Video: US Air Force airlifting French military into northern Mali

posted at 3:51 pm on January 23, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Most of the attention today will focus on Hillary Clinton’s testimony on the terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi, and it should — but some of it should also focus on the impact of Barack Obama’s war on Libya has had in a broader sense. CBS News profiles the large-scale logistical role that the US is now playing in the French intervention in neighboring Mali, where weapons and fighters from the “liberating” forces in Libya are now being used to fuel an Islamist insurgency that nearly took over the country. The US and France want African nations to take over the fight, but that seems rather unlikely to happen:

Why unlikely? For one, the UN is balking at it, expressing concern over their own staff in Mali, although the Security Council has already approved combat operations for an all-Africa force:

U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon warned the U.N. Security Council against requiring the world body to provide logistical support for combat military operations in Mali, saying such a move would put U.N. civilian staff throughout the region at “grave risk.”

In December, the 15-member Security Council authorized the deployment of an African-led military force to help defeat al Qaeda and other Islamist militants in northern Mali and called on the secretary-general to submit funding options.

“The situation in Mali is critical. Terrorist organizations threaten the way of life of the Malian people, and even the existence of the state,” Ban told the Security Council in a letter on Sunday to the council, obtained by Reuterson Tuesday. …

“If the United Nations were to provide logistics support to military forces engaged in an offensive operation, it would place civilian United Nations personnel at grave risk, and undermine their ability to carry out their current tasks in the region,” Ban wrote.

The perceived neutrality of U.N. staff across the Sahel region – a belt of drought-stricken land spanning nearly a dozen impoverished countries on the southern rim of the Sahara – would be undermined if the world body supported the Mali offensive.

At the moment, the UN forces number less than 900 troops.  That number may expand to 3300, as the Security Council originally envisaged AFISMA in December, but they won’t be ready until, oh … September.  That leaves France and the US holding the bag for quite a while, meaning that the few weeks suggested by this CBS News report sounds downright Pollyannaish.

It prompts once again the question of Chuck Hagel’s nomination, too.  As Senator, Hagel ended up opposing these kinds of interventions, and with his apparent mandate to cut spending at the Pentagon, these kinds of support missions may not even be possible for very much longer.  Will the Senate Armed Services Committee ask Hagel how he plans to square that particular circle?

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Didn’t Obowma arm the “liberating” forces in Libya…?

… Oh, wait!

Seven Percent Solution on January 23, 2013 at 3:55 PM

Did I miss the congressional approval on this?

MoreLiberty on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Didn’t our involvement in Vietnam start out this way?

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Still paying for Europe’s socialism.

While those same countries deride us for our military.

cozmo on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM

When is the Nobel committee going to ask 0bama for that peace prize back?

UltimateBob on January 23, 2013 at 3:57 PM

Will the Senate Armed Services Committee ask Hagel how he plans to square that particular circle?

Magic 8 Ball says: “No.”

trigon on January 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM

I’m sure we have some slightly used C-47′s they can have.

RickB on January 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM

Send the women’s combat units in!!!!!!

Rocks on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

Well, come on all of you, big strong men,
Uncle Sam needs your help again.
He’s got himself in a terrible jam
Way down yonder in Vietnam Mali
So put down your books and pick up a gun,
We’re gonna have a whole lotta fun.

And it’s one, two, three,
What are we fighting for ?
Don’t ask me, I don’t give a damn,
Next stop is Vietnam Mali;
And it’s five, six, seven,
Open up the pearly gates,
Well there ain’t no time to wonder why,
Whoopee! we’re all gonna die.

Come on Wall Street, don’t be slow,
Why man, this is war au-go-go
There’s plenty good money to be made
By supplying the Army with the tools of its trade,
But just hope and pray that if they drop the bomb,
They drop it on the Viet Cong Jihadist.

And it’s one, two, three,
What are we fighting for ?
Don’t ask me, I don’t give a damn,
Next stop is Vietnam Mali.
And it’s five, six, seven,
Open up the pearly gates,
Well there ain’t no time to wonder why
Whoopee! we’re all gonna die.

Well, come on generals, let’s move fast;
Your big chance has come at last.
Now you can go out and get those reds
‘Cause the only good commie Jihadi is the one that’s dead
And you know that peace can only be won
When we’ve blown ‘em all to kingdom come.

And it’s one, two, three,
What are we fighting for ?
Don’t ask me, I don’t give a damn,
Next stop is Vietnam Mali;
And it’s five, six, seven,
Open up the pearly gates,
Well there ain’t no time to wonder why
Whoopee! we’re all gonna die.

Come on mothers throughout the land,
Pack your boys off to Vietnam Mali.
Come on fathers, and don’t hesitate
To send your sons off before it’s too late.
And you can be the first ones in your block
To have your boy come home in a box.

And it’s one, two, three
What are we fighting for ?
Don’t ask me, I don’t give a damn,
Next stop is Vietnam Mali.
And it’s five, six, seven,
Open up the pearly gates,
Well there ain’t no time to wonder why,
Whoopee! we’re all gonna die.

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

Why are we doing this exactly?

CorporatePiggy on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

How wars are lost

Schadenfreude on January 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM

Sorry Rocks. Just saw your comment.

Schadenfreude on January 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM

Either we are being paid by France for the service, or our military budget is, indeed, excessive.

Archivarix on January 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM

Will it turn out as well for the French as Dien Bien Phu?

kit dinker on January 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM

The Peace President or something or other…….

D-fusit on January 23, 2013 at 4:02 PM

The French can’t move their own military ?

What the hell good is an army that can’t move ?

Man, the French are funny.

Jabberwock on January 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Tell the U.N. the forces be out as soon as the Muslim Brothethood is firmly in place.

And if French assets prove ineffective, the ATF has American guns standing by…

ROCnPhilly on January 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Is the USAF charging ferrying fees to fly the French troops to Mali? Fuel, labor, and equipment useage cost money while the French don’t care to maintain adequate capacity to do so on their own dime or is that franc? :) just kidding, but I do wonder.

Russ808 on January 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Send the women’s combat units in!!!!!!

I see it now…..new comic book fodder…Sgt. Francesca Rock and her squad of Fightin’ Rockettes!!

This does not bode well for the future of our armed forces.

hawkeye54 on January 23, 2013 at 4:04 PM

so in essence france is fighting us, or itself..with the jihadists using our weapons…what a war, what a administration..

sadsushi on January 23, 2013 at 4:05 PM

That’s what we need: more interventionism.

Dante on January 23, 2013 at 4:06 PM

Just about 60 years since France asked us to provide logistics support and such…right before Dien Bien Phu….hmmmm.

Hope the current frog command is a lot better than Henri Navarre’s.

Why are we there at all?

Didn’t Great leader, Field Marshall, Doctor, President for Life Barrack Hussein Obama ordain that the war was all but over…we had just about won?

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM

That’s what we need: more interventionism.

Dante on January 23, 2013 at 4:06 PM

Yeah. Why didn’t U-Haul get a chance to bid ?

Or UPS for that matter. You know, LOGISTICS !

Jabberwock on January 23, 2013 at 4:08 PM

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

Country Joe and the Fish…ahh, the memories. (Misspent youth and all that…)

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:08 PM

Didn’t Great leader, Field Marshall, Doctor, President for Life Barrack Hussein Obama ordain that the war was all but over…we had just about won?

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM

Why, yes, he did. He’s just waiting for the Islamists to finally agree with him.

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM

The anti-war movement is going to be so mad about this!

Any minute now.

JUST WAIT.

mudskipper on January 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM

Is the USAF charging ferrying fees to fly the French troops to Mali?

Probably gratis. Barry just has to get us military involved so he can pave the way for Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover of yet another nation.

And if French assets prove ineffective

Maybe they prove too effective and we have to nudge them to be replaced by more ineffective UN troops.

hawkeye54 on January 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM

Getting in deep … and long?

I just noticed what you did here, Ed…

Archivarix on January 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM

Thanks for the lift guys. Don’t get comfy though, we’ll be withdrawing in a few hours and you guys can take it from there.

antipc on January 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM

Out of one hot theatre to another…

Rambeaux’s War

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM

Send in the Senegalese!!!

Maybe, the Cote d’Ivorians!!!

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM

Did that open an opportunity to post irrelevant out of context and edited comments here?
 
lester on November 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM

 

Another war?! I hope Obama blasts Romney with his own message!
 
lester on May 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM

rogerb on January 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM

Dante on January 23, 2013 at 4:06 PM

Here’s a Rothbardian essay you’ll like:

Refusing to Disarm: Lexington and Concord

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM

Is there anything in the whole wide fracking world that the American taxpayers aren’t on the hook for?

Rebar on January 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM

That’s what we need: more interventionism.

Goes hand in hand with reducing our armed forces by 30%. Send ‘em
more places overseas, overextend them, wear ‘em out and cut ‘em down. Barry hates our military.

hawkeye54 on January 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM

How do you say Code Pink en francaise?

Shouldn’t somebody tell them about this?

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM

Obozo hates brown people. Bush helped Africa, obozo bombs it.

Flange on January 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM

Is there anything in the whole wide fracking world that the American taxpayers aren’t on the hook for?

Nope. Its planned that way.

hawkeye54 on January 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

Country Joe and the Fish…ahh, the memories. (Misspent youth and all that…)

coldwarrior on January 23, 2013 at 4:08 PM

Best of all, that little Marxist pansy would undoubtedly stroke out if he were to read what I did to his song… <insert truly evil grin here:

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM

Why are we doing this exactly?

CorporatePiggy on January 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM

That’s what I’m wondering as well.

Whatever the reason, rest assured that it’s someone’s interest somewhere, and will in some way harm the United States.

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 23, 2013 at 4:16 PM

Good thing we are flush with cash to be able to provide this service.

Next we will be providing free designated driver service for depressed rural drunken Irishmen.

Ditkaca on January 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM

France kicked out U.S. NATO forces in the 60′s and has generally been a thorn in our side since WW II. But we can always count on France to use us when they need us.

I don’t know why we put up with these bug eaters.

Special Forces Grunt on January 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM

The French don’t have C-17s, they were holding their breath for the Airbus A-400, which is again delayed because you know, their don’t buy American issues. It seems that they’ll have to swallow their pride again on this one, too.

Frankly, as long as is only their combat troops, I support our airlift efforts. Regardless of everyone’s feelings, the Jihadis need to be stop now.

El Coqui on January 23, 2013 at 4:19 PM

Next we will be providing free designated driver service for depressed rural drunken Irishmen.

Ditkaca on January 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM

I would rather we did that than helped Al Qaeda. The Irish at least sober up between drunken binges, Muslim hatred is forever.

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM

Can’t wait for the Obama cultists to start marching on the White House because of this.

NOT IN OUR NAME, amirite?

Good Lt on January 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM

meaning that the few weeks suggested by this CBS News report sounds downright Pollyannaish

Quick show of hands, who thinks even 3300 U.N. troops, who may or may not get there sometime in the fall, will be able to quell AQIM?

JusDreamin on January 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM

Does each french soldier carry with him a small WHITE FLAG or does the entire contingent just have one BIG WHITE FLAG?

TeaPartyNation on January 23, 2013 at 4:27 PM

meaning that the few weeks suggested by this CBS News report sounds downright Pollyannaish

Quick show of hands, who thinks even 3300 U.N. troops, who may or may not get there sometime in the fall, will be able to quell AQIM?

JusDreamin on January 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM

Who thinks 3300 U.N Troops could quell a kindergarten uprising without raping half the kindergarteners?

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:27 PM

Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who ‘will fire on U.S. citizens’

On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama’s second term.

Garrow made the following Facebook post:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

So, who is the source?

Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

Understand, this is not coming from Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease.

Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country’s one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work.

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:30 PM

When is the Nobel committee going to ask 0bama for that peace prize back?

UltimateBob on January 23, 2013 at 3:57 PM

When, indeed!

SD Tom on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Next we will be providing free designated driver service for depressed rural drunken Irishmen.
Ditkaca on January 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM

Next? we already are in one county of my state. The taxpayers are picking up the tab for free transport from the bars….

Although I don’t think you have to be rural, depressed or Irish. Heck, they are spending a million bucks for advertising it.

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Still paying for Europe’s socialism.

While those same countries deride us for our military.

cozmo on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Its easy to be a socialist country when your capitalist neighbor provides security for you.

BobMbx on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Does each french soldier carry with him a small WHITE FLAG or does the entire contingent just have one BIG WHITE FLAG?

TeaPartyNation on January 23, 2013 at 4:27 PM

Both.

I also expect a huge sale of captured French rifles with the advert, “Never fired and thrown down only once.”

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

I guess they couldn’t count on Parisian taxis like they did in 1914.

Almost a hundred years later, and the French still cannot transport their military to the front lines on their own.

rw on January 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM

So the left now thinks war is sexy?

Getting in deep … and long?

Bmore on January 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM

Frankly, as long as is only their combat troops, I support our airlift efforts. Regardless of everyone’s feelings, the Jihadis need to be stop now.

El Coqui on January 23, 2013 at 4:19 PM

We’re simply providing transport for the French Surrender Battalion.

BobMbx on January 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM

So the left now thinks war is sexy?

Getting in deep … and long?

Bmore on January 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM

It recently occurred to them that battlelines have a front and a rear.

BobMbx on January 23, 2013 at 4:34 PM

That’s what I’m wondering as well.

Whatever the reason, rest assured that it’s someone’s interest somewhere, and will in some way harm the United States.

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 23, 2013 at 4:16 PM

That’s what I’m thinking. It’s why Barky likes to keep as quiet as possible about these things – the answer doesn’t sound good.

CorporatePiggy on January 23, 2013 at 4:34 PM

Non-Scientific Poll: Who Wore It Better? (Spew Alert Issued)

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Comedy gold, right there.

Rebar on January 23, 2013 at 4:34 PM

Non-Scientific Poll: Who Wore It Better? (Spew Alert Issued)

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Well, there goes another sip of coffee all over the monitor…

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 4:36 PM

The French can’t move their own military ?

What the hell good is an army that can’t move ?

Man, the French are funny.

Jabberwock on January 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Start a rumor that the C-17s are flying on algae gas.

BobMbx on January 23, 2013 at 4:36 PM

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:30 PM

A couple of months ago, Here at Hot Air, I wrote that that was happening.

Most ignored it. Some thought I was insane to claim it.
Well, maybe a world renowned humanitarian will have better success.

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM

Well, maybe a world renowned humanitarian will have better success.

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM

I doubt it, the “Professional Blogger’s” won’t touch a story like that because it might make them look like conspiracy theorist nut jobs. They desperately want to avoid that stigma because it might cut into their incomes or chances of being recognized as serious Journolisters…

SWalker on January 23, 2013 at 4:41 PM

I remember last yr when I was very vocal in my disagreement with that Libya debacle, many people here disagreed with me. Gaddhafi might have been bad at one time, but he was a strong bulwark that help together Northern Africa.

Obama basically destabilized the whole of Northern Africa, but the worst thing about it is that he is clueless about what he did.

Chudi on January 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM

I’ve seen this movie before…

… It does not end well for us.

Seven Percent Solution on January 23, 2013 at 4:45 PM

I remember last yr when I was very vocal in my disagreement with that Libya debacle, many people here disagreed with me. Gaddhafi might have been bad at one time, but he was a strong bulwark that help together Northern Africa.

And I was one who agreed with you completely

Obama basically destabilized the whole of Northern Africa, but the worst thing about it is that he is clueless about what he did.
Chudi on January 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM

And there, I DISAGREE with you. He isn’t /wasn’t clueless. THAT WAS HIS INTENT.

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM

So the left now thinks war is sexy?

Getting in deep … and long?
Bmore on January 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM

That’s what she said ….

rsherwd65 on January 23, 2013 at 4:51 PM

Non-Scientific Poll: Who Wore It Better? (Spew Alert Issued)

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Awesome! Thanks for the much needed spew alert!

UltimateBob on January 23, 2013 at 4:53 PM

Didn’t our involvement in Vietnam start out this way?

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM

Where are the anti-war protestors?
Where are the impeach Obama signs???

Sure – it’s OK when its YOUR president…..

HYPOCRITES!!!!

redguy on January 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM

RWM:
This one too:

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:57 PM

Oh, and those Obamafones?????

RFID chip installed so they can track them.
And they go through a different switch that the feds can monitor….
Heh, heh – not such a great deal now eh?

redguy on January 23, 2013 at 4:58 PM

Wow 0 has us involved in quite a few conflicts. I think I am going to have to start naming them. I guess this is that more flexibility thingy he talked about for after the election. The left must be truly pleased with his record. I noticed they are completely silent for a change. I’ll call this one chumps war.

Bmore on January 23, 2013 at 4:59 PM

With Obama getting us involved in ANOTHER war does this mean that he LIED when he claimed that he had won the war on terror in his inaugural speach on Monday?

It would seem that the media should have placed his comments within the context of this NEW military activity.

Any idea where Code Pink stands on this new war?

Meanwhile, I just heard someone state that al quieda and the taliban were diminished in numbers and were no longer relevant in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Freddy on January 23, 2013 at 5:00 PM

Didn’t our involvement in Vietnam start out this way?

Liam on January 23, 2013 at 3:56 P

Dien Bien Phu

tom daschle concerned on January 23, 2013 at 5:07 PM

Meanwhile, I just heard someone state that al quieda and the taliban were diminished in numbers and were no longer relevant in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Freddy on January 23, 2013 at 5:00 PM

They like to winter in Africa. Gets real cold in the Kush, the Wakhan and the Khyber this time of year.

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 5:07 PM

Will the Senate Armed Services Committee ask Hagel how he plans to square that particular circle?

They will ask, he wont answer and that’ll be that.

Sacramento on January 23, 2013 at 5:10 PM

The anti-war movement is going to be so mad about this!

Well, it’s not like it’s a a war-war! If it was a war-war, there would be a Republican in charge, and Congress would have to be consulted.

Don’t you people know anything about the Constitution?

drunyan8315 on January 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM

If that War Monger Bush was President right now, the Dems would have already started impeachment hearings.

Del Dolemonte on January 23, 2013 at 5:30 PM

After they refused overflights to Libya, I say ditch ‘em and leave ‘em on the tarmac. That’ll fromage ‘em.

Christien on January 23, 2013 at 5:31 PM

I heard that originally Obama wanted the French to payback the US.

That is a laugh .. when in the last 75 years have the French ever paid the whole bill ?

J_Crater on January 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM

LegendHasIt on January 23, 2013 at 4:57 PM

Good catch!

Resist We Much on January 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM

The French can’t move their own military ?

What the hell good is an army that can’t move ?

Jabberwock on January 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM

The bicycles kept sinking when they tried to cross the Med.

bofh on January 23, 2013 at 5:38 PM

It was the French who would not let our F-111s fly over their country when trying to take out the terrorist Gaddafi. We should have said no to them.

tommer74 on January 23, 2013 at 6:26 PM

A serious situation. Hopefully President Obama is on top of this..

Opinionnation on January 23, 2013 at 6:27 PM

That number may expand to 3300, as the Security Council originally envisaged AFISMA in December, but they won’t be ready until, oh … September.

Wait a minute. The UN has had 19,000 men in DR Congo costing $1.4 billion per year for how many years now? What have they accomplished aside for ensuring their presence and another $1.4 billion will be required next year? (Been there since 1999, or going on 14 years now). If you are a UN “official” or a member of an NGO, you get on average about $200,000 in annual salary tax free on assignment there, a car that would cost $75,000 and lodging that would cost $5,000 a month if you paid for it yourself.

That war began in 1998 and has so far resulted in about 5.4 million deaths, many from starvation as the land can not be farmed due to the fighting. It is the second deadliest conflict since WWII. Meanwhile, in the 12 years since 2000, there have been a grand total of 47 casualties among MONUC-Monusco.

So, why the hell is the UN getting involved here? That basically simply guarantees a perpetual conflict that is nothing more than a massive gravy train for “officials” and NGOs while the people will bear the brunt of the violence.

We would be a lot better off keeping the UN out of this.

crosspatch on January 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM

…this is a joke…..right?

KOOLAID2 on January 23, 2013 at 8:04 PM

We are at war with these terrorists, and this time we are doing the right thing — stabilizing and expanding the power of existing governments rather than trying to topple them in some badly misnamed “Arab Spring” — or, in this case “African Spring”.

unclesmrgol on January 23, 2013 at 8:28 PM

I heard that originally Obama wanted the French to payback the US.

That is a laugh .. when in the last 75 years have the French ever paid the whole bill ?

J_Crater on January 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM

Years ago, when the French were – yet again – fromaged at the USA over something (God knows what), a lot of French veterans went to the US Embassy and threw their US medals over the fence (ala jawn kerree).
I then wrote a letter to the president of France – one Charles de Gaulle – and asked him when their pique would drive them to return the US$9billion that we had spent saving their butts from the Germans (in protest, of course).
Oddly enough, I never received a reply.

Solaratov on January 23, 2013 at 9:35 PM

A serious situation. Hopefully President Obama is on top of this..

Opinionnation on January 23, 2013 at 6:27 PM

BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!lebenty!!!!!!

Thanks. A little humor in a serious situation is good for morale.

Solaratov on January 23, 2013 at 9:38 PM

In it “Long and Hard”. So is that called a FRENCH MALI?

Jason Alexander on January 23, 2013 at 10:01 PM