Vilification of NRA going about as well as you’d expect

posted at 7:01 pm on January 19, 2013 by Jazz Shaw

Clearly it’s been a pretty bad month for the NRA. I heard it myself from irrefutable sources at The Hill.

NRA stumbles in fight with Obama over gun-control proposals

Television commentator Joe Scarborough, a former GOP member of the House, hammered the group’s leaders for creating a “fringe organization.”

“Their children have targets on their backs and the NRA is putting something out like [this]? What’s wrong with these people?” Scarborough said Wednesday on his “Morning Joe” program on MSNBC.

“They need new leadership is what they need. Their leadership has dragged them over the cliff, they are now a fringe organization,” added Scarborough, who routinely mentions he maintained an A-rating from the NRA through his tenure in the House. “What the NRA once was, it no longer is. This extremism is so frightening, and just over, over, over the line.”

Well, that certainly is bad news. Unless, of course, you listen to right wing nutjob, fringe conservative sites like… The Washington Post.

But, there’s also plenty of evidence to suggest that the NRA is regarded entirely differently in the country at large. Polling conducted by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal this week showed 41 percent of people had a favorable opinion of the NRA, while 34 percent viewed it unfavorably, a margin largely unchanged from a similar survey conducted in January 2011.

And a look at the longer-term trend line on views of the NRA by Gallup suggests a striking consistency in the overall impression Americans have of the gun rights group.

Here’s the graphic attached with the Gallup polling.

Gallup NRA poll

It’s worth pointing out that with 54%, at least from the running Gallup survey, the NRA is still currently more popular than President Obama. (For the record, I originally typed “more popular than Congress,” but given they’re currently hanging on to only a slim popularity margin over urinary tract infections, it seemed a bit futile.) But sadly, that doesn’t fit with the narrative that far too many in the media are trying to project. In a way, it’s a rather classic line of attack. Going out and directly insulting the 49% of the nation who are gun owners – as well as whatever percentage don’t own guns but support gun owners’ rights – it’s a far better strategy to attack their most influential and effective representative body.

These attacks have been in a repeating pattern which is too consistent to be coincidence and was probably predictable. The NRA is described as a “fringe” organization. Polls are cited which intend to make their positions seem extreme. Of course, the phrasing of many of the poll questions leaves little to the imagination. If you ask people if they are “in favor of ex-felons being able to stroll into gun shows and buy hundreds of military style assault weapons with no background check” you’ll get some pretty spectacular results. However, Gallup stuck with something a little more basic.

What is your overall opinion of the National Rifle Association, also known as the NRA? Favorable – Unfavorable.

When you phrase it like that the picture becomes a bit clearer. This ties back into the previous point about how opponents are choosing to attack the organization. The other common accusation making the rounds on Scarborough’s show and others is that “the NRA doesn’t represent American gun owners. They work for gun manufacturers who make millions of dollars selling these weapons.” It’s a fairly clever bit of marketing, since it ties in that whole resentment of the 1% thing with yet another wedge to drive between the members and the organization. Fortunately – at least for now – it doesn’t seem to be sinking in.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Why is anyone surpprised at this? Both sides are pushing the same damn crap. They are playing bad cop good cop on the entire country. Have been for years. Wake up people.

bgibbs1000 on May 7, 2013 at 6:12 PM

So Flake is for Open Borders Amnesty, higher taxes (internet), and now ready to flip and push gun control?

Is he running for RINO of the year?

DaMav on May 7, 2013 at 6:22 PM

I don’t understand the desire to die on this hill repeatedly, when the war will end in the House, which they have no control over and will most likely not pass this bill.

ButterflyDragon on May 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM

You’re kidding, right? Do you really think that John Boehnor will provide any serious opposition at all, especially when the Senate bill has the sheen of “bipartisanship” courtesy of unprincipled cowards like Flake and Ayotte (who, I’m sure, is anxious to get on board as soon as she can figure out a plausible cover story).

The house “leadership” will be all too happy to recruit most of the democrats and a minority of republicans (allowing a few inside-friends who need to appear “conservative” to vote meaninglessly against it once they’ve calculated the whip count).

Boehnor has already demonstrated by word and deed that the concept of the “Hastert Rule” is of no concern to him. Think about the significance of that: he feels no compunction against acting in direct contradiction of the expressed wishes of the majority of the members of his own party, who in turn, presumably represent the majority of the voting citizens of this country.

There is less and less reason to try to differentiate between the “Democrat” and “Republican” parties. Neither believes that We The People have any right to have a say about our own governance.

bofh on May 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM

I’d never heard of Mr. Flake but now I have. Do it Mr. Flake and you’ll be back in the private sector so quick your name will change, no? Try us on the National Stage Mr. Flake.

Tangerinesong on May 7, 2013 at 7:03 PM

If Republicans think Obamacare is a volatile issue they ain’t seen nothin’ yet. If they were to flip and pass a gun control bill through both Houses that doesn’t have say Coburn and Grassley behind it. They may as well disband. There would be no recovery.

bluesdoc70 on May 7, 2013 at 8:56 PM

Jeff Flake told CNN he is willing to reverse his opposition to expanding background checks for guns

Might just as well
pull the trigger on the one you
have pointed at your head, dumbass!

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on May 8, 2013 at 12:01 AM

Then plant him on Boot Hill
between Marco’Pancho’Rubio
and Johnny ‘Flap Jaw’ McCain:

~~~~~~~Here Lies~~~~~~~
~~~~Jeff’pussyfoot’Flake~~~
~~~The fastest rolloverer~~~
~~~~~~in the West~~~~~~~

On Watch on May 8, 2013 at 12:30 AM

Is this guy not capable of saying NO to both?!?!

moron.

RealMc on May 8, 2013 at 7:39 AM

That argument is the same as the Left’s on late-term abortion. No one wants some sort of national registry or gun banning, however we should have a set of principles we believe in and stand by, not political positions. I like to think we are above that sort of thinking.

Tater Salad on May 7, 2013 at 12:02 PM

Read this bill proposal from Oregon (which appears dead for the moment):

http://www.leg.state.or.us/13reg/measpdf/hb3200.dir/hb3200.intro.pdf

Now tell me Mr. NRA/people should compromise, how do you argue with that? They want to ban darn near 90% of modern guns. A lever action .22 is an assault weapon? There is no compromise with these people. This is the line and no further. This showdown has been building for over 100+ years. Government vs the individual.

oryguncon on May 8, 2013 at 12:03 PM

So Flake is for Open Borders Amnesty, higher taxes (internet), and now ready to flip and push gun control?

Is he running for RINO of the year?

DaMav on May 7, 2013 at 6:22 PM

He has let the mother of all rinos, john mccain, make all his descisions.

doublee on May 8, 2013 at 12:07 PM

Flake is such a disappointment. We (Arizonan’s) need to recall his butt along with McCain.

John_G on May 9, 2013 at 12:12 PM

South Carolina sympathizes with y’all in Arizona.After all we have Lindsey Graham!

redware on May 9, 2013 at 7:26 PM

Comment pages: 1 2