You couldn’t make a little girl run away.

MelonCollie on December 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM

awwwww precious….I sense butt-hurt….and a massively out-of-control ego given your obvious lack of substance.

How about we get back to you explaining the whole “Lifestyle BS” oh wise one?

Tim_CA on December 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM

um…..waiting…..?

So….you’re obviously not a little girl (per you…I can’t make them run away)…so you must be “in bed” again.

Where’s that super smart good speller who knows how to “argue”?

(lol)

You couldn’t make a little girl run away.

MelonCollie on December 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM

awwwww precious….I sense butt-hurt….and a massively out-of-control ego given your obvious lack of substance.

How about we get back to you explaining the whole “Lifestyle BS” oh wise one?

Huh. Ran Away.

And you’re such a good speller too.

Tim_CA on December 19, 2012 at 1:33 AM

Better than you’ll ever be. And going to bed at past midnight is not ‘running’, Bubba McMoron, and you know it. You couldn’t make a little girl run away.

Learn to spell and argue Timmy-boy.

MelonCollie on December 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM

Tim_CA on December 19, 2012 at 12:50 AM

Huh. Ran Away.

And you’re such a good speller too.

Mimzey is exactly right. The real motives are for destructive lifestyles to be seen as perfectly normal. Except potheads won’t sue churches, hopefully.

MelonCollie on December 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM

So help me oh wise one….how is smoking pot a “lifestyle”?

Is having a drink a “Lifestyle”?

How about a cup of coffee?

A ciggie or cigar perhaps?

What about anti-siezure meds prescribed by your M.D.?

Grow the frig up.

Legal issues by your state aside, smoking a joint is smoking a joint….just like taking a drink is taking a drink. Nothing more, nothing less

If it was even 1/10 as bad for you as you geniuses want to pretend it is….everyone who went to college in the 70′s and 80′s would be friggin’ dead.

By all means oh wise one….let the government make your choices for you….it worked so friggin’ well during prohibition.

Friggin’ “Lifestyle”….FFS.

For if there’s one thing on which we can all agree, it is that legalization more guns will mean even more use by even more people crime.

Good Lord your an idiot.

Tim_CA on December 18, 2012 at 9:51 PM

Learn to spell and argue Timmy-boy.

Mimzey is exactly right. The real motives are for destructive lifestyles to be seen as perfectly normal. Except potheads won’t sue churches, hopefully.

Please show me ANY study that proves that everyone reacts to pot smoking the same way as you do.

NapaConservative on December 18, 2012 at 8:27 PM

WTF does that even mean, moron?

Who said they do?

It’s not “equality” or “fairness” that activists on both issues really want, nor is it a “right”. It’s a demand for acceptance by society of the lifestyle and activity.

Mimzey on December 18, 2012 at 3:32 PM

Good Lord your an idiot.

WTF is wrong with you?

Please show me ANY study that proves this absolutely INANE theory.

Have smoked pot on and off since I was in my teens.

Graduated college with 3 years on the Deens list and my senior year I made the President’s Honor Role.

Had a successful career and retired at age 50.

Your stupidity is absolutely breathtaking….have another drinkie skippy.

Tim_CA on December 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM

Please show me ANY study that proves that everyone reacts to pot smoking the same way as you do.

I didn’t see anyone address this assertion. I disagree. From around 1975, Alaska had legalized personal use of marijuana. Studies in the later decades showed teenage use of pot in Alaska to be lower than other States. Teenagers saw marijuana users as aging hippies and they didn’t want to be like them.

Today, with marijuana illegal, marijuana is so widely available, that anyone who wants to obtain marijuana can. How many of them are attracted to marijuana due as a “forbidden fruit”? Will the number of users of marijuana increase or decrease? No one knows, which is a far cry from everyone can agree.

listens2glenn on December 18, 2012 at 1:27 AM

.
Marijuana being legalized no more makes it less of a crime to drive while stoned than alcohol being legal makes it legal to drive drunk.

Slowburn on December 18, 2012 at 2:14 AM

.
But that doesn’t that mean “no problem”, or “problem solved.”

Being illegal didn’t stop Ricky Gates. Because of that incident, the Federal Government is now in the business of licensing all railroad engineers. The railroad industry didn’t need that, and the survivors of those killed at Chase, Md didn’t need to deal with pre-mature funerals.

Public “stigma”, is the best way to deal with this.
That will require a revival of Christianity.

whether we want to add another detrimental influence on upward mobility and prosperity at this particular moment in time

WTF is wrong with you?

Please show me ANY study that proves this absolutely INANE theory.

Have smoked pot on and off since I was in my teens.

Graduated college with 3 years on the Deens list and my senior year I made the President’s Honor Role.

Had a successful career and retired at age 50.

Your stupidity is absolutely breathtaking….have another drinkie skippy.

listens2glenn on December 18, 2012 at 1:27 AM

Marijuana being legalized no more makes it less of a crime to drive while stoned than alcohol being legal makes it legal to drive drunk.

Given the evidence that drug prohibition has not stopped a statistically significant number of people from using. The stoners are already driving.

Slowburn on December 17, 2012 at 11:34 PM

.
Or operating railroad locomotives, before the accident at Chase, Md, January 1987.

For if there’s one thing on which we can all agree, it is that legalization will mean even more use by even more people

If he’s just going to start making crap up and mandating that I agree with it, I’m not going to bother reading the rest.

MelonCollie on December 17, 2012 at 11:00 PM

The stoners are already on the other side.

KOOLAID2 on December 17, 2012 at 11:15 PM

Given the evidence that drug prohibition has not stopped a statistically significant number of people from using. The stoners are already driving.

The wannabe tyrants on the left must be laughing themselves sick.

I take it you don’t believe the report from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, either.

Then, who’s monumentally stoopid, Sparky?

And, don’t bogart the cheetohs, duuude.

If you believe it’s not harmless, why do you want to legalize it,

kingsjester on December 17, 2012 at 5:13 PM

Good God, sometimes you are breathtakingly stupid.

Alcohol is not harmless. You would have been arguing against repal of the 18th Amendment.

Which, as has been proven quite sufficiently, would have put you on the stupid side of history…

listens2glenn on December 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM

.
As buffoonish as it is to value an employee by how he spends his recreational time, rather than his body of work, they are.

bocat on December 17, 2012 at 8:33 PM

.
IF . . . . . employers were not allowed to discriminate against users, what’s to keep a user from using ‘on the job?’

The better choice would be to allow voters in each state to decide what kind of laws they want about marijuana use and have the federal government get out of the way. We can look at the results of these choices in a closer light and compare and contrast legalization with prohibition more rationally.

Well said Ed. It’s the basis of our 10th amendment. The states are the laboratories of democracy.