Newspaper removes map showing location of gun owners in New York State

posted at 6:59 pm on January 18, 2013 by Allahpundit

A pang of conscience after not one but two homes listed on the map were burglarized, possibly with an eye to finding guns inside? Of course not. The new New York gun law that just passed includes a provision, as a sop to gun-rights supporters, allowing gun owners to restrict public access to their information going forward. The Journal News yanked the map because they were violating the spirit, if not the letter, of a new law that was enacted as a direct response to what they’d done.

The publisher posted a statement this afternoon informing the public of the change and the fact that she’s emphatically not sorry:

In the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings, the Journal News thought the community should know where gun permit holders in their community were, in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety

Today The Journal News has removed the permit data from lohud.com. Our decision to do so is not a concession to critics that no value was served by the posting of the map in the first place. On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake. Nor is our decision made because we were intimidated by those who threatened the safety of our staffers. We know our business is a controversial one, and we do not cower.

But the database has been public for 27 days and we believe those who wanted to view it have done so already. As well, with the passage of time, the data will become outdated and inaccurate.

Rotten garbage aimed at justifying a transparent attempt to intimidate gun owners. I don’t know how else to read the first paragraph except as an accusation that if you own a gun, however lawfully and however clean your record is, then you’re inherently dangerous or at least more dangerous than the average joe. In that case, if this is all For The Children, why not publish a map of everyone in the county who’s been convicted of a violent offense instead? And it’s also a transparent lie that everyone who wants to view the map has already done so. Apparently, some convicts were using it to let their prison guards know that they should sleep with one eye open. There must be other prisoners who’d like to do the same but haven’t had a chance to load the map yet. No matter: Hasson, the publisher, takes care to say that she disagrees with the legislature’s new confidentiality provisions and that the Journal News will keep a snapshot of the map up on the site, presumably just as a middle finger to everyone who objected to it. Not “cowering” means sticking to your awful mistake and never admitting error, no matter what. That’s what real journalists do.

Speaking of not cowering, go read Breitbart.com’s post reporting on an interview with NRA chief David Keene in which says he’s gotten “hundreds” of death threats in the past few weeks. Time for a map showing were all the passionate gun-control fans live so that we have a vague sense of where the most violent anti-gun nuts are.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

AGAIN, I ask, if the removed map was accurate, why are there thousands of “dots” in Westchester County, and, like six in more working class Rockland (where I am from) across the river? I call BS on this entire thing.

ParisParamus on January 18, 2013 at 7:02 PM

On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake.

“Too many”? What was that; two, three?

And how many did you hear from that thought your stunt was BS?

GarandFan on January 18, 2013 at 7:04 PM

Oh, I see.

So not only do your people get to CHOOSE which people to out, you also decide to CHOOSE how long of an outing serves the public interest.

‘Tards.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:06 PM

Even the snapshot they left up shows lots of territory where there are no permitted gun owners, otherwise known as “soft target areas” for the criminals to plan from.

I think there’s a gathering storm of potential lawsuits against this newspaper and their lawyers have advised them to take it down.

Harbingeing on January 18, 2013 at 7:07 PM

On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake.

Then why the need to hire armed security if so many were grateful?

JPeterman on January 18, 2013 at 7:07 PM

How about do something publicly USEFUL, such as the names of all people convicted of running RED LIGHTS?

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:08 PM

We know our business is a controversial one, and we do not cower.

No, they just higher armed guards to protect themselves…they just rent guns rather than own them….HAHAHHAHAHA!!!

right2bright on January 18, 2013 at 7:08 PM

Apparently, some convicts were using it to let their prison guards know that they should sleep with one eye open. There must be other prisoners who’d like to do the same but haven’t had a chance to load the map yet.

Oh wonderful….er…

ted c on January 18, 2013 at 7:09 PM

No, they just higher armed guards to protect themselves…they just rent guns rather than own them….HAHAHHAHAHA!!!

right2bright on January 18, 2013 at 7:08 PM

heh! anything to assuage that guilt trip, eh?

ted c on January 18, 2013 at 7:09 PM

Time for a map showing were all the passionate gun-control fans live so that we have a vague sense of where the most violent anti-gun nuts are.

do bridges have addresses???

ted c on January 18, 2013 at 7:10 PM

Whew! Fortunately, once something is removed from the internet, it’s gone forever! So… lesson learned all round, eh? Eh?

The map of the addresses of Journal News employees, however, should remain online indefinitely… as a warning to others.

Jeddite on January 18, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Rotten garbage aimed at justifying a transparent attempt to intimidate gun owners. I don’t know how else to read the first paragraph except as an accusation that if you own a gun, however lawfully and however clean your record is, then you’re inherently dangerous or at least more dangerous than the average joe

I’ve never understood this part of this whole thing. I can understand the “privacy” aspect of it, but not the “intimidation” aspect of it. I’ve got NRA stickers on the back of my car and one on my front porch window greeting everyone who darkens my doorway. Having a firearm isn’t shameful, it’s quintessentially American. I’m proud of American gun manufactures.

Weight of Glory on January 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM

Total scumbags the bloody lot of them…

I hope they sued and sued for everything they have…

*spit*…

Scrumpy on January 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM

OT – hope there will be a separate thread, Ed? Allah?

On Drudge now:

Ex-New-Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin indicted on 21 federal corruption charges:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/18/new-orleans-mayor-ray-nagin/1845617/

NEW ORLEANS – Ray Nagin, former New Orleans mayor and the public face of the battered city in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, has been indicted by a grand jury on 21 federal corruption charges.

The indictment, released Friday, alleges Nagin awarded lucrative city contracts to

contractors in exchange for more than $200,000 in kickbacks and first-class trips to Hawaii, Jamaica and Las Vegas.

Nagin, 56, served two four-year terms as mayor, from 2002 to 2010, and currently lives in Frisco, Tex., outside Dallas. If convicted on all charges, he faces more than 15 years in prison. Nagin becomes the first mayor in the city’s 295-year history to be indicted under federal corruption charges.

Nagin could not be reached at phone numbers list

He’s just PERFECT!!!!

First he runs for mayor, with little experience other than being a cable/internet provider exec, with his whole sales pitch:

“I am not the corrupt guy, like Mayor Marc Morial. Elect me because I am the inexperienced CLEAN GUY!!!!!”

Then Katrina comes and he:

1. Waits too damn long to issue the evac order, when every Cajun who had access to radar had already evac’ed, myself included, 24 hours earlier.

2. Sends his family by airplane to Dallas, 24 hours BEFORE he issues the evac order.

3. Fails to lead – lets the buses drown.. along with a few people.

3. Holes up in a downtown hotel, refusing to come out, losing his mind.

4. Cusses out Bush on live radio and says it’s his fault.

5. Passes the buck to Blanco, when he himself was the mayor.

So now he WASN’T squeaky clean?

Mayor Nagin, you were elected because you were finally going to be the dumb but HONEST New Orleans mayor.

Lock this dumbbutt up and throw away the key. He let people drown… yes he did, while he saved his own family.

‘Tard.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM

in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety…

Of course…It’s “for the Children”

Our decision to do so is not a concession to critics that no value was served by the posting of the map in the first place.

Of course not!

On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake.

lol…MILLIONS of ‘em, I’m sure.

Nor is our decision made because we were intimidated by those who threatened the safety of our staffers. We know our business is a controversial one, and we do not cower.

Seems to me that’s what your doing now.

But the database has been public for 27 days and we believe those who wanted to view it have done so already. As well, with the passage of time, the data will become outdated and inaccurate.

blah, blah, blah.

Fail.

Tim_CA on January 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM

Ray Nagin

justice ‘a comin’…..

ted c on January 18, 2013 at 7:19 PM

“in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety…”

One “careful decision” parents could make would be to move out of your Godforsaken state to Texas, where gun owners galore guarantee lower crime and greater freedom.

But you couldn’t care less about children’s safety, you psycho-controlling Progressive filth.

rrpjr on January 18, 2013 at 7:19 PM

The map of the addresses of Journal News employees, however, should remain online indefinitely… as a warning to others.

Jeddite on January 18, 2013 at 7:14 PM

Not an hour goes by when someone over on twitter puts it out there for all to see.

JPeterman on January 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Friday nt news dump. More bravery by the Journal News.

I hope the vengeance on them is served cold.

rayra on January 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Whatever…the damage has been done..no apologies, i want to see lawsuits brought to this newspaper.

sadsushi on January 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM

excerpt form the freedom of information law of new york

2. (a) The committee on open government may promulgate guidelines regarding deletion of identifying details or withholding of records otherwise available under this article to prevent unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. In the absence of such guidelines, an agency may delete identifying details when it makes records available.
(b) An unwarranted invasion of personal privacy includes, but shall not be limited to:

i. disclosure of employment, medical or credit histories or personal references of applicants for employment;
ii. disclosure of items involving the medical or personal records of a client or patient in a medical facility;
iii. sale or release of lists of names and addresses if such lists would be used for solicitation or fund-raising purposes;
iv. disclosure of information of a personal nature when disclosure would result in economic or personal hardship to the subject party and such information is not relevant to the work of the agency requesting or maintaining it;
v. disclosure of information of a personal nature reported in confidence to an agency and not relevant to the ordinary work of such agency; or
vi. information of a personal nature contained in a workers’ compensation record, except as provided by section one hundred ten-a of the workers’ compensation law.
(c) Unless otherwise provided by this article, disclosure shall not be construed to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision:

the address should never have been released to the new paper

RonK on January 18, 2013 at 7:26 PM

Too bad it wasn’t a map of chick-fil-a restaurants. Those sandwiches are great.

Rusty Allen on January 18, 2013 at 7:26 PM

in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety…

Hmmm…So why not post a list of sex offenders, released convicted felons, etc.?

Deanna on January 18, 2013 at 7:27 PM

Whatever…the damage has been done..no apologies, i want to see lawsuits brought to this newspaper.

sadsushi on January 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Going to be tricky to link the paper’s revelations to damages.

Going back to my journalism training (yes, I am a trained journalist), I would possibly go a combination of the malicious-publishing, and prurient-interest angles.

First-Amendmen press protections do NOT apply to printing things out of 1. malice, nor from 2. prurient interest, among other prohibitions.

The prurient-interest clause may actually bear more fruit.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:28 PM

BTW, #2 should have a “/” tag ;-)

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:29 PM

Nagin will get his.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM

the editor and publisher need to be punished.

tom daschle concerned on January 18, 2013 at 7:31 PM

Maybe they will keep getting threats and bomb scares daily.Armed guards don’t come cheap and unexpectedly cut right to the bottom line.

docflash on January 18, 2013 at 7:35 PM

How about planting “THIS HOUSEHOLD IS UNARMED” signs on the front lawns of all editors and reporters involved…..

Wear masks….

Do it again and again and again, as fast as they are removed, under cover of night.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:37 PM

The map of the addresses of Journal News employees, however, should remain online indefinitely… as a warning to others.

Jeddite on January 18, 2013 at 7:14 PM

How about the NRA renting a billboard in their town…. printing addresses in 4-foot-high letters for all drivers to see?

Would that be legal?

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:38 PM

Freedom of Information Act cuts both ways.

I can’t remember how many lefty pundits I heard on TV – whose first and only argument was – like we were dumb – “Have you ever heard of the Freedom of Information Act?????”

They would repeat it, over and over, when righties tried to have an honest discussion.

Rent a billboard.

Then rent a plane.

Print the names and addresses of all Journal-News employees and bombard the area with leaflets. It worked in WWII.

Do it to them.

Time to fight back, and fight as dirty as it takes.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:41 PM

Sample leaflet:

“My name is Jackwad Leftwich. I am unarmed and I do not believe in defending myself and my family against intruders. My address is 666 Butt St. Please wipe your feet on the mat as you come and go.”

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:43 PM

How about the NRA renting a billboard in their town…. printing addresses in 4-foot-high letters for all drivers to see?

Would that be legal?

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:38 PM

In this hypothetical, I myself would probably limit it to the editors/publishers responsible.

Jeddite on January 18, 2013 at 7:45 PM

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Love it!! You are on fire tonight!!

Scrumpy on January 18, 2013 at 7:45 PM

In the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings, the Journal News thought the community should know where gun permit holders in their community were, in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety…

…I think the community should have a map of the homes of all the Journal News employees that do not have gun permits…so the children know where to flee should they ever feel threatened….while out and about in the community!

KOOLAID2 on January 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM

Well what do you know? Obama’s Chicago may not yet be quite the Murder Capital of America, but it’s already the Bed Bug Capital of America.

The company [Orkin] has just released its rankings of U.S. cities in order of the number of bedbug treatments from January to December 2012. The “Windy City” of Chicago tops the list, followed by Detroit, Los Angeles, Denver and Cincinnati.

Good job, Obamaa and Rahm and democrats!!!

VorDaj on January 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Love it!! You are on fire tonight!!

Scrumpy on January 18, 2013 at 7:45 PM

Agreed. Brilliant, Cane_Loader!!

PatriotGal2257 on January 18, 2013 at 7:48 PM

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Love it!! You are on fire tonight!!

Scrumpy on January 18, 2013 at 7:45 PM

Agreed. Brilliant, Cane_Loader!!

PatriotGal2257 on January 18, 2013 at 7:48 PM

Hehe…. sometimes I think reeeally primitive and caveman and outside the box, to cut through all the crap :-) Let’s declare war on these SOBs like we’d do it in elementary school. Really simple, dumb, and in-your-face.

Now I have to leave, because the old lady wants to go out for Friday-night oysters.

Hope she agrees :)

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:51 PM

I seriously would rent a Cessna, print the flyers, totally litter the hell out of the town with them, and let the chips fall where they may.

Maybe I’d do like King Barry and get some foreign backers to donate with security questions disabled.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:53 PM

Time for a map showing were all the passionate gun-control fans live so that we have a vague sense of where the most violent anti-gun nuts are.

Excellent point Allah.. :)

Dire Straits on January 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:51 PM

Sounds delectable!! Enjoy!!

Scrumpy on January 18, 2013 at 7:56 PM

They don’t cower, they say. How many anti Muslim stories have they printed?

Guns are a danger to visiting chlluns. Post the address of people owning dangerous snow blowers, ATVs and chain saws. Kids can be damaged from these.

An aside. I could never make the map work at Chapaqua. I was curious.

FOWG1 on January 18, 2013 at 7:57 PM

Real translation:

Our lawyers are going apes**t. People are being harmed by this website and they will sue.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 8:01 PM

Newspaper removes map showing location of gun owners in New York State

Oh, really?

flipflop on January 18, 2013 at 8:05 PM

The first Republican running in 2016 who promises to prosecute to the fullest extent this sort of crap gets my vote. I don’t care how many dogs he straps to the roof of his car.

CurtZHP on January 18, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Real translation:

Our lawyers are going apes**t. People are being harmed by this website and they will sue.

Happy Nomad on January 18, 2013 at 8:01 PM

I have a different take:

Cops are seriously pi$$ed that their addresses were printed and delivered thinly veiled threats to take this outside of the courts.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Just to throw a debating topic in….

Hasn’t been done a lot.. but what if the losing candidate runs again?

Romney had 49%. Add a few disillusioned 0bama voters, who came to respect Romney a bit, and you get more than 50%

Instead of starting over with an unknown, run Romney again,… give the American people a do-over.

I honestly think he could win, though I know a lot of folks think he’s a squish.

I’d take a Romney win over Hillary.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 8:20 PM

The corrupt, politicized, left-wing media in this country is long overdue for its comeuppance. They are enemies of the people, enemies of liberty, apologists for corruption and tyranny. Sure, the politicians are corrupt, but the media LIES to the American people about their corruption, abets it, and covers it up, and so the (democrat) politicians rarely pay a price, as they likely would if the nation had a media that wasn’t entirely corrupt. They are long overdue for their comeuppance. And I suspect they will eventually get it. One way or another. The agents of tyrants usually do. One way or another.

Rational Thought on January 18, 2013 at 8:33 PM

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 7:51 PM

I absolutely agree, especially about taking the war to them. Keep posting your outside-of-the-box ideas here and have a great oyster dinner with your wife!

PatriotGal2257 on January 18, 2013 at 8:38 PM

On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake.

“Too many”? What was that; two, three?

And how many did you hear from that thought your stunt was BS?

GarandFan on January 18, 2013 at 7:04 PM

She means the criminals that robbed the houses thanked her afterward.

njrob on January 18, 2013 at 8:40 PM

I’ve never understood this part of this whole thing. I can understand the “privacy” aspect of it, but not the “intimidation” aspect of it. I’ve got NRA stickers on the back of my car and one on my front porch window greeting everyone who darkens my doorway. Having a firearm isn’t shameful, it’s quintessentially American. I’m proud of American gun manufactures.

Weight of Glory on January 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM

An excellent point Weight of Glory.

I’ve said that if they posted such a map in Alabama where I live, next door neighbors would be comparing weapons, getting you a beer and high-fiving you.

itsspideyman on January 18, 2013 at 9:28 PM

just a reminder…NY does have a “castle doctine” law…I’m torn between removing the maps (handguns only I think) vs leaving them out there. Given that NY is on the brink of belly-up at any given time, leaving the information out there might lessen the prison costs…

just a thought…

teejk on January 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM

….in part to give parents an opportunity make careful decisions about their children’s safety…

Really?

Hadn’t the parents already made that value judgement when they decided to protect their children by arming themselves? Who are these stupid people who risk the lives of others without thinking of unintended consequences that would actually endanger their children? These people are cowards hiding behind the protection of the first amendment at the expense of another. They should be stripped of their right to have armed protection if they so fervently believe in gun control and have their names published in perpetuity. If I were a judge I would order it be done.

DevilsPrinciple on January 18, 2013 at 9:39 PM

The Journal made an ideological decision to punish and intimidate law abiding citizens who went through strenuous requirements in order to comply with restrictive and unconstitutional state laws in order to participate in and exercise their rights as Americans under the Second Amendment.

They took a poorly calculated risk to punish law abiding citizens for the actions of those those who are not law abiding. That poor decision, like most poor decisions liberals make, backfired. They overestimated the idea that those on the left would vindicate them for this poor decision and underestimated how serious real Americans are when it comes to defending their Second Amendment rights when domestic enemies threaten to take them away.

These bad miscalculations on their part forced them to expose their own hypocrisy (and with a little help from the esteemed James O’Keefe) and use the very guns they proclaimed to detest, for their own personal safety. It also brought about a teachable moment through irony, when suddenly their own personal information was made available on the web.

This was a win for the Second Amendment and real Americans who support the Constitution that our forefathers fought for, died for, and entrusted us to carry forward. As is the case when liberals make poor decisions, in defeat, they seek to rewrite history to alter the perception that their defeat was a victory.

This should also be a teachable moment for democrats in the legislative branch as well as Obama himself. Know your limits and pick your fights carefully. You’ve pushed and pushed and pushed. Now might be a good time for reflection, before you make a very bad decision that will have far reaching consequences beyond anything you may have imagined.

BruthaMan on January 18, 2013 at 9:52 PM

I wonder if these drooling retards ever thought that they might be endangering the people who DON’T own guns.

Because, ya know, not everyone who doesn’t own a firearm doesn’t do so for political reasons. That big ‘empty’ spot in the middle of all the owners could well be something like a nursing home…and guess where all the local crooks are going to descent after reading that map.

MelonCollie on January 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM

Cops are seriously pi$$ed that their addresses were printed and delivered thinly veiled threats to take this outside of the courts.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Quite likely, and they have more ability to deliver on said threats than private citizens. If they perceive those moonbats to have seriously endangered and/or killed their fellow LEO’s because of some idiot stunt, they are in very real danger of ‘disappearing’.

MelonCollie on January 18, 2013 at 10:00 PM

Romney had 49%. Add a few disillusioned 0bama voters, who came to respect Romney a bit, and you get more than 50%

Instead of starting over with an unknown, run Romney again,… give the American people a do-over.

cane_loader on January 18, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Oh good Lord, please stop! Romney lost by 4 points, 51-47%. He’d need more than a few disillusioned Obama voters to overcome that lead.
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

cam2 on January 18, 2013 at 11:11 PM

Saddam Hussein and his sons had a gigantic plastic-shredder that they fed people into to kill them.

It was gruesome and horrible.

All of these people that work at this newspaper, and their families and the families of anyone who owns this newspaper should experience this artifact first-hand, up-close and personal.

williamg on January 19, 2013 at 12:45 AM

Hmmm…So why not post a list of sex offenders, released convicted felons, etc.?

Deanna on January 18, 2013 at 7:27 PM

Because sex offenders and released felons have rights, silly. Gun owners just have, well, guns.

ghostwalker1 on January 19, 2013 at 12:47 AM

When DICTATORS with ABSOLUTE POWER avail innocent bystanders of the Most Severe Consequences Imaginable – Like the Reporters, Editors and Owners of this newspaper have…….

They should be MADE to SEE Close-Up and EXAMPLE of the CONSEQUENCES that Another Dictator availed on Innocents – such as Saddam Hussein’s Plastic Shredder – so they can LEARN and UNDERSTAND how HEINOUS and IMMORAL their Behavior IS!!

williamg on January 19, 2013 at 12:59 AM

I don’t know how else to read the first paragraph except as an accusation that if you own a gun, however lawfully and however clean your record is, then you’re inherently dangerous or at least more dangerous than the average joe

Given that you can’t legally buy a gun with a felony conviction, and that getting a concealed carry license generally requires staying out of any trouble with the law….

… Wouldn’t this map actually be a good guide to the homes of people with above average moral character?

Not that most journalists are capable of that sort of reasoning…

There Goes The Neighborhood on January 19, 2013 at 1:51 AM

Why don’t they do a real public service for parents and print the names and addresses of people convicted on drug charges and for drunk driving, especially at the felony level? Those felons can’t ever own a firearm again, so kids should be safe with them, right?

I also wonder how much readership of the Journal News fell off as a direct result of their stunt, and how much an influence that had in their attempt to say, “Mission accomplished!”

Liam on January 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM

There is no greater threat to America than the progressive movement. Those people make up about 20% of the population. It just goes to show you how stupid another 30/35% of the country is.

The good news…liberals are self-destructing in the northeast and northwest. They reek havoc on themselves and then go to the polls and…wait for it…vote for liberals. Once those areas of the country implode, perhaps there will be an opportunity to save what’s left of the country.

cajunpatriot on January 19, 2013 at 6:45 AM

There is no greater threat to America than progressive women.

cajunpatriot on January 19, 2013 at 6:45 AM

FIFY

Cleombrotus on January 19, 2013 at 8:04 AM

The “ladies” brain farts finally got some fresh air.
What a couple of stupid girls.

mmcnamer1 on January 19, 2013 at 10:15 AM

I hope that 100% of the victims of home burglaries in this area sue the irresponsible Journal News.

It would also serve the Journal News right if someone published the home addresses of their reporters, along with vehicle license plates, work schedules, phone numbers, etc!!! Would this give these bozos a new perspective on “public information”??

landlines on January 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM