Comments on: GOP turns to McConnell for entitlement-reform fight

By: winter trend

winter trend — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:38:05 +0000

…Recommended websites…

[...] What web host are you the usage of? Can I get affiliate hyperlink to your host? I wish web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol[...]…

By: easyt65

easyt65 — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:29:56 +0000

GREAT…..since Boehner has proven to be a complete FAILURE as Speaker of the House at getting anything done in a House where the GOP holds the Majority, let’s put all of our ‘hopes’ on the shoulders of Mitch McConnell, the Senate MINORITY Leader who can’t get squat done due to the fact that the Liberals hold the Majority & Harry Obstructonist’ Reid has been content to reap the high salary & massive benefits paid for by our tax dollars for doing absolutely NOTHING for the last few years…and is content to KEEP DOING SO!

GREAT PLAN!

By: ActinUpinTexas

ActinUpinTexas — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:30:09 +0000

All these big brains can’t figure out what a negative number and a positive number are….. Anytime any of these fiscally irresponsible morons want educate themselves on how to run a budget, they can look me up, I have consistently over the years and multitude of administrations have had to tighten my household budget because of their consistent increasingly overreaching taxation and regulation.

By: rrpjr

rrpjr — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:16:32 +0000

“GOP turns to McConnell for entitlement-reform fight”

Still going to lose.

By: Ward Cleaver

Ward Cleaver — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:54:51 +0000

Boehner is supposed to be Speaker of the House, second in line for the presidency behind the VP, and he won’t even go into negotiations? What a joke.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:15:58 +0000

Just because something has been squandered doesn’t mean it wasn’t ever there.

alchemist19 on January 9, 2013 at 2:12 PM

I’m refering directly to his strength of priniple, moral fiber, and negotiating skills.

You can’t squander what you never possessed.

I absolutely have no argument, however, with your base premise.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:12:50 +0000

@Tim As I mentioned earlier, google it. And you continue to avoid ‘amn’t’, Tim. Dishonest of you.

tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 2:01 PM

lol…I know sparky….I admit it…. three dictionaries, two websites, google and I are big fat liars!

(you do know we can check your nonsense in a nanosecond, right?)

Now keep your promise and and get lost.

(lol…you won’t….trolls never do).

By: alchemist19

alchemist19 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:12:01 +0000

Sorry sparky…One cannot “weaken” that which has no strength to begin with.

But hey….thanks for playing.

Tim_CA on January 9, 2013 at 11:19 AM

*facepalm*

The person elected by his peers to be second in line for the presidency, the most visible leader and spokesman for the opposition to Obama, the person chosen by Republicans to be their leader in the only part of government they control has no strength, has no strength? Just because something has been squandered doesn’t mean it wasn’t ever there.

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:01:18 +0000

@Tim As I mentioned earlier, google it. And you continue to avoid ‘amn’t', Tim. Dishonest of you.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000

Stupidity – what are you winning, exactly?

Schadenfreude on January 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM

LOL…That was my typo that started our illiterate friend on his misspelled rant.

By: Dire Straits

Dire Straits — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:59:34 +0000

Tim_CA on January 9, 2013 at 1:55 PM

LoLz..Looks like you need to teach someone the first rule of holes..:)

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:55:53 +0000

@Tim Google it. You keep digging.

tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:41 PM

Then…try this:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ofcourse?s=t

Since you won’t…I’ll help:

ofcourse – no dictionary results

Keep Digging.

By: Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:54:16 +0000

Double teaming, I see. But still losing. Lol. Stpidity. tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM

Stupidity - what are you winning, exactly?

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:53:54 +0000

“ofcourse is not”? Try and make ‘cogent’ sentences. And what about ‘amn’t'? Forgot about that?

By: bluefox

bluefox — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:51:11 +0000

Boehner, McConnell? I’ve never seen any difference really, other than tears:-) Reid/McConnell/Boehner have always worked well with Obama. What haven’t they given B.O.?

They all make me sick!!

By: Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:50:52 +0000

@Schad I’ve already received your hate, previously. Doesn’t matter. It happens. Goes with the terrain.

tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:37 PM

Dude, you’re not even on the radar of my hate. My hate is as strong as my love. They’re special.

Intelligence, perception and hilarity are indignant. Other than that, take good care. Don’t stumble.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:50:52 +0000

@Tim Google it. You keep digging.

tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:41 PM

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/of+course

Try this sparky.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:49:46 +0000

@Tim Google it. You keep digging.

tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:41 PM

Done.

The idiomatic phrase “of course” is in the dictionary.

“ofcourse is not”.

Honest to God…do you just make up everything you vomit out?

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:48:28 +0000

@Tim What about your whine about amn’t? Conveniently forgot about that? Keep digging.

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:41:24 +0000

@Tim Google it. You keep digging.

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:37:27 +0000

@Schad I’ve already received your hate, previously. Doesn’t matter. It happens. Goes with the terrain.

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:36:55 +0000

@Tim Ofcourse, I’m hilarious. tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:34 PM

New word? Cogent. (keep digging)

By: Tim_CA

Tim_CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:34:58 +0000

Now that little timmy has lost the battle, I’m exiting this stpidity. Lol tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:05 PM

Double teaming, I see. But still losing. Lol. Stpidity. tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM

lol...YOU LIE!

By: Fenris

Fenris — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:34:12 +0000

Well, if ‘arguement’ really was accepted British spelling then … Nah, you’d still be losing.

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:34:12 +0000

@Tim Ofcourse, I’m hilarious. To the wingnuts on either side, I usually am. I’m just a realist.