<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Consumer Financial &#8220;Protection&#8221; Bureau steps into the fray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi1220</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6635577</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi1220</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6635577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Cordray and the CFPB can jump up my a$$.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Cordray and the CFPB can jump up my a$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeful</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634916</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And once again, the government gets involved in something they have no business being involved in, mess it up and then &quot;fix&quot; it with more regulations.  And they treat citizens as small children who have no idea how to take care of themselves.  When we were applying for a mortage some years ago, our bank approved us for an amount that was more than we were comfortable with.  We could have made the payments but if one of us got laid off, we&#039;d have been in trouble.  We opted for a smaller loan and thus a smaller house and haven&#039;t regretted that decision.  Even if mortgage companies are pushing loans on people at the governments behest, they still have the ability to say &quot;no thank you.&quot;  And the responsibility to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And once again, the government gets involved in something they have no business being involved in, mess it up and then &#8220;fix&#8221; it with more regulations.  And they treat citizens as small children who have no idea how to take care of themselves.  When we were applying for a mortage some years ago, our bank approved us for an amount that was more than we were comfortable with.  We could have made the payments but if one of us got laid off, we&#8217;d have been in trouble.  We opted for a smaller loan and thus a smaller house and haven&#8217;t regretted that decision.  Even if mortgage companies are pushing loans on people at the governments behest, they still have the ability to say &#8220;no thank you.&#8221;  And the responsibility to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowblind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634852</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowblind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm....

So we are back to loaning money only to people who don&#039;t need it?

Is all the BS about &quot;Redlining&quot; going away? Or does the bank still have to make sure minorities and other people traditionally seen as NOT having the ability to repay get &quot;their fair share&quot; of loans?

Dear Mr and Mrs Smith, 
you are not a minority, and we simply cannot find one to offset your loan.

Application Denied.

1st City Bank, FDIC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>So we are back to loaning money only to people who don&#8217;t need it?</p>
<p>Is all the BS about &#8220;Redlining&#8221; going away? Or does the bank still have to make sure minorities and other people traditionally seen as NOT having the ability to repay get &#8220;their fair share&#8221; of loans?</p>
<p>Dear Mr and Mrs Smith,<br />
you are not a minority, and we simply cannot find one to offset your loan.</p>
<p>Application Denied.</p>
<p>1st City Bank, FDIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katablog.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634771</link>
		<dc:creator>katablog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the Ability-to-Repay rule: My guess this rule means that if a lending institution lends to any liberal, it will be the bank&#039;s fault if the liberal can&#039;t repay. Owe will insist on bank punishment.

And yes, wouldn&#039;t it be nice if they instituted this rule in the US Congress? Apparently the government feels it necessary to protect us from each other. Who is protecting us from THEM?

Does a bank have to consider each consumer&#039;s portion of the US debt when deciding if we have the ability to repay?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Ability-to-Repay rule: My guess this rule means that if a lending institution lends to any liberal, it will be the bank&#8217;s fault if the liberal can&#8217;t repay. Owe will insist on bank punishment.</p>
<p>And yes, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if they instituted this rule in the US Congress? Apparently the government feels it necessary to protect us from each other. Who is protecting us from THEM?</p>
<p>Does a bank have to consider each consumer&#8217;s portion of the US debt when deciding if we have the ability to repay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabberwock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabberwock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t the President part of a lawsuit that prevented banks from having such a reliability qualification ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the President part of a lawsuit that prevented banks from having such a reliability qualification ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerryW</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634557</link>
		<dc:creator>TerryW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Adjustment Bureau?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Adjustment Bureau?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odannyboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634543</link>
		<dc:creator>odannyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how many months weeks days before we find that there are quotas attached to this so that a certain Percentage of these loans must be made to blacks to Latinos to various minorities and if you can&#039;t find enough minorities that can actually afford to pay the banks will get heavy fines. Or if they are making loans to people in that affluent neighborhoods but not in the poor ones they will be fined.  Hmmmm anyone ever hear of that happening before?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how many months weeks days before we find that there are quotas attached to this so that a certain Percentage of these loans must be made to blacks to Latinos to various minorities and if you can&#8217;t find enough minorities that can actually afford to pay the banks will get heavy fines. Or if they are making loans to people in that affluent neighborhoods but not in the poor ones they will be fined.  Hmmmm anyone ever hear of that happening before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cajunpatriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634399</link>
		<dc:creator>cajunpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The Consumer Financial “Protection” Bureau steps into the fray&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Their first order of business should be to shut down the government except the military.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Consumer Financial “Protection” Bureau steps into the fray</p></blockquote>
<p>Their first order of business should be to shut down the government except the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634394</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another 800-page rule that was not released until 5:30 p.m., after Richard Cordray spent the day blogging and bragging about it and getting all sorts of flattering headlines.  This agency is so damn political it is ridiculous.  Nver have we seen a regulatory agency do such grandstanding over a regulation that it was required by law to write and which essentially closes the barn door after the horse is way out of the barn and down the road.

Totally typical for this Administration - do nothing of real susbtrance, but grandstand the hell out of it and claim you are &quot;helping the middle class.&quot;  The only people this rule helps are lawyers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another 800-page rule that was not released until 5:30 p.m., after Richard Cordray spent the day blogging and bragging about it and getting all sorts of flattering headlines.  This agency is so damn political it is ridiculous.  Nver have we seen a regulatory agency do such grandstanding over a regulation that it was required by law to write and which essentially closes the barn door after the horse is way out of the barn and down the road.</p>
<p>Totally typical for this Administration &#8211; do nothing of real susbtrance, but grandstand the hell out of it and claim you are &#8220;helping the middle class.&#8221;  The only people this rule helps are lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634363</link>
		<dc:creator>nathor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;it would work in plunging the house prices enough so that those ppl could afford them:P

nathor on January 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
that is, if they would still have a job after the whole economy colapses]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>it would work in plunging the house prices enough so that those ppl could afford them:P</p>
<p>nathor on January 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>that is, if they would still have a job after the whole economy colapses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634361</link>
		<dc:creator>nathor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Fine. Just only write mortgages to people with an over 800 credit score. Liberals won’t like the results, though.

Ward Cleaver on January 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
it would work in plunging the house prices enough so that those ppl could afford them:P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fine. Just only write mortgages to people with an over 800 credit score. Liberals won’t like the results, though.</p>
<p>Ward Cleaver on January 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>it would work in plunging the house prices enough so that those ppl could afford them:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ward Cleaver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ward Cleaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fine.  Just only write mortgages to people with an over 800 credit score.  Liberals won&#039;t like the results, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine.  Just only write mortgages to people with an over 800 credit score.  Liberals won&#8217;t like the results, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostic</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634295</link>
		<dc:creator>apostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer Financial &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_racket&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“Protection” &lt;/a&gt; Bureau]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Financial <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_racket" rel="nofollow">“Protection” </a> Bureau</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634243</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;largely and directly incentivized&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Um, the government &lt;strong&gt;REQUIRED&lt;/strong&gt; banks to lend to those who could not repay their loans. And some of those folks lived in and still have some very swank digs.

Do you all recall the embarrassing incident on CNN where they interviewed a woman about to lose her 800,000 dollar house? When the CNN twinkie asked what the woman did for a living she said she drove a bus part time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>largely and directly incentivized</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, the government <strong>REQUIRED</strong> banks to lend to those who could not repay their loans. And some of those folks lived in and still have some very swank digs.</p>
<p>Do you all recall the embarrassing incident on CNN where they interviewed a woman about to lose her 800,000 dollar house? When the CNN twinkie asked what the woman did for a living she said she drove a bus part time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634218</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Those who steal from private individuals spend their lives in stocks and chains; those who steal from the public treasury go dressed in gold and purple.
– Marcus Porcius Cato – (Roman Statesman – 190 B.C.) &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Those who steal from private individuals spend their lives in stocks and chains; those who steal from the public treasury go dressed in gold and purple.<br />
– Marcus Porcius Cato – (Roman Statesman – 190 B.C.) </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwelf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634202</link>
		<dc:creator>gwelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only lending money to people who can pay it back?
Wow - I&#039;m sure the lenders would never have thought of this own their own and have would few incentives to actually follow through with it even if they did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only lending money to people who can pay it back?<br />
Wow &#8211; I&#8217;m sure the lenders would never have thought of this own their own and have would few incentives to actually follow through with it even if they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634194</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the Ability-to-Repay rule&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, what a concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the Ability-to-Repay rule</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, what a concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634178</link>
		<dc:creator>trigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Today, we’re issuing one of our most important rules to date, the Ability-to-Repay rule.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s try this rule out on the Federal Government for a while, first, huh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Today, we’re issuing one of our most important rules to date, the Ability-to-Repay rule.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s try this rule out on the Federal Government for a while, first, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antipc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634161</link>
		<dc:creator>antipc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IOW, there going back to the same standards used before the government got involved via the CRA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IOW, there going back to the same standards used before the government got involved via the CRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634156</link>
		<dc:creator>nathor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes lets do insist that anyone that breaks the law be tried and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. You do know that with the geometric increase in laws that on average you commit three felonies a day you can be charged with. You and that newscaster that waved the high capacity magazine should go to jail with those bankers you hate.

chemman on January 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think more eyeballs should be upon those who handle the largest amounts of $. if you handle billions, you should make sure you dont step over the line.


&lt;blockquote&gt;Go to hell, you f*cking moron.

Midas on January 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The time and energy you waste on willful ignorance is astounding. Should you actually put your noggin to good use you might eventually get out of your Mom’s basement.

HotAirian on January 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

let me introduce you to the bank that was too big to jail:

http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21568403-two-big-british-banks-reach-controversial-settlements-too-big-jail

And I am still waiting for any banker to be jailed for the libor fix. when you steal billions, you get seem to get an &quot;get out of jail card&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes lets do insist that anyone that breaks the law be tried and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. You do know that with the geometric increase in laws that on average you commit three felonies a day you can be charged with. You and that newscaster that waved the high capacity magazine should go to jail with those bankers you hate.</p>
<p>chemman on January 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think more eyeballs should be upon those who handle the largest amounts of $. if you handle billions, you should make sure you dont step over the line.</p>
<blockquote><p>Go to hell, you f*cking moron.</p>
<p>Midas on January 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The time and energy you waste on willful ignorance is astounding. Should you actually put your noggin to good use you might eventually get out of your Mom’s basement.</p>
<p>HotAirian on January 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>let me introduce you to the bank that was too big to jail:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21568403-two-big-british-banks-reach-controversial-settlements-too-big-jail" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21568403-two-big-british-banks-reach-controversial-settlements-too-big-jail</a></p>
<p>And I am still waiting for any banker to be jailed for the libor fix. when you steal billions, you get seem to get an &#8220;get out of jail card&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634147</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RWM: http://cnsnews.com/cartoons/glenn-foden/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWM: <a href="http://cnsnews.com/cartoons/glenn-foden/" rel="nofollow">http://cnsnews.com/cartoons/glenn-foden/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;d think &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; being right would feel better than this. But every time the Democrats confirm what we always&lt;em&gt; knew&lt;/em&gt; (and &lt;em&gt;they&#039;d&lt;/em&gt; denied and demagogued...and blamed Bush for), it just feels kid of hollow, you know? 
Obama&#039;s taking all the fun out of proving them liars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think <em>always</em> being right would feel better than this. But every time the Democrats confirm what we always<em> knew</em> (and <em>they&#8217;d</em> denied and demagogued&#8230;and blamed Bush for), it just feels kid of hollow, you know?<br />
Obama&#8217;s taking all the fun out of proving them liars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634144</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal worker gets reprieve: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/01/10/management-backed-off-social-security-worker-after-flatulence-reprimand-went-public/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal worker gets reprieve: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/01/10/management-backed-off-social-security-worker-after-flatulence-reprimand-went-public/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/01/10/management-backed-off-social-security-worker-after-flatulence-reprimand-went-public/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634143</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Just to clarify, “protection,” in the Obama-administration context, is hereafter joining my list of words that deserve to be indelibly surrounded by quotation marks&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/01/toon-of-day-obamas-protection-racket.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;Toon: Obama&#039;s &quot;Protection&quot; Racket&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just to clarify, “protection,” in the Obama-administration context, is hereafter joining my list of words that deserve to be indelibly surrounded by quotation marks</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/01/toon-of-day-obamas-protection-racket.html" rel="nofollow">&#8216;Toon: Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Protection&#8221; Racket</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/11/the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-steps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-6634140</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238411#comment-6634140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sooner people realize that Obama &amp; Co.&#039;s goal is the destruction of the middle class for the purpose of establishing a Marxist USSoA, the sooner we can stop this nonsense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sooner people realize that Obama &amp; Co.&#8217;s goal is the destruction of the middle class for the purpose of establishing a Marxist USSoA, the sooner we can stop this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>