Susan Rice: On second thought, there was no protest before the Benghazi attack

posted at 2:41 pm on November 27, 2012 by Allahpundit

Does this mean it’s no longer racist to oppose her nomination as Secretary of State? Or, since she’s now admitting her mistake, does this mean it’s really racist to oppose her nomination as Secretary of State?

I’m sure the left will tell us when the time is right.

Today, Acting CIA Director Michael Morell and I met with Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte to discuss my September 16th public comments regarding the attack against the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, and the intelligence assessments that formed the basis for those comments. I appreciated the opportunity to discuss these issues directly and constructively with them.

In the course of the meeting, we explained that the talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi. While we certainly wish that we had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack, as is often the case, the intelligence assessment has evolved. We stressed that neither I nor anyone else in the Administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the Administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved.

The Administration remains committed to working closely with Congress as we thoroughly investigate the terrorist attack in Benghazi and bring to justice the terrorists responsible for the tragic deaths of our colleagues, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. We also look forward to the findings of the Accountability Review Board and the FBI investigation.

The White House press corps got Carney to say the magic words this afternoon too. For what it’s worth, Rice’s statement does jibe with what U.S. intel officials told the Wall Street Journal last month about what she knew and when. If you believe them, the first intelligence inklings that the whole “protest” storyline was crapola came on the evening of Saturday, September 15th, hours before Rice appeared on the Sunday shows to talk Benghazi. That Sunday morning, while she was making the rounds on TV, they collected more intel further debunking the protest claims. But then that raises other questions, which the Journal framed at the time:

Unanswered in the account is whose role it was to prevent Ms. Rice from broadcasting information that already risked being wrong. Also unanswered is why it took longer for the new information to come out publicly, even after the DNI revised its assessment.

Let me throw another one at you. Why was U.S. intelligence still leaning towards the protest theory on Sunday, September 16th, when a Libyan guard who was wounded in the consulate attack had already told McClatchy three days earlier that there had never been any protest? All they had to do was read the newspaper that Friday to realize the narrative they were handing Rice was in doubt. And here’s a fourth question, which I believe remains unanswered even now: How did the idea that there had been a protest over the Mohammed movie at the consulate get started in the first place? Was it just a matter of U.S. intel officials watching what happened in Cairo and blindly leaping to the conclusion that the same thing must have happened in Benghazi or was there actual circumstantial evidence of a protest at some point? The only evidence I’ve heard of after months of reading about this came from an AP story on October 27, in which an eyewitness claimed that one of the jihadis at the scene had pressured bystanders to chant about the movie while his crew was busy setting up roadblocks for the attack. The “spontaneous protest,” in other words, was propaganda manufactured by terrorists at the scene as the plot was being put in motion, but maybe the CIA heard about the chanting from another eyewitness and hadn’t yet figured out who was behind it when Rice was briefed. Is that the explanation? Or, as I say, was this pure half-assed guesswork early on, which they nonetheless dutifully passed along to Susan Rice for dissemination on America’s news shows?

Anyway, there are lots of reasons not to want her as Secretary of State even if you think her main failing in the Benghazi affair was being too willing to believe what the CIA was feeding her. Exit quotation from Dan McLaughlin:

Update: Jay Carney’s sick and tired of Obama’s flacks and mouthpieces being beaten up by the press, darn it:

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney grew testy with reporters Tuesday over questions about UN Ambassador Susan Rice’s role in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack.

“What is the point of the focus on this,” Carney asked of questions about Rice’s comments on the five Sunday shows days after the September 11, 2012 attack that killed four Americans signaling it was a spontaneous event. “It could have been me. We all relied on information from the intelligence community.”…

“What your question seems to suggest is that it is more important that I or others used talking points provided by the intelligence community than actually what happened in Benghazi,” Carney said.

Over in the Greenroom, Duane Patterson has some questions for the administration’s much-maligned spokespeople.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:41 PM

Your a despicable racist. Your views that black people are worthless garbage that can’t abide by decent standards are outrageous. Do you have a smiley face on the back of your sheet and hood? Of course all the people you mention have been treated exactly the same as Bill and Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, John Kerry, Al Gore etc. But of course the democrats love their racist like you verblue, that’s why you guys created eugenics and the KKK.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM

verbaluce is always dumb and a racist.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Someone should tell Verbaluseless that his race card has holes worn through it…

affenhauer on November 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM

Someone should tell you I’m not the one bringing up race.
I ain’t the one conflicted here so much…y’know?
Again we have to go through this tired exercide where the defense against an accusation that it’s ‘racist’ to attack Rice is that it’s ‘racist’ to defend her.
Merry go ’round, go ’round, go ’round…
Don’t deal the race card if you don’t wanna play it.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:56 PM

“What is the point of the focus on this,” Carney asked of questions about Rice’s comments on the five Sunday shows days after the September 11, 2012 attack that killed four Americans signaling it was a spontaneous event. “It could have been me. We all relied on information from the intelligence community.”…

Yeah, and so did President Bush on Iraq and WMD…but that was then and this is now…right?

Dr. ZhivBlago on November 27, 2012 at 3:56 PM

to affenhauer & ToddPA:

verbaluce is always dumb and a racist.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 3:56 PM

see!!
Ha.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM

Let’s see if I have the facts straight here:

1. We did not have a real “Protest-Protest”, that never really happened.
2. At a not real “Embassy-Embassy”, that the Ambassador was at.
3. Over a movie that no one has ever really “seen-seen”.

Who writes this stuff Woopie Goldberg?

jpcpt03 on November 27, 2012 at 3:59 PM

to affenhauer & ToddPA:

Your a despicable racist. Your views that black people are worthless garbage that can’t abide by decent standards are outrageous. Do you have a smiley face on the back of your sheet and hood?

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM

see again!!
Flange is sooooooo mad about ‘racism’.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

see!!
Ha.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM

I’m glad you see, fool.

No one is more racist than Obama and Rice. Grow up. The illiteracy is staggering.

Btw, the highschool graduation rate is the lowest in…DC.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

It is the ultimate form of racism to accept lesser of a standard for hue alone. Grow up, you miserable idiotic racists.

It is an insult to all minorities to hold them to a lower standard.

MLK died for nothing in this regard. He hates you all.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Any decent minority should hate Obama and vervaluce.

Decent minorities work as hard as anyone else and demand the same standards and norms for all.

Obama, Rice, verbaluce, and their handlers, want to keep minorities inferior, in squaller, uneducated, for votes, in modern day plantations. See the phone lady. That’s how your master love you.

Decent people would want you out of that state. Wake up and pitchfork your suppressors. They wish you nothing but ill, while they live like the Obamas.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM

John McCain on Cavuto now. Says Susan Rice admitted to giving false information to the American people. McCain goes on to say there are a lot of layers to this onion.

Interesting metaphor. Hannah Arendt compared the inner workings of a fascist state to the layers of an onion.

esr1951 on November 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

But YOU are the one who thinks blacks should be viewed as inferior.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:05 PM

It’s equally wrong to hide behind racism as it is to practice it.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:06 PM

MLK died for nothing in this regard. He hates you all.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Ah yes…the convenient and cynical embrace of MLK.
I almost offered a countdown for this ‘zinger’ to appear.
How well you know how much he would have stood on your side.
And Glenn Beck’s.
No doubt he’d have voted for Romney too, right?
Ha.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:06 PM

did Colin Powell take the fall for his WMD testimony? Oh wait! Colin Powell testified before we invaded Iraq on more than 1 occasion IIRC. The WMD evidence was staggering a priori. Nowadays, the post hoc evidence for the video was scant but the a priori evidence supported the terrorism angle.

thus Susan Rice testifying after the fact that this was about a video is like Colin Powell testifying in 2007 that the invasion of Iraq was about WMDs (after they hadn’t found any). It’s absurd on face, folks.

Who gave the Stand Down order?

ted c on November 27, 2012 at 4:07 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

But YOU are the one who thinks blacks should be viewed as inferior.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:05 PM

Sorry, but his is your hall of mirrors.
And that’s not my reflection you’re seeing.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:08 PM

Press on.

There’s still more to this. And don’t accept the term “CIA talking points.” Disgraced Gen. Petreaus already testified that his talking points did not include anything about a video. Someone else inserted that into the talking points and the last I read about it, that somebody just about had to be the Administration.

So, Jay, it’s about the lies.

EconomicNeocon on November 27, 2012 at 4:09 PM

Now that Obama is safe in a second term, Rice can afford to come clean a little. The MSM will surely admit ‘some mistakes were made because of bad intel’, so GOP pursuit is simply a political witch hunt and racist. Accusations will fly against the GOP, while the MSM will never ask for more from the Administration.

Liam on November 27, 2012 at 4:09 PM

Merry go ’round, go ’round, go ’round…
Don’t deal the race card if you don’t wanna play it.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Just so.
Criticism and complaints are part and parcel of Washington DC.
Been going on long before you or I were born.
Let’s not let race or gender stand in the way of that tradition.

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Only in American could an African-American be elected president TWICE and the liberals still sob about discrimination at every opportunity. What a bunch of morons.

scalleywag on November 27, 2012 at 4:12 PM

Ah yes…the convenient and cynical embrace of MLK.
I almost offered a countdown for this ‘zinger’ to appear.
How well you know how much he would have stood on your side.
And Glenn Beck’s.
No doubt he’d have voted for Romney too, right?
Ha.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:06 PM

Does not matter who he’d have voted for….only
what he BELIEVED IN. I know your little mind can’t wrap
around that theory, so I’ll sink back down into the
sewer with you for a moment.

Stephanie Cutter-remember her?? She took an azz beating on here.
I seem to recall she was White, in fact a Blonde.

Oh wait, she was an AA dressed in “WhiteFace” wasn’t she??

ToddPA on November 27, 2012 at 4:12 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:08 PM

Actually it is you in the mirror. You still refuse to say blacks should be treated as equals, because you know you don’t believe it. To say that they should means that Rice and obozo should be held accountable.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:13 PM

It’s hilarious that people who spent 8 years calling Colin Powell & Condi Rice liars now say it’s racist to accuse a diplomat of lying.

— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) November 27, 2012

Carney is always a fool.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:14 PM

Ha.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:06 PM

The “Ha” is on you, creep. You’re not very observant, fool.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:15 PM

verbaluce believes in the infriourity of blacks.

This is the ultimate form of racism.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:16 PM

inferiority of blacks, for shame, lots of shame.

MLK hates you verbaluce.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM

John McCain on Cavuto now.

esr1951 on November 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM

Really?
McCain is on Fox News talking about Benghazi/Rice?
Wow. That’s huge a twice daily occurrence.
And – let me guess – he’s offering that something…can’t really say what…just ain’t right. And that right now we have more questions than answers.
And maybe he’s saying there’s more we do not know then we do know right now.
An onion as metaphor…the many layers…
Sounds like he needs a special committe…that he would, like, be the chair of…maybe? “Can I, Can I, pleeeaaase??”

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM

“What is the point of the focus on this,” –Carney

The media hacks should have focused on Benghazi ahead of the election.

A charlatanic crook, with blood on his hands, sits in the WH. Not even 60% of what happened in Benghazi is yet known.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM

“Why was Amb. Stevens in Benghazi on the anniv. of 9/11, officially and unofficially?”

Ask this question until you get the answers. Therein lies the truth. Your president has blood on his hands.

Why is the WH not condemning Morsi’s power grab?

Yes, the left loves dic tators, always.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:21 PM

You still refuse to say blacks should be treated as equals, because you know you don’t believe it.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Now you’re just imagining things.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM

Peter Kirsanow has a healthy does of skepticism towards Susan Rice’s latest “narrative.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/334179/rice-keeps-digging-peter-kirsanow

Quit digging that hole, Susie. Your team’s propaganda wing is badly wounded.

onlineanalyst on November 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM

If you weren’t so pathetic I’d be mad at you. Instead, I marvel in the fact that nature has allowed such a low capacity organism to survive this long.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM

MLK hates you verbaluce.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM

You mean MKH?

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM

If you weren’t so pathetic I’d be mad at you. Instead, I marvel in the fact that nature has allowed such a low capacity organism to survive this long.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM

Wow, that was incredibly pointless.
Try being mad at me…it might inspire a substantive retort.
(But then how can you be mad if you live in Napa, right? Effin’ gorgeous place.)

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:25 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM

Whatever you need to say to convince yourself. But you’re the one that doesn’t think black people should be held to the same standards.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM

Imagine if this were any R president and any of their UN ambassadors…indeed, verbaluce, you fool extraordinaire.

No, not MKH. That’s your problem.

Btw, shallow = obtuse

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM

Try being mad at me…it might inspire a substantive retort.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:25 PM

I can’t get mad at people with mental handicaps, it’s just not “fair”.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:28 PM

TAUTOLOGY

Isn’t it racism to accuse a white person of being racist based solely on they are white simply because they critize the ideas of a non-white person?

PC TAUTOLOGY

Isn’t it racism to accuse a person of one color of being racist based solely on the color of their skin simply because they critize the ideas of a person of a different color?

EdmundBurke247 on November 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM

Whatever you need to say to convince yourself. But you’re the one that doesn’t think black people should be held to the same standards.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM

This is just a silly way to argue a point.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM

PC TAUTOLOGY

Isn’t it racism to accuse a person of one color of being racist based solely on the color of their skin simply because they critize the ideas of a person of a different color?

EdmundBurke247 on November 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM

You forgot the other type: when West, Cain and many other hued people dare to say what they say.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:34 PM

This is just a silly way to argue a point.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM

No it’s not. You are not for equality. Leftists never are. Nor are you for freedom and liberty, domestic or in Egypt, for ex. Obama and Hillary don’t denounce the dictatorial power-grab in Egypt, and you don’t either.

Until you declare yourself for all these things, you are what you are.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:36 PM

Btw, shallow = obtuse

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM

A joke.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:36 PM

A joke.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:36 PM

You sure are…nah, you’re ‘fun’ to banter with. You’re actually not as bad as lester or tommyhawk. You and sesqui were actually granted brains. It’s sad that you don’t utilize them for something more risky, but more satisfying by far.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:39 PM

This is just a silly way to argue a point.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM

I’ve given you about 5 chances to say black people should have the same standards and you have failed each time to do it. Instead you keep changing the subject. You have no idea how to make a point, let alone decide what’s silly.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM

I can’t get mad at people with mental handicaps, it’s just not “fair”.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Wow…are you here all week?
(Or is that “week”?)

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:41 PM

Btw, shallow = obtuse

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM
A joke.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:36 PM

No. A definition.

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:41 PM

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:41 PM

A reference to something in another thread.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM

You have no idea how to make a point, let alone decide what’s silly.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM

Obviously – s/he is a leftist.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:43 PM

A reference to something in another thread.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Question or comment ?

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM

It’s sad that you don’t utilize them for something more risky, but more satisfying by far.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:39 PM

Well there’s bantering here ain’t exactly my day job.
This is a risk free environment…for all.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:45 PM

Wow…are you here all week?
(Or is that “week”?)

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:41 PM

It’s gonna be alright son. Remember, everybody is a winner. Don’t you let them smart kids tell you otherwise. And free ice cream for everyone after the race is over.

You heard me, ICE CREAM!!! Yoohoo

Now put your mouth guard back in so you don’t chew through your gums and make a mess again.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:45 PM

Didn’t mean your job. Meant your entire life philosophy.

It’s hard but marvelous to be 100% free.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM

I’ve given you about 5 chances to say black people should have the same standards and you have failed each time to do it. Instead you keep changing the subject. You have no idea how to make a point, let alone decide what’s silly.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM

You first engaged me but referring my ‘KKK hood’ or something.
And now you’re imagining some “chances” you offered me to say something about “black people’.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM

Filthy, greasy liars.

Typical of the South Side…

JohnGalt23 on November 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM

Oh gawd…you’re one of those.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM

It’s hard but marvelous to be 100% free.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM

Freedom’s just another word…well, you know.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM

Oh gawd…you’re one of those.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM

Taxpayers?

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM

Freedom’s just another word…well, you know.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM

Yeah. Obama left me with nothing as well.

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM

where’d my comment go?

ted c on November 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM

Freedom’s just another word…well, you know.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM

Wow, how sad a case you are. Try thinking of all the people who’re not free…not even to spew what you do.

Schadenfreude on November 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM

I see the verbose one is here, doing his Dante impression, playing Rhetorical Games.

A strategy about as effective as Michelle Obama’s Thighmaster.

kingsjester on November 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM

Oh gawd…you’re one of those.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM

BTW, it’s spelled God. You soulless creatin.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:41 PM

What a total fool you are. We’ve been nasty to Cankles/Shrillary/etc (Hill), Baghdad Bob (Gibbs), Howdy Doody (Carney), Lurch (Kerry), Washerwoman-Shultz and a host of other white people male and female.

But you go abusing that chicken, hon. Bless your wee, wee heart.

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM

creatin=cretin

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM

Hey, maybe she’ll go on Jimmy Fallon to explain everything and the Roots will play “Lyin’ Ass Bitch” as she walks out.

I don’t know why I suggested that. They would never do that to anyone, ever.

gatsbysgirlontheside on November 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM

Freedom’s just another word…well, you know.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM

Yeah. Obama left me with nothing as well.

Jabberwock on November 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM

Can we get a better class of troll? One that can do better with race card baiting and quoting song lyrics, please?

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM

Can we get a better class of troll? One that can do better with race card baiting and quoting song lyrics, please?

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM

I don’t know, verbie gets paid in food stamps. You get what you pay for.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:13 PM

One of the things that amazes me (besides all of the other insane garbage that has gone on to cover-up what ever was REALLY going on that got Stevens into the situation in the first place – likely the reason he was left to die along with the SEALS) is that no one has noticed that a very light-skinned biracial woman seems to get darker and darker skinned every time she appears in public.

babylonandon on November 27, 2012 at 5:14 PM

Does this mean it’s no longer racist to oppose her nomination as Secretary of State?

Of course not. It’s still racist.

It’s racist to oppose affirmative action in any and all forms. Incompetents must be given a chance to help make up for past discrimination. Opposing such a noble action is prima facie de facto evidence of racism.

farsighted on November 27, 2012 at 5:17 PM

What we do not understand is that it’s all about quantum physics, “those” people live in a different 4th dimension than the rest of us do. To them YESTERDAY, TODAY and TOMAROW, are all the same time plane and as such they are allowed to move between the pains at their will. Only Stephen Hawking and the Black Female Congressional Caucus under stand such things. The remainder of us must just stand in awe with blind admiration.

jpcpt03 on November 27, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Can we get a better class of troll? One that can do better with race card baiting and quoting song lyrics, please?

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM

I don’t know, verbie gets paid in food stamps. You get what you pay for.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:13 PM

Hmpf. I’d ask for a refund.

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:30 PM

Amb. Susan Rice has proven that she is a liar and therefore she should be fired from her current job.

That President Obama is even considering Susan Rice as a candidate for Secretary of State shows how incompetent he is.

But the person who is directly responsible for the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is current Secretary of State HILLARY CLINTON.

Where is HILLARY? In a sane world the media would be insisting that Hillary Clinton answer tough questions about Benghazi.

The Benghazi fiasco is just one more example of what a weak Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been.

wren on November 27, 2012 at 5:33 PM

Oh gawd…you’re one of those.
verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM
BTW, it’s spelled God. You soulless creatin.
NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM

Now you sound mad.
(And it’s spelled c-r-e-t-i-n. The irony, huh?)

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 3:41 PM
What a total fool you are. We’ve been nasty to Cankles/Shrillary/etc (Hill), Baghdad Bob (Gibbs), Howdy Doody (Carney), Lurch (Kerry), Washerwoman-Shultz and a host of other white people male and female.
But you go abusing that chicken, hon. Bless your wee, wee heart.
kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM

Thank you!
This is what I have been awaiting.
Yes indeed…you have been nasty to many.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM

My friends in conservatism:

Liars, thieves, and craven cowards. CALL them out. Every damn one of them, from Obama, his wife, his Jarrett, his Axlerod, his Carney, his Barney, his Harry, et al.

We owe them NOTHING. They are the ones who are tearing this country apart with their lies and prevarications. THEY lie to destroy our country, and WE act like ladies and gentlemen to them.

ENOUGH!!!

THEY ARE LIARS, THEY ARE THIEVES, THEY ARE CRAVEN, FRIGHTENED COWARDS, AND LIKE ALL LIARS, COWARDS AND THIEVES, THEY ARE FRIGHTENED TO DEATH OF US.

CALL them on their lies! End it. End it NOW!!!

We MUST, because there are no more Republicans, there are no more Democrats.

There are only AMERICANS fighting these cowards, liars and thieves to defend OUR way of life.

Here I am!! Right here in front of you! There are thousands like me, ready to shut these liars down regardless of costs.

Simply begin to call for us, and we WILL be there, and this Age of
Craven Cowards, Liars and Thieves will end.

It will not be pretty, and it will not be safe. But when it is over, it will be America once again. They shall be defeated.

Farmer on November 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM

Farmer on November 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM

That rant was a total rip off of Zod from Superman 2.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:43 PM

(And it’s spelled c-r-e-t-i-n. The irony, huh?)

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM

creatin=cretin

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM

1/2 hour too late, as usual

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:43 PM

I want to know if Obama watched those men die, and then fly to Vegas and collect money from those with pull and those who want pull.

gbear on November 27, 2012 at 5:46 PM

Thank you!
This is what I have been awaiting.
Yes indeed…you have been nasty to many.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM

You really are a moron. First off all the first post of mine that you commented on said roughly the same thing. So you haven’t been awaiting. The whole point of what everyone has been trying to tell you is that white democrats get treated exactly the same as black democrats. So for anyone to claim criticism of Rice or obozo is racist is a blatant liar. It’s you who refuse to treat blacks the same.

Flange on November 27, 2012 at 5:46 PM

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:43 PM

An hour later…a week later…
still funny.
Come on…join in and have a laugh at yourself.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:47 PM

Come on…join in and have a laugh at yourself.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:47 PM

I rather laugh at you and your endless supply of unintended comedy.

NapaConservative on November 27, 2012 at 5:49 PM

Rice was a straw dog; the misdirection of a magic trick. She is a three card monte cutout meant to insulate the White House and yet lend some (here’s that word again) ‘gravitas’ for the cameras in hopes of distracting the sheeple.

How about this for a list of questions for not just one or two but EVERY witness, including those who have already cpme beofre the committee:

Why was the Ambassador in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9-11 without security?

Why was the Ambassador’s (and others) requests for security turned down and who made the decision to deny it?

Since (in his own words) the President claimed it was terrorism in the Rose Garden the next day was Amb. Rice sent out to misdirect and who gave her her talking points?

If the President gave (as he has stated) a direct order to ‘do everything possible to help our people on the ground’ WHERE IS IT?

If the President knew the day after the incident that this was a terrorist action, why did he allow Rice to go smokescreen?

Where is the footage from the drone taken during the attack and who saw it live?

Who gave the order to ‘stand down’?

Where is the testimony of the other people from the CIA annex who were on the ground before and during the attack?

If State didn’t feel the need for security for the Ambassador and he and others were killed as a result, why did we not send in enough ‘security’ to secure the site – even when the FBI teams hit the ground three weeks later? They only had a few hours to investigate the site and were forced to leave classified documents behind as a result of the ‘insecurity on the ground’???

If we are ‘still investigating and gathering information’ let’s forgo the final results (none of us will live that long) and take a look at the raw data.

Of course, NONE of these questions will be answered if even asked. The compromised (Petraeus)won’t answer and the faithful liars won’t either. Good luck to all on the ground in the hot spots around the globe; you are on your own. You will be sold out in order to protect the regime at any costs.

ghostwalker1 on November 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM

Thank you!
This is what I have been awaiting.
Yes indeed…you have been nasty to many.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM

Uh… your point is? We admit it. We cheerfully admit it.

SO?

Seriously, though, you posted all that crap, accused us of being racists so you can give us the equivalent of water is wet?

The pointlessness of your existence is truly saddening.

kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM

Do you always try to appear stupid?

blink on November 27, 2012 at 5:12 PM

I doubt it takes extra effort. Most likely it comes naturally.

farsighted on November 27, 2012 at 5:58 PM

Maybe Bush would’ve done better with the Iraq War if he had claimed that all criticism of the war was actually just racism directed at Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice.

Progressive Heretic on November 27, 2012 at 5:59 PM

You are confirming that you’re just a troll.

blink on November 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM

For about the millionth time.

farsighted on November 27, 2012 at 5:59 PM

Strong words Farmer, but true to my heart.

We are continually assaulted with spins, re-spins and misdirections.
Fast and Furious is off the radar with no answers or penalties. One Gun Runner in Florida got less time then a local contract go for stiffing me out of $2,000. The Benghazi incident has degenerated to a racist and sexist issue.

We The People must keep in mind that in Benghazi is about “They watched live” , “People asked for help” , “They got none”, “Four people died”.

Why?

jpcpt03 on November 27, 2012 at 6:02 PM

Thank you!
This is what I have been awaiting.
Yes indeed…you have been nasty to many.
verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM
Uh… your point is? We admit it. We cheerfully admit it.
SO?
Seriously, though, you posted all that crap, accused us of being racists so you can give us the equivalent of water is wet?
The pointlessness of your existence is truly saddening.
kim roy on November 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM

Never accused you of being racists.
My point was that the preemtive defensiveness is far more prevelant than
any actual accusations of racism.
So I see race as a factor for you guys and very present in your arguments. Again, I am not one who brought it up.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 6:06 PM

The lying dirtbags have successfully maneuvered the conversation from:
Why were US troops involved in a Libyan civil war with a semi ally as the leader without congressional consent?
Why were US troops subjected to UN authority and command without consulting congress?
Why were American Dignitaries and Armed Forces personnel pleas for help disregarded and left to die?
Why did the Lyin POTUS go before the UN days later and blame the attacks on a video when everyone knew it was a terrorist attack?
The RATS, and PRESSTITUTES have maneuvered the feckless Repunks away from impeachable, treasonous offenses to a possible blockage of the Sec of State appointment of latest sacrificial lamb of this lying corrupt regime.
These gutless Repunks make me ill. Throw their stupid, feckless asses out starting with Grahamnasty.

ConcealedKerry on November 27, 2012 at 6:09 PM

That rant was a total rip off of Zod from Superman 2.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 5:43 PM

Ladies and gentlemen,I present to you and to one and all: verbaluce, a LIAR.

PROVE your statement, LIAR! Show ME, liar! Present unequivocably your case, LIAR!

Zod, indeed.

(What the heck’s a “Zod”?)

No, no, no, LIAR — present your case DIRECTLY, and as postulated, LIAR.

Farmer on November 27, 2012 at 6:19 PM

Liberals remind me of the smug, holier-than-thou, and condescending character Sheldon from Big Bang Theory. But without the character’s intelligence, of course.

Liam on November 27, 2012 at 6:28 PM

Strong words Farmer, but true to my heart.

We are continually assaulted with spins, re-spins and misdirections.
Fast and Furious is off the radar with no answers or penalties. One Gun Runner in Florida got less time then a local contract go for stiffing me out of $2,000. The Benghazi incident has degenerated to a racist and sexist issue.

We The People must keep in mind that in Benghazi is about “They watched live” , “People asked for help” , “They got none”, “Four people died”.

Why?

jpcpt03 on November 27, 2012 at 6:02 PM

Strong words?!?!?!? You ain’t seen NUTHIN’ yet.

Strong ACTIONS with strong words will return our country to its destiny.

As more and more CITIZENS in fear for the loss of their country unite to hold these cowards, liars and thieves’ collective noses to the fire of patriotism, you’ll hear the most cowardly lies coming from their frightened mouths, to try to convince you of their innocence.

THEY HAVE NO INNOCENCE

And WE can prove it, using their own lies to convict them!!

We MUST demand proof and confirmation of every single one of their lies, constantly!

The Truth is what we’ve need around here for 50 years.

NOW is the time.

Let us grasp the Truth with both hands, and beat them to within an inch of their lives with it!!

We owe them NOTHING!!!

They owe us our country.

MAKE them give it back!!

Farmer on November 27, 2012 at 6:30 PM

So I see race as a factor for you guys and very present in your arguments. Again, I am not one who brought it up.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012 at 6:06 PM

And yet, you ARE ‘the one’ who brings up the issue of race.

What you’re busily engaged in is called “blame shifting.”

You introduce a theme (in your case, your accusations about ‘other people’s racist views’), then you decry anyone who retorts, like this: “See? You just identified race as a factor in your views.”

There are a handful of Palin-obsessed accounts here who do likewise except their topic is, of course, Palin and not “race” as is yours.

WHEN YOU/ANYONE introduces an issue by trying to “complain about other people complaining about” that issue, and then people respond about that issue, what you’re doing is blame-shifting.

As in, it’s YOUR issue, you introduce it, then you take some sort of satisfaction in blaming others for taking up that issue in discussion, and crticize them for what they have to say about ‘it’.

Otherwise, some people call it “trolling” but that’s a term that is flung about all too generally and it’s lost it’s impact or specificity in many cases.

Lourdes on November 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM

Dunno – I can see how verbaluseless sees race as a factor in a lot of our comments; of course, most of his just scream out a preference for pre-teen Semitic males. You know, code words and all that. Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

affenhauer on November 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM

Voice boxes in these Obamabots are unnecessary because every sound they emit is false or distorted.

rplat on November 27, 2012 at 7:31 PM

Now you’re just imagining things.

verbaluce on November 27, 2012

…no!…you constantly are displaying to everyone…that you’re a dumbfock!

KOOLAID2 on November 27, 2012 at 8:02 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3