<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House buckling on HHS mandate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking&#8230;.Obama administration backs off on HHS contraception for religious groups? &#124; Politicaldog101.Com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6691178</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking&#8230;.Obama administration backs off on HHS contraception for religious groups? &#124; Politicaldog101.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6691178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Don’t be.  The Obama administration is under court order to produce a new version of the HHS mandate, thanks to a federal court that essentially forced [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don’t be.  The Obama administration is under court order to produce a new version of the HHS mandate, thanks to a federal court that essentially forced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Administration Rolling Back the HHS Mandate? CNN Thinks &#8220;Yes.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6691091</link>
		<dc:creator>The Administration Rolling Back the HHS Mandate? CNN Thinks &#8220;Yes.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6691091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are morally opposed to,” said the source.Surprised?  Don’t be.  The Obama administration is under court order to produce a new version of the HHS mandate, thanks to a federal court that essentially forced [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are morally opposed to,” said the source.Surprised?  Don’t be.  The Obama administration is under court order to produce a new version of the HHS mandate, thanks to a federal court that essentially forced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizens 4 Freedom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6587213</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizens 4 Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6587213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;White House buckling on HHS mandate?...&lt;/strong&gt;

...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>White House buckling on HHS mandate?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleuries</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6587073</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleuries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6587073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;...requires a religious order to provide free contraception coverage to celibate nuns... &lt;/blockquote&gt;

and also requires they pay for maternity coverage? Ahem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;requires a religious order to provide free contraception coverage to celibate nuns&#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p>and also requires they pay for maternity coverage? Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_Crater</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6586809</link>
		<dc:creator>J_Crater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6586809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s all part of the stealth White House &quot;War on Women&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all part of the stealth White House &#8220;War on Women&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unravel #5 Continues To Unravel &#151; Hillary Is 44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6586209</link>
		<dc:creator>Unravel #5 Continues To Unravel &#151; Hillary Is 44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6586209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] influential and powerful District of Columbia Appeals Court and leads many to ask &#8211; is the White House buckling on HHS mandate? In a press release the victorious Becket Fund provides the news:  &#8220;Today, a federal appeals [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] influential and powerful District of Columbia Appeals Court and leads many to ask &#8211; is the White House buckling on HHS mandate? In a press release the victorious Becket Fund provides the news:  &#8220;Today, a federal appeals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdp629</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585815</link>
		<dc:creator>jdp629</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HHS mandate has served its purpose: keeping alive the meme that republicans want to outlaw contraception.  It will be quietly dropped now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HHS mandate has served its purpose: keeping alive the meme that republicans want to outlaw contraception.  It will be quietly dropped now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott H</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585499</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might point out t=hat the Obama Administration has ignored judicial decisions before, with energy permits.

Why should they listen to this one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might point out t=hat the Obama Administration has ignored judicial decisions before, with energy permits.</p>
<p>Why should they listen to this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marybel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585360</link>
		<dc:creator>marybel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This HHS mandate was conceived and delivered as political candy for the &quot;Julia&quot; masses to help Obama with single women voters.  It worked and its usefulness is pretty much over and done with.   

It was issued with an expiration date somewhere beyond November 6, 2012.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This HHS mandate was conceived and delivered as political candy for the &#8220;Julia&#8221; masses to help Obama with single women voters.  It worked and its usefulness is pretty much over and done with.   </p>
<p>It was issued with an expiration date somewhere beyond November 6, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWalker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585286</link>
		<dc:creator>SWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;SWalker on December 19, 2012 at 1:29 PM

Excellent my good fellow!! :-)

Scrumpy on December 19, 2012 at 2:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why thank you Scrumpy, that is my &quot;Christmas Blog Post&quot; I do hope you had as much fun reading it as I did writing it. If we lose our ability to laugh we will lose everything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>SWalker on December 19, 2012 at 1:29 PM</p>
<p>Excellent my good fellow!! :-)</p>
<p>Scrumpy on December 19, 2012 at 2:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Why thank you Scrumpy, that is my &#8220;Christmas Blog Post&#8221; I do hope you had as much fun reading it as I did writing it. If we lose our ability to laugh we will lose everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585283</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;When the government requires a religious order to provide free contraception coverage to celibate nuns, we’ve gone beyond political satire and into the bureaucratic deep weeds.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;No, the really scary part is that such a requirement MAKES SENSE to the liberal mind!&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When the government requires a religious order to provide free contraception coverage to celibate nuns, we’ve gone beyond political satire and into the bureaucratic deep weeds.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>No, the really scary part is that such a requirement MAKES SENSE to the liberal mind!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrumpy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585281</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SWalker on December 19, 2012 at 1:29 PM 

Excellent my good fellow!! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SWalker on December 19, 2012 at 1:29 PM </p>
<p>Excellent my good fellow!! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doufree</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585272</link>
		<dc:creator>doufree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will see.  If HHS does not perform, what remedy will the DC appeals court be willing to impose. Anny involuntary would be challenged.


I have to laugh out loud when conservative pundits suggest the Obama Administration must obey the rule of law.

Ha! I laugh again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see.  If HHS does not perform, what remedy will the DC appeals court be willing to impose. Anny involuntary would be challenged.</p>
<p>I have to laugh out loud when conservative pundits suggest the Obama Administration must obey the rule of law.</p>
<p>Ha! I laugh again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zumkopf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585267</link>
		<dc:creator>Zumkopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Becket Fund link shows the Fund site as having been suspended.  Not sure why.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Becket Fund link shows the Fund site as having been suspended.  Not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedInMD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585266</link>
		<dc:creator>RedInMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Either that, or a paper bag.

NapaConservative on December 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM
Or a level of intoxication that leads to death

22044 on December 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM 


&lt;/blockquote&gt;heard a saying once, go to bed at 2 with a 10, get up at 10 with a 2. That Fluker definitely qualifies for that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Either that, or a paper bag.</p>
<p>NapaConservative on December 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM<br />
Or a level of intoxication that leads to death</p>
<p>22044 on December 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM </p>
</blockquote>
<p>heard a saying once, go to bed at 2 with a 10, get up at 10 with a 2. That Fluker definitely qualifies for that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamsaved</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585250</link>
		<dc:creator>iamsaved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We get legislation like Obamacare because of the idiots we elect over and over again. We&#039;re in store for a whole lot of regulatory surprises from HHS.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.westernjournalism.com/if-obama-was-white-he-wouldnt-be-president/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Common sense has left the building.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We get legislation like Obamacare because of the idiots we elect over and over again. We&#8217;re in store for a whole lot of regulatory surprises from HHS.  <a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/if-obama-was-white-he-wouldnt-be-president/" rel="nofollow">Common sense has left the building.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585237</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Weren’t we told that Catholics secretly were thanking HHS for this mandate? They couldn’t say it in public but they really wanted Flukecare. Because, after all, if a slut at a top law school can blow through $10K of contraception a year I can only imagine how much it would cost for 300 nuns!]

Woowee, what kind of contraception is she using that would cost $10k. All I know, is that it’s only $10 a month…as per my daughter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Weren’t we told that Catholics secretly were thanking HHS for this mandate? They couldn’t say it in public but they really wanted Flukecare. Because, after all, if a slut at a top law school can blow through $10K of contraception a year I can only imagine how much it would cost for 300 nuns!]</p>
<p>Woowee, what kind of contraception is she using that would cost $10k. All I know, is that it’s only $10 a month…as per my daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22044</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585224</link>
		<dc:creator>22044</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Either that, or a paper bag.

NapaConservative on December 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or a level of intoxication that leads to death]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Either that, or a paper bag.</p>
<p>NapaConservative on December 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Or a level of intoxication that leads to death</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585213</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;    Heh! With that face, I’m guessing a box goes pretty far.

    Happy Nomad on December 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t kiss her, even with your lips. 

:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    Heh! With that face, I’m guessing a box goes pretty far.</p>
<p>    Happy Nomad on December 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t kiss her, even with your lips. </p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveDief</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585208</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveDief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;This decision forces an end to that strategy.  The “intense questioning” forced the administration to make what the appellate court considers a binding submission, and now has to produce a revamped rule that won’t infringe on religious liberty.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In a nutshell this means the Democrats are going to try to rework the worst piece of legislation ever passed by Congress. What could possibly go wrong?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This decision forces an end to that strategy.  The “intense questioning” forced the administration to make what the appellate court considers a binding submission, and now has to produce a revamped rule that won’t infringe on religious liberty.</p></blockquote>
<p>In a nutshell this means the Democrats are going to try to rework the worst piece of legislation ever passed by Congress. What could possibly go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWalker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585164</link>
		<dc:creator>SWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/breaking-news/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Breaking News: Breathtakingly shocking US Federal Government Scandal Exposed.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/breaking-news/" rel="nofollow">Breaking News: Breathtakingly shocking US Federal Government Scandal Exposed.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMbx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585160</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP suffering from ED; Judiciary grows a pair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP suffering from ED; Judiciary grows a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585158</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...where there is a will...there is a way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;where there is a will&#8230;there is a way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585149</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Too busy trying to ban guns while driving us over the fiscal cliff.

JPeterman on December 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have absolutely no doubt that 0bama wants us to go over the &quot;fiscal cliff.&quot;  The reason being that in the ensuing chaos, the attention will be diverted away from the devastating avalanche of tax increases that 0bamacare will bestow on all Americans, especially on the poor and middle class who can least afford it.

He needs to blame that on the Republicans somehow, and the &quot;fiscal cliff&quot; is the perfect cover.  He is doing everything he can to avoid a deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Too busy trying to ban guns while driving us over the fiscal cliff.</p>
<p>JPeterman on December 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I have absolutely no doubt that 0bama wants us to go over the &#8220;fiscal cliff.&#8221;  The reason being that in the ensuing chaos, the attention will be diverted away from the devastating avalanche of tax increases that 0bamacare will bestow on all Americans, especially on the poor and middle class who can least afford it.</p>
<p>He needs to blame that on the Republicans somehow, and the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; is the perfect cover.  He is doing everything he can to avoid a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schadenfreude</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/white-house-buckling-on-hhs-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-6585148</link>
		<dc:creator>Schadenfreude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235412#comment-6585148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Mhhh, just think that I could have replaced this ultra conservative Mr. Bork with Sandra Fluke” — Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mhhh, just think that I could have replaced this ultra conservative Mr. Bork with Sandra Fluke” — Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>