Obama for America is morphing into a nonprofit advocacy group

posted at 1:11 pm on January 18, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

We all knew that the campaign machinery Team Obama has built up over the past few years was going to continue to work to push President Obama’s agenda, but in what capacity they’d be doing so wasn’t one hundred percent clear.

They can’t technically be a campaign anymore, and in the post-election lull, they moved into the DNC and renamed themselves Organizing for America, while certain Democrats have been laying on the pressure for the group to share the resource-wealth with Democratic candidates. Their further options included transforming those resources into a super PAC or a tax-exempt nonprofit, and it looks like they’ve decided upon the latter course of action:

The former Obama campaign will become a non-profit that will advocate for the president’s policies, the first such transition for a major political organization, according to a senior Democratic official.

Obama for America campaign manager Jim Messina will become chairman of the new group, and White House aide Jon Carson will join as executive director. The group will disclose its donors.

The new group will be called Organizing for Action and accept donations form individuals and corporations but not from lobbyists or PACs, the AP reported.

And it looks and sounds exactly what you’d expect it to look and sound like:

“…We should all be proud of what we accomplished, but let’s be clear: All that hard work was about more than just one election. So, if we want to finish what we started, and truly make that change we believe in, we can’t stop now. And that’s why today, I’m proud that our friend and supporters are launching Organizing for Action, the next phase of our movement for change. Supporters like you will be the heart of this organization, because, for the past six years, you’ve done something so much bigger than elect a president. You’ve given ordinary people a place in our democratic process again. …Winning an election won’t bring about the change we seek; it’s simply the chance to make that change.”

Again, I’m skeptical that they can garner quite the same kind of sustained enthusiasm for the everyday humdrum of politics that they managed for President Obama’s reelection, but I won’t be putting anything past them, either. It could turn out to be a formidable political weapon, and the precise type of communication machine that the GOP is sorely lacking:

The whole wide world is living in an age of always-on messaging, and the Republican Party is living in the age of Morse code. It isn’t that no one is listening to the GOP. There is nothing to hear.

Smarting from defeat by Barack Obama’s made-in-Silicon-Valley messaging network, congressional Republicans in Washington are getting tutorials to bring them into a Twitterized world. I have a simpler idea: First join the 20th-century communication revolution by creating an office of chief party spokesman. One for the House and one for the Senate.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

This just doesn’t seem like it would be “legal” reading that it is going to try and influence legislation… But with this group I’m not surprised…

sandee on January 18, 2013 at 1:19 PM

OFA is Obama’s retirement fund. He ain’t giving away those databases, technology and infrastructure for free.

can_con on January 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM

The new group will be called Organizing for Action and accept donations form individuals and corporations but not from lobbyists or PACs, the AP reported

Which means they’ll accept donations from lobbyists and PACs.

Archades on January 18, 2013 at 1:21 PM

Posting a video of Jabba the Hutt in a tight red dress after my lunchtime was genuinely evil.

Archivarix on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

anyone has a link to the donations page? thanks!

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

I say its high time to Executive Oder are way around that 22 amendment thingy.
C’mon- si se puede !

FlaMurph on January 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM

Posting a video of Jabba the Hutt in a tight red dress after my lunchtime was genuinely evil.

Archivarix on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

dude, if i were you i’d refrain from commenting on other people’s looks.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Think – like his majesty – Bloomberg.

FlaMurph on January 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Goebbels just orgasmed in his grave, again.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Well how will bho/team deal with what they are up to now going around congress/courts? Don’t need any stinkin congress/ courts per bho/team

http://nation.foxnews.com/securities-and-exchange-commission/2013/01/18/obama-bypasses-congress-attempts-force-companies-reveal-political-donations-through-sec
L

letget on January 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM

He ain’t giving away those databases, technology and infrastructure for free.

can_con on January 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM

Both Hillary and Biden are going to be spending some serious time (figuratively) on their knees to get access to that database.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM

Posting a video of Jabba the Hutt in a tight red dress after my lunchtime was genuinely evil.

Archivarix on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

The last time I saw a mouth like that it had a gaff in it.

Roy Rogers on January 18, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Moochie…. Go back to Chicago and start by changing that cesspool……….

From whence you came, indeed.

FlaMurph on January 18, 2013 at 1:29 PM

And it looks and sounds exactly what you’d expect it to look and sound like:

Propaghanda Brown-Shirt Agenda Enforces!!!

canopfor on January 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM

So even after Obama finally leaves office, we will still feel his wrath. Scary times, and a scary man.

Jack_Burton on January 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM

If I remember correctly, he wouldn’t even share the info with the DNC or House or Senate candidates this time around.

I am sure him and Axlegrease have already figured out the transactional surcharges and royalty rates for loaning out that info.

can_con on January 18, 2013 at 1:31 PM

Wow. Fascism is on the march.

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 1:31 PM

There is definitely a large fear element involved. The news, politicians, businesses fear for their careers and well being. If you go off the shelf you are the NRA.

I’m sure, “We bring good things to life” will be the new slogan.

tomas on January 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM

Well, there has to be some sort of organization out there to get out the vote for Obama in 2016.

Barry had his turn; now it is Michelle’s turn, right?

In future generations, when the term grifter is mentioned, the names Obama and Clinton will be highlighted.

Unless, of course, by the time there are future generations, the entire shooting match will be shot to pieces…

Was a nice country we had…once upon a time.

coldwarrior on January 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM

America has morphed into this.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM

her new hairstyle is really beautiful. if i was a closet homosexual, i’d marry her too!

GhoulAid on January 18, 2013 at 1:33 PM

WATCH WHERE YOU POINT THAT FINGER GUN!

Roy Rogers on January 18, 2013 at 1:33 PM

You’ve given ordinary people a place in our democratic process again. …

And what did the TEA part do?

JellyToast on January 18, 2013 at 1:34 PM

dude, if i were you i’d refrain from commenting on other people’s looks.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM

That guy is much prettier than Mike Obama. Her face has the look of someone trying to talk with a 2X4 stuck up her butt. If in fact she is a she. She usually looks so manly it’s hard to tell.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM

Propaganda Machine expands!!

CoffeeLover on January 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM

You’ve given ordinary people a place in our democratic

Just who are these “ordinary” people? And saying just winning the election is not enough, is really scary…

sandee on January 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM

America has morphed into this.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM

That is the best news I’ve heard today! It sure does take awhile.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM

So when does this bunch convert into Hussein’s civilian army ?

burrata on January 18, 2013 at 1:43 PM

**Alert ***

Photos: Satellite images of the under-siege gas facility near In Amenas, in Algeria – @itvnews

3 mins ago from http://www.itv.com by editor
=========================================

6:32pm, Fri 18 Jan 2013 Algeria:

Brit tells of relief
In Amenas gas facility seen from the sky
Last updated Fri 18 Jan 2013
****************************

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-01-18/in-amenas-gas-facility-seen-from-the-sky/

canopfor on January 18, 2013 at 1:45 PM

dude, if i were you i’d refrain from commenting on other people’s looks.
 
sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM

 

because you’re aggressively stupid.
 
sesquipedalian on August 30, 2012 at 8:59 PM

 
Nicely done.

rogerb on January 18, 2013 at 1:45 PM

So basically Obama is going to create a temple for his cult.

Lets hope they all move to Guyana after 2016.

William Eaton on January 18, 2013 at 1:47 PM

Her face has the look of someone trying to talk with a 2X4 stuck up her butt. If in fact she is a she. She usually looks so manly it’s hard to tell.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM

the rants about michelle-o’s looks are understandable considering all the 250-lb mary beths with cracked heels of Real America. as ginsberg wrote, you can’t eat shit without having visions.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Taking bets on whether this “new” organization will be pushing to eliminate Presidential term limits ?

Jabberwock on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Brown-Shirt Agenda Enforces!!!

canopfor on January 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM

Exactly.

John the Libertarian on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

anyone has a link to the donations page? thanks!

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

Check with Hamas or the Tamil Tigers…they can hook you up.

HumpBot Salvation on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

anyone has a link to the donations page? thanks!

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

Just go to Whitehouse.gov. They are one and the same.

Give till it hurts!

UltimateBob on January 18, 2013 at 1:50 PM

How did OFA get Rick James to do a video for them? Thought he kicked the bucket?

HumpBot Salvation on January 18, 2013 at 1:50 PM

It isn’t that no one is listening to the GOP. There is nothing to hear.

It’s both.

Anything the GOP says (if they actually say anything worth hearing, which isn’t much these days) is quickly drowned out by the screeching denizens of stupid in both the mainstream press and in political pusher organizations where people make full-time liberal politics their job. And consequently, that’s all you hear.

The rest of us are too busy trying to make a living to be able to do anything about it, so they win the message-pushing war by default.

Good Lt on January 18, 2013 at 1:51 PM

anyone has a link to the donations page? thanks!

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

Just go to Whitehouse.gov. They are one and the same.

Give till it hurts!

UltimateBob on January 18, 2013 at 1:50 PM

A fool and his money….

CurtZHP on January 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM

Tax exempt. Of course.

These crooks should be rounded up and thrown in prison.

UltimateBob on January 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM

the rants about michelle-o’s looks are understandable considering all the 250-lb mary beths with cracked heels of Real America. as ginsberg wrote, you can’t eat shit without having visions.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Just admit it, that is one ugly woman. She always looks mean and unhappy. As for the rest of your almost incoherent rant, I think you could extrapolate from the national evidence, conservative women are MUCH better looking than democrat women. That is a settled fact. I have always been considered pretty, and I feel certain I am much prettier than you.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:58 PM

you can’t eat shit without having visions.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM

I guess you would know, being the shit eating aficionado we all know you to be.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:59 PM

As far as I’m concerned, this is just a more sophisticated version of ACORN.

RebeccaH on January 18, 2013 at 2:03 PM

Just admit it, that is one ugly woman.

most people would disagree, but there’s no arguing about taste.

As for the rest of your almost incoherent rant, I think you could extrapolate from the national evidence, conservative women are MUCH better looking than democrat women. That is a settled fact. I have always been considered pretty, and I feel certain I am much prettier than you.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 1:58 PM

you’re mistaking the fact that part of the great conservative media scam is that outlets, including salem, purposely hire platinum-blonde beauty contestants for eye candy, with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Romney won a majority of congressional districts in 2012 and pressuring Congress means pressuring Congressional disctricts… Having the support of 99% of Cleveland residents has zero impact on the other congressional districts in Ohio and the country… It is much tougher than they think…

mnjg on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

anyone has a link to the donations page? thanks!

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM

…reminds you of your Hilter Youth Movement days?

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM

There are too many “non-profits” that are tax loopholes for selfish people who just want their way, and want to collect money without paying taxes on it, and pay others top dollar without having to worry about where the money comes from. I think a lot of people should look at turning their business into a non-profit. A lot of people do a lot of good in their work, and they are taxed like they are naughty children. Habitat for Humanity is a non profit, why are not the other people that build homes allowed to be non profit? People need homes, they need food, farms should all be non profit; You can still pay yourself a really nice salary. You can still pay your friends, I mean your employees a pretty sum for their work. We really need heating oil…did you know Citizen’s Energy is a non-profit and pays a Kennedy a lot to act like he Cares…but they sell heating oil, by roundabout means…as a non profit. Take a look, I am confused.
http://www.citizensenergy.com/main/Home.html

Fleuries on January 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

I wasn’t talking about news readers, I was talking about conservative women in Congress and throughout the nation. But the conservative media woman are clearly better looking than democrats and the used used up hacks in the liberal media, with state of their dried up, miserable souls written all over their faces.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM

with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

That’s a fact ?? Really ?

What sexist pig put that together ?/s

Jabberwock on January 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM

…reminds you of your Hilter Youth Movement days?

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM

LOL!

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM

eye candy, with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

name one!…an actress does not count!…you said
“public figure”…NOT Airhead!…
(and not a plastic surgery mass of chemicals)…Pat Murray makes your thighs wet?…does something get hard when Shiela Jackson talks?

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM

with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

MontanaMmmm on January 18, 2013 at 2:20 PM

When do the summer indoctrination camps start for inner city kids?

jediwebdude on January 18, 2013 at 2:24 PM

MontanaMmmm on January 18, 2013 at 2:20 PM

We’ll never see her again. She’s off trying to make up a list- LOL!

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM

with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Oops double post, I was busy laughing and hit enter.
Best laugh I’ve had all day. I could post to all of the evidence to the contrary, but I don’t have all day.

MontanaMmmm on January 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM

…name one!…an actress does not count!…you said
“public figure”…NOT Airhead!…

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM

i’ll raise you a sarah palin.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM

I’ll end the game with a Nancy Pelosi.

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM

The new group will be called Organizing for Action and accept donations form individuals and corporations but not from lobbyists or PACs

Yeah. We’ll see how long they’ll go without lobbyists or Pac money.

As for involvement, why would any Obamabot want to get off their rear end and have to work for “free” stuff?

GarandFan on January 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM

i’ll raise you a sarah palin.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:28

KA2 is looking for one of yourns.

Jabberwock on January 18, 2013 at 2:31 PM

I’ll end the game with a Nancy Pelosi.

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM

look, i never disputed that the gop wins the battle of blonde one-time beauty queens with single-digit IQs.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM

with the reality that 98% of attractive female public figures in the US are liberal.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Yeah, that Rachael Maddow is one hot looking woman. If you happen to be an incarcerated lesbian.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM

Ralph Maddow’s a woman?!

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM

look, i never disputed that the gop wins the battle of blonde one-time beauty queens with single-digit IQs.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM

Yet, you can’t see the moron that is Soledad O’Brien? She’s perpetually confused.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM

Nice to see that Michelle is using that same, “Let me be clear” speechwriter that her hubby relies on for so much of his drivel…

CaptFlood on January 18, 2013 at 2:40 PM

Ralph Maddow’s a woman?!

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM

So rumor has it.

Oh! That reminds me. Let’s not forget to add Janet Napolitano to the list of hot liberal women.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM

Yeah, that Rachael Maddow is one hot looking woman. If you happen to be an incarcerated lesbian.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM

for every rachel maddow there’s a dozen mila kunis.

y’all keep struggling with the concept of statistical analysis.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM

for every rachel maddow there’s a dozen mila kunis.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM

So? Much of a shock as it might be, I don’t find Mila Kunis all that attractive. She’s no dog but definitely not more than average looking with a really ugly inside. Sorta like Mooch without the giant chip on her shoulder.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:43 PM

look, i never disputed that the gop wins the battle of blonde one-time beauty queens with single-digit IQs.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM

LOL! We were talking looks, but it’s also a well established fact, and clearly the vast majority agrees, but woman conservatives are also much more intelligent than those ugly liberals as well. Whether on TV, in Congress, or here in fly-over country, it’s true and it would be better for your psyche if you just focus on those things you ARE good at, like capitalization and stuff. Oh, wait!

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM

look, i never disputed that the gop wins the battle of blonde one-time beauty queens with single-digit IQs.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM

I know I said I didn’t have all day but this is fun.
Rocket Scientist.

MontanaMmmm on January 18, 2013 at 2:45 PM

Ralph Maddow’s a woman?!

kingsjester on January 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM

Sort of. I think from here on out we should all refer to Michelle Obama as Mike Obama. It got quite a rise out of the resident homely liberal woman.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM

I know I said I didn’t have all day but this is fun.
Rocket Scientist.

MontanaMmmm on January 18, 2013 at 2:45 PM

I want to thank you for doing the heavy lifting on this issue that I can not do for fear of breaking a nail!

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM

for every rachel maddow there’s a dozen mila kunis.

y’all keep struggling with the concept of statistical analysis.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM

They have to be at least 50% not plastic, so your entry, sadly does not count. Besides, it’s cheating to go to Hollywood, we were talking about political figures and average women.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM

Much of a shock as it might be, I don’t find Mila Kunis all that attractive.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 2:43 PM

you’re henceforth disqualified from any discussion regarding female beauty.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM

Riiiiiiiight.

Am I on Candid Camera?

The Rogue Tomato on January 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM

They have to be at least 50% not plastic, so your entry, sadly does not count. Besides, it’s cheating to go to Hollywood, we were talking about political figures and average women.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM

i clearly remember typing public, not political, figures. regardless, keep moving those goal posts.

i struggle to understand why the dubious honor of having recruited more beauty pageant contestants than your opponents is so cherished by conservatives. it seems like a pitiful defensive reflex in response to everyone hating your guts.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM

No one beats Maxine Waters on looks and brains.

She s/b Sec. of State.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM

“people hate us but at least we have michelle bachmann!”

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM

The squishes in the GOP, incl. the ones who ran under the diguise of TEA (it’s not tea, as opposed to coffee – it’s TEA, as in taxed enough already) deserve to have a rating of 1%.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM

sesqui is right, not as in politics

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM

you’re henceforth disqualified from any discussion regarding female beauty.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM

It’s not who casts a vote, it’s who counts ‘em. Right ?

Jabberwock on January 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM

Leftards consider this “awesome”.

Make sure you’re not eating before you click.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM

sesqui is right, not as in politics

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM

The only one of them I think is pretty is Kirsten Powers, and the way she sounds lately, she won’t be a liberal for long. The others should wear a burqua.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:09 PM

Leftards consider this “awesome”.

Make sure you’re not eating before you click.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM

Good Heavens! Talk about What Not To Wear.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:11 PM

i struggle to understand why the dubious honor of having recruited more beauty pageant contestants than your opponents is so cherished by conservatives. it seems like a pitiful defensive reflex in response to everyone hating your guts.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM

You aren’t getting it. Conservative women are so good looking because their hearts are pure, so it shows on the outside. You liberal women are ugly for the same reason. The love of death, especially of babies, the general nihilism, the hatred and envy you carry inside you all show in your faces. So because you have so little to work with, I will allow your entry back in.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM

Che and Moochell have two things in common:

1. They look alike.
2. None speaks English.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:16 PM

canopfor posted this link last night and it has a lot more info
on this. Breitbart has an article which contains this:
President Obama’s network across this country, grassroots individuals, who organize, volunteered with their time to get the president reelected are much more powerful than the NRA lobby.

Link#1 http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-sources-obama-team-form-agenda-group#overlay-context=article/armstrong-admits-doping-oprah-0

Link#2 http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/17/Obama-admin-permanent-campaign

They act like the NRA is an organization unto itself. Americans make up the NRA. So when they say they are going after the NRA, they mean Americans. I think if they would speak the truth, their tongues would fall out!!

bluefox on January 18, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Good Heavens! Talk about What Not To Wear.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:11 PM

View the entire slide show.

p.s. on Che

3. Goes without saying that they are one and the same in philosophy.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:17 PM

i struggle to understand why the dubious honor of having recruited more beauty pageant contestants than your opponents is so cherished by conservatives. it seems like a pitiful defensive reflex in response to everyone hating your guts.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM

Michelle would say “I schtruggle”.

sesqui wrote this with a straight face? How many articles are out ther about the Obama’s looks…and ‘brains’?

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM

Oops, looks like I was O/T with my 3:16PM comment (snark)

bluefox on January 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:09 PM

They’re not in politics.

Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM

Rand Paul coming up on Hannity’s radio show.

bluefox on January 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM

You aren’t getting it. Conservative women are so good looking because their hearts are pure, so it shows on the outside. You liberal women are ugly for the same reason. The love of death, especially of babies, the general nihilism, the hatred and envy you carry inside you all show in your faces. So because you have so little to work with, I will allow your entry back in.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM

You got that right. liberal women (including our resident trollturd…squidforbrains) shine ugly from the inside out. $2000 jackets, $800 purses and $600 sneakers can’t mask over the ugliness that oozes from their every pore.

HumpBot Salvation on January 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM

Again, I’m skeptical that they can garner quite the same kind of sustained enthusiasm for the everyday humdrum of politics that they managed for President Obama’s reelection

I absolutely guarantee you that they can’t. And it’s going to be entertaining to see them fail.

cicerone on January 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM

You aren’t getting it. Conservative women are so good looking because their hearts are pure, so it shows on the outside.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM

i was going to write something funny in response, but… wow, take a bow, son. no way i can trump that.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM

Oops, looks like I was O/T with my 3:16PM comment (snark)

bluefox on January 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM

LOL! I thought, why are you putting something in here I should actually pay attention to! I found a very sensitive spot in sesquahana or whatever, so I’ve been poking it just for fun.

They act like the NRA is an organization unto itself. Americans make up the NRA. So when they say they are going after the NRA, they mean Americans. I think if they would speak the truth, their tongues would fall out!!

bluefox on January 18, 2013 at 3:16 PM

There are other groups mainly made up of people like us, so you would have to combine them all to make a fair comparison. I don’t belong to the NRA, but I might show up somewhere tomorrow to support them. Of course they mean Americans, else what would be the point of demonizing them (us)? It will be interesting to see if they can get their “base” out on a regular basis. It might start looking too much like a job and scare them off.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM

i was going to write something funny in response, but… wow, take a bow, son. no way i can trump that.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM

Good thing you didn’t try the humor route. It has been clearly established, and a vast majority of the American people agree with me, that conservative women are also endowed with way more wit and humor than liberal women, what with the nihilism and all. That schtick just isn’t that funny.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:34 PM

It has been clearly established, and a vast majority of the American people agree with me, that conservative women are also endowed with way more wit and humor than liberal women, what with the nihilism and all.

Night Owl on January 18, 2013 at 3:34 PM

and with that, you have finally slipped the surly bonds of reality and dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 3:37 PM

i’ll raise you a sarah palin.

sesquipedalian on January 18, 2013 at 2:28
KA2 is looking for one of yourns.

Jabberwock on January 18, 2013 at 2:31 PM

…Sarah makes my thighs wet…and I’m a guy.
…how you doing Jab ?…moved and settled in?…doing better?

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM

Comment pages: 1 2