House Republicans: Keep the sequester in place

posted at 10:01 am on January 18, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

A smart move, and one that House Republican leadership should adopt from its members:

GOP leaders on Thursday heard from rank-and-file members in a closed-door session, with many urging sequester cuts or a government shutdown to take effect in hopes of forcing the White House into accepting spending cuts.

Those options are “very much on the table,” veteran Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters on Thursday, from Virginia, where House GOP lawmakers are meeting for their annual retreat.

According to several sources, during the members-only brainstorming session, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) delivered “concise” remarks before opening the microphones to member feedback.

Despite recent internal House GOP squabbles over the handling of the “fiscal cliff” negotiations and a handful of defections against Boehner in the vote for Speaker, GOP lawmakers are looking to present a unified front ahead of crucial budget battles.

There are three potential inflection points in the next two months on spending.  The first is the debt ceiling, which is poor ground for the GOP, as the spending Congress has already authorized requires Treasury to borrow funds to comply.  Denying a raise in the ceiling to at least the amount necessary for authorized spending amounts to a bad-faith effort to reopen the previous agreement, and it will be perceived that way especially as the media hyperventilates about default.

That leaves the sequester in late February and the expiration of the continuing resolution on March 27th, the government-shutdown option.  Republicans stand on the best ground on that point for demanding real spending cuts in the final half of the FY2013 budget and the new FY2014 budget.  However, if Republicans attempt to evade the sequester — which splits $1.2 trillion in cuts over ten years evenly between defense and domestic spending — they will undermine their case for a government-shutdown threat in March.  Those cuts are painful on both sides, butany significant cuts are going to be painful; if they weren’t, they would have already taken place.

This is why the Republicans will have better ground after the tax and debt-ceiling deadlines pass by.  Inaction in both of those cases favored Democrats (big tax hikes and a default scenario they could blame on Republican intransigence).  In contrast, inaction on the last two “cliffs” of the sequester favor the GOP — real spending cuts and a standoff on the real issue of spending. And in fact, House Republicans can pass a final FY2013 budget using normal order well before March 27th and simply state that they will not negotiate with the Senate except through a conference committee, demanding a normal-order budget from Harry Reid.  If he refuses, then it’s Democratic inaction that will produce the government shutdown.

Republicans are outnumbered in Washington power.  They have to look for the best ground on which to fight. This is a big step in the right direction.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

You’re an idiot. Only members of the press with WH credentials are allowed to attend Presidential press conferences.

As for getting answers and your willingness to always give Obama a pass, you just prove that you are a despicable, hypocritical ObamaFirster. I can see why Progressives like Glenn Greenwald, who do truly care about civil liberties and the truth, can’t f*cking stand you.

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM

First…you’re idiotically taking too much literally.
Chill?
You think I was suggesting Malkin, Jones, Beck would be allowed within a mile of a WH briefing? Or that their rhetoric would have any place in any serious discussion…about anything??

Second…much as that what’s you need to believe to feel yourself somehow rational when it comes to Obama…I am fully capable of being critical of the guy. You though, indeed would never give him a pass and are behaving today like a ObamaLaster. What’s your Obama-gripe-of-the-day? Guantanamo? Where’s your legal eagle mind on that clusterf*uck? No…you’re too concerned what some would call a ‘victory’ for Obama vs. what others would call (and cheer) a failure?
Bush/Obama/Cheney/Graham.Malkin…who cares.
Guantanamo is at a minimum an outdated failure…useless.
Obama said it…so I suppose you’ll have to disagree.
ObamaLaster rules say so.
Or…am i wrong…and do you agree with Obama (and Glenn Greenwald).

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Schadenfreude on April 30, 2013 at 1:17 PM

If only your words could be as substantive as they are colorful.

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:32 PM

Twenty six is a child? I had a child of my own when I was 26. Gee, We could have saved a lot of money if I could have stayed on Mommy and Daddies insurance for my Pre-Natal…

sandee on April 30, 2013 at 11:34 AM

By August 4, we will have twice a child running our country, when Obama turns 52.

Steve Z on April 30, 2013 at 3:02 PM

If, by “HOME”, he means Kenya, Illinois, or Hawaii. By all means, yes. He probably meant just stomping off to the private quarters of the WH. To him that IS home.

hawkeye54 on April 30, 2013 at 1:59 PM

Why doesn’t he go home to where he spent his formative years, in Indonesia? He can recite the Muslim creed to his heart’s content. We the Taxpayers will be super generous and give him a special passport and a one-way ticket…

Steve Z on April 30, 2013 at 3:07 PM

He[Biden]’s a dummy, as is Obama, but he doesn’t hate the land and her people.

Schadenfreude on April 30, 2013 at 12:58 PM

Except his neighbors in Delaware, who own slaves and his wife will blow them away with a double-barreled shotgun.

Steve Z on April 30, 2013 at 3:11 PM

Beware what you worship.

APACHEWHOKNOWS on April 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM

That’s stony, right there.

Axe on April 30, 2013 at 3:17 PM

If only your words could be as substantive as they are colorful.

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:32 PM

And that’s irony. :)

But, what does this mean:

ObamaLaster

. . . I’m trying to keep up.

Axe on April 30, 2013 at 3:19 PM

check

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Dude, I didn’t vote for Bush/Cheney and I CAN’T BLOODY STAND GRAHAM & INSANE. In fact, I probably loathe them as much as I do Obama.

My positions have been completely consistent throughout both administrations. Gitmo is just one of many flip-flops that you Obama Firsters have excused.

Patriot Act?

Fine.

Drones?

Fine.

New military entanglements?

Fine.

Warrantless searches of homes?

Fine (see the administration’s amicus brief in Kentucky v King).

Government tracking of credit card usage in real time and without a warrant?

Fine. (See DOJ’s Hotwatch programme)

Government tracking automobiles without a warrant because, as Eric Holder said, ‘Americans have NO expectation of privacy of any kind in public’?

Fine.

Government ability to demand any and all customer information from financial institutions?

Fine. (See Dodd-Frank and DOJ’s rulemaking)

Government tracking of internet history and review of emails and purchases without a warrant?

Fine.

Government demanding “election communication transactional records” from third parties without a subpoena?

Fine. (See Hogwatch)

Government not being required to show probable cause and obtain a search warrant or subpoena to track cellphones?

Fine.

Tremendous explosion in deficit spending?

Fine.

I could go on, but that should give you an idea of all of the things that Bush never did, Obama is doing, and of which you are either ignorant or hypocritical.

I give no politician a ‘pass’ because politics isn’t a game to me. I hate the government and want it out of my life. My participation is to ensure my protection. Not to win or gain power for power’s sake.

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 6:19 PM

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Dude, I didn’t vote for Bush/Cheney and I CAN’T BLOODY STAND GRAHAM & INSANE.

My positions have been completely consistent throughout both administrations. Gitmo is just one flip-flop that you Obama Firsters have excused.

Patriot Act?

Fine.

Drones?

Fine.

New military entanglements?

Fine.

Warrantless searches of homes?

Fine (see the administration’s amicus brief in Kentucky v King).

Government tracking of credit card usage in real time and without a warrant?

Fine. (See DOJ’s Hotwatch programme)

Government tracking automobiles without a warrant because, as Eric Holder said, ‘Americans have NO expectation of privacy of any kind in public’?

Fine.

Government ability to demand any and all customer information from financial institutions?

Fine. (See Dodd-Frank and DOJ’s rulemaking)

Government tracking of internet history and review of emails and purchases without a warrant?

Fine.

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 6:20 PM

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Dude, I didn’t vote for Bush/Cheney and I CAN’T BLOODY STAND GRAHAM & INSANE.

My positions have been completely consistent throughout both administrations. Gitmo is just one flip-flop that you Obama Firsters have excused.

Patriot Act?

Fine.

Drones?

Fine.

New military entanglements?

Fine.

Warrantless searches of homes?

Fine (see the administration’s amicus brief in Kentucky v King).

Government tracking of credit card usage in real time and without a warrant?

Fine. (See DOJ’s Hogwatch programme)

Government tracking automobiles without a warrant because, as Eric Holder said, ‘Americans have NO expectation of privacy of any kind in public’?

Fine.

Government ability to demand any and all customer information from financial institutions?

Fine. (See Dodd-Frank and DOJ’s rulemaking)

Government tracking of internet history and review of emails and purchases without a warrant?

Fine.

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Government demanding “election communication transactional records” from third parties without a subpoena?

Fine. (See Hogwatch)

Government not being required to show probable cause and obtain a search warrant or subpoena to track cellphones?

Fine.

Tremendous explosion in deficit spending?

Fine.

I could go on, but that should give you an idea of all of the things that Bush never did, Obama is doing, and of which you are either ignorant or hypocritical.

I give no politician a ‘pass’ because politics isn’t a game to me. I hate the government and want it out of my life. My participation is to ensure my protection. Not to win or gain power for power’s sake.

Resist We Much on April 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM

Anybody ask Dear Leader about Pigford..?

d1carter on April 30, 2013 at 8:38 PM

First…you’re idiotically taking too much literally.
Chill?
You think I was suggesting Malkin, Jones, Beck would be allowed within a mile of a WH briefing? Or that their rhetoric would have any place in any serious discussion…about anything??

Second…much as that what’s you need to believe to feel yourself somehow rational when it comes to Obama…I am fully capable of being critical of the guy. You though, indeed would never give him a pass and are behaving today like a ObamaLaster. What’s your Obama-gripe-of-the-day? Guantanamo? Where’s your legal eagle mind on that clusterf*uck? No…you’re too concerned what some would call a ‘victory’ for Obama vs. what others would call (and cheer) a failure?
Bush/Obama/Cheney/Graham.Malkin…who cares.
Guantanamo is at a minimum an outdated failure…useless.
Obama said it…so I suppose you’ll have to disagree.
ObamaLaster rules say so.
Or…am i wrong…and do you agree with Obama (and Glenn Greenwald).

verbaluce on April 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM

Verbaluce, like Crr6, is a nothing sandwich with it’s one-liner insults. I am glad it expands on it’s thoughts every once in a while. It’s at that point when you can see, like any other irrational liberal, it doesn’t have an original thought of it’s own. A cartoon of a talking-point list.

And sweetie, after that meandering rant with numerous improper uses of punctuation, poor grammar, lack of capitalization and generally unhinged keyboard slapping, I’d think twice about getting catty with other’s typos.

hawkdriver on May 1, 2013 at 8:35 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4