Sarah Palin: “quitter”; Susan Rice: “victim.”

I chortle at the bias.

Then again, her body, her choice, right libs?

We’ve been told how brilliant Ms Rice is and her career offers little refutation. So it would be somewhat counter intellectual to think she was not familiar with facts, policies and the Presidents political desires. Given that landscape, Ms. Rice provided statements in full realization of the truths and flaws. Whatever the reasons or administration directives, she proceeded to strongly promote the political story.

That not only shows poor judgment, but an inability to adhere to facts and draw reasonable conclusions or outcomes. Hardly the skills one desires from a Secretary of State.

The bottom line is four Americans were murdered and Mr. Obama, Ms. Clinton and yes, Ms. Rice are all responsible for what happened and the aftermath. While I perceive Ms. Rice’s actions to at least be somewhat responsible, we still have two more of the prime suspects avoiding rightful blame and stonewalling anyone trying to get the truth.

This investigation should proceed until all the questions are answered for the American people and the families of our brave countrymen.

It would be nice to think that Scott Brown can get elected in another special election, we don’t know if it is true, but in the meantime you would either get Duval appointing himself, or some other really annoying democrat from MA to fill the spot.

I think if Kerry were to be appointed it would be a “formal” position, and ceremonial. He talks a lot of NPR nonsense, and would probably be a lot like the Susan Rice/UN philosophy.

And Kerry is not used to working very hard, it is hard to know if that is a minus or a plus. Basically, republicans would be without anyone minding the store, for the important things, and the state department would be all about superficial symbolic things that democrats love and republicans think is a waste of money.

Mrs. Clinton has increased the spending there on stupid things and even more stupid new protocols, by a huge amount, and did not care about the security of the ambassador in Benghazi. Yah vote for her for president. Whatever are they thinking?

Good riddance to a sleazeball.

How does Andrea Mitchell sleep at night?

IlikedAUH2O on December 13, 2012 at 6:45 PM

Next to a corpse

…defending myself against baseless political attacks.

There is most certainly a basis for claiming that you misled the American people about Benghazi, therefore such attackes are not baseless.

How the commies hold up the massive lies is a new world wonder.

You keep telling yourself that.
(Ha! I do hope you get that.)

verbaluce on December 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM

Excellent comeback!
Seriously, I’ll bet even you don’t get the hiprocracy in your post.

…It inclines me to believe that even our worst speculations on what happened in Benghazi might not be bad enough, and it inclines me to hope that Obama might be more vulnerable on the subject than we think. (Given all the other stuff he’s pulled during his presidency, for him to think he wouldn’t be able to weather the storm a close look at Benghazi might raise, even with the protection of the press, is rather telling.)

butterflies and puppies on December 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM

Yes. I suspect Benghazi is more sinister than we have imagined, and I’m beginning to think that way about anything this sorry joke of a president is involved with. He’s a profoundly evil yet stupid man.

1 Less Progressive!!

First, my commitment to public service is rooted in the belief that our nation’s interests must be put ahead of individual ones. I’ve devoted my life to serving the United States and trying to mend our imperfect world. That’s where I want to focus my efforts, not on defending myself against baseless political attacks.

Gag me Susan.

If her confirmation had been a pure referendum on Benghazi, Senate Democrats probably would have gone to bat for her. But if it’s not a pure referendum, if it’s Benghazi plus three or four other weak spots, then maybe a handful would defect and suddenly O’s looking at a major humiliation to start his second term.

Um….. That is what we call vetting. More troubling to me is the fact that a gal who can not become SecState can keep her job our representative to the United Nations. How about sending Susan Rice to Tripoli. From the news, I understand that there is an opening there.

Wonder what she got as a consolation prize?

I hear NSA Chief.

Even better, no repsonsibility to congress what-so-ever.