libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 7:39 AM

Way to tell us all “I’ve never once experienced even one single feeling that comes from a public win of anything bearing even minor local significance, much less (inter)national and televised”.
 
rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM

 
I’m guessing there are years and years of rich and deeply personal feelings accompanying repeated public losses, though.
 
We can just add this one to the stack, eh, professor?

You’re fine with the blatant negative stereotyping you set regarding a private and consensual sexual relationship, right?

rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM
 

I’m much less concerned with the casual comments people make on the internet, provided they don’t involve any material damage to a person’s life or reputation, than I am with parts of social structure which oppression vulnerable populations in a variety of material ways.

 
You’re suggesting discriminatory comments on the internet don’t hurt anything? The casual acceptance of damaging words in our language doesn’t saturate society and make a particular race/sexual orientation slightly less human?
 
rogerb on January 10, 2013 at 6:30 AM

 
And there it will sit, forever unanswered.
 

I don’t flee threads, I have a job.
 
libfreeordie on January 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM

 
Don’t overwork yourself, professor.

This is why you flee threads, btw.

rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM

rogerb on January 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM

I don’t flee threads, I have a job.

libfreeordie on January 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM

Engagement would be responding to the substance of my claims in ways that illustrates you understand the argument and can defeat it with your own.

libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM

 
Dead thread, LFOD?
 
Well defended. Sorry, abandoned.

That child damn near forgot his girlfriend even existed at his moment of triumph.
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 7:39 AM

 
Way to tell us all “I’ve never once experienced even one single feeling that comes from a public win of anything bearing even minor local significance, much less (inter)national and televised”.
 
rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM

Cross-cultural data show that prehomosexual boys are more attracted to solitary sports such as swimming, cycling and tennis than they are to rougher contact sports such as football and soccer;

Yup! I was woeful at baseball and had no interest in football, but was an excellent gymnast (yes you are on a team, but its not nearly the same) and swam through the YMCA fish categories.
 
libfreeordie on July 6, 2012 at 8:46 PM

 
Nailed that one, didn’t I?
 
Unique little snowflake.

He/she isn’t a college professor, that has been “discovered” awhile back…
 
right2bright on January 9, 2013 at 12:41 PM

As my grandmother would say “you a lie.”
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM

from dissertation to book it tends to take 6 years due to the heavy teaching/committeeloads assistant professors have. I’m in a unique situation…
 
libfreeordie on June 24, 2012 at 10:45 PM

 
And hopefully you’ve noticed, but I use “professor” jokingly whenever you post exceptionally stupid things.
 
It’s a shame to have to tell an assistant-professor that, but there’s obviously an enormous unique-snowflake ego barrier to overcome.

You’re fine with the blatant negative stereotyping you set regarding a private and consensual sexual relationship, right?
 
rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM

I’m much less concerned with the casual comments people make on the internet, provided they don’t involve any material damage to a person’s life or reputation, than I am with parts of social structure which oppression vulnerable populations in a variety of material ways.

 
You’re suggesting discriminatory comments on the internet don’t hurt anything? The casual acceptance of damaging words in our language doesn’t saturate society and make a particular race/sexual orientation slightly less human? Say, have you met this guy?
 

Homosexuality still remains a very small practiced perversion within America. One need only go to any high school to see just how bad it is still viewed.

Yup, lets make social policy on the insults of teenagers. Wait a minute, maybe what’s so jacked up about American politics is that we already do just that.
 
libfreeordie on February 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM

 
Y’all should talk if you haven’t met him yet. Nice fellow somedays. Sort of full of himself, but I think he’s still a minor under Obamacare so you have to cut him some slack. You remember how it is knowing everything when you’re young.
 

Me calling her a beard is certainly rude and unkind, as would be calling someone a “f@g.” Since when does progressive mean touchy feely we all love each other crap.

 
Oh, sorry. I must’ve had you mistaken for this guy:
 

And why was Rush Limbaugh fired from ESPN again?
 
JellyToast on December 14, 2012 at 7:45 AM

Because he suggested that black men lacked the intellectual acumen to fulfill the role of quarterback via Donovan McNabb. Rob Parker, by contrast, just called RG III massive nerd and suggested that means he was “cornball.” These thiings feel different.
 
libfreeordie on December 14, 2012 at 7:47 AM

 
You really should meet him. I bet you’d get along swell.
 
(Not even a month old. Extra points for your use of “feel” in both statements, btw.)
 

Since when does progressive mean touchy feely we all love each other crap. Its about a vision for the state’s interaction with capital and the individual citizen.
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM

 
State interaction and individual citizens like this?
 

Its hilarious to see the people who burned Dixie Chicks CDs in effigy or collected them in a huge pile and crushed them under a steam roller acting as if Thomas is some kind of media victim. Puhleeze.
 
libfreeordie on January 26, 2012 at 7:33 AM

 
I guess you two spell your name so similarly that it’s easy to get you mixed up. Seriously, though, you two should talk. He has no moral compass to speak of, and he contradicts himself and his current position in nearly every single thread, but I think you’d like him.

…But, very clever, you’re trying to inspire me to “prove” my identity…
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM

 
Before I forget, good job on not letting some slow-on-the-uptake idiot non-college professor conservative trick you into repeatedly posting substantial bits of your own personal information against your will.
 
Keep up the good work, professor.

As my grandmother would say “you a lie.” But, very clever, you’re trying to inspire me to “prove” my identity so people can start posting my personal information again without recourse. Not gonna work.

libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM

No, I could care less about you “personal” information, just making a factual statement. I don’t care much about anyone’s “personal information”, since, as shown by you, it’s probably not factual.

I just like to set the record straight, if someone claims something, they need to prove it…you, the opposite happened, it was shown you are not a professor, perhaps you confuse the word with profess…

It has been shown several times you are not a “professor”, I believe it’s a student of about 24 years old, or a drop out of 24 I can’t remember which.

But good try…

I hate to throw shade, but that interaction just screamed “beard.” To me.

You’re fine with the blatant negative stereotyping you set regarding a private and consensual sexual relationship, right?

rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM

I’m much less concerned with the casual comments people make on the internet, provided they don’t involve any material damage to a person’s life or reputation, than I am with parts of social structure which oppression vulnerable populations in a variety of material ways. Me calling her a beard is certainly rude and unkind, as would be calling someone a “f@g.” Since when does progressive mean touchy feely we all love each other crap. Its about a vision for the state’s interaction with capital and the individual citizen.

Yes, she is drop-dead gorgeous, but she loses points for fake boobs.

Mallard T. Drake on January 8, 2013 at 9:09 PM

How do you know? Did Elaine check ‘em out for you in the sauna?

Nutstuyu on January 9, 2013 at 9:43 AM

Amazing how every Seinfeld episode can be applied in real life.

TxAnn56 on January 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM

They’re real, and they’re spectacular….

rogerb on January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM

Confirmed – lfod hates gay people.
He hates himself.
I guess the latter point is obvious.

I hate to throw shade, but that interaction just screamed “beard.” To me. That child damn near forgot his girlfriend even existed at his moment of triumph. AL QB plus Md. Alabama, uh uh, he one of the kids honey. We know our own.
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 7:39 AM

 
libfreeordie, let’s assume you’re right. Yes, I know, I know, but play along anyway. Pretend it happens. Just for fun.
 

I hate to throw shade, but that interaction just screamed “beard.” To me.

 
Those are two consenting adults enjoying a private sexual relationship of their choice.
 
You’re not a “beard”, obviously. With that in mind, I suspect you’d be full of all-caps, anger, and righteous indignation if a heterosexual were to post about some unknown good-looking guy and how they didn’t really want “to throw shade”, but, well
 

“something about that interaction just screamed “f_g” to me”

 
or
 

“something about that interaction just screamed “q_eer” to me”

 
Using libfreeordie’s logic, it’s easy to pick out homosexuals. I mean, look at how they _______.
 
(The same homosexuals who I believe should enjoy healthy, self-aware, fulfilling, and satisfying adult relationships, free of judgement and biases, etc.)
 
Just like it’s easy to pick out “beards”, right libfreeordie?
 

I hate to throw shade, but that interaction just screamed “beard.” To me.

 
You’re fine with the blatant negative stereotyping you set regarding a private and consensual sexual relationship, right?

The real issue is that the ‘Bama QB is dating an Auburn Grad.
That there is the story.

Jabberwock on January 9, 2013 at 1:45 PM

And I have to agree with Jabberwock.

Face it – the game was a fairly boring blowout (even though I enjoy seeing ND get their butts kicked), so they were looking for anything to keep the audience interested.

you seem content to cut and paste. Porque?
 
libfreeordie on August 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM

 
you do have a tendency to abandon them once you can’t touch bottom, so too much effort isn’t warranted. FWIW, you’re not the only one.
 
rogerb on August 2, 2012 at 12:38 PM

 
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/03/july-jobs-report-163k-jobs-added-8-3-jobless-rate/comment-page-3/#comment-6095887
 
Funny why I’d make that comment if you saw a debate through to the end.

Aw, rogerb, your post really does prove that the opposite of love isn’t hate, its indifference. I should have picked up on the cues of your copy/paste stalk act as signs of your profound interest in/obsession with me,

 
Wow. You truly have never understood why it gets posted, have you?
 
It has nothing to do with you. It’s only done to point out general progressive hypocrisy. You, sesqui, urban elitist, and whoever else comes up first in the searches is what gets posted. You’re all interchangeable.
 
You really thought it was something special you achieved? Some unusual insight specific to you and you alone?
 
Aww. That’s sweet. Sad and pathetic and amusing in a nope-never-won-anything-publicly sort of way, but still kind of sweet.
 

But more to the point, I challenge the notion that you are someone who engages me. You don’t actually… Engagement would be responding to the substance of my claims in ways that illustrates you understand the argument and can defeat it with your own. You don’t do that and therefore you are not one of the few who “engage me.”
 
libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM

 
I also would’ve thought you were bright enough to realize that anytime this was posted:
 

Why do you let so many threads die after you present your data and/or open ended argument?
 
rogerb on June 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM

 

Which threads are those?
 
libfreeordie on June 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM

 
It was making fun of you fleeing my engagement.
 
Every time it appeared it’s because you ran away from a question I asked.
 
Here are some, btw:
 
http://www.google.com/search?btnG=1&pws=0&q=site%3Ahotair.com+libfreeordie%22which+threads+are+those%22
 
All of them your decision to flee.
 
All of them your decision to not engage me.
 

Engagement would be responding to the substance of my claims in ways that illustrates you understand the argument and can defeat it with your own.

 
Nicely done, btw.

Aw, rogerb, your post really does prove that the opposite of love isn’t hate, its indifference. I should have picked up on the cues of your copy/paste stalk act as signs of your profound interest in/obsession with me, but I didn’t know you truly cared. But really, the pearl clutching is sort of a lot to handle this early into 2013. Nor is it warranted. While you did post “too far” when someone encouraged me to die, your act of altruism merely extends to the realm of a digital debate forum, and thus the stakes are quite low.

But more to the point, I challenge the notion that you are someone who engages me. You don’t actually. You needle me with copy and paste gags, sometimes more effectively than not, but that isn’t “engagement.” That’s following me around, that’s reading all of my posts, but that’s not “engagement.” Engagement would be responding to the substance of my claims in ways that illustrates you understand the argument and can defeat it with your own. You don’t do that and therefore you are not one of the few who “engage me.”

libfreeordie on January 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM

You don’t find yourself the least bit pompous or melodramatic, do you? LOL

I find it amusing that libfreeordie thinks that males enjoying the beauty and attractiveness of Katherine Webb “dehumanizes” her when actually it is a celebration of what makes us human men and women.

Not what I said, try again.