Westboro Baptist to protest Newtown?
posted at 12:31 pm on December 16, 2012 by Jazz Shaw
As if things weren’t bad enough in Newtown, Connecticut already, word has begun circulating that they may be the recipients of some unsavory and most decidedly unwelcome “guests” today in connection with President Obama’s visit. The members of Westboro Baptist Church, (yes… those guys again) are apparently threatening to protest at the funerals of the slain children.
On Saturday, Shirley Phelps-Roper – a member of the extremely controversial Westboro Baptist Church – messaged with a tweet on the social media platform of Twitter:
Westboro will picket Sandy Hook Elementary School to sing praise to God for the glory of his work in executing his judgment.
The message on Twitter was sent the day after 20 children and six adults were killed by Adam Lanza in the horrific massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
Words simply can not describe how disgusting this would be nor the possible reaction to it. But the Westboro clan won’t have all smooth sailing. Members of Reddit are planning a counter-march to block them if they show up. The Phelps folk have attracted some enemies of their own as well, including one of the most odd pairings I can recall seeing. The hacker group Anonymous has set their sights on Westboro, already hacking their web site and releasing the personal details of their members.
The hacking collective known as Anonymous renewed their war on the Westboro Baptist Church today. After the haters from the infamous church posted their intentions to picket the funerals of the twenty children killed in the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, Anonymous responded by re-posting the personal and professional information for members of the church on the Internet. Now the general public can contact the church members directly and tell them what they think about people who would desecrate the funerals of murdered children.
No matter how revolting this entire situation becomes, I still have one question about the key players here. Does the Baptist Church have any measure of control over who uses their name? I know that when there is a new Catholic church erected, closed or moved, there’s a rather lengthy process involved so they maintain some level of control over their locations. Do the Baptists have nothing similar, or can just anyone go throw a sign up on their garage proclaiming it a Baptist Church and begin slaughtering chickens? It just seems to me that they would have distanced themselves entirely from these Phelps idiots by now if they have any control over it.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Can’t wait to hear about how “even Al Qaeda thinks our path to citizenship is weak”
El_Terrible on April 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM
Al Gaeda does background checks? Assault rifle bans too?
forest on April 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM
They’re ignorant and don’t know what the hell they’re talking about. Not that it’s ever stopped them before.
GarandFan on April 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Do they also offer their opinions about our voter ID system, too?
Sir Napsalot on April 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM
Al Qaeda took advantage of our lax immigration system, and yet, we are loosening THAT and Morning Hoes is crickets on THAT.
Joe, come out of the closet already. Embrace your inner commie already!
RovesChins on April 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Actually, you can, but the process involves a more thorough background check and a pocketful of money. You have to pay a transfer tax. The number of civilian market full-autos is limited and demand is high, so the weapons all have hefty price tags. (The real $$$ killer is the cost of ammunition, which the Class III dealers don’t mention!)
These NFA registry weapons are virtually never involved in crimes.
novaculus on April 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM
MSDNC had to scrub the first take of this bit when someone figured that Mika saying “And now we go to our special field correspondent Adam Gadahn…well good morning, Adam…” might not go over all that well.
Bishop on April 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM
And, also with internet sales. The weapon has to be shipped to a FFL licensed dealer. Apparently Mancin and Toomey didn’t take the trouble to look that up.
a capella on April 11, 2013 at 5:20 PM
They’ve gone from comedy to self-parody.
Ward Cleaver on April 11, 2013 at 5:21 PM
It’s a wee bit too much of “the enemy of my enemy…” for my taste but I guess that makes me an Islamophobe.
Drained Brain on April 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM
Maybe we follow Al Qaeda’s lead on Homosexuality and Gays playing house in marital bliss?
Whaddya think bout dat mika-poo ?
FlaMurph on April 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM
Yes, but is Al Qaeda’s position on gay marriage evolving?
rbj on April 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM
Well, it for sure knows Barry’s admin is weak, so all else follows.
hawkeye54 on April 11, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Probably the later. He probably gets his information from the same place all of HA’s liberal trolls do. And considering he has no clue whatsoever about purchasing automatic weapons in the US he has obviously never attempted to procure weapons himself inside the US. Yet we will have to listen to ignorant leftists drone on about how stupid us pro-gunners are because we don’t take heed what their fellow ignoramus Gadahn has to say on the issue.
NotCoach on April 11, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Why do you and other conservatives insist on treating Joe Scarborough and MSNBC as if they were mainstream and/or journalists when they are neither.
That punk has never come clean as to why he had to resign his seat right after being reelected.
I don’t have MSNBC on my channel lists. Who gives a rat’s patootie what that bunch of leftist nuts say?
Adjoran on April 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM
I do think Al Qaeda members are more thoughtful about the future of the US, and our policies, than Democrats are.
Fenris on April 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM
Al Qaeda took advantage of our lax immigration system, and yet, we are loosening THAT and Morning Hoes is crickets on THAT.
Joe, come out of the closet already. Embrace your inner commie already!
RovesChins on April 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM
oh yeah..you mean when they used US flight schools as training camps for 9/11?
That was smart power.
hmmm mmm mmm
We also gave underwear bomber access to us via visa.
And many more…
Hamas is in Meheco eying our week a$$ border now…laughing like demons.
bazil9 on April 11, 2013 at 5:42 PM
I thought only the drug cartels were able to procure fully automatic weapons here.
fourdeucer on April 11, 2013 at 5:42 PM
How come Al Qaeda knows we already do background but liberals don’t?
darwin on April 11, 2013 at 5:43 PM
Well, I’d venture to guess liberals think no one does background checks because mass murderers acquire fire arms so easily. Obviously, we don’t have background checks, otherwise potential mass murderers would be subjected to background checks and incidents such as at Sandy Hook could never occur.
hawkeye54 on April 11, 2013 at 5:49 PM
Well, they’re the only ones we know of allowed to procure them no questions asked with full Federal approval.
hawkeye54 on April 11, 2013 at 5:50 PM
It sure would be nice if someone was held accountable…
Seven Percent Solution on April 11, 2013 at 5:50 PM
rogerb on April 11, 2013 at 5:53 PM
They had seen the clip ahead of time, so they or their staff would have had time to check it. “Fully automatic” is always a huge red flag, and it’s hard to imagine they wouldn’t catch it, but maybe they really are just that stupid.
theperfecteconomist on April 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM
Hey Joe… AQ would turn you into their sniveling little Bi*ch Boy before they let you off the hook with a public beheading… I say we run with that meme too…
RalphyBoy on April 11, 2013 at 6:01 PM
Not really. After all our president just repeated the exact same lie recently. I believe that most really are this stupid. I believe that the depth of their firearm knowledge is the last action movie they saw.
NotCoach on April 11, 2013 at 6:03 PM
Morning Joe? Is tat the asinine show that devotes their first hour to gun control every day?
It’s so pathetic it makes Piers Morgans propaganda hour look entertaining.
N Korea could hit Japan with a missile tomorrow and that rag show wouldn’t get around to mentioning until the second hour. Phhhht
Bensonofben on April 11, 2013 at 6:05 PM
You also have to have a Class III firearms license to buy/possess automatic weapons. The seller, also, has to have the proper license, not just an FFL.
There is so much lying attached to this issue, most people really don’t know the truth.
And the media simply perpetuate the lies…
Smh.
catmman on April 11, 2013 at 6:06 PM
It’s all so surreal.
The President who got caught selling high powered assault weapons to drug cartels in Mexico lecturing us on gun safety.
The only individuals in this whole mess who need to have their guns banned work for the government.
JellyToast on April 11, 2013 at 6:09 PM
I don’t know about any of you but their coming at us in unprecedented ways here and accelerating it getting more reckless and assertive. I’m done talking to the choir as we sit here at our keyboards thinking we’re making a change by communicating with each other that are in agreement here while every day Obama tightens his grip on lawful American citizens. people, they are taking lawful firearms from good law abiding citizens due to a single prescription? Marriage counseling? How many in our majority have not ever gone to counseling or received a prescription from their doctor, especially after Obama’s first 4 years? How much more are we going to allow them to continue weakening us? This man has 4 more years so you all will have to make a decision at some point.
Tangerinesong on April 11, 2013 at 6:12 PM
Allah, I don’t know what gun shows you’ve attended, but it is certainly possible to purchase fully automatic firearms at a gunshow. But you must have a class III weapons license to do so. And, of course, the 7 page or so background check still applies.
ROCnPhilly on April 11, 2013 at 6:15 PM
rogerb hat on:
NotCoach on April 11, 2013 at 6:20 PM
Would Banning Big Magazines and ‘Assault’ Weapons Cut Down on Gun Violence? Most Cops Say No.
Resist We Much on April 11, 2013 at 6:35 PM
Cops just erroneously suspended the CCW licence and ordered a man to turn in his guns in NY.
But, don’t worry. Something similar will not happen to you. The Feds and the states PINKY PROMISE!
Resist We Much on April 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM
And Obama and the Dems. are working to take over the House in 2014. Can you say “voter fraud”!
If that happens it is over.
wolverinefan on April 11, 2013 at 6:39 PM
You don’t need a Class III license to buy a full-auto firearm. You do need a Class III license if you want to take delivery of the firearm immediately. Otherwise you have to wait out the FBI background check (not just an NICS check).
novaculus on April 11, 2013 at 6:40 PM
My understanding is that, in the 79 years since the NFA was passed, legally-owned and -registered machine guns have been used in precisely… two murders. One of which involved a police officer who used his department-issued submachine gun. So, yeah, their use in crime is virtually non-existent.
I’ll try to find the cite for the above info.
Hayabusa on April 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM
.
Sure, they are … as stolen merchandise.
(well, you did say “involved”, rather than ‘used’)
listens2glenn on April 11, 2013 at 6:47 PM
Thank-you for the correction. Does that differ by state?
ROCnPhilly on April 11, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Yeah, my bad on that.
Ownership and possession are affected by where you live. I some states, only Class III dealers may possess.
But my brain farted on the other.
Ima derp.
catmman on April 11, 2013 at 6:52 PM
Joe’s head is filled with mush after several years with the fools over at MSNBC.
He doesn’t realize he’s their useful idiot.
Tater Salad on April 11, 2013 at 6:54 PM
I heard that segment this morning and thought they needed the same lesson in guns as Obama, Biden, Peirs…….
I generally peak in to see what the Left wants to talk about, I couldn’t take the crap this morning and changed the channel and not going back.
Tater Salad on April 11, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Great, now we know where the dem-tards get their talking points!
kregg on April 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM
I don’t know about Al Qaeda, but I’m pretty sure Mexican drug cartels think our background check system is pretty weak.
Socratease on April 11, 2013 at 7:05 PM
The fact that you’re discussing such intricate details of Class III weapons laws only highlights the sheer ignorance of those who claim to have some professional competency to tell us about gun ‘facts’ on television, as if they’d, as implied in their job descriptions, done extensive research before opening their knob-slobberers.
James on April 11, 2013 at 7:16 PM
Toomey and Manchin’s Slippery Slope
Resist We Much on April 11, 2013 at 7:31 PM
Keeping the uninformed voters ignorant is a full time job.
1. Lie about it.
2. Get a terrorist to swear to it.
3. Pass laws based on lies with the supported by the ignorant.
4. Profit?
Oxymoron on April 11, 2013 at 7:52 PM
So is he advocating for profiling? That is clearly what Al Qaeda was talking about.
ojfltx on April 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM
Very spot on tome.
Of course, the biggest problem with allowing any branch of the federal government to pass any measure limiting the Constitutional Rights of U.S. citizens is that they get the crazy idea they actually have the right to pass measures limiting the Constitutional Rights of U.S. Citizens.
Where do We the People turn for redress of such grievences?
ROCnPhilly on April 11, 2013 at 8:06 PM
Yes. Some states do not allow possession of full auto by citizens. Only law enforcement and Class III in those states (federal dealer’s license trumps state law).
novaculus on April 11, 2013 at 8:17 PM
TWO since the law was enacted in 1934.
Solaratov on April 11, 2013 at 9:31 PM
No. Those are very strictly controlled. The drug cartels have to wait for the American government agencies to deliver the weapons to them.
Solaratov on April 11, 2013 at 9:38 PM
Probably because the average liberal (leftist) is not as smart as a 7th Century savage living in a cave in the paki tribal areas.
Solaratov on April 11, 2013 at 9:40 PM
Solaratov on April 11, 2013 at 9:48 PM
The reason that it’s been taking so long is that one of their clerks retired and another left on maternity leave…and there was a hiring freeze in place, so they couldn’t be replaced.
Word around the campfires, though, is that the hiring freeze for that office has been lifted — so there’s hope that the wait will be more like two to four months.
Solaratov on April 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM
Q: When was the last time an Al Qaeda terrorist illegally bought a gun in the US, under current law, and used it to murder Americans in the US?
A: That has never happened.
Q: Would Al Qaeda have an interest in disarming US citizens?
A: Why yes. Isn’t that obvious?
“Morning Joe” fails basic logic, again.
Q: When was the last time the US government sold guns to murderous foreign drug cartels with a significant presence in the US who used them to murder a US citizen?
A: The Obama admin did that. The operation was called Fast and Furious.
“Morning Joe” also fails at connecting inconvenient dots.
farsighted on April 11, 2013 at 10:37 PM