<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, Democrats eager for bipartisan work in new year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:32:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mixplix</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6620178</link>
		<dc:creator>mixplix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6620178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have all heard that song before, by partisan blah, blah, and it all means the same amount of lies for this coming year. With the mix of RHINO&#039;s anything is possible and when the media gets going it all turns into the mental masturbation of politicians are famous for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have all heard that song before, by partisan blah, blah, and it all means the same amount of lies for this coming year. With the mix of RHINO&#8217;s anything is possible and when the media gets going it all turns into the mental masturbation of politicians are famous for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bflat879</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619859</link>
		<dc:creator>bflat879</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed, many of the comments are calling for legislative action, i.e. passing budgets.  Just for the sake of conversation, does anyone know WHY the Democrats haven&#039;t passed a budget, in the Senate, in 4 years? 

I wonder why the national press is not telling the public what the Democrats get, if they DON&#039;T pass a budget?  You&#039;d think they would really be giving Reid and company a hard time, yet no one has done this.  Why?  

I&#039;ll give you a hint, spending has increased and the debt has gone up, all while there have been no budgets.  Now, if we really want to do something about how this government runs, perhaps we need to look at how that happened and put a stop to that, then the rest will be a lot easier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed, many of the comments are calling for legislative action, i.e. passing budgets.  Just for the sake of conversation, does anyone know WHY the Democrats haven&#8217;t passed a budget, in the Senate, in 4 years? </p>
<p>I wonder why the national press is not telling the public what the Democrats get, if they DON&#8217;T pass a budget?  You&#8217;d think they would really be giving Reid and company a hard time, yet no one has done this.  Why?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint, spending has increased and the debt has gone up, all while there have been no budgets.  Now, if we really want to do something about how this government runs, perhaps we need to look at how that happened and put a stop to that, then the rest will be a lot easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatecraft</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619624</link>
		<dc:creator>hatecraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 05:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, bipartisanship means that the republicans give the democrats everything they want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, bipartisanship means that the republicans give the democrats everything they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sackett</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619226</link>
		<dc:creator>Sackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 02:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we are headed for a full blown constitutional crisis.  And I mean the real thing, as the ideas being floated are all stupid.

$1 trillion dollar coins?

Insane.  Just watch inflation and interest rates skyrocket as all the bond buyers realize the US Federal Government is run by delusional madmen.  Result: America&#039;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.

Obama issues bonds on his own authority? ie the &quot;Constitutional Solution&quot;

Morons.  Who is going to buy a bond of doubtful legality, that may or may not being honored depending upon which political party controls power?  Result: America&#039;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.

Obama defaults by &quot;delaying&quot; bond payments.  A default no matter how you slice it.  Result: America&#039;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.

Do you really think Americans will care who is to blame if the above happens?  Democrats will get hammered too.

The frustrating thing is that there is an obvious solution for Obama.

If the debt limit is not raised then Obama as the executive must determine how to spend the incoming revenue.  First pay the interest on the debt.  Now we have not defaulted.  Then start paying the most important thing in the budget until we run out of money.  You know, the thing that every single person in America does when dealing with their own budgets.

And Obama gets to decide what to cut.  So bye bye Defense spending.  And since Obama is a beanball thrower you know he&#039;d be sure to cut any and all spending to Republican areas.  Sorry Texas, you don&#039;t get any Medicare money this year.

Sure it&#039;s abusive of authority and will cause a crisis, but not nearly as bad as any of those insanely moronic solutions up above.  Yet people keep pushing for those solutions because they are too attached to unlimited government spending.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are headed for a full blown constitutional crisis.  And I mean the real thing, as the ideas being floated are all stupid.</p>
<p>$1 trillion dollar coins?</p>
<p>Insane.  Just watch inflation and interest rates skyrocket as all the bond buyers realize the US Federal Government is run by delusional madmen.  Result: America&#8217;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.</p>
<p>Obama issues bonds on his own authority? ie the &#8220;Constitutional Solution&#8221;</p>
<p>Morons.  Who is going to buy a bond of doubtful legality, that may or may not being honored depending upon which political party controls power?  Result: America&#8217;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.</p>
<p>Obama defaults by &#8220;delaying&#8221; bond payments.  A default no matter how you slice it.  Result: America&#8217;s credit is ruined, thus necessitating either massive tax increases, or massive elimination of major government programs.</p>
<p>Do you really think Americans will care who is to blame if the above happens?  Democrats will get hammered too.</p>
<p>The frustrating thing is that there is an obvious solution for Obama.</p>
<p>If the debt limit is not raised then Obama as the executive must determine how to spend the incoming revenue.  First pay the interest on the debt.  Now we have not defaulted.  Then start paying the most important thing in the budget until we run out of money.  You know, the thing that every single person in America does when dealing with their own budgets.</p>
<p>And Obama gets to decide what to cut.  So bye bye Defense spending.  And since Obama is a beanball thrower you know he&#8217;d be sure to cut any and all spending to Republican areas.  Sorry Texas, you don&#8217;t get any Medicare money this year.</p>
<p>Sure it&#8217;s abusive of authority and will cause a crisis, but not nearly as bad as any of those insanely moronic solutions up above.  Yet people keep pushing for those solutions because they are too attached to unlimited government spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619206</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Two hours later all you have is an argument of three branches. Typical Saul Alinsky lose the argument and attack and nit pick.

Guess you agree that Establishment thinking always loses. Not a single mention of when Establishment thinking ever won an election. Of course that is unfair because you would have to go way back to Nixon and he hardly won the House.

House and Senate the two branches of the Legislative. The President the other elected branch of Government. The judiciary is not elected. The House and Senate are very much two branches. No party can win the Judiciary Branch.

Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 8:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not nitpicking, you idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two hours later all you have is an argument of three branches. Typical Saul Alinsky lose the argument and attack and nit pick.</p>
<p>Guess you agree that Establishment thinking always loses. Not a single mention of when Establishment thinking ever won an election. Of course that is unfair because you would have to go way back to Nixon and he hardly won the House.</p>
<p>House and Senate the two branches of the Legislative. The President the other elected branch of Government. The judiciary is not elected. The House and Senate are very much two branches. No party can win the Judiciary Branch.</p>
<p>Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 8:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not nitpicking, you idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steveangell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619197</link>
		<dc:creator>Steveangell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.

Two hours later all you have is an argument of three branches.  Typical Saul Alinsky lose the argument and attack and nit pick.


Guess you agree that Establishment thinking always loses.  Not a single mention of when Establishment thinking ever won an election.  Of course that is unfair because you would have to go way back to Nixon and he hardly won the House.

House and Senate the two branches of the Legislative.  The President the other elected branch of Government.  The judiciary is not elected.  The House and Senate are very much two branches.  No party can win the Judiciary Branch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>Two hours later all you have is an argument of three branches.  Typical Saul Alinsky lose the argument and attack and nit pick.</p>
<p>Guess you agree that Establishment thinking always loses.  Not a single mention of when Establishment thinking ever won an election.  Of course that is unfair because you would have to go way back to Nixon and he hardly won the House.</p>
<p>House and Senate the two branches of the Legislative.  The President the other elected branch of Government.  The judiciary is not elected.  The House and Senate are very much two branches.  No party can win the Judiciary Branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619133</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;SD Tom on January 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wrote about Comrade Chase here:

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-face-only-richard-trumka-could-love_5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Face Only Richard Trumka Could Love...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

M2RB:  Def Leppard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>SD Tom on January 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wrote about Comrade Chase here:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-face-only-richard-trumka-could-love_5.html" rel="nofollow">A Face Only Richard Trumka Could Love&#8230;</a></strong></p>
<p>M2RB:  Def Leppard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mixplix</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619131</link>
		<dc:creator>mixplix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When in the last four years has the Democrats worked together with the Republicans? Closed door sessions of the left and the right for what purpose? There seems to be a code of some sort there in DC to deny we have a dictator in office. Here on the outside of the beltway news is heavily edited to the point that truths are hardly known and of course the media swears they are the truth and when they are caught they come back with a weak apology but never held in contempt. Hel* Dan Rather refused to apologize for lieing about Bush&#039;s records.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When in the last four years has the Democrats worked together with the Republicans? Closed door sessions of the left and the right for what purpose? There seems to be a code of some sort there in DC to deny we have a dictator in office. Here on the outside of the beltway news is heavily edited to the point that truths are hardly known and of course the media swears they are the truth and when they are caught they come back with a weak apology but never held in contempt. Hel* Dan Rather refused to apologize for lieing about Bush&#8217;s records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619120</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/02/New-Hampshire-Legislator-We-Need-to-Restrict-Freedoms-of-Conservatives&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For those unaware&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a conservative project of sorts has been underway in New Hampshire since 2001. The idea is that Americans of conservative ideals are to move to New Hampshire, gather in communities, run for office, and work to drive the state toward libertarianism and conservatism. It is called the “Free State Project” and adherents are called “Free Staters.”

These Free Staters figure that the state’s motto, “Live Free or Die,” should really mean something and it is these citizens whose freedoms legislator Chase wants to oppress.

In her December 21 post, Chase wrote that, “Free Staters are the single biggest threat the state is facing today.”

“In the opinion of this Democrat, Free Staters are the single biggest threat the state is facing today. There is, legally, nothing we can do to prevent them from moving here to take over the state, which is their openly stated goal. In this country you can move anywhere you choose and they have that same right. &lt;strong&gt;What we can do is to make the environment here so unwelcoming that some will choose not to come, and some may actually leave. One way is to pass measures that will restrict the ‘freedoms’ that they think they will find here.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Written by this so-called &#039;elected official&#039; - New Hampshire 3rd District State Representative Democrat &lt;a href=&quot;http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2013/01/03/cynthia-chase.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cynthia Chase&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;[yup, that is a female]&lt;/em&gt; - on a Liberal blog called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluehampshire.com/viewRating.do;jsessionid=3AD6ED5088988B53C345D25CB2064A9A?rateCommentId=131674&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&#039;&lt;em&gt;Blue&lt;/em&gt; Hampshire&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

This is what they have planned for anyone and everyone who does not jump on their bandwagon.

Why would &lt;em&gt;Preezy of the United Steezy&lt;/em&gt; Barack Hussein Obama do anything different?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/02/New-Hampshire-Legislator-We-Need-to-Restrict-Freedoms-of-Conservatives" rel="nofollow"><strong>For those unaware</strong></a>, a conservative project of sorts has been underway in New Hampshire since 2001. The idea is that Americans of conservative ideals are to move to New Hampshire, gather in communities, run for office, and work to drive the state toward libertarianism and conservatism. It is called the “Free State Project” and adherents are called “Free Staters.”</p>
<p>These Free Staters figure that the state’s motto, “Live Free or Die,” should really mean something and it is these citizens whose freedoms legislator Chase wants to oppress.</p>
<p>In her December 21 post, Chase wrote that, “Free Staters are the single biggest threat the state is facing today.”</p>
<p>“In the opinion of this Democrat, Free Staters are the single biggest threat the state is facing today. There is, legally, nothing we can do to prevent them from moving here to take over the state, which is their openly stated goal. In this country you can move anywhere you choose and they have that same right. <strong>What we can do is to make the environment here so unwelcoming that some will choose not to come, and some may actually leave. One way is to pass measures that will restrict the ‘freedoms’ that they think they will find here.</strong>&#8220;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Written by this so-called &#8216;elected official&#8217; &#8211; New Hampshire 3rd District State Representative Democrat <a href="http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2013/01/03/cynthia-chase.jpg" rel="nofollow"><strong>Cynthia Chase</strong></a> <em>[yup, that is a female]</em> &#8211; on a Liberal blog called <a href="http://www.bluehampshire.com/viewRating.do;jsessionid=3AD6ED5088988B53C345D25CB2064A9A?rateCommentId=131674" rel="nofollow"><strong>&#8216;<em>Blue</em> Hampshire&#8217;</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This is what they have planned for anyone and everyone who does not jump on their bandwagon.</p>
<p>Why would <em>Preezy of the United Steezy</em> Barack Hussein Obama do anything different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfShadow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619104</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfShadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They keep spelling it wrong:

BUY Partisan...buy our partisan line...or else no cookies!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They keep spelling it wrong:</p>
<p>BUY Partisan&#8230;buy our partisan line&#8230;or else no cookies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kettlewell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619102</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kettlewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contraction should be occuring by March regardless. 2% away from the market society and toward federal governance. Then the health-insurance premiums increase, an additional $20-$100 per week transferred from where it would have gone, into the insurance pile.

This will have the same result as high gasoline prices; whereby &quot;the pie&quot; has it&#039;s slices adjusted. The health-care sector will increase, but the rest of the economies will suffer from the shift.

I expect a near zero first-quarter, possibly negative. It&#039;s unfortunate this &quot;debate&quot; won&#039;t be in April instead. If adjustments aren&#039;t made, there may very well be a recession, by definition.

here&#039;s a decent read:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-04/how-fiat-currency-leads-collective-corruption]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contraction should be occuring by March regardless. 2% away from the market society and toward federal governance. Then the health-insurance premiums increase, an additional $20-$100 per week transferred from where it would have gone, into the insurance pile.</p>
<p>This will have the same result as high gasoline prices; whereby &#8220;the pie&#8221; has it&#8217;s slices adjusted. The health-care sector will increase, but the rest of the economies will suffer from the shift.</p>
<p>I expect a near zero first-quarter, possibly negative. It&#8217;s unfortunate this &#8220;debate&#8221; won&#8217;t be in April instead. If adjustments aren&#8217;t made, there may very well be a recession, by definition.</p>
<p>here&#8217;s a decent read:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-04/how-fiat-currency-leads-collective-corruption" rel="nofollow">http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-04/how-fiat-currency-leads-collective-corruption</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619048</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I know that the US is a Republic&lt;strike&gt;an&lt;/strike&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know that the US is a Republic<strike>an</strike>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Schaef</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6619046</link>
		<dc:creator>The Schaef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6619046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let it burn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let it burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618998</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;And, Stevie, this is equally stupid. None “rule” in a democracy although the Court rules, as in holds, routinely.

Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 6:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, I know that the US is a Republican.  What I mean is that it is a democratic form as far as elected officials versus a ruler, ie, monarch or dicKtator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And, Stevie, this is equally stupid. None “rule” in a democracy although the Court rules, as in holds, routinely.</p>
<p>Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 6:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I know that the US is a Republican.  What I mean is that it is a democratic form as far as elected officials versus a ruler, ie, monarch or dicKtator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618995</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Technically correct. But it is common to use this. Only three rule the other the Judicial is lifetime appointments.

Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 4:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And, Stevie, this is equally stupid.  None &quot;rule&quot; in a democracy although the Court rules, as in holds, routinely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Technically correct. But it is common to use this. Only three rule the other the Judicial is lifetime appointments.</p>
<p>Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 4:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>And, Stevie, this is equally stupid.  None &#8220;rule&#8221; in a democracy although the Court rules, as in holds, routinely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hucklebuck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618994</link>
		<dc:creator>Hucklebuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the current Repub leadership in place, it will work like a charm!  Their main aspect is fear: of the press, or the electorate, of the WH.  (&quot;Oh my gosh, we have to do everything we can not to be blamed if anything goes wrong!! David Gregory might not have lunch with me!&quot;)

They&#039;ve had my last vote.

Default is the only option.  

Burn, baby, burn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the current Repub leadership in place, it will work like a charm!  Their main aspect is fear: of the press, or the electorate, of the WH.  (&#8220;Oh my gosh, we have to do everything we can not to be blamed if anything goes wrong!! David Gregory might not have lunch with me!&#8221;)</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve had my last vote.</p>
<p>Default is the only option.  </p>
<p>Burn, baby, burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listens2glenn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618989</link>
		<dc:creator>listens2glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;gophergirl&lt;/strong&gt; on January 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
.
I agree with your sentiment, but unfortunately I feel like we lost the propaganda war a long time ago.

&lt;strong&gt;TarheelBen&lt;/strong&gt; on January 5, 2013 at 5:42 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
.
I&#039;m not holding your &quot;feelings&quot; against you, but I&#039;m telling you the war&#039;s not OVER.
But it &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; been defaulted on, by the Republican leadership. . &lt;strong&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; (]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><strong>gophergirl</strong> on January 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
I agree with your sentiment, but unfortunately I feel like we lost the propaganda war a long time ago.</p>
<p><strong>TarheelBen</strong> on January 5, 2013 at 5:42 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
I&#8217;m not holding your &#8220;feelings&#8221; against you, but I&#8217;m telling you the war&#8217;s not OVER.<br />
But it <em>has</em> been defaulted on, by the Republican leadership. . <strong>:</strong> (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stukinIL4now</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618985</link>
		<dc:creator>stukinIL4now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What like all that bipartisan work we saw last year? And the year before that? And the decade before that? Yeah, right. But I guess they gotta make it look good for spoon-feeding the little low-info massively lazeee Obamuh knuckleheads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What like all that bipartisan work we saw last year? And the year before that? And the decade before that? Yeah, right. But I guess they gotta make it look good for spoon-feeding the little low-info massively lazeee Obamuh knuckleheads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealMc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618969</link>
		<dc:creator>RealMc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the words of Eddie Murphy:

Wanna lick?, PSYCH!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of Eddie Murphy:</p>
<p>Wanna lick?, PSYCH!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rplat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618955</link>
		<dc:creator>rplat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give him whatever he wants and let the country fall into fiscal oblivion.  Not until he drives this sick Republic straight down a bankrupt rat hole will his idiot supporters understand the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give him whatever he wants and let the country fall into fiscal oblivion.  Not until he drives this sick Republic straight down a bankrupt rat hole will his idiot supporters understand the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TarheelBen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618941</link>
		<dc:creator>TarheelBen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Republicans have to start now – go on every station you can, be interviewed by as many people as you can. Heck go on the Daily Show and Jimmy Kimmel Live if you have to.

Tell the American People what our position is.

Messaging! Messaging! Messaging!

gophergirl on January 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with your sentiment, but unfortunately I feel like we lost the propaganda war a long time ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Republicans have to start now – go on every station you can, be interviewed by as many people as you can. Heck go on the Daily Show and Jimmy Kimmel Live if you have to.</p>
<p>Tell the American People what our position is.</p>
<p>Messaging! Messaging! Messaging!</p>
<p>gophergirl on January 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with your sentiment, but unfortunately I feel like we lost the propaganda war a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMbx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618928</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;For the rest of us we will go with the traditional political meaning of three branches House, Senate and President.

Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 4:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to see what constitutes &quot;the traditional political meaning of three branches House, Senate and President.&quot;

A history book?  NYT style guide? MSM common usage?  

Help me out here.

BTW, its tradition here at HA to rake those who continue to argue a point that has been proven to be wrong over the coals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For the rest of us we will go with the traditional political meaning of three branches House, Senate and President.</p>
<p>Steveangell on January 5, 2013 at 4:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see what constitutes &#8220;the traditional political meaning of three branches House, Senate and President.&#8221;</p>
<p>A history book?  NYT style guide? MSM common usage?  </p>
<p>Help me out here.</p>
<p>BTW, its tradition here at HA to rake those who continue to argue a point that has been proven to be wrong over the coals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618927</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HotAir, Rush, Beck, Drudge, Hannity, Towhnall, MRC, TWS, etc... We&#039;re painted into a relative &quot;extremist&quot; bubble and not reaching the un/mis-informed masses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HotAir, Rush, Beck, Drudge, Hannity, Towhnall, MRC, TWS, etc&#8230; We&#8217;re painted into a relative &#8220;extremist&#8221; bubble and not reaching the un/mis-informed masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618917</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The new strategy seems to be one of demanding what you want and daring the GOP to not go along with it, trusting that the story will be spun well enough in the press that the media will dutifully predict that Republicans will be blamed if a worst case scenario comes to pass.&lt;/blockquote&gt;New?  

The media are the referees, and the game is fixed.  Obama knows this, and will continue to take full advantage.  

As we watch football this weekend, imagine how impossible it would be for one of the teams to win if breathing constitued a &quot;false start&quot; or &quot;off sides&quot; while the other team could move all they wanted prior to the snap.  

I think that&#039;s a pretty good analogy for where we are today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The new strategy seems to be one of demanding what you want and daring the GOP to not go along with it, trusting that the story will be spun well enough in the press that the media will dutifully predict that Republicans will be blamed if a worst case scenario comes to pass.</p></blockquote>
<p>New?  </p>
<p>The media are the referees, and the game is fixed.  Obama knows this, and will continue to take full advantage.  </p>
<p>As we watch football this weekend, imagine how impossible it would be for one of the teams to win if breathing constitued a &#8220;false start&#8221; or &#8220;off sides&#8221; while the other team could move all they wanted prior to the snap.  </p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a pretty good analogy for where we are today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rio Linda Refugee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/05/obama-democrats-eager-for-bipartisan-work-in-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6618916</link>
		<dc:creator>Rio Linda Refugee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237496#comment-6618916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[don&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;lump&lt;/strong&gt; those of us]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t <strong>lump</strong> those of us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>