Now that’s a LOUD silence . . . . . . . not even any crickets

listens2glenn on January 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM

That’s the usual response to a post made by a c*cksucking little maggot like xblade and his sockpuppet Nutless, that’s so disgusting it even brings crickets on a political forum.

Not only is he still on their insurance, he’s still breastfeeding.

xblade on January 16, 2013 at 7:06 PM
.

Wow. You need to take a break from watching South Park. Not only was that childish, stupid, and lame, that would get you slapped if you said it in public.

MelonCollie on January 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM

.
Why, are you still breastfeeding too?

Nutstuyu on January 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Now that’s a LOUD silence . . . . . . . not even any crickets

100 bullets should be enough for anyone’s lifetime,

you aren’t legally allowed to nonconsensually exchange your fluid with another person,

and

native americans respected animals and nature and hunted for food, not for pleasure.

 
I tip my hat to you, nonpartisan, and look forward to watching you continue honing your ability to imitate and emulate 180 proof idiocy with hypocritically moronic precision.
 
(The living in NYC/DC bit was a very clever touch, btw.)

Why, are you still breastfeeding too?

Nutstuyu on January 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM

Are you his sockpuppet account, or are you just another person who’s such a stupid placenta-brained breeder that you think that’s a clever comeback?

Frickin’ amazing. It’s all about the kids.

It’s OK to take a life in utero with a sharp curette as long as you don’t shoot the fetus.

Seriously? WTF?

Not only is he still on their insurance, he’s still breastfeeding.

xblade on January 16, 2013 at 7:06 PM

Wow. You need to take a break from watching South Park. Not only was that childish, stupid, and lame, that would get you slapped if you said it in public.

MelonCollie on January 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM

Why, are you still breastfeeding too?

Armed rebellion may in fact be the only way to save our republic.

bgibbs1000 on January 17, 2013 at 3:18 AM

Maybe, but we had damn well exhaust all other options first. The amount of blood that will flow in a modern American civil war would make the last look like a day at the park.

none of your business frankly.

nonpartisan on January 16, 2013 at 5:58 PM

It is now thanks to Obamacare.

“As important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute for action from members of Congress,” he said during remarks at the White House. “To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act, and Congress must act soon.”

If it weren’t controlled by the do-nothing except the capitulate, compromise, and cave in GOP, I’d say, be careful Obama–you may just get what you wished for….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooa98FHuaU0&feature=player_detailpage

Obama signs 23 exec orders and all we do is bleat about it.
 
It’s over, folks.
 
We lost.
 
fossten on January 17, 2013 at 8:21 AM

 
Not yet:
 

Twenty-three executive actions announced by the president command federal agencies to — among other things — conduct studies, issue letters, review standards and launch a national dialogue on gun violence.
 
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/277661-president-exec-orders-not-enough#ixzz2IEuWMYZh

 
He’s (thankfully) trapped by the stupid-old-white-white-guys’ Constitution at the “conduct studies” and “issue letters” stage. He’s still impotent on these matters and just trying to community organize the willingly uninformed ” native americans respected animals and nature” voters. He’s great at campaigning, though, and that’s what this mostly is.
 
Congressional laws are the key, and Obama knows it. From the link:
 

“As important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute for action from members of Congress,” he said during remarks at the White House. “To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act, and Congress must act soon.”

 
We must do it soon, btw. 2008-2010 when (D)s controlled both Executive and Legislative branches and were fine with abruptly forcing massively unpopular laws onto their subjects wasn’t any good, but now it needs to be soon.

Obama signs 23 exec orders and all we do is bleat about it.
It’s over, folks.

I dunno about that. But for the massive push back, especially against congress, over the last few weeks regarding this issue I believe these EO’s would have been much more comprehensive and authoritarian. Barky backed off.

Obama signs 23 exec orders and all we do is bleat about it.

It’s over, folks.

We lost.

fossten on January 17, 2013 at 8:21 AM

Disagree with you on this.
All we have seen is the PR aspect of the gun grabbers campaign. Just for public consumption. Waterpaint on a rainy day.
Next step is the evaluation of what is in those EOs and how they exist with laws already on the books. This is hard, nuts and bolts stuff. Takes time and is behind the scene.
By the time all is said and done, there will be much less there than what we saw yesterday.You won’t know about it until the grabbers start whinning.

It’s over, folks.

We lost.

The longer Obama is in office the more we see the similarities between him and the leftist tyrants of the past. He uses the exact same playbook. They haven’t changed anything in over a hundred years.

darwin on January 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM

Sadly, the references to Fascism, i.e., Ernst Röhm, Benito Mussolini, Nicolae Ceaușescuetc, etc. (read a book) does NOT refer to the NRA – as some of us know what happened to both Fascists, but most Americans have no idea who they were. It refers to the despotic manner in which the man-child in mom-jeans “leads” the country. Hell, at least Ernst Röhm and Benito Mussolini had snappy uniforms!
Remember … It’s all about optics.
~(Ä)~

Before you start arguing with the monitor, think about this: Would you have used innocent children as props to further a political agenda?

kingsjester on January 17, 2013 at 6:57 AM

The longer Obama is in office the more we see the similarities between him and the leftist tyrants of the past. He uses the exact same playbook. They haven’t changed anything in over a hundred years.

You answer my goddamn questions

nonpartisan on January 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM

Oh look, another jackass liberal with a god-complex.

Before you start arguing with the monitor, think about this: Would you have used innocent children as props to further a political agenda?
kingsjester on January 17, 2013 at 6:57 AM

I worked for Hitler and Lennin both of who used the tactic extensively.

You answer my goddamn questions

nonpartisan on January 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM
rogerb on January 17, 2013 at 6:00 AM

Classy!

Before you start arguing with the monitor, think about this: Would you have used innocent children as props to further a political agenda?
My take.

You answer my goddamn questions
 
nonpartisan on January 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM