — and this is very important both substantively and politically — that there is a secure border, and we’re going to work for that. But it’s not — and Dick [Durbin] and I and Bob [Menendez], as well as our three Republican friends, want to make sure the border’s secure but not to use it as a barrier to prevent the 11 million from eventually gaining a path to citizenship.”

Time for Rubio to cut the cord, says Mark Krikorian. He’s right that the GOP’s going to get rolled if this scheme passes, but I’m not sure Schumer’s categorically ruling out using border security as a trigger here. What he’s saying, it seems to me, is that he won’t let border hawks use the trigger as a pretext to forever delay the citizenship process. That’s why Durbin rushes to the mic right after him and emphasizes that they want some sort of objective metric of security in the bill so that, if it’s met, the border can be declared officially “secure” and they can move on the citizenship phase. Without that, if “security” is based on a subjective assessment, conservatives in the Senate will supposedly go on claiming unto eternity that we’re not quite there yet. I could be wrong in reading him that way, but look: Schumer surely knows Rubio’s position. He also knows how important Rubio is in getting conservatives to buy into comprehensive reform. Why knife him in the back now, just three days removed from the press conference announcing the bipartisan plan, when they won’t even have a draft bill ready for another month? I have no doubt that Schumer does oppose using border security as a trigger, but I bet he’d be willing to concede on that if he can negotiate a security “metric” that’s forgiving enough to ensure that the trigger is indeed triggered. What he really wants is instant probationary legal status for illegals, and Rubio’s already agreed to that in theory. If that stays in the final bill and the bar for border security can be negotiated nice and low, why wouldn’t Schumer agree to letting it be a trigger?

Like I say, watch Durbin too. He refers specifically to making the path to citizenship “contingent” upon stronger border security. It’s just that that security has to be measurable so that it’s a real trigger, not something vague that border hawks can finesse to delay legalization.

Update: Conn Carroll says it’s too early for Rubio to walk away but that he expects he’ll be gone within 24 hours once the draft bill is published. I think it’ll be sooner than that; Rubio won’t wait for the draft bill to appear before cutting the cord if he knows there’s stuff in it that’ll make conservatives choke. But Schumer’s little performance here likely affects the odds. If this week started with, say, a 40 percent of Rubio quitting the group, let’s bump that up to an even 50 this evening.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Yeppers

Welcome to ObameriKa.

Schadenfreude on January 31, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Unless the entire border is being secured with an Israeli-style West Bank security fence we will need much better interior enforcement. We already have adequate law enforcement assets between local and state police, county sheriffs, regional ICE and DEA. If left wing politicians would let them do their jobs and Morton would take custody and deport them we would be in good shape.

Republican messaging could be so much better. How about saying you oppose amnesty for illegal aliens because you are protecting job opportunities for legal hispanic immigrants who spent a lot of time and money to be in the USA legally. Opposing amnesty will also mean more public resources will be available for resident aliens who are in need of government assistance such as Section 8 housing.

Wigglesworth on January 31, 2013 at 8:05 PM

In Texas large stretches of the border need men to patrol it…and enforce the law.

That said Texas should increase the budget for the Texas Rangers & step up recruitment which Obama can’t do nuthin’ to stop.

Gov. Perry can bill DC like he does every year.

workingclass artist on January 31, 2013 at 8:26 PM

Take it from a New Yorker who curses this man’s name every day – Schumer really does mean it, and he’s deliberately being a jackass. Because he knows he’ll get away with it, and he knows that he can jettison Rubio and he’ll still have McCain and Grahamnesty cuddling up next to him in bed.

KingGold on January 31, 2013 at 8:31 PM

No illegal should ever be able to get citizenship. The proper and fair punishment for committing the crime of forcing oneself on our nation and totally disregarding our law and our sovereignty is that that person will NEVER be eligible to become a citizen. Period. End of story.

And they have to be deported as they are found – which is easy as they all use government services more than actual citizens.

There is nothing else to this situation and Marco Rubio, Juan McShame and the rest of the treasonous lot can go take a running jump. Maybe they all ought to think of moving to Mexico or other parts of the world – to be with the people they are working for because they are working against American interests and against American citizens.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on January 31, 2013 at 8:33 PM

you want to help stop this go here ….join ….send the faxes …its free …..make the calls …its not … we together stopped this the last time …we can stop it now

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Aggie95 on January 31, 2013 at 8:38 PM

Unless the entire border is being secured with an Israeli-style West Bank security fence we will need much better interior enforcement.

Wigglesworth on January 31, 2013 at 8:05 PM

Even if all the physical borders were hermedically (which is close to impossible) we would STILL need serious interior enforcement as over 50 millions come through the US every year, legally, on various visas. It only takes a tiny percentage of them deciding to overstay their visas for the nation to become filled up with illegals.

it will ALWAYS be about interior enforcement, which is exactly what Rubio, McShame and the rest of the traitors absolutely REFUSE TO DO. This whole traitorous move is to not do any interior enforcement and for them to make some silly noises about “the border”. It doesn’t matter what happens with the border, interior enforcement will always be the most important aspect. It cannot be surrendered on, otherwise, we will have this same issue with the same numbers (or greater) every ten years … not that this nation will last that long, anyway.

There is no escape from the fact that dealing with illegals is ALWAYS about interior enforcement. Period.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on January 31, 2013 at 8:38 PM

and we’re going to work for that. But it’s not — and Dick [Durbin] and I and Bob [Menendez]

If Guilty, Menendez Could Face 30 Years in Prison

If Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey is found guilty of traveling to the Dominican Republic to engage in sexual intercourse with underage prostitutes, he could face up to 30 years prison. The appropriate law, which would seem to apply in this instance, is the Prosecutorial Remedies And Other Tools To End The Exploitation Of Children Today (or the Protect Act).

Menendez voted for the law when he was a member of the House of Representatives.

“TRAVEL WITH INTENT TO ENGAGE IN ILLICIT SEXUAL CONDUCT”…

Irony.

Resist We Much on January 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM

but I’m not sure Schumer’s categorically ruling out using border security as a trigger here. What he’s saying, it seems to me, is that he won’t let border hawks use the trigger as a pretext to forever delay the citizenship process

Hey, AP, I’ve got this football, I’m going to hold it for you and you run and kick it as hard as you can, OK?

AZfederalist on January 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM

“But we’re not using border security as an excuse or block to the path of citizenship.

Schumer just admitted that he intends to renege on the deal.

agmartin on January 31, 2013 at 8:59 PM

Enforcement first Shmuckie.

Speakup on January 31, 2013 at 9:03 PM

Alternate title:

Chuck Schumer: A G-D’ed Lying Jackhole if there ever was one

RedCrow on January 31, 2013 at 9:03 PM

If Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey is found guilty of traveling to the Dominican Republic to engage in sexual intercourse with underage prostitutes, he could face up to 30 years prison.

Resist We Much on January 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Yeah, right.
As if the law applied to our lawmakers.
(Insider trading readily springs to mind. Why, look at all our legislator-criminals serving time for–Wha?! Oh, never mind.)

RedCrow on January 31, 2013 at 9:06 PM

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Aggie95 on January 31, 2013 at 8:38 PM

Thanks Ag. 350,000 members helped stop it last time. There’s now 1.3 million. A lie goes halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on. The Axis of Amnesty is no fait accompli yet.

TxAnn56 on January 31, 2013 at 9:15 PM

Marcobarack Rubiobama: I refuse to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals my goal of living in the White House.

———————————————–

Don’t worry, Chucky Baby, the GOP’s top “progressives”, Rubio, Christie and Jeb Bush are all on the same page as you and obama.

Pork-Chop on January 31, 2013 at 9:17 PM

Skip to 10:15 for the key bit.

Based on the headline I expected Schumer to say that he refused to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals.

This is what piqued my interest. No liberal calls illegals what they are. They use terms like migrants and undocumented workers to describe those among us who have come into our society without legal standing, have likely faked documents to get work, and have broken our laws.

But, please, skip to 10:15 to see the ways Schumer went out of his way to call these criminals everything but illegal. My favorite, just referring to them as the “Eleven Million” as if they have a right to be here and it is his effing job to make sure they get to stay.

Happy Nomad on January 31, 2013 at 9:19 PM

Schumer, Durbin, and Menendez wanted nothing more than the optics of being seen with Rubio (new meat).

That was the prize and they got it because of Rubio’s naivete.

The Senator from Florida is not Presidential timber.

If you didn’t believe it after his pathetic performance when questioning Hillary Clinton, believe it now.

Kodak moments are forever.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IfrK9620VH8/UQpujVDHUhI/AAAAAAAABsk/jIJqKEoCzqw/s1600/Rubio_Democrats.jpg

Barrack on January 31, 2013 at 9:23 PM

as the “Eleven Million” as if they have a right to be here and it is his effing job to make sure they get to stay.

Happy Nomad on January 31, 2013 at 9:19 PM

And he’ll be a Senator until he decides to retire.
(Term limits, anyone?)

RedCrow on January 31, 2013 at 9:24 PM

Chuck “You” Schumer is the guy Kay Hagen chose to get cozy with. Remember that in 2014, you people in North Carolina.

SouthernGent on January 31, 2013 at 9:37 PM

Democrats want more clients dependent on govt voting for them. That’s a lot more important than national security.

gsherin on January 31, 2013 at 6:54 PM

This times a zillion.

BallisticBob on January 31, 2013 at 9:43 PM

“If I were running against Chuck Schumer,” he says about New York’s publicity-un-shy senior senator, “I would take every one of his Sunday press releases—and there are 52 for as many years as he’s been there—and I would ask, ‘How many of the things he said he was proposing became law?’ I doubt many.”

-
Former NYC mayor Ed Koch.

diogenes on January 31, 2013 at 9:45 PM

I loathe Schumck Schumer. I think the man is possessed if not the anti-Christ himself.

jawkneemusic on January 31, 2013 at 9:46 PM

Well I guess that ends that..:)

Dire Straits on January 31, 2013 at 10:03 PM

I don’t care what schumer thinks. I live here. In AZ on the border. When he goes unarmed to Organpipe … we’ll talk.

wolly4321 on January 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM

Schumer is soros sock puppet. Barky just reads the dictates off the prompter.

wolly4321 on January 31, 2013 at 10:08 PM

And he’ll be a Senator until he decides to retire.
(Term limits, anyone?)

RedCrow on January 31, 2013 at 9:24 PM

I’ve been back and forth on term limits faster than a Chinese ping-pong game.

Where I think I come down on the issue is that I am against term limits for one reason. It doesn’t solve the problem of a professional political class. I live in Virginia where our governor is limited to a four-year term. The incumbent can get a second term but not without a break in tenure. (It’s a throwback to the founding days most don’t understand).

What happens is that the political class adapts. Virginians run for governor for one reason- to get to the U.S. Senate. If we install term limits, we don’t get rid of professional politicians we just change their career paths. Even now, no out-of-office politician goes back to the folks back home. They just join a K Street firm.

A prominent Congressman goes to my church here in DC. He came here as a staffer to another politician from his home state. He married another staffer working on the hill. His kids were raised here. Yet, he represents voters in another part of the nation. This is the epitome of what it means to be part of the political class. Spend enough time in the district to win elections but raise your family within sight of the US Capitol.

Happy Nomad on January 31, 2013 at 10:24 PM

Unfortunately Chuck Schumer is one of those people I refuse to listen to or watch. I won’t even jump to 10:15 or wherever it was.

Dasher on January 31, 2013 at 11:00 PM

I refuse to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals keep me away from the nearest camera.

That’s better.

xblade on January 31, 2013 at 11:00 PM

How do we stack the bundles of shit? By alphabet, age,, height, sex, or smell. We’d start with Dumb Boxer, crooked Clinton, Dirty Durbin, Deviate Feinstein, slime trail Harry Reid, No-Neck Nadler, Outhouse Rangel, Cheap Gin Maxine Waters, Cheaper Gin Sheila Jackson, Ratboy Waxman, you can boil enough grease out of slime bags to grease all the cars in Detroit

RdLake on January 31, 2013 at 11:06 PM

When illegal immigration is fought with the right tool, border security becomes less of an issue. The right tool is “attrition through enforcement”. Essentially making their presence here uncomfortable and unproductive through law enforcement. When this is implemented effectively, illegal aliens leave on their own and at their own expense. Then they have no reason to come here in the first place. That ultimately makes border security a more attainable goal.

NumbersUSA defines “attrition through enforcement” this way…

The principle behind Attrition Through Enforcement is that living illegally in the United States will become more difficult and less satisfying over time when the government – at ALL LEVELS – enforces all of the laws already on the books. The goal is to make it extremely difficult for unauthorized persons to live and work in the United States. There is no need for taxpayers to watch the government spend billions of their dollars to round up and deport illegal aliens; they will buy their own bus or plane tickets back home if they can no longer earn a living here.

And they have a good article on it too.

Attrition Through Enforcement Is the True Middle-ground Solution

While you’re there, sigh up and start faxing your opposition to amnesty.

voiceofreason on January 31, 2013 at 11:11 PM

There are some people who would make the world a better place if they’d just reduce their own carbon footprints.

The Rogue Tomato on January 31, 2013 at 11:55 PM

Bob Menendez will receive the same punishment as Eric Holder (Fast & Furious), Jon Corzine (the vanishing 1.5 billion), Sandy Burglar (stuffing documents), Bill Clinton (I did not have sex), Hillary (Benghazi), Obama (too numerous to count); the list is endless.

http://www.redstate.com/fdardick/2012/10/03/140-obama-crimes

Back to border security, its just not going to happen with the Demons & the Republicrats. The King will get his Amnesty passed, even if he has to pull another executive order similar to the Dream Act.

Belle on February 1, 2013 at 12:00 AM

In other words, Rubio exposed himself as a progressive RINO, and won’t even get his amnesty?

Damn, that’ll leave a mark.

Rebar on February 1, 2013 at 12:05 AM

And so it continues…Republicans become Democrats.

Bi-partisanship is only useful, if you have no convictions, no ideals, and no concept of the rule of law and right or wrong.

Every inch you give, is an inch closer to what the Left wants.

F-you Republicans. You’re no different from that which you oppose.

It’s all fun and games, until someone loses their country.

Smart money says to move outta here before the whole thing collapses.

realitycheck on February 1, 2013 at 12:29 AM

Oh, and by the way, why hasn’t our prissy Republican “leardership” focused the attention on jobs and the economy? Hmmm?

*crickets*

realitycheck on February 1, 2013 at 12:31 AM

Schumer should be arrested for active treason against America and a betrayal of his sworn oath.

profitsbeard on February 1, 2013 at 2:19 AM

Repellent.

Amnesty by any other name stinks.

Feedie on February 1, 2013 at 3:04 AM

F-you Republicans. You’re no different from that which you oppose.

realitycheck on February 1, 2013 at 12:29 AM

This is why we have to purge RINOs.

No one remembers it was the House republicans that stopped the Bush amnesty and will stop this one, that the state level GOP are making major headway against the progressive agenda.

A few RINOs smear the whole party, and everyone jumps ship. Every elected RINO is likely costing us two or three elected conservatives.

Rebar on February 1, 2013 at 3:08 AM

Why knife him in the back now, just three days removed from the press conference announcing the bipartisan plan…

You’re so right. It is pure stupidity on the left’s part to knife him in the back only three days before the big press conference. Wait until three days after the bill is law and then take out the Marxist machete.

Don L on February 1, 2013 at 3:45 AM

I want to break grandma’sSchoomerz glasses off his face.

Sherman1864 on February 1, 2013 at 3:49 AM

Our whole Fed. gov. is crap.

Sherman1864 on February 1, 2013 at 3:50 AM

GFY lizard face.

fossten on February 1, 2013 at 6:22 AM

if “security” is based on a subjective assessment, conservatives in the Senate will supposedly go on claiming unto eternity that we’re not quite there yet.

Like liberals do with affirmative action. The dems are sensitive to this tactic only because they constantly use it themselves.

tommyboy on February 1, 2013 at 6:55 AM

diogenes on January 31, 2013 at 9:45 PM
-
This was eerie.
-
Ed Koch died this morning at around 2 AM.
Ed was 88.
RIP

diogenes on February 1, 2013 at 6:58 AM

But it’s not — and Dick [Durbin] and I and Bob [Menendez], as well as our three Republican friends, want to make sure the border’s secure but not to use it as a barrier to prevent the 11 million from eventually gaining a path to citizenship.”

 
Questions their peers won’t ask:
 
“Mr. Schumer, why do you assume brown skinned people to be less capable of understanding/following written rules than European whites or Asians?”

rogerb on February 1, 2013 at 7:35 AM

I hope Rubio learned a valuable lesson, never trust a Democrat and really, really, never trust Schumer. I’d love to watch the video of Schumer shaking his head in agreement while Rubio was putting his political career on the line, knowing he was going to do this.

bflat879 on February 1, 2013 at 7:35 AM

Schumer is Insane.

Fleuries on February 1, 2013 at 7:54 AM

Treason, plain and simple.

M240H on February 1, 2013 at 8:45 AM

Any form of amnesty for illegal aliens is political death for any politician. Both sides know it and both sides are playing a game with the American people by trying to convince Hispanics that they actually care about them. If that were not the case, the Democrats would have passed a bill between 2008 and 2010.

It’s better to do nothing than ever give illegal aliens citizenship.

cajunpatriot on February 1, 2013 at 8:46 AM

Chuck Schumer is making sense. His position is anti-white, and that makes sense because the Republican Party gets 90% of its votes from whites. Drive that demographic to destruction, and the Republican Party is beaten forever. Mass immigration plus forced integration is ruinous for whites, especially for working class whites who can’t price themselves out of contact with the imported competition. It’s just common sense for Democrats, and anyone else who profits from the demographic destruction of whites, to promote amnesty.

Chuck Schumer doesn’t have to care why Marco Rubio is doing what he’s doing. It’s not Chuck Schumer’s job to protect any Republican. Chuck Schumer is pushing his own agenda, and if that hurts Rubio, great.

Whatever happens, Democrats and other anti-whites will keep pushing for more amnesties and more mass immigration. Chuck Schumer doesn’t have to treat this as the last chance to get a deal. There’ll always be more sellout Republicans looking to make a compromise.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 8:54 AM

You’re so right. It is pure stupidity on the left’s part to knife him in the back only three days before the big press conference. Wait until three days after the bill is law and then take out the Marxist machete.

Don L on February 1, 2013 at 3:45 AM

There’s always another sellout Republican and another amnesty deal on thew table. Democrats don’t have to protect this one.

That’s Rubio’s problem, and that was McCain’s problem too. They think selling out Republican base interests makes them special and will give them good publicity in a general election. It doesn’t and it won’t.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 9:01 AM

Schumer is an out of touch jerk and a hopeless liberal. More social parasites in this country can only advance his Party’s standing and bolster his individual power. If this mindset is not squelched, this country will be lost.

rplat on February 1, 2013 at 9:04 AM

More social parasites in this country can only advance his Party’s standing and bolster his individual power.

rplat on February 1, 2013 at 9:04 AM

He knows.

If this mindset is not squelched, this country will be lost.

rplat on February 1, 2013 at 9:04 AM

Too bad there are so many Republicans, including Rubio, who gladly go along with that mindset in return for what they hope will be personal power.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 9:10 AM

Confirmed: Rubio = Dem Pawn + Moron

Panther on February 1, 2013 at 9:11 AM

Confirmed: Rubio = Dem Pawn + Moron

Panther on February 1, 2013 at 9:11 AM

He thinks being a sellout gives you a privileged central position and power.

When you’re the only one it does.

When there’s about a hundred would-be sellouts jumping up and down with their hands in the air, shouting “pick me!” being a sellout doesn’t even get you minimal respect. You’re taken for granted and expendable.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 9:15 AM

I didn’t think Schumer would pull the football so early in the game… I expected it – just not so soon.

Hill60 on February 1, 2013 at 9:22 AM

It’s all fun and games, until someone loses their country.

realitycheck on February 1, 2013 at 12:29 AM

Yeah, that’s what bites.

Otherwise I’d just laugh at all the sellouts and traitors not getting what they expect.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 9:40 AM

Republicans, prepare to walk away. Walk. Away.

IF 11 million illegals are made legal, it will make a bad economy worse as there are not enough jobs already. Republicans should not want their fingerprints on that.

WannabeAnglican on February 1, 2013 at 10:35 AM

It’s more secure than it was several years ago, but it has a ways to go.

LOL. Border Patrol reports that illegal crossings on the southern border were up 9% last year. The U.S. economy still sucks, and there are still no jobs, but the illegals are still coming. But don’t worry, our border is more secure than ever!

AZCoyote on February 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM

He thinks being a sellout gives you a privileged central position and power.

When you’re the only one it does.

When there’s about a hundred would-be sellouts jumping up and down with their hands in the air, shouting “pick me!” being a sellout doesn’t even get you minimal respect. You’re taken for granted and expendable.

David Blue on February 1, 2013 at 9:15 AM

Please tell me you have books to your name; that was very well written!

MelonCollie on February 1, 2013 at 10:55 AM

I and Bob [Menendez], as well

I am guessing Schumer may be rethinking his choice of partners.

More substantively, this could simply be posturing. Because if it’s sincere you can throw immigration reform into the burn pit. Which is perhaps what Democrats want in order to falsely imply Republicans are racists, xenophobes and hate “brown people” or something…

Marcus Traianus on February 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Poisoned by the Schumer Kool-Aid, will young Rubio be inoculated against the next Gang of 8 (morons) epidemic?

LetsBfrank on February 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM

Democrats don’t want “comprehensive immigration reform” before 2014. Duh.

It’s their only issue to get a sizable chunk of Obama’s casual voters to the polls.

BocaJuniors on February 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM

Those “illegals” aren’t going to want competition from the “new illegals” Chuckie!

Without security there is no reason to go any further.

Remember when you swore to uphold that pesky “Constitution” document?

It starts out:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Securing the border … kinda fits there, right?

Dereliction of duty at best, malfeasance in office most likely.

ProfShadow on February 1, 2013 at 11:43 AM

I really don’t understand why we need to make all these people citizens. Legal residency surely is enough for people who failed to follow the rules to gain citizenship.

alwaysfiredup on February 1, 2013 at 12:16 PM

New Comprehensive Immigration Reform, just like the Old Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Let it die, Rev’; Let it die!

Another Drew on February 1, 2013 at 12:44 PM

The open borders part of any immigration/amnesty law is far more important than making them citizens.
The regime doesn’t really care if they are legal or not. They will be voting irregardless. A little thing like election laws never stopped this communist regime from getting the job done. No matter how many votes they need.
Open borders are all about Cloward Piven and collapsing the welfare system as much as it is a steady stream of voters forever.Enough to keep them viable even when the few sane dems left do leave the party.

rodguy911 on February 1, 2013 at 1:09 PM

Schumer should be arrested for active treason against America and a betrayal of his sworn oath.

profitsbeard on February 1, 2013 at 2:19 AM

.
Just one, of a . . . . . . .very large number.

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 2:21 PM

Sen Chuck Schumer: I refuse to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals

.
listens2glenn: I refuse to let citizenship for illegals become a barrier to border security.
.
Chuck U ! … Senator Schumer.

listens2glenn on February 1, 2013 at 2:26 PM

No way Menendez wants a secure border. Without those Dominican Republic trips, where else can he get his “youngest and newest girls”?

batter on February 1, 2013 at 4:49 PM

federal law: transporting a minor across state lines for purposes of prostitution minimum term of 10 years in prison and a maximum penalty of life in prison

This is why Mendez has to go to Dominican Republic. In prison, he would have to stick to boys over 18, who could probably beat him up and take his glasses

A Senator with a 16 year old hooker in the closet is a very useable Senator indeed. The WH could work with a guy like that

entagor on February 1, 2013 at 6:29 PM

Liberals are sickening idiots, I can’t believe I used to be one of them (now I’m centrist).

While there’s some things I hate about conservatives and will never see eye to eye on, where I consider you flat/dead wrong, on issues like abortion, christianity/existence of god and some aspects of socialism, I’m grateful for conservatives being around and offering sanity, wisdom and strength on good principles. Things like locking up the border, defending Israel, patriotism and more.

If the liberals got their way, the USA would become an Islamic state full of Mexican and Arab muslims-or god knows what the left would allow America to turn into if they got their way.

However there’s many on the right who’ve turned into a bunch of cowards and are letting Obama get away with supporting our Islamic enemies, rather than impeach him for doing such things.

thinkagain on February 2, 2013 at 1:33 AM

While there’s some things I hate about conservatives and will never see eye to eye on, where I consider you flat/dead wrong, on issues like abortion, christianity/existence of god and some aspects of socialism, I’m grateful for conservatives being around and offering sanity, wisdom and strength on good principles. Things like locking up the border, defending Israel, patriotism and more.

thinkagain on February 2, 2013 at 1:33 AM

.
How are you going to react, when ALL of the Christians on the face of the earth suddenly disappear in the blink of an eye?
.

If the liberals got their way, the USA would become an Islamic state full of Mexican and Arab muslims-or god knows what the left would allow America to turn into if they got their way.

thinkagain on February 2, 2013 at 1:33 AM

.
The liberal Progressives at the top of the leadership hierarchy, want this for the whole world. It’s their ultimate goal

listens2glenn on February 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM

Chuck Schumer: I refuse to let border security become a barrier to citizenship for illegals

New Speak Translation: Can’t close the tap yet, don’t have all the cheap labor votes we need.

jpcpt03 on February 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM

api on February 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM

Comment pages: 1 2