Is the end nigh for Hugo Chavez?

posted at 3:21 pm on January 7, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez won reelection for a fourth six-year presidential term in October, but since his reported cancer operation in Cuba in early December, he has neither spoken nor been seen publicly — which is turning into something of a problem for him, considering that a president is traditionally supposed to be present for his inauguration.

On Thursday, the ideologue – who has used his country’s oil riches to bankroll left-wing bed-fellows across Latin America, forged a cosy alliance with Iran and assailed the US from its back yard – is due to be celebrating his next inauguration.

But there will be no joyous scenes. For this weekend, he is lying close to death in a Cuban hospital bed, quite possibly being kept alive on a ventilator, suffering from respiratory problems and a severe lung infection after his fourth round of surgery in 18 months for an undisclosed type of pelvic cancer.

His illness has already sparked a constitutional crisis in Venezuela, where he won a hotly-contested election in October but has not yet started a new term. His death would send shock waves across the region and could endanger the survival of Cuba’s communist regime which is dependent on his largesse for cheap oil.

Never having been one to miss a chance for a grandiose display of self-love and communist glory, his probable incapacitation is fueling all kinds of rumors; the Venezuelan government is going on the offensive to apparently quell the fears of the Venezuelan populace the Chavez might actually be a mere mortal:

Venezuela’s vice president has attacked the “lies” he says are being spread on social media about the health of President Hugo Chavez.

Nicolas Maduro, who is Mr Chavez’s chosen successor, was speaking to supporters in Caracas alongside Diosdado Cabello, who was re-elected president of Venezuela’s National Assembly yesterday.

Mr Maduro said Mr Chavez’s supporters must “be in constant battle to fight the lies” that were being spread by the opposition, naming Twitter and Facebook as conduits for the rumours. …

Mr Cabello told the crowd that it “doesn’t mean anything” if Mr Chavez is unable to be sworn in on Thursday for a third term as president. …

Regardless, opposition and allies alike are already circling, sniffing around for ways to navigate his possible demise; even without some kind of outright coup, what Chavez has deemed to be the constitutional proceedings might not be enough to keep his singular agenda on top if he doesn’t recover:

Here’s what the Bolivarian constitution is clear about: if Chávez dies before Jan. 10, then a new presidential election has to be held within 30 days, and during that time the National Assembly President “shall take charge of the presidency of the republic.” Should Chávez somehow be able to return to Venezuela to be sworn in on Jan. 10 but dies during the first four years of his new term, a new election still has to be held within 30 days, but this time his Vice President becomes President during the interregnum. Should Chávez die during the last two years of the term, then the Vice President simply completes the term’s lame-duck remainder.

If the Bolivarian succession process sounds convoluted, analysts say it’s meant to be. It keeps the Vice President post relatively weak and therefore discourages any challenge to Chávez’s authoritarian rule from within his United Socialist Party (PSUV) while he’s alive; but it aids the continuance of his left-wing, anti-U.S. revolution if he dies by giving the opposition a paltry 30 days to mount an election campaign. Still, what Chávez may not have expected, says Stephen Johnson, Americas director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., is that the scenario would play out “at a moment precisely like this one,” when the opposition does have a viable candidate — Henrique Capriles, the centrist governor of Miranda state adjoining Caracas — ready to hit the trail again after a relatively respectable effort against Chávez in October.

Capriles put in a good showing in the presidential race and already has widespread name recognition, although it would likely still not be enough to overcome a Chavez-esque successor (even as his lieutenants fight about who exactly that should be). Whatever happens, Venezuelan politics have been more or less defined by the one-man show of hyper-corrupt, America-hating, Assad-backing, democracy-destabilizing Hugo Chavez for over twenty years; any change in leadership would have deep-seated implications for the oil-rich communist country and Latin America in general. The rumors and the questions about Venezuela’s fate have only been gaining steam, which seems to suggest that Chavez’s time as president is indeed growing short.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

As Roger Noriega points out at AEI, these certainly don’t look much like the actions of a regime that is sure its win was legitimate…

posted at 8:01 pm on May 1, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

Indeed

workingclass artist on May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM

I wonder who would have come out on top..
Obama or Mitt..

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Biteme or Paul

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM

McCain or Obama

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM

Sarah or Biteme

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM

Boehner or Botox..

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:05 PM

West or Hank

Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM

We need tazers in the senate. And, a cage in the house.
Only ONE can survive!

RovesChins on May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM

Keep duking it out, you might not get control but you may get more of a say in what goes on. The owwie looks like it hurts.

Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Do you think Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan can be out of politics by then?

Yeah. Me neither.

WryTrvllr on May 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM

A leftist, is a leftist, is a leftist.

rob verdi on May 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM

And I didn’t think Venezuelan politics could take another black-eye. Silly me.

Flange on May 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM

We can only pray that our conservative legislators, in both chambers, would do the same. I can’t tell you how much I’d give to see some jabs and right hooks on the faces of some of the wussy-Ds and -Rs, for that matter.

This would be must-see TV, for sure, and would raise the Q-factor among the LIVs for the Republicans who threw some great punches and groin kicks.

TXUS on May 1, 2013 at 8:37 PM

Flashback to 2007: “Turkish MPs fight during election reform debate.”

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on May 1, 2013 at 8:44 PM

They need a new permission structure.

Curtiss on May 1, 2013 at 8:48 PM

When Chavez got couped when first elected, the plotters failed the de gracie part. All this trouble would not be occurring if Hugo would have been given the dirt nap in 2002.

arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 9:10 PM

Eh. In Ukraine, this is simply how the chairman calls for new business. It’s so common there, that the opposition even has a ringer. Alas, he has too much class to participate.

Of course, over there it’s mostly flabby guys weakly wailing on each other, as opposed to PSUV thugs toppling and kicking women.

Gingotts on May 1, 2013 at 9:23 PM

The self-declared winner, Nicolás Maduro, is behaving very much like a man who knows he lost on April 14. In resorting to violence and brute force to silence the opposition’s demand for an honest recount, Maduro has signed the death warrant for chavismo’s legitimacy.

Don’t bet on it. As Alvaro Vargas Llosa & Co. point out in Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot, this is typical of caudillo rule in the region.

Elections there operate on the twin principles of “One man, one vote- once” and “It doesn’t matter if you win or lose, it matters that I win”. This is especially true of leftist regimes. Purges of opponents are the default action of such governments, and have been since before United Fruit Co. existed. (It exploited existing conditions; it did not create them.)

Numerous videos of soldiers and other chavista thugs chasing, beating, and shooting unarmed protesters have circulated around the world since last month’s election. …

Or in other words, they’re behaving exactly as they did under Chavez’.

Post-election analyses have shown that even many of those who had supported caudillo Hugo Chávez before his recent death were among a majority of Venezuelans who voted for change last month. And that majority now has no choice but to resist the Cuban-backed regime that cannot hold on to power, let alone govern, unless it uses violence against the Venezuelan people.

Expecting Maduro to behave differently than his former boss is what I would expect from progressives. Anyone else should have figured out by now that in a culture which tends to breed brutal dictators, those who can count on apologists from the ranks of the “enlightened” in the developed world will feel the freest to indulge themselves in their Platonic/Robespierresque fantasies.

clear ether

eon

eon on May 1, 2013 at 9:32 PM

We can only pray that our conservative legislators, in both chambers, would do the same. I can’t tell you how much I’d give to see some jabs and right hooks on the faces of some of the wussy-Ds and -Rs, for that matter.

This would be must-see TV, for sure, and would raise the Q-factor among the LIVs for the Republicans who threw some great punches and groin kicks.

TXUS on May 1, 2013 at 8:37 PM

Lindsay Grhamnesty, John “My Friends” McCant, and John Bohenor all fight like girls.

Myron Falwell on May 1, 2013 at 9:44 PM

Lindsay Grhamnesty, John “My Friends” McCant, and John Bohenor all fight like girls.

Myron Falwell on May 1, 2013 at 9:44 PM

And why I qualified my remarks. Agreed.

TXUS on May 1, 2013 at 9:55 PM

The question that I BELIEVE this leaves us with is:

Has there been ENOUGH Violence in Venezuela Over This?

williamg on May 1, 2013 at 10:04 PM

…I know some politicians in DC…I would like to look like that!
…I wouldn’t mind being their make-up artist!

KOOLAID2 on May 1, 2013 at 10:04 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preston_Brooks

unclesmrgol on May 2, 2013 at 12:12 AM

He is primarily remembered for severely beating Senator Charles Sumner

For a split second I read that as Charles Schumer, and found myself rooting for the guy.

Seriously though, easy to notice even back then that it tends to be the opponents of freedom that always jump to beating. Nasty freedom lovers standing in the way with their principles? Time to resort to thuggery. Original rabid supporters of slavery, 20th and 21st century union thugs and corruptocrats forcing us all into slavery, Venezuelan tinpot dictators overseeing a nation of slaves… nothing new under the sun.

Gingotts on May 2, 2013 at 1:25 AM

Not that I want our government to engage in unneccessary spending, especially now, but… I may be misinterpreting this article, but it sounds like this is a test or prototype fuel cost for a evaluation test program. I am assuming the company supplying the fuel is not in regular production with this fuel. The cost per gallon is not really out of line with my experience with the cost of prototype parts for my industry versus standard production costs. In our case we do not have production tools yet and there are a lot of slow & expensive prototype processes. In the case of a prototype fuel I would imagine they either run a small batch refining process or have to shut down production equipment and set up a short run, then clean the system out to go back to standard production product. Both ways would be a much more expensive process. Again I don’t think we should be doing this testing while we are running monster deficits, but the costs are probably not too far out of line. FWIW

long dogs on May 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM