Test run – nabbing Jesse Jackson jr’s seat
posted at 10:01 am on November 24, 2012 by Jazz Shaw
Sometimes you just have to latch on to what’s seems like an obviously crazy idea and run with it. If nobody ever grabbed for a rather insane looking brass ring, we’d have never had the turducken. It is with this wild eyed spirit of possibilities rising from the ash fields that I propose giving serious consideration to a plan suggested by Moe Lane at Red State. The seat in the the US House of Representatives most recently held by Congressman Jesse Jackson jr is now rather famously open. So here’s the plan.
Now that he’s resigned it… how’s about trying to, maybe, I don’t know: win it?
Hold on, hear me out. Let’s jump back for a second to 2009. You might remember that in 2009 Rahm Emanuel resigned his House seat (IL-05) in order to bungle being White House Chief of Staff. Well, that caused a special election to trigger, and at the time I took the position that hey, how’s about trying to, maybe, I don’t know: win it? …And I was told, quietly but firmly, no. Folks didn’t like the candidate, didn’t like the idea of spending the money, didn’t want to contest the seat.
At first glance it’s easy to blow this idea off as a pipe dream. We’re talking about Illinois -2 here. It takes in Cook and Will Counties, part of the southern suburbs of Chicago itself. Jackson carried it with 63% of the vote while he was away in a medical center seeking treatment for a possible mental disorder. Why would anyone spend money on this race, right? You’d need to check the exact math for me, but I think IL-2 is approximately D + 107.2.
But Moe is looking a little further than that and it all comes down to numbers. Turnout is at its highest in presidential election years. It falls off considerably during the mid-terms. Turnout for odd year elections is simply pathetic. What is the turnout in odd year special elections? It’s sub-pathetic, unless the race turns into a national media feeding frenzy like the Doug Hoffman debacle. As an example, Moe returns to the aforementioned special election to fill Rahm Emanuel’s seat. Mike Quigley beat Rosanna Pulido, 30.6K to 10.6K. Read that again. The Democrat won with 30,600 votes. In this last election, it’s true that Jackson swamped the field with 181, 067 votes. But Republican Brian Woodworth got 67,396 votes and independent candidate Marcus Lewis took 38,733 votes.
If you let that sink in for a moment, you’ll come to the same conclusion Moe did. In a very low turnout election, there is a pool of Republican voters with some possible lift from independents which could amass enough votes to take the seat – potentially by a fairly wide margin. Granted, it would only be for one term, and the winner would be sent packing in 2014, but there’s a larger point here. With all the talk we’ve been hearing about “micro-targeting” and what a bunch of geniuses the Democrats were this cycle with polling science, this could prove to be a perfect, miniature laboratory to test those ideas on the Right side of the coin.
So how do you do it? The first thing to settle on is what you don’t do. You don’t dump a ton of money into an air war that gets the Democrats noticing that there’s a race going on. What you do instead is bring back a very old, but mostly forgotten idea which we used to great effect in 2010: Precinct Captains. Invest the available resources in identifying one solid Republican in each and every precinct. Get them the data from pouring through registration stats to identify every single Republican and potential independent in the few miles around their house. Help them round up a few friends and quietly begin going door to door explaining the situation. Save your money for the final week before the special election and then hit a direct mail bomb targeting only the people on those lists.
The message is fairly simple. “Hey. There’s an election on Tuesday, and for the first time in living memory you’ve got a chance to have your voice heard. All you have to do is show up, because the liberals aren’t going to. Hell, we’ll even come give you a ride.”
Would it work, even in such a dismally conservative-poor area? You won’t know unless you try. But if it did, it would send shock waves across the country and be used as a model for the next cycle, demonstrating that 21st century election science is a game that both parties can play, not just Team Obama.
Think about it.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Ay carumba!!!
abobo on April 15, 2013 at 9:23 AM
Next up Carter sanctions the election as free and fair.
Limerick on April 15, 2013 at 9:23 AM
That dude looks just like Saddam.
BobMbx on April 15, 2013 at 9:24 AM
Face it, when it comes to these third-world dictatorships the only votes that matter belong to the generals that run the military.
Happy Nomad on April 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM
I’m surprised that the election results were allowed to be as close as they are. Chavistats have to take a few lessons from Putin and Obama – but I bet they’ll put the next six years towards exactly that use.
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM
… Sean Penn gets raging hard-on.
Pork-Chop on April 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM
Whatever. Dumbasses voted themselves further in bondage. Not too far in the future there will be headlines in foreign newspapers saying similar things about the United States: Lying, cheating, politicos cement their hold on a dying nation.
Bishop on April 15, 2013 at 9:31 AM
FIFY, bro.
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 9:31 AM
Well, that’s what happens when you allow Socialists to take over your country… you can’t root them out. They lie, cheat, and rob the treasury in order to stay in power. Something we’re finding out now right here in the U.S.
Murf76 on April 15, 2013 at 9:31 AM
FIFY, bro.
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Don’t be silly. The people of Venezuela are not as stupid as you may think, and they did not vote for the alleged winner. But it does not matter who votes, as long as it matters who counts the votes. Same here – some Philly district results can attest to it.
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM
So what’s the big effin deal? He was democratically elected, right?
-Libs
CycloneCDB on April 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM
When you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul’s vote.
petefrt on April 15, 2013 at 9:50 AM
Apparently they are and apparently they did, or enough did to make the cheating a viable tactic.
How can Venezuelantonianites not be stupid and vote for socialist douchebags but we here in the U.S. can?
Bishop on April 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM
It was my understanding that from the moment Chavez died, Maduro was looked at as a candidate with no base. It wasn’t even assumed he’d win.
ernesto on April 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM
Jimmy Carter certifies the results anyway and Obama will send congratulations as soon as he recuperates from his hard weekend golfing.
Skywise on April 15, 2013 at 10:12 AM
Don’t be an idiot. In Russia, some regions voted for Putin to the tune of 146% of the overall adult population. Do you really so incredibly naive as to believe that the numbers shown on TV have anything to do with the actual votes?
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM
Until we fix the voting fraud in our own country, we should shut the hell up.
beatcanvas on April 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM
We won’t. It requires a
Republicanconservative President, a majority in both Congress chambers, and a prevalence of conservative Supreme Court jurists, all of them with dinosaur-sized balls to enable them to withstand massive urban rioting. Naturally, none of that will be allowed to happen as soon as Soros-owned computer tallies the election results.Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 10:25 AM
Every Democrat and left wing person I know says there hasn’t been any election problems since President Bush stole the White House from Kerry and Gore.
You are saying we need voter ID, maybe national ID, and and a CPA audit of our whole process, then?
OK.
IlikedAUH2O on April 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM
I would start with non-computerized voting machines leaving an actual paper trail, but a federally-issued Voter ID and a heavy jail term for registration fraud would be good, too.
Archivarix on April 15, 2013 at 10:39 AM
The sex metaphor is apt.
Once you decide that Social Justice is all that matters, little things like majority rule become less important. After all, who knows better than media lords and Hollywood types what the little people really need?
Meantime, they impoverish (screw) the people they love so much.
IlikedAUH2O on April 15, 2013 at 10:44 AM
Odd that voters in Venezuela showed more sense than voters in the USA. The Marxist candidate there got a smaller percentage of the vote than the neo-Marxist in the United States.
paulus1 on April 15, 2013 at 11:02 AM
Anyone else’s jaw drop when they saw the results? That was only 1.6 pts!
ZachV on April 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM
Personally, I was rooting for Maduro to win, because coming after Chavez will be a tough act to follow, and the next president will be blamed for everything wrong with the country, will be hugely unpopular, and will be hated with all the fervor that the people used to love Chavez with. Maduro will be the rebound pastor of the Church of Chavez, and the rebound pastor always gets fired in his first term. Better it be Maduro than Capriles. If he stops screaming bloody murder and goes away quietly for now, people will be looking for him in a few years.
JoseQuinones on April 15, 2013 at 1:02 PM
Not unlike the point some Republicans made when Obama beat Romney: let the Democrats own the destruction they created.
(And the other points about voting irregularities also apply.)
AesopFan on April 16, 2013 at 5:34 PM