<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyt65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6622119</link>
		<dc:creator>easyt65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6622119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitch McConnel is a pathetic POS, a disgrace to the GOP &amp; conservatives everywhere. during the last Debt Ceiling Increase &#039;battle&#039;, when Boehner tried to rally all the GOP together, as he attempted to negotiate with Obama behind closed doors - shame, shame, McConnel refused to help unite the Republican Party but instead crafted his OWN plan and attempted to sell it to the GOP - in competition with Boehner. This effectively divided the GOP, preventing a unified front, &amp; Obama successfully defeated the disorganized GOP, getting everything he wanted!

He may be an honorable, well-intended man, but like many MILLIONARE Republican leaders/politicians, he has been separated from the real people for too long, see constituents as &#039;monopoly pieces&#039; he &#039;plays with&#039; rather than as living, breathing, struggling people with whsoe LIVES he is playing...when he &#039;loses&#039; - he is $crewing all of US, and he feels no pain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch McConnel is a pathetic POS, a disgrace to the GOP &amp; conservatives everywhere. during the last Debt Ceiling Increase &#8216;battle&#8217;, when Boehner tried to rally all the GOP together, as he attempted to negotiate with Obama behind closed doors &#8211; shame, shame, McConnel refused to help unite the Republican Party but instead crafted his OWN plan and attempted to sell it to the GOP &#8211; in competition with Boehner. This effectively divided the GOP, preventing a unified front, &amp; Obama successfully defeated the disorganized GOP, getting everything he wanted!</p>
<p>He may be an honorable, well-intended man, but like many MILLIONARE Republican leaders/politicians, he has been separated from the real people for too long, see constituents as &#8216;monopoly pieces&#8217; he &#8216;plays with&#8217; rather than as living, breathing, struggling people with whsoe LIVES he is playing&#8230;when he &#8216;loses&#8217; &#8211; he is $crewing all of US, and he feels no pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6621402</link>
		<dc:creator>virgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6621402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;he and Joe Biden didn’t solve anything
 &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Because Joe Biden doesn’t want to solve anything.
 
He wants the overspending to continue, because his base also does. They benefit (or at least think they do) from govt overspending.

itsnotaboutme on January 6, 2013 at 8:04 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfair! Joe is busy solving the Gun thing, remember?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>he and Joe Biden didn’t solve anything
 </p></blockquote>
<p>Because Joe Biden doesn’t want to solve anything.</p>
<p>He wants the overspending to continue, because his base also does. They benefit (or at least think they do) from govt overspending.</p>
<p>itsnotaboutme on January 6, 2013 at 8:04 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>Unfair! Joe is busy solving the Gun thing, remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkdriver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6621242</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkdriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6621242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;More Conservatives from my generation need to go into reporting. If the media isn’t brought back, I don’t think our side has a prayer.

smoothsailing on January 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You were just in college, BirdPoop! You had your shot. Would be great if you could spare an hour or two of that education helping me with the garage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More Conservatives from my generation need to go into reporting. If the media isn’t brought back, I don’t think our side has a prayer.</p>
<p>smoothsailing on January 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You were just in college, BirdPoop! You had your shot. Would be great if you could spare an hour or two of that education helping me with the garage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6621153</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6621153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;These talking heads talk only sh*t.&lt;strong&gt; Why bother?&lt;/strong&gt;

Liam on January 6, 2013 at 8:03 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;...I didn&quot;t!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>These talking heads talk only sh*t.<strong> Why bother?</strong></p>
<p>Liam on January 6, 2013 at 8:03 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;I didn&#8221;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6621066</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6621066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;onlineanalyst on January 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just watched his FNC interview today. This guy is a star.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>onlineanalyst on January 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Just watched his FNC interview today. This guy is a star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6621054</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6621054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;onlineanalyst on January 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

More like Cruz. Why isn&#039;t every GOP pol explaining this? &lt;strike&gt;We&lt;/strike&gt; They are the stupid party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>onlineanalyst on January 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>More like Cruz. Why isn&#8217;t every GOP pol explaining this? <strike>We</strike> They are the stupid party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620763</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth repeating if this Cruz remark has already been cited:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Let me be clear, I do not support default on the debt and we should never default on the debt and the only players who are threatening to default are President Obama and Harry Reid. This is an issue, and earlier in the show you played the President threatening default. In any given month tax revenue are 200 billion and interest is 30 or 40 billion. There is it plenty of revenue to service the debt and any responsible President would&#039;ve stood at that podium and said &#039;whatever happens with the debt ceiling, we will always pay our debt. We&#039;ll never default on the debt&#039; and the reason the President isn&#039;t doing that is he&#039;s trying to scare people and raise the spector of financial apocalypse.&quot; - Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Fox News Sunday 1/6/12 &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth repeating if this Cruz remark has already been cited:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let me be clear, I do not support default on the debt and we should never default on the debt and the only players who are threatening to default are President Obama and Harry Reid. This is an issue, and earlier in the show you played the President threatening default. In any given month tax revenue are 200 billion and interest is 30 or 40 billion. There is it plenty of revenue to service the debt and any responsible President would&#8217;ve stood at that podium and said &#8216;whatever happens with the debt ceiling, we will always pay our debt. We&#8217;ll never default on the debt&#8217; and the reason the President isn&#8217;t doing that is he&#8217;s trying to scare people and raise the spector of financial apocalypse.&#8221; &#8211; Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Fox News Sunday 1/6/12 </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultracon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620670</link>
		<dc:creator>ultracon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I have said before, remember that all these basta*rds are the ones who worked diligently over the last couple of decades to put us in the situation that we are in.  Most of them are typical, elitist, self-serving, career politicians, more concerned for their own welfare than that of their constituents.  Anybody who doesn&#039;t believe that is an empty-headed fool.  The deal with oba-mao should have been, &quot;make all the Bush tax cuts permanent&quot;.  End of story, no negotiations, nothing.  Oba-mao, Reid, etc. would have been totally unable to counter that.  Idiots!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have said before, remember that all these basta*rds are the ones who worked diligently over the last couple of decades to put us in the situation that we are in.  Most of them are typical, elitist, self-serving, career politicians, more concerned for their own welfare than that of their constituents.  Anybody who doesn&#8217;t believe that is an empty-headed fool.  The deal with oba-mao should have been, &#8220;make all the Bush tax cuts permanent&#8221;.  End of story, no negotiations, nothing.  Oba-mao, Reid, etc. would have been totally unable to counter that.  Idiots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinidiva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620373</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinidiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;@Illinidiva I agree with you. Immigration reform is inevitable. But Rubio or Ryan? Senator and Congressman. Just not my cup of tea. Prefer a Governor.

tommy71 on January 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Both Rubio and Ryan will be running for President. The fact that both have become so interested in immigration reform is the least subtle signal ever.  I was just reporting on that fact.  

I do think that Ryan and Rubio are probably the best two Republican candidates in 2016 although I have some serious misgivings about Rubio.  There is the Gen X factor and I&#039;m not sure why the Republicans would want to give that up especially since Uncle Joe and Hillary are going to be old in 2016.  That image of the Republican candidate being hipper and more  in tune with pop culture, etc. is not something that happens very often.  And all the Republican governors have been pretty unremarkable unless you&#039;re talking Walker (who isn&#039;t going to run because his BFF Ryan is) or Jindal (who has a huge charisma deficit and has said some pretty smarmy things since the election). And I certainly hope that you aren&#039;t a fan of Krispy Kreme.  May that bully flameout spectacularly.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;Amnesty isn’t happening unless the GOP loses the House, or Boehner violates the Hastert Rule to bring it to the floor, neither of which is likely.

Jon0815 on January 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is probably a majority in the House Republican caucus that will support some type of legislation.  The entire House Leadership will be behind it unlike the fiscal cliff split and Ryan actually cosponsoring the legislation helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>@Illinidiva I agree with you. Immigration reform is inevitable. But Rubio or Ryan? Senator and Congressman. Just not my cup of tea. Prefer a Governor.</p>
<p>tommy71 on January 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Both Rubio and Ryan will be running for President. The fact that both have become so interested in immigration reform is the least subtle signal ever.  I was just reporting on that fact.  </p>
<p>I do think that Ryan and Rubio are probably the best two Republican candidates in 2016 although I have some serious misgivings about Rubio.  There is the Gen X factor and I&#8217;m not sure why the Republicans would want to give that up especially since Uncle Joe and Hillary are going to be old in 2016.  That image of the Republican candidate being hipper and more  in tune with pop culture, etc. is not something that happens very often.  And all the Republican governors have been pretty unremarkable unless you&#8217;re talking Walker (who isn&#8217;t going to run because his BFF Ryan is) or Jindal (who has a huge charisma deficit and has said some pretty smarmy things since the election). And I certainly hope that you aren&#8217;t a fan of Krispy Kreme.  May that bully flameout spectacularly.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Amnesty isn’t happening unless the GOP loses the House, or Boehner violates the Hastert Rule to bring it to the floor, neither of which is likely.</p>
<p>Jon0815 on January 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>There is probably a majority in the House Republican caucus that will support some type of legislation.  The entire House Leadership will be behind it unlike the fiscal cliff split and Ryan actually cosponsoring the legislation helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PersonFromPorlock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620338</link>
		<dc:creator>PersonFromPorlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s no reason the GOP should cave or trade off on any issue, the President’s quest to kill off the Republican party should be blatantly obvious by now.

Speakup on January 6, 2013 at 8:56 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I&#039;m sure Republican leaders don&#039;t want to be perceived as obstructionist about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s no reason the GOP should cave or trade off on any issue, the President’s quest to kill off the Republican party should be blatantly obvious by now.</p>
<p>Speakup on January 6, 2013 at 8:56 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m sure Republican leaders don&#8217;t want to be perceived as obstructionist about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620335</link>
		<dc:creator>KW64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;To me the right thing is the Boehner rule. A dollar of real true budget cuts not smoke and mirror lies we usually get from them vs. a dollar of debt increase in the national debt.

rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 12:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Amen Brother]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To me the right thing is the Boehner rule. A dollar of real true budget cuts not smoke and mirror lies we usually get from them vs. a dollar of debt increase in the national debt.</p>
<p>rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 12:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen Brother</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodguy911</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620328</link>
		<dc:creator>rodguy911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 11:28 AM

Ted Cruz and Hume were also good on that point on Fox. They made it clear that there were plenty of dollars coming in revenue each month to pay debt service with violating the debt ceiling if other spending was restrained and defaulting would be a choice by the president if it happened. That is how to defuse the administration’s game of chicken over the debt ceiling.

KW64 on January 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM
....................................................
I agree but when I advance that same idea on other sites I get blasted for daring to give the rats something else to use against us. We may be approaching a point where we learn to ignore  the DBM and just do the right thing.
To me the right thing is the Boehner rule. A dollar of real true budget cuts not smoke and mirror lies we usually get from them vs. a dollar of debt increase in the national debt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 11:28 AM</p>
<p>Ted Cruz and Hume were also good on that point on Fox. They made it clear that there were plenty of dollars coming in revenue each month to pay debt service with violating the debt ceiling if other spending was restrained and defaulting would be a choice by the president if it happened. That is how to defuse the administration’s game of chicken over the debt ceiling.</p>
<p>KW64 on January 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
I agree but when I advance that same idea on other sites I get blasted for daring to give the rats something else to use against us. We may be approaching a point where we learn to ignore  the DBM and just do the right thing.<br />
To me the right thing is the Boehner rule. A dollar of real true budget cuts not smoke and mirror lies we usually get from them vs. a dollar of debt increase in the national debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew8787</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620311</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew8787</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be helpful if Jim Jordan would work on his posture and learn to sit up straight. 

Van Hollen walked all over Jordan because Jordan looked like a 3-year old needing a nap.

Must have been one Hell of a binge last night for Congressman Jordan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be helpful if Jim Jordan would work on his posture and learn to sit up straight. </p>
<p>Van Hollen walked all over Jordan because Jordan looked like a 3-year old needing a nap.</p>
<p>Must have been one Hell of a binge last night for Congressman Jordan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novaculus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620288</link>
		<dc:creator>novaculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;acyl72 on January 6, 2013 at 12:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Kathy Griffin?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>acyl72 on January 6, 2013 at 12:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Kathy Griffin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acyl72</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620282</link>
		<dc:creator>acyl72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate to admit it but Alan Simpson was actually pretty firm and determined on his answers.  Not a whole lot of fluff at all.  
Bowles was actually fairly agressive also and actually interupted gregory to repeat a point that was glossed over by the puppet.  

However,  not one single guest bothered to ask if maybe Simpson/Bowles could be adopted.  Not one. 

I think someone was fellating that Dionne clown under the table. He appeared very happy and giddy.  He speaks and smiles alot but makes no sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to admit it but Alan Simpson was actually pretty firm and determined on his answers.  Not a whole lot of fluff at all.<br />
Bowles was actually fairly agressive also and actually interupted gregory to repeat a point that was glossed over by the puppet.  </p>
<p>However,  not one single guest bothered to ask if maybe Simpson/Bowles could be adopted.  Not one. </p>
<p>I think someone was fellating that Dionne clown under the table. He appeared very happy and giddy.  He speaks and smiles alot but makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620270</link>
		<dc:creator>KW64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;without&lt;/em&gt; violating the debt ceiling]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>without</em> violating the debt ceiling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620267</link>
		<dc:creator>KW64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 11:28 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ted Cruz and Hume were also good on that point on Fox. They made it clear that there were plenty of dollars coming in revenue each month to pay debt service with violating the debt ceiling if other spending was restrained and defaulting would be a choice by the president if it happened. That is how to defuse the administration&#039;s game of chicken over the debt ceiling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>rodguy911 on January 6, 2013 at 11:28 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ted Cruz and Hume were also good on that point on Fox. They made it clear that there were plenty of dollars coming in revenue each month to pay debt service with violating the debt ceiling if other spending was restrained and defaulting would be a choice by the president if it happened. That is how to defuse the administration&#8217;s game of chicken over the debt ceiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solaratov</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620260</link>
		<dc:creator>Solaratov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;...did you know the guy had to spend 40 hours on Air Force 1 going back and forth? 

smoothsailing on January 6, 2013 at 8:39 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


40hrs X $180,000/hr = $7,200,000.00

And worth every dime. /s/

Can you say, &quot;imperial pResidency&quot;?

I know you can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;did you know the guy had to spend 40 hours on Air Force 1 going back and forth? </p>
<p>smoothsailing on January 6, 2013 at 8:39 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>40hrs X $180,000/hr = $7,200,000.00</p>
<p>And worth every dime. /s/</p>
<p>Can you say, &#8220;imperial pResidency&#8221;?</p>
<p>I know you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620259</link>
		<dc:creator>KW64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;You do realize that nothing is actually cut if that happens, right?

beatcanvas on January 6, 2013 at 8:51 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That depends on how its done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You do realize that nothing is actually cut if that happens, right?</p>
<p>beatcanvas on January 6, 2013 at 8:51 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>That depends on how its done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620244</link>
		<dc:creator>trigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;There is no such thing any more as a ‘journalist’. There are only reporters and liberal media hacks.

Liam on January 6, 2013 at 9:11 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&#039;Reporters&#039; are getting pretty rare, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There is no such thing any more as a ‘journalist’. There are only reporters and liberal media hacks.</p>
<p>Liam on January 6, 2013 at 9:11 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8216;Reporters&#8217; are getting pretty rare, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodguy911</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620167</link>
		<dc:creator>rodguy911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope McConnell backs up Boehner’s position that any debt ceiling increase has to be matched dollar for dollar with spending cuts. No more divide the Republicans and conquer.

KW64 on January 6, 2013 at 8:38 AM
...............................................................

McConnell was brilliant against DNC Dave. Gregory kept at him trying to get him to say he would allow the country to stop paying it&#039;s bills by refusing to authorize an increase in the debt ceiling. McConnell never even acknowledged DNC Dave. Instead he turned the issue around on whether or not zero would cut spending! That infuriated the far left commentator who gets all his questions from the DNC.
Newt was good as well pointing out how we won elections because we were not afraid to close down the govt. DNC Dave didn&#039;t like that one either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope McConnell backs up Boehner’s position that any debt ceiling increase has to be matched dollar for dollar with spending cuts. No more divide the Republicans and conquer.</p>
<p>KW64 on January 6, 2013 at 8:38 AM<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>McConnell was brilliant against DNC Dave. Gregory kept at him trying to get him to say he would allow the country to stop paying it&#8217;s bills by refusing to authorize an increase in the debt ceiling. McConnell never even acknowledged DNC Dave. Instead he turned the issue around on whether or not zero would cut spending! That infuriated the far left commentator who gets all his questions from the DNC.<br />
Newt was good as well pointing out how we won elections because we were not afraid to close down the govt. DNC Dave didn&#8217;t like that one either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExpressoBold</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620105</link>
		<dc:creator>ExpressoBold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Expresso- RWM used that analogy a week ago.

wolly4321 on January 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
.
I got it from Jazz Shaw, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/12/28/us-budget-for-dummies/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;right here on Hot Gas&lt;/a&gt; ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Expresso- RWM used that analogy a week ago.</p>
<p>wolly4321 on January 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
I got it from Jazz Shaw, <a href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/12/28/us-budget-for-dummies/" rel="nofollow">right here on Hot Gas</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy71</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620102</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Illinidiva I agree with you. Immigration reform is inevitable. But Rubio or Ryan? Senator and Congressman. Just not my cup of tea. Prefer a Governor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Illinidiva I agree with you. Immigration reform is inevitable. But Rubio or Ryan? Senator and Congressman. Just not my cup of tea. Prefer a Governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PappyD61</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620101</link>
		<dc:creator>PappyD61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Until I find out otherwise...........me likely TED CRUZ.&lt;/strong&gt;





Jeb Junior in Florida, not so much.






As a bonus, Cruz doesn&#039;t have to run for re-elect in 2016, but Rubio does.





As a national opposition party........gop still dead unless otherwise noted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Until I find out otherwise&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..me likely TED CRUZ.</strong></p>
<p>Jeb Junior in Florida, not so much.</p>
<p>As a bonus, Cruz doesn&#8217;t have to run for re-elect in 2016, but Rubio does.</p>
<p>As a national opposition party&#8230;&#8230;..gop still dead unless otherwise noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/06/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-55/comment-page-1/#comment-6620100</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237480#comment-6620100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;

******* Alert **********



White House weighs broad gun-control agenda in wake of Newtown shootings, sources say - @washingtonpost

    24 secs ago from www.washingtonpost.com by editor 
=====================================================


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-weighs-broad-gun-control-agenda-in-wake-of-newtown-shootings/2013/01/05/d281efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></p>
<p>******* Alert **********</p>
<p>White House weighs broad gun-control agenda in wake of Newtown shootings, sources say &#8211; @washingtonpost</p>
<p>    24 secs ago from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com</a> by editor<br />
=====================================================</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-weighs-broad-gun-control-agenda-in-wake-of-newtown-shootings/2013/01/05/d281efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-weighs-broad-gun-control-agenda-in-wake-of-newtown-shootings/2013/01/05/d281efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>