Pablo Honey on January 22, 2013 at 4:10 PM

I see Pablo is still trying to spin straw into gold.

Rainsford on January 22, 2013 at 6:01 PM

Fail

Here it is typed out:
http://secondamendmentfreedom.blogspot.com/2011/03/worlds-largest-army-america-s-hunters.html

Uh huh. So tell me, when that big black bear is coming at you because he’s curious about the color of your insides, which round would you rather have, a military 9mm or a sporting .41 magnum. Would you prefer an Armalite AR’s .223 or a Winchester lever action in .45-70?

“Sporting” firearms have “military” firearms outgunned in every area except cyclic rate. And what is spray-n-pray going to do for you when you go up against a guy who can drop a buck at 300 yards with bullets that will penetrate body armor like it was putty?

Think I’m kidding? See below.

One final note. Our police, troopers and servicemen are not mindless storm troopers. They’re us. They’re part of our communities and called to service by noble desire. Does any sane American think men and women of this character are going to answer a call to mobilize against their countrymen?

No American is putting his countrymen in his sights. So confiscation will not happen. The libs just don’t get that fact.

And a Winchester is way cooler than an AR. Sorry black gun lovers, but that’s just the way it is ;)

The State of Wisconsin had over 600,000 hunters in the field during their nine day hunting season last year. Allow me to restate that number, 600,000 in the field. Red Dawn has nothing on these guys. During the last hunting season, Wisconsin ‘s hunters became the eighth largest army in the world.

The whole thing is worth reading:

White Americans would be a FedGoov horror show. A tank commander would roll up to an intersection and pop the tank top. Boom, his head explodes from an invisible rifleman 400 years away. Crew calls for help. FBI and BATF show up and in the space of a few seconds take 5 or 6 of their own casualties. Rifleman goes home, cleans his rifle for another day. Meanwhile hundreds of agents swarm around the “incident”, disrupting traffic and generally being stormtrooperish. Multiply this by 50 a day and you get an idea what 2nd Amendment guys are talking about. We are not talking about some guy shooting up a bar in San Stinko for “Viva Revolution!”. We are talking about highly intelligent men who are part of the gun culture who have owned weapons, built weapons accurized weapons and have the best weapons in the world taking on disorganized, fat, overpaid police forces who will die in DROVES (and far more will quit and some will even switch sides) in an effort that will lead to a real change in Government, but one in which the Liberals can’t possibly believe.

Look up “Battle of Athens”.

I don’t believe the Founder’s intent is arbitrary.

I believe it can be proven in a court of law.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 8:23 PM

.
…unless rollover Roberts is in that court!

KOOLAID2 on January 22, 2013 at 8:33 PM

.
Oh, you had to bring that up . . . . . . . : (

Wow why is this guy not running for political office? He would draw back all that Asian vote in to the Republican party, and God knows we need it.
Raquel Pinkbullet on January 22, 2013 at 4:05 PM

I’d vote for him. Obama got most of the Asian vote. Taiwanese fellow I worked with, PhD Math, very bright, told me “America has too much freedom. In my country [back then] if you move to another city, you must report to the police and register” Yet this man became a citizen. Why didn’t he stay in paradise? He could not connect that our sloppy liberty encouraged the fantastic growth and creativity of the populace.

American growth has stalled. This is due to over control, private property is the key to a man s willingness to sacrifice or even die for his individual kingdom. The gun gives a man his share of the power, and his share of the responsibility. Liberty means a man will be hung after he steals the sheep, and not in case he might steal.

I am so glad to have seen the video. In China there are many heroes, only they get no publicity. One day, one of them may save our hides

And not so ironically, after taking control, their next step was to disarm the population – followed immediately with the extermination of any and all opposition.

dentarthurdent on January 22, 2013 at 10:33 PM

Actually that started under the Nationalists. Do you suppose private gun ownership is more common in Taiwan than on the mainland?

Ironically Communist China was founded when the armed masses rose up and overthrew the government.

DarkCurrent on January 22, 2013 at 8:58 PM

And not so ironically, after taking control, their next step was to disarm the population – followed immediately with the extermination of any and all opposition.

But I didn’t mean to imply that there shouldn’t have been a response to his (or her?) comment.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 8:20 PM

No problem.

I don’t believe the Founder’s intent is arbitrary.

I believe it can be proven in a court of law.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 8:23 PM

…unless rollover Roberts is in that court!

I agree. That line is arbitrary. The government will use that arbitrary reasoning to push for gun control and tyranny. It’ll be a slippery slope to disarm the citizenry.

Kyle_Reese on January 22, 2013 at 7:05 PM

.
I don’t believe the Founder’s intent is arbitrary.

I believe it can be proven in a court of law.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM

.
And there are those reading who may actually believe that crap. According to a recent poll, 35% actually do, so I don’t much care to leave stuff like that unanswered, even if it does give Rainsford a woody.

sharrukin on January 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM

.
I apologize for wording that poorly. I wasn’t making fun of you.

I believe that’s all Rainsford was looking for, was the reaction. Just a “hit ‘n’ run” statement designed to stir things up.
But I didn’t mean to imply that there shouldn’t have been a response to his (or her?) comment.

As we all know, tanks are afraid of bullets, particularly those fired by handguns.

lester on January 22, 2013 at 4:05 PM

As pointed out, while a rifle has no chance against a tank, it doesn’t mean those slaughtered should just sit there and take it.

aryeung on January 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM

During the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, 10-year old boys did a hell of a job destroying tanks by dropping bottles of gasoline onto the engine compartment, thereby setting the tank afire…and then shooting the crew as they tried to flee the burning tank.
It might be “old style”, but it still works.

Guns are not enough…we also have a constitutional right to machine guns, grenades, SAMS, and RPG’s.

Pablo Honey on January 22, 2013 at 4:10 PM

RPGs were found in a gun buy back in Los Angeles. The US government sells RPGs to other countries. However, a US citizen cannot have those arms.

You liberals want to talk about Constitutional rights, but you don’t talk about why you want to infringe upon the 2A when it comes to RPGs, etc. Or why it’s OK to allow others to have RPGs and not US citizens.

You liberals are disgusting because you want to turn the US into a defenseless nation filled with frightened people. Frightened of their own government.

Private citizens should be allowed to own anything that the civil authorities have, and use. All of the items you’ve listed are supposed to be forbidden for civil law enforcement to use.

That’s where the line is drawn.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 4:22 PM

The thing is, that line was never highlighted in the 2A.

Extreme, I agree, but freedom isn’t docile.

aryeung on January 22, 2013 at 4:24 PM

I agree. That line is arbitrary. The government will use that arbitrary reasoning to push for gun control and tyranny. It’ll be a slippery slope to disarm the citizenry.

“To me, a rifle is not for sporting or hunting, it is an instrument of freedom.”

The Communists are well aware of that..that’s how they came to power in most countries. That’s why they don’t want those who oppose them to be armed.

We’re seeing a different tactic here (Socialist takeover), but that’s because we’re so heavily armed to begin with unlike most societies.

Hey Rainsford ! … It worked !

Look how many HA commenters you got to respond to that.

listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM

And there are those reading who may actually believe that crap. According to a recent poll, 35% actually do, so I don’t much care to leave stuff like that unanswered, even if it does give Rainsford a woody.

The second amendment has never had anything to do with “defense against government tyranny”. Anyone who says it does flatly doesn’t understand it/how our government works.

Rainsford on January 22, 2013 at 6:01 PM

.
Hey Rainsford ! … It worked !

Look how many HA commenters you got to respond to that.