Jindal calls for elimination of all Louisiana income and corporate taxes
posted at 6:58 pm on January 10, 2013 by Mary Katharine Ham
Gov. Bobby Jindal is proposing to eliminate Louisiana’s income and corporate taxes and pay for those cuts with increased sales taxes, the governor’s office confirmed Thursday. The governor’s office has not yet provided the details of the plan.
“The bottom line is that for too long, Louisiana’s workers and small businesses have suffered from having a state tax structure that is too complex and that holds back economic prosperity,” Jindal said in a statement released by his office. “It’s time to change that so people can keep more of their own money and foster an environment where businesses want to invest and create good-paying jobs.”
Jindal says he’s meeting with legislators now, with the goal of revenue neutral tax reform. Some reports claim the state’s 4-percent income tax might have to rise to 7 percent to make up the difference, but the governor’s office hasn’t gotten that deep into details as it discusses possibilities:
Gov. Bobby Jindal’s tax reform package could raise the state’s sales tax to as much as 7 percent so the state’s corporate and personal income taxes could be eliminated.
Jindal met with key legislative leaders and cabinet members at the Governor’s Mansion Wednesday to discuss possible proposals that would allow the elimination of income taxes. Each scenario discussed would raise sales taxes to some degree, depending onhow many tax exemptions and exclusions could be eliminated.
The Tax Foundation gives the edge in state tax competitiveness to any U.S. states who do without one of the three major taxes— personal income, corporate, or sales. Tax simplification along these lines would likely vault Louisiana from a rank of 32nd into the top half of the top 10.
Wyoming, Nevada, and South Dakota have no corporate or individual income tax; Alaska has no individual income or state-level sales tax; Florida has no individual income tax; and New Hampshire and Montana have no sales tax.
It’ll be interesting to watch this plan progress. In contrast with President Obama, Jindal has often shown himself to be a chief executive with an understanding of how laying groundwork and cajoling support are part of advancing one’s agenda. He does his share of speech-giving, but he doesn’t assume his mere declaration magically makes legislation appear and pass. Jindal showed his desire to be an intellectual and enthusiastic leader for the right in the immediate aftermath of Obama’s win. This fight can serve as a model of his ability to be an on-the-ground policy leader as well. Good luck to him, to the people of Louisiana, and the businesses that go there to flourish.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


It’s come to this: Venezuela approves funds to relieve the toilet-paper shortage

Video: Dem Congressman rips IRS for abuses, threatens bringing in special prosecutor






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oddly, I’m looking forward to Romney’s speech. I could very well be disappointed, but the others are here mostly to burnish their own credentials, and Romney’s not (or is delusional if he thinks he is, and I don’t think he is). That could open up some interesting avenues for Romney to take.
LukeinNE on March 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM
The real story from All-white, All-the-time MSNBC will be, “Look at all those pasty white faces! No diversity at all!”
Liam on March 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM
Romney? I thought this was CPAC, not RPAC.
mythicknight on March 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM
Uh, no mention of Wayne LaPierre? LaPierre is speaking now.
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM
ABR fest in 3…2….1
FlaMurph on March 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM
It’s the Ides of March……. Happy Resist Tyranny Day!!
TBinSTL on March 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Uh, no mention of Wayne LaPierre? LaPierre is speaking
now.…… any minute.
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM
I’ll repeat my question of yesterday.
Given the young demographics of CPAC, is this little confab even relevent?
Happy Nomad on March 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM
Show a little cation lest Ed or Allahpundit rebuke you for questioning their pro 2nd credentials.
SWalker on March 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Wayne LaPierre is the exact wrong person to be spokesman for the NRA if they want to attract new people to the cause. He looks like Skelator, a caricature of what people think the NRA is.
commodore on March 15, 2013 at 11:07 AM
You won’t see the pasty white faces from Iowa on a White House tour. You will see Beyonce, Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods.
crash72 on March 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM
So what exactly is it you are attempting to assert here, that no youth can be Conservative, that none of the young people involved in CPAC are actually Conservatives, that all of the youthful participants of CPAC are RINO’s? Or that simply by virtue of their youth they have little to no political impact or voice?
SWalker on March 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM
No, the Republican Party has rejected the candidates who have offered themselves as the conservative “choice”. That’s a separate issue then conservatism itself. Mr. Perry has conflated philosophy with candidacy.
Mr. Perry is perhaps one of the finest governors to serve Texas. But he was obviously a lousy presidential choice who didn’t appeal to the party or this finicky electorate.
Certainly we want a candidate who espouses a conservative philosophy and can simply articulate their goals. But that person also needs to be a pragmatic and thus, electable, politician who appeals to voters. We also need someone who isn’t tepid about their beliefs or accomplishments but not overly restrictive in espousing them.
The problem with our party is we are more effective at fighting each other than the opposition. Until that ceases, get familiar with the view. Nobody gets everything they want in a negotiation and I am sick of the whining.
Marcus Traianus on March 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM
If you honestly believe American’s are that shallow, then I am inclined to believe that the ole commodore has been hitting the
Rum a bit too much and has run his boat up on a reef.
SWalker on March 15, 2013 at 11:14 AM
Wow! What pissed you off this morning? Because I know it couldn’t possibly be my question about the relevence of CPAC.
Simply put, CPAC is largely a mid-20s crowd. Of course they can be energetic and passionate conservatives. But you don’t win elections simply through energy and passion. Beyond a forum for aspiring politicians to give speeches I’m inclined to believe that CPAC has little purpose in the political process.
Happy Nomad on March 15, 2013 at 11:23 AM
Hallelujah! Awesome speech, Wayne!
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 11:23 AM
Romney will be bashed by the Hot Air commentators in a Huffingtn Post style nastiness, but I for one am glad hes speaking. He would have made a fantastic President, and hes just a kind and decent man, the polar opposite of who currently occupies the White House.
Jack_Burton on March 15, 2013 at 11:30 AM
Paul Ryan’s speech …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4Fj_Ch0blIg
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/paul-ryan-touts-budget-plan-at-cpac-1295vet-198449871.html
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 11:36 AM
…and whose fault is that?
KOOLAID2 on March 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM
…someone is missing from this thread…that will be a first!
KOOLAID2 on March 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM
I’m not pissed off in the slightest, I am just trying to understand why you are being so dismissive of CPAC, and particular it’s youthful participants. Look, I am in my 50′s and would attend a CPAC event in a heartbeat if I could afford to.
As to their having “little purpose in the political process“? I have trouble grasping what this phrase is even suppose to mean.
SWalker on March 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM
Mitt Romney will take the gloves off any minute and attack Obama. Any minute now…. Any minute.
SparkPlug on March 15, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Go Mitt Go!
No Really, Go. Get out.
portlandon on March 15, 2013 at 12:01 PM
OT: What has happened to Bob Woodward? Haven’t seen or heard him in quite a while now. Is he being re-educated?
Mirimichi on March 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM
Announce for 2016, Mitt, and bus in more troops to stack the straw poll! Mittmania!
rrpjr on March 15, 2013 at 12:19 PM
Senator Tim Scott’s speech …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jps5UibXZrA
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 12:25 PM
I look forward to Mitt’s speech. There is certainly no reason to chace him out of the building. I’m sure he’ll have something constructive to add.
dczombie on March 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM
That is a very interesting shade of blue. Stop and take a breath now.
katy the mean old lady on March 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM
.
So, in a way, those who supported Romney are guilty of underestimating the integrity and intelligence of the American Voting electorate?
Come to terms with the fact that this country is headed for Total Socialist controlled $hithole status, and the votting majority are OK with that – and willingly welcome the demise.
Then this group would also include those who felt Romney was no more conservative than the Marxist-raised purple lipped Corruptocrat who showed his true colors over 4 years of ineptness- but remains for another 4.
FlaMurph on March 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM
.
Banished by his own.
FlaMurph on March 15, 2013 at 12:57 PM
check Fort Marcy park ….
conservative tarheel on March 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM
Rick Santorum’s nephew has passed away; Santorum completely rewrote his speech, remembers nephew in emotional speech …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhdL5_P_7ZQ&list=PLmqnjF1D2hhaZ0r5hw-0beF9R7oaB9lOt&index=33
Very moving. Powerful.
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM
Wow…longggggg standing ovation for Romney at CPAC.
GOPRanknFile on March 15, 2013 at 1:34 PM
Getting a lot of favorable tweets from folks who are there, too, it looks like.
crosspatch on March 15, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Romney’s speech was mediocre. I wish he had not included Christie in his list of governors that “we need to hear from” (Bob McDonnell, Scott Walker, John Kasich, Susanna Martinez, Chris Christie, Brian Sandoval), but his speech was okay – not his best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddj8Fz4u2KI&list=PLmqnjF1D2hhaZ0r5hw-0beF9R7oaB9lOt&index=37
Pork-Chop on March 15, 2013 at 2:34 PM
…he’s still…a good man!…unlike JugEars
KOOLAID2 on March 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM