Comments on: NYT public editor: It’s hard to tell who our writers voted for

By: S. D.

S. D. — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:35:57 +0000

Oh, Lawdy, my sides hurt. Heh.

By: Delsa

Delsa — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:56:54 +0000

This woman is deaf, dumb, and blind!
Never mind the fact she is a cerebral midget

By: viking01

viking01 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:45:32 +0000

Moochelle always votes for Moe Lobstah.

The NY Times DNC shills reputedly still are writing in “Uncle Joe Stalin” for every presidential ballot.

By: Bookworm Room » New York Times public editor keeps straight face while saying she doesn’t know reporters’ political orientation

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:14:10 +0000

[...] the New York Times public editor stating — with a straight face yet! — that she really has no idea what political viewpoint informs their writing. Maybe this screen shot, from today’s online edition, will help [...]

By: talkingpoints

talkingpoints — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:45:33 +0000

It’s hard to tell who our writers voted for

And all this time I thought such a position at the newspaper required a modicum of intelligence. Guess not.

GarandFan on January 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM

Not in decades.

By: drunyan8315

drunyan8315 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:07:17 +0000

The NYT cosmology: it’s congenital liars at the top, and then another layer of congenital liars, and then congenital liars all the way down.

By: pilamaye

pilamaye — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:04:56 +0000

What the heII is a journalist?

Bmore on January 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM

Legends say that once they were a proud race who stood for speaking the truth, with honesty, integrity, an open-mind, and a desire to tell only the facts and nothing else.

But it is suspected that they were nothing less than a myth.

By: Another Drew

Another Drew — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:59:00 +0000

Stupid, or a Liar!
Either way highly qualified for a position at the Times.

By: acyl72

acyl72 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:46:10 +0000

I thought this paper had changed it’s name to the Volkisscher Beobachter a while back?

By: Bacon4allah

Bacon4allah — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:45:18 +0000

Sure, and it,s hard to tell if a bear sh@ts in the woods.

By: Dopenstrange

Dopenstrange — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:43:24 +0000

NYT public editor: It’s hard to tell who our writers voted for. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take a hit off my bong.

FIFY.

By: earlgrey133

earlgrey133 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:42:49 +0000

This just sort of seems like the equivalent of he who smelt it dealt it. If they have to say than we all know it’s not true.

By: belad

belad — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:22:02 +0000

crrr6 on January 25, 2013 at 10:36 AM

Wouldn't ludicrous or farcical be more apropos?

By: Pork-Chop

Pork-Chop — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:16:57 +0000

NYT public editor: It’s hard to tell ~~who~~ how many times each of our writers voted for obama. "Vote early, and vote often" is our motto.

By: bw222

bw222 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:11:22 +0000

As much as I dislike the media’s bias, In lislike the fact that they are liars even more.

By: Resist We Much

Resist We Much — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:08:17 +0000

"The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses." - Vladimir Lenin

By: RadClown

RadClown — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:02:23 +0000

If It Wasn’t For Social Media, You Wouldn’t Know Who Our Reporters Voted For

I think she just called us stupid. Or maybe she thinks everyone is as clueless as she is.

By: Harbingeing

Harbingeing — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:30:22 +0000

NYT public editor: It’s hard to tell who our writers voted for

It just means she has her suspicions about some on the staff who may or may not be guilty of certain thought crimes, based on a look, a gesture, a word out of place, their race, etc. and still need to be purged…

By: burserker

burserker — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:27:40 +0000

and stupid Americans believe her, and they are the majority in this country

By: wepeople

wepeople — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:16:51 +0000

She needs to have the dog crap slapped out of her head so she can think straight…..

By: Opinionnation

Opinionnation — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:12:50 +0000

Is it hot in here, or is it just m....... my pants!! -@AsalamaTweetum

By: Tater Salad

Tater Salad — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:07:06 +0000

If she can’t tell then she needs to be fired for stupidity.

By: Axeman

Axeman — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:52:32 +0000

Sure it’s hard, because liberals can’t figure out anything. They don’t feel that they slant things. They feel that they are simply telling the truth. They don’t like to feel that they are being political hacks or in the tank because those are not good things. The want to feel like they support only good things and feel good about it.

So they approach it as they usually do. They sloganize it and propagate it among themselves until the echo chamber is filled with that sentiment and then they take a bath in the thrill of consensus, and the outside world of facts fades away.

By: stormridercx4

stormridercx4 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:42:42 +0000

LOL 100% Obozo

By: 3.14159

3.14159 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:39:25 +0000

I’m sure a handful went for Ralph Nader or an ironic Randee of the Redwoods write-in.