Virginia looking to eliminate their gas tax?

posted at 7:21 pm on January 14, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

President Obama likes to include ‘infrastructure investment’ as part of the justification for his pushes for new spending, but he often conveniently forgets to mention how we’re supposed to pay for all that infrastructure development when we’re currently racking up trillion-dollar deficits every year — unless you count “asking the wealthy to pay a little more” as a viable solution for our spending problems, which I don’t.

Inflation, fuel efficiency, alternative vehicles, and other factors that mean that gas consumption no longer grows in tandem with road use mean that many states’ gasoline taxes are an outmoded method for collecting revenue for infrastructure and transportation projects, and in Virginia, Gov. Bob McDonnell is proposing what he says will be a more efficient way of financing and caretaking Virginia’s (amazingly congested, I might attest) highways and byways and funding transportation projects.

On the eve of the 2013 General Assembly session, Gov. Bob McDonnell proposed increasing the state’s sales tax and eliminating the gasoline tax in an overhaul of how the state funds transportation.

He wants to increase the state and local sales tax to 5.8 percent from 5 percent and permanently shift the revenue source for transportation to a tax with rising revenue, from one with diminishing buying power.

If lawmakers approve the plan, Virginia would be the first state in the country without a gas tax.

In the last full session of his term McDonnell is seeking a solution to the road-funding problem that has vexed Virginia lawmakers for decades. Overall, McDonnell says the plan would raise $3.2 billion in additional funding over the next five years, or through 2018.

Yet another reason why more federalism is usually an excellent idea: Competition between states can lead to innovations in tax codes, just like everything else. The proposal is getting a wide range of mixed reviews, but if nothing else, it’s a bold new plan for tackling the obviously glaring problem of transportation funding, and certain businesses at least seem to like the idea. Here he is on Cavuto on Monday afternoon defending his plan:


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

The nature of the two cases are totally different, but

just imagine for one second that Bush WH released a statement regarding Valerie Plame case that “some one may have fallen short…..”

You think the Left would accept that?

Sir Napsalot on May 13, 2013 at 6:08 PM

It’s was ROGUE agents! Yeah! That’s it! Just like at ATF with “Fast and Furious”! ROGUE agents! And Benghazi! Yeah! ROGUE agents in the State Department! Yeah! They’re responsible!

I KNOW NOTHING! (Probably the truest thing he’s ever said)

Come on Barry! If you’re going to pull a “Sgt Shultz” and KNOW NOTHING, at least try to be credible!

GarandFan on May 13, 2013 at 6:11 PM

Anything less then prison is a slap on the wrist.

deptofredundancydept on May 13, 2013 at 7:19 PM

Rennet what happened when Obama’s passport records were accessed.

Hugh Glass on May 13, 2013 at 9:48 PM

Comment pages: 1 2