Forward!, over the regulatory cliff
posted at 2:41 pm on December 13, 2012 by Erika Johnsen
While the priority (well, some people’s priority) at the moment is avoiding falling off the fiscal cliff because of the damage the sudden smack of across-the-board tax hikes and spending cuts would inflict upon the economy, and while Republicans have been plenty vocal about the deeply negative economic impact that would also come from Obama’s plan of removing more money from the private sector via hiking taxes on families making more than 250k/year, let’s not forget about the other means the Obama administration has at their disposal to continue hampering economic growth (which, funnily enough, is the one thing that would bring both the revenue and prosperity for which they claim to be shooting).
While both the fiscal cliff and Obama’s tax hikes are still to-be-determined, the new year will start to show more signs of the policy mechanisms already in the works that are going to take a big bite out of Americans’ economic productivity. ObamaCare springs immediately to mind, but the administration’s many minions are already running around composing the rules and regulations they put off until after the election that are going to pose considerable compliance and opportunity costs on businesses across the country:
In recent weeks, the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed rules to update water quality guidelines for beaches and other recreational waters and deal with runoff from logging roads. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, meanwhile, has proposed long-delayed regulations requiring auto makers to include event data recorders — better known as “black boxes” — in all new cars and light trucks beginning in 2014.
The administration also has initiated several rules to implement its health care overhaul, including a new fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions. …
Obama has spent the past year “punting” on a slew of job-killing regulations that will be unleashed in a second term, said Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. …
A new study by the National Association of Manufacturers claims major new EPA rules could cost manufacturers hundreds of billions of dollars and eliminate millions of American jobs.
Even the government’s reliably-rosy outlook is projecting that our economy is scheduled to stay on the strugglebus for awhile yet, and whether or not we directly hike tax rates, it’s only going to get worse as these rules finally start to get written. Sen. Rob Portman called out President Obama in a letter on Wednesday for his administration’s inexplicable failure to publish their legally required regulatory outlook, on which we’re all still eagerly waiting:
U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio), former Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), today sent a letter to the President asking why his Administration has failed to publish its Spring 2012 and Fall 2012 Regulatory Agendas identifying regulations under development, as required by law and executive order. …
“President Obama promised the most transparent administration in history, but he has failed to comply with the basic duty to publish plans for new regulations, as required by federal law,” Portman said. “The Administration first skipped the required Spring regulatory plans without any explanation and has also now missed the deadline for the Fall agenda. This troubling pattern calls into question whether the Administration has abandoned this important tradition of openness in government.”
For nearly three decades, presidents of both parties have published a twice-annual “regulatory agenda” identifying all planned and expected regulations. These spring and fall regulatory agendas are required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act and by Executive Order 12,866, issued by President Clinton and reaffirmed by President Obama last year.
But this year, the Obama Administration inexplicably failed to release the required Spring 2012 Regulatory Agenda and has now missed the deadline for the Fall 2012 plans. Although the Obama Administration set a “firm deadline” to collect agency plans by April 13, eight months have passed and the plans have still not been made public.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

British troops told not to wear uniforms outside bases after yesterday’s attack in London


Boehner: “Inconceivable” that Obama didn’t know about IRS abuse






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If government is going to be arbiter of fair and lawful competition, long as RICO, monopoly, and other LARGE laws aren’t being violated, then government is WAY too large.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:44 PM
How else are the bureaucrats going to keep the bribe money coming?
malclave on May 21, 2013 at 8:48 PM
That pretty much covers the topic.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:53 PM
How do you pronounce this: womp
Whoomp (as in Whoomp, there it is)? Wahmp (rhymes with pomp)? something else?
cptacek on May 21, 2013 at 8:59 PM
Uber is a FANTASTIC company… naturally, it and the innovation it represents would be antithetical to the current oppressive environment this crony-based government has spawned…
dpduq on May 21, 2013 at 9:03 PM
I hate to throw the grammar Nazi flag, but the word I bolded above should be wringer.
Gator Country on May 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM
Woah! Erika’s quite the womp rat!
KS Rex on May 21, 2013 at 9:44 PM
Wringer is a ringer for “ringer”
Now if you’ll excuse, I have clothes to dry.
wolly4321 on May 21, 2013 at 9:45 PM
And then those cities wonder out loud why they continually suffer ‘brain drains’ when the best and brightest flee for greener pastures.
It’s not rocket surgery.
Myron Falwell on May 21, 2013 at 9:56 PM
Just like the medieval guilds, the purpose is to protect the existing businesses from aggressive competition.
And yes, this undermines the whole free enterprise system. Fortunately, the startups just view it as one more obstacle to get past, and manage anyway. But it’s still a waste of time and money.
There Goes the Neighborhood on May 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM
Had the opportunity to use Uber’s sedan service in L.A. a few weeks ago.
As soon as the service was ordered I knew that my car was 4 minutes away. I watched on the screen as it got closer and closer. When it hit 1 minute, I saw a black sedan on the opposite side of the street signaling to make a u-turn.
Contrast this with a year earlier when I called for a taxi in order to make the exact same trip. I was told that they were busy but they’d have someone there in 10 minutes. 15 minutes later I called and was told that someone would be there in 10 minutes. Another 15 minutes later I called and was told dispatch had sent someone and if they weren’t there in 5 minutes I should give them another call. 10 minutes after that I flagged down a passing cab and they got my business instead.
The Uber sedan service was $90 with tip. The taxi was $110 with tip.
If Uber wants to extend their business into the taxi realm (and they plan to keep the same level of service), it’s nothing but a boon to the residents of the cities they are operating in.
JadeNYU on May 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM
Wonder how much the preferred payment providers are paying DC?
unclesmrgol on May 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM